THR  

Go Back   THR > Social Situations > Legal

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old April 15, 2008, 06:44 PM   #1
billybob
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 2, 2006
Posts: 76
Can a rifle be made into a pistol legally?

If you sawed (well...turned) the barrel to 4" and did NOT put it back in the rifle stock but modified the rifle stock to be a pistol stock, would it be legal?

Thinking Ruger 10-22 here.

__________________
"The IRS" spells "THEIRS"
billybob is offline  
Old April 15, 2008, 06:47 PM   #2
Sniper X
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 3, 2007
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,546
As far as I know no. But there is a pistol version of the 10~22 available, it is called a Charger. Here's a linky. Looks like as much fun as a gun can be to me!


http://www.ruger.com/Charger/Features.html
Sniper X is offline  
Old April 15, 2008, 06:50 PM   #3
nalioth
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 9, 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,528
Under the laws, a rifle cannot be made into a pistol.

Under the laws, a pistol can be made into a rifle (and back into a pistol).


If you want to go the rifle > short barrel route, you'll need to pony up $200 for the treasury department and get a tax stamp for a "short barreled rifle". It will never 'legally' be a pistol, but it will look the same.
__________________
Your computer is yours: Linux for human beings @ ubuntu.com
Check out the unofficial THR chat room!
Home | Blog | Forum | @nalioth
"Tactical" is a mindset, not an equipment list.
nalioth is offline  
Old April 15, 2008, 06:52 PM   #4
wdlsguy
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 1, 2004
Location: TX
Posts: 2,883
Quote:
If you sawed (well...turned) the barrel to 4" and did NOT put it back in the rifle stock but modified the rifle stock to be a pistol stock, would it be legal?
A rifle with a 4" barrel and a pistol stock would be a "short-barreled rifle". They are legal to make (federally) after receiving a $200 tax stamp affixed to an approved ATF Form 1.

Quote:
Thinking Ruger 10-22 here.
Ruger already makes a 10-22 Pistol:

http://www.ruger-firearms.com/Firear...ding&famlst=63
__________________
مسيحي (Christian)
wdlsguy is offline  
Old April 15, 2008, 07:04 PM   #5
Sniper X
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 3, 2007
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,546
Isn't that the same thing you have to do for a supressor?
Sniper X is offline  
Old April 15, 2008, 07:09 PM   #6
SaxonPig
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 11, 2006
Posts: 2,666
You cannot modify an existing gun. However, I was surprised to learn that apparently it is legal to buy a brand new rifle action and ask the dealer to simply check the handgun box on the form describing the type of gun. From then on that firearm is legally a handgun and you can put a pistol grip stock on it and use a short barrel.

But be aware it is always a pistol. Even if you convert into rifle form later the ATF will consider it a pistol.

I assume he doesn't want to get into Class III territory, hence my response doesn't include the SBR info.
__________________
---------------------

Don't provoke me. I'm already on double secret probation.

Last edited by SaxonPig; April 16, 2008 at 06:18 PM.
SaxonPig is offline  
Old April 15, 2008, 07:24 PM   #7
nalioth
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 9, 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaxonPig
You cannot modify an existing gun.
You can. See posts 3 and 4 above.
__________________
Your computer is yours: Linux for human beings @ ubuntu.com
Check out the unofficial THR chat room!
Home | Blog | Forum | @nalioth
"Tactical" is a mindset, not an equipment list.
nalioth is offline  
Old April 15, 2008, 07:33 PM   #8
lonegunman
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 2, 2005
Location: pac nor west
Posts: 208
You can buy any type of reciever and have it registered as a pistol and the ATF will not gripe. I was suprised to learn that also. But a rifle reciever is always a rifle, if it has a barrel less than 16 inches and an OAL of less than 26.5" (I believe) it is a Short Barrelled Rifle or SBR and must be registered as such.

Pistols, even large ones, have barrels less than 14 inches and no front pistol grip to avoid being classified as SBR's or AOW's

The Ruger Charger has a 9" barrel and is made as a pistol from the factory.

Two things to remember when making an interesting homemade firearm.

1. Most guys at gunstores do not know all the rules and regs governing this sort of thing.

2. Most ATF agents know little or nothing about firearms. You really need to read most of the regs yourself.

Subguns.com has a pretty good group of class 3 experts and class 2 builders who can answer most AOW/SBR/DD questions.
lonegunman is offline  
Old April 15, 2008, 07:40 PM   #9
rcmodel
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2007
Location: Eastern KS
Posts: 16,785
Quote:
ask the dealer to simply check the handgun box on the form describing the type of gun
I don't think it works that way.

The manufacture has to tell the ATF what the action serial number is for when they report making it.
If Ruger makes a 10/22 reciever for a rifle, it is always a rifle.
If they make it for the Charger pistol, it is a pistol.

If an AR lower is for a rifle, it will always be a rifle.
If an AR lower is a pistol lower, it says pistol on it by the serial number.

An FFL dealer can't simply change it by checking a box.

rcmodel
rcmodel is offline  
Old April 15, 2008, 07:50 PM   #10
nalioth
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 9, 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcmodel
I don't think it works that way.

The manufacture has to tell the ATF what the action serial number is for when they report making it.
If Ruger makes a 10/22 reciever for a rifle, it is always a rifle.
If they make it for the Charger pistol, it is a pistol.

If an AR lower is for a rifle, it will always be a rifle.
If an AR lower is a pistol lower, it says pistol on it by the serial number.

An FFL dealer can't simply change it by checking a box.
Respectfully, you are mistaken.

A virgin receiver is neither handgun or rifle. Until the FFL holder signs it out, it is neutral.

The law doesn't specify that it even has to be marked by the FFL as a pistol. It just says "a virgin receiver can be built into a rifle or pistol".

You may be confused by some companies marking their bare receivers "Pistol", but that is their decision, and not any federal law.
__________________
Your computer is yours: Linux for human beings @ ubuntu.com
Check out the unofficial THR chat room!
Home | Blog | Forum | @nalioth
"Tactical" is a mindset, not an equipment list.
nalioth is offline  
Old April 15, 2008, 07:57 PM   #11
db_tanker
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 22, 2005
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 1,486
Naturally there will be some disagreement with this statement but I believe the Contender is another one of those "middle ground" firearms.

As long as you do NOT assemble it with a barrel shorter than 16" while having a rifle stock on it, then you are safe. IF you take the stock off and put a pistol grip on, then you can go hog-wild.

I site evidence as follows....


http://www.stephenhalbrook.com/tc.html


SCOTUS quote for those not wanting the link...

On June 8, 1992, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Contender pistol and carbine kit are not a short-barreled rifle under the National Firearms Act, 26 U.S.C. §5845(a)(3). This means that a consumer may possess the pistol with its 10" barrel and may use the kit parts to make a rifle with the 21" barrel, as long as the shoulder stock is not assembled onto the receiver at the same time as the 10" barrel.


D
__________________
Jayne "She is startin' to damage my calm!"

NRA Life Member
TSRA
db_tanker is offline  
Old April 15, 2008, 07:59 PM   #12
Soybomb
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 31, 2005
Posts: 3,962
Quote:
But be aware it is always a pistol. Even if you convert into rifle form later the ATF will consider it a pistol.
What are the practical implications of that as far as why someone shouldn't have all their ar15 lower receivers logged as pistols?
__________________
Every social movement (*snip*) that tries to break the bonds of mindless convention and tradition and that defies established privilege gets accused of being rude and worse, much worse, and there are always weak apologists for the status quo who use that pathetic etiquette excuse to try and silence the revolutionaries. Successful revolutionaries ignore the admonitions about which fork to use for their salad because they care only to grab the steak knife as they launch themselves over the table. -- Richard Dawkins
Soybomb is offline  
Old April 15, 2008, 08:26 PM   #13
nalioth
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 9, 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,528
Quote:
Originally Posted by Soybomb
What are the practical implications of that as far as why someone shouldn't have all their ar15 lower receivers logged as pistols?
If you never encounter anyone else, none.

If you encounter Barney Fife with your 20" HBAR AR15 with a receiver marked "Pistol", he might get confused and impound pending investigation.
__________________
Your computer is yours: Linux for human beings @ ubuntu.com
Check out the unofficial THR chat room!
Home | Blog | Forum | @nalioth
"Tactical" is a mindset, not an equipment list.
nalioth is offline  
Old April 15, 2008, 08:31 PM   #14
PTK
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 26, 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,074
Quote:
Pistols, even large ones, have barrels less than 14 inches and no front pistol grip to avoid being classified as SBR's or AOW's
Pistols can have any length barrel, however you are correct about only one pistol grip. In addition, pistols may not have stocks.

Quote:
A virgin receiver is neither handgun or rifle. Until the FFL holder signs it out, it is neutral.
Ask the NFA tech branch at the BATFE about that one, you're incorrect. If the manufacturer made it as a rifle receiver, it's a rifle. Handgun receiver, handgun. Upon making a receiver, it is logged by the manufacturer with the BATFE as either a rifle, pistol, or shotgun. If you have a "pistol" built on a receiver that the manufacturer logged as a rifle, even if the FFL marked it as a pistol on the 4473, and you do not have a $200 tax stamp for a SBR, you are in violation of Federal law.
PTK is offline  
Old April 15, 2008, 09:04 PM   #15
claytonfaulkner
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 10, 2008
Posts: 45


first staement, secound paragraph.

check out ar15.com, they have plenty of info on ar15 pistols and sbrs
__________________
Speak softly and carry a big stick - Teddy Roosevelt
claytonfaulkner is offline  
Old April 16, 2008, 01:00 PM   #16
rcmodel
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2007
Location: Eastern KS
Posts: 16,785
Quote:
Respectfully, you are mistaken.
A virgin receiver is neither handgun or rifle. Until the FFL holder signs it out, it is neutral.
I agree I was mistaken, if the first question that started this thread is not relevant.

Billybob ask about making a 10/22 rifle into a pistol.

Since you cannot buy a "virgin" 10/22 receiver from Ruger, the only way to get one is to buy a 10/22 rifle. A FFL dealer cannot change the fact that it has a rifle serial number.

If Billybob were to buy a 10/22 Charger pistol, he could do anything he wanted too with it, except make a smoothbore shotgun out of it..

But that is the only way he could get a 10/22 receiver he could use for a pistol action.

rcmodel
rcmodel is offline  
Old April 16, 2008, 01:10 PM   #17
Funderb
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 23, 2007
Location: Jacksonville, Bold new city of the south.
Posts: 2,105
buy a new receiver and mark it as a handgun, the build away.
__________________
Ray Charles

Do you love military history?
http://troopsoftime.com/
Funderb is offline  
Old April 16, 2008, 01:26 PM   #18
JesseL
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 26, 2004
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 2,469
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcmodel
But that is the only way he could get a 10/22 receiver he could use for a pistol action.
That may be the only way to get a 10/22 receiver made by Ruger, but there are alternatives.
JesseL is offline  
Old April 16, 2008, 01:29 PM   #19
jfh
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 28, 2003
Location: Maple Plain, MN
Posts: 3,125
Well, you can buy 10/22-type receivers from Brownells--Volquartsen 10/22 receiver.

heh--JesseL brought up a better page, showing all the 10/22 receivers they sell.

Jim H.
__________________
gun control: the belief that a woman raped and strangled with her own hose is morally superior to one who defends herself with a firearm.
jfh is offline  
Old April 16, 2008, 01:54 PM   #20
billybob
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 2, 2006
Posts: 76
I am forgetting the project. I was just musing about how neat a ONE HAND pistol using the ultra reliable Ruger mag would be.

Sort of a cheapass Walther GSP. The Walthers have short barrels yet are very accurate.

__________________
"The IRS" spells "THEIRS"
billybob is offline  
Old April 16, 2008, 04:22 PM   #21
Navy joe
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 2,363
As for the manufacturer designating a reciever as rifle or pistol that doesn't really happen. With the OP example of a 10/22 it obviously was a rifle when it left the factory, Ruger doesn't sell bare recievers. As per the scanned letter above if you get a new reciever you can build away. I had an AR pistol, however briefly. DPMS does a great thing with a "K" suffix on their serial numbers indicating the reciever with a "K" left the factory as a stripped, never built as a complete rifle, reciever.
__________________
FY47012 , Shut up and shoot.

USPSA, NRA, VCDL
Navy joe is offline  
Old April 16, 2008, 04:31 PM   #22
The Viking
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 9, 2005
Location: Sweden
Posts: 404
billybob, Ruger markets a .22 caliber pistol based on the 10/22. Check it out, might be what you are looking for .
__________________
Live Free & Die Free.
The Viking is offline  
Old April 16, 2008, 05:15 PM   #23
nalioth
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 9, 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,528
Nodak Spud (the sales arm of DCI) is also selling 10/22 receivers now.
__________________
Your computer is yours: Linux for human beings @ ubuntu.com
Check out the unofficial THR chat room!
Home | Blog | Forum | @nalioth
"Tactical" is a mindset, not an equipment list.
nalioth is offline  
Old April 16, 2008, 05:21 PM   #24
waterhouse
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 7, 2005
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 2,708
Quote:
What are the practical implications of that as far as why someone shouldn't have all their ar15 lower receivers logged as pistols?
One reason, if you are worried about registration and all, is that if you pick up 5 stripped lowers at the same time and ask me to log them as pistols then both the ATF and your local CLEO will receive the multiple handgun purchase forms, which contain the make, model, and serial number of all of the receivers, as well as your name and address.

If you only pick up one at a time, or don't have any concerns about the registration thing, you would probably be OK having them all logged as pistols.
waterhouse is offline  
Old April 16, 2008, 08:58 PM   #25
revjen45
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 26, 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 594
When I was in gunsmithing school the bookstore had Sako actions for excellent prices. Lots of people bought them and built silhouette pistols. Naturally, they kept the receipts showing they bought an action, not a rifle.
__________________
revjen45@hotmail.com
Better to perish in the struggle for freedom than live to see defeat. There ARE things to be feared more than death.
revjen45 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.