Quantcast
Identity and Date of Manufacture of S&W Revolvers - Page 7 - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Handguns: Revolvers

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 16, 2008, 03:33 AM   #151
Oro
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 22, 2007
Location: WA state
Posts: 3,496
Quote:
timburn: We will need more information to narrow down the model, but my guess is a .38 Hand Ejector, also called a M&P. Tell us what other markings are on the gun. The best I can do if it is an M&P is 1915-1942. Serial # 241704 started in 1915, while 700000 ended in 1942. Of course, who knows when these old S&Ws were actually made (as Old Fuff will attest).
Shade, what you mean is that 700,000+ were made up to 1942. That is when they hit 999,999 and rolled over to V1. (God, wouldn't it be cool to find that - probably in a museum or somewhere, they usually gave those away as honoraria or kept them in the vault).

His gun, if it is does not have a V or C prefix, will date to the mid/early 20's I think. If so, it should have a 1/2 moon front sight, single line address on the r. frame (e.g., "Made in USA" as opposed to blank or the later four line address), and a mushroom head ejector (deleted in 1930 I think). Heat treating started at S/N 316xxx, and I have it on good sources that was in 1921 (could be wrong). So his should be shortly after that. It's after 1929 and until 1940 that all S/N's get screwy, because the depression played hell on production/shipping/sales dates.

Shande, since you like doing this so much, there's another source for dates. It was posted at the S&W forum by SaxonPig last fall, and he put it in the sticky at the top of this forum about "common S&W identifying features" a month or so ago. It is mostly good only for post-war K and N frames and pre-alpha/numeric sequence, but is more accurate than the SCSW 2nd appendix.

Last edited by Oro; July 16, 2008 at 04:47 AM.
Oro is offline  
Old July 16, 2008, 04:23 AM   #152
Shade00
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 29, 2008
Location: Ruston, Louisiana & Jackson, Mississippi
Posts: 715
kamerer, it's Shade, not Shane. I had seen that post previously, but assumed for some reason that it might've been taking from the SCSW. Live and learn. I just likes helpin' people out.
__________________
Colt .357 | Diamondback |
Smith & Wesson 32-1 | Pre-34 | 36 | 37 | 042 | 681
Walther PPK/S | Ruger Speed Six | H&R M1 Garand | Springfield M1 Garand
Coharie Arms CA89K | CA94 | Century C93 | FAL
Shade00 is offline  
Old July 16, 2008, 04:42 AM   #153
Oro
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 22, 2007
Location: WA state
Posts: 3,496
Shade, I'm sorry about the name goof. My girlfriend was making drinks tonight!

yeah, it's a different list, and better. I keep meaning to ask SP where he got it. I have a few guns in there and it is more accurate than the SCSW. Hey, it's like west coast time out here, so I can make a credible excuse for being up. Aren't you in the central zone? You need to sleep. Are't' you in law school? Don't delude yourself staying up studying is helpful - I learned that in med school!

Cheers.
Oro is offline  
Old July 16, 2008, 12:32 PM   #154
Shade00
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 29, 2008
Location: Ruston, Louisiana & Jackson, Mississippi
Posts: 715
You're right... due to night classes, I seem to be staying up later and later. Which is not good... I just can't get into a good sleep pattern. At any rate, how else can I give people accurate inorrect dates for their S&Ws? This stuff is always going to be best guess without a Jinks letter, but at least it pacifies the large majority of folks. Off to look at a Ruger Speed Six and then do some catching up on classwork!
__________________
Colt .357 | Diamondback |
Smith & Wesson 32-1 | Pre-34 | 36 | 37 | 042 | 681
Walther PPK/S | Ruger Speed Six | H&R M1 Garand | Springfield M1 Garand
Coharie Arms CA89K | CA94 | Century C93 | FAL
Shade00 is offline  
Old July 16, 2008, 12:41 PM   #155
Old Fuff
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 21,886
Shade00:

Just for grins, look at this and the winning bid.

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=103727115
Old Fuff is offline  
Old July 16, 2008, 01:23 PM   #156
Shade00
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 29, 2008
Location: Ruston, Louisiana & Jackson, Mississippi
Posts: 715
I had that little guy on my watch list. I did a when it went past $600, and I almost had a heart attack when it ended at that price. Explain that, will ya?
__________________
Colt .357 | Diamondback |
Smith & Wesson 32-1 | Pre-34 | 36 | 37 | 042 | 681
Walther PPK/S | Ruger Speed Six | H&R M1 Garand | Springfield M1 Garand
Coharie Arms CA89K | CA94 | Century C93 | FAL
Shade00 is offline  
Old July 16, 2008, 02:53 PM   #157
Old Fuff
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 21,886
I can assure you that you weren't outbid by me...

This is another case like the K-22 Masterpiece we followed before.

I'm pretty sure the winning bidder didn't buy it to use. The only one left that occasionally carries a .38 S&W revolver is the Old Fuff, and he has to do it in the dark of night so that no one will know... I can't say that for sure about the K-22.

But as I read it, certain select model hand ejector models (other then those made on the N-frame which are in a class by themselves) during the 1930's to mid-1950's are becoming collectable if they are in perfect condition. Previously if they were considered at all it was in the context of being shooters. This is interesting to me, because such revolvers sometimes pop up in ordinary gun shops at "shooter prices." Again, you need your copy of Standard Catalog of Smith & Wesson to keep informed, but I notice that pre-war Terrier's in this condition are valued around $500-plus (maybe) and pre-model 32's at about $100 less.

So something happened.
Old Fuff is offline  
Old July 16, 2008, 03:37 PM   #158
timburn
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 15, 2008
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 35
Follow up with pictures

Shade and fellow Gurus,
Hopefully these pictures will come through. There is: L
95894
3
On frame below yoke and 95894 on yoke. Serial number repeated on cylinder and barrel. Hope some of this helps. Grips not original. It came with large custom too large for my girlfriend and did not look right.
Tim ( new Guy)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg SW 001.JPG (250.4 KB, 33 views)
timburn is offline  
Old July 16, 2008, 05:04 PM   #159
timburn
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 15, 2008
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 35
And another thing

Do not know how I missed this, but there ia "c" apx 3/4" in front of serial#.
Tim
timburn is offline  
Old July 16, 2008, 08:59 PM   #160
Shade00
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 29, 2008
Location: Ruston, Louisiana & Jackson, Mississippi
Posts: 715
Old Fuff: My theory is that diamonds are secreted away in the cylinder. I am always on the lookout for pre-model # guns, and I happen to be fond of the little Terrier, but have yet to run into one in a shop. I would be forced to pass it up at half that price too.

timburn: Pre-Model 10, 5-screw with serial # C95894 was produced sometime between 1948-1951.
__________________
Colt .357 | Diamondback |
Smith & Wesson 32-1 | Pre-34 | 36 | 37 | 042 | 681
Walther PPK/S | Ruger Speed Six | H&R M1 Garand | Springfield M1 Garand
Coharie Arms CA89K | CA94 | Century C93 | FAL
Shade00 is offline  
Old July 16, 2008, 09:41 PM   #161
timburn
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 15, 2008
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 35
Thanks

Shade and others,
Thanks for the input.
Tim
timburn is offline  
Old July 17, 2008, 08:12 AM   #162
Haze
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 13, 2008
Posts: 11
DOB for Model 29?

Would anyone have an approximate age of a model 29 with a serial number BCA9xxx?
Haze is offline  
Old July 17, 2008, 09:24 AM   #163
SaxonPig
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 11, 2006
Posts: 4,787
Late 1988 or early 1989?
__________________
If you are not willing to say your insults to my face, in person, then keep them to yourself.
SaxonPig is offline  
Old July 17, 2008, 10:24 AM   #164
Haze
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 13, 2008
Posts: 11
Thanks. Sorry I posted the question in the wrong place the 1st time. I'm new here.
Haze is offline  
Old July 17, 2008, 11:03 AM   #165
Old Fuff
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 21,886
New members are allowed to make mistakes, we only hope you will keep coming back.
Old Fuff is offline  
Old July 17, 2008, 09:41 PM   #166
Haze
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 13, 2008
Posts: 11
I will. Nice site. Thanks again!
Haze is offline  
Old July 19, 2008, 06:05 PM   #167
Downrange
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 27, 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 59
Hi, just a quick post on a new acquisition today of a 38-2, SN BNT 33##. Curious why this isn't a "638" like current production models that look identical to these eyes, anyway...
Thanks.
Downrange is offline  
Old July 19, 2008, 10:21 PM   #168
Catalina25
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 28, 2008
Location: east of NYC west of Montauk Pt.
Posts: 47
Old Fuff, once more if you please

Shade00 you're from the south so you must be used to the high heat and humidity I would think. And Old Fuff I'm guessing you're what, a desert rat, so the heat is O.K. by you? Well let me tell you, man it was a brutal one here in the New York metro area and sitting in an air conditioned truck and taking a ride up the Hutchinson River Parkway to retrieve that revolver that Old Fuff was helping me out with a few pages back was a cool thing to do. Cool get it.
Before I write about the gun I'd like to apologize for a lack of pictures. I know how frustrating it can be to not be able to put an eye ball on an item that is being explained. Something always gets lost in the translation. It's hard being an analog man living in this digital age but before I purchase some gee wiz digital camera for what ever money, brother on my budget I'm buying ammo. Or gas.
Anyway, the gun came from the Smoke N Guns shop in Mount Vernon about a half hour to forty five minute drive north of New York City, I live an equal amount of time east. I'll tell you what it was the most pleasure I've ever had buying a gun, Though we struggled communicating trough the internet in the beginning they ended up being great to do business with.
So the gun comes out, paper work is being done and I'm eye balling my new gun and the owner of the shop and I start to converse about said gun and this is what I find out.
The gun it seems has spent most of it's life locked up in a vault with some two hundred other old M&P's with holsters and eleven High Standard 12 gauge pump shot guns with bead sights and eighteen inch barrels one of which, the shotguns that is, they have in the store and it's worn and weathered and very, very COOL. Much like my '52 870 I'll have to say.
So I'm holding and looking at my new gun with it's, what looks like new S&W grips and really kind of nice bluing for such an old gun and I say to Mike the shop owner, so when do you think it was refinished? "Refinished?", "Never, I can't explain the grips but I'd be surprised if the gun was ever fired" he says. Well O.K. I mean refinished or not I'm happy, the gun is tight and I've only spent a buck seventy five with a drive, I'm more than happy.
But there is more Mike says it was one of the nicer gun to come from the lot, the other guns had a lot more wear than this one and a few others.
So the vault turns out to be in a bunker in the basement of Yonkers Raceway a horse racing track not far from the gun shop and the track had it's own security thing going until a private security company took over. When that happened I don't know but thats when the guns were put away. Neat right?
So I get home and I'm messing with the gun and I take off the grips and notice that although they look like S&W diamond grips the the medallion is in fact not an S&W anchor but a bird, an eagle I'd say, but nice grips none the less.
Old Fuff like you I too believed that this gun had been re-blued but now I think not. Here's why on my work bench is one of those large round jeweler's lamps you know the kind, on a crane. Well as I was moving about cleaning the gun and retrieving and returning stuff from my cleaning kit when the light from the lamp caught the gun just right and I could see the ghost image of where the old original 3/4 type grips ended. With that I spotted the gun under the lamps magnifying glass and was I surprised by what I found nothing not a spot of wear on the forcing cone nothing but blue. Wait....O.K. with gun in pocket beer in hand and pretzel in mouth one of those big hard sour dough ones from UTZ, yum tasty. I went back to the bench to be certain that what I saw and felt this afternoon still held. And it does. No sign of etching on top strap no blast wear around the breach holes on the front of the cylinder, clean. There is also this, I've owned brand spanking out of the box new Smith revolvers and their triggers have a certain, oh say stiffness. Wouldn't you agree? Well this gun is just like that.
If this gun shot more than a cylinder full well paint me red call me late to dinner and beat me with a stick cause cousin I've got it coming. Old Fuff, yourself, Brain Williams, Shade00, Kamerer the jellyroll, SaxonPig well I trust your guys opinions over my own. Thats not to say I can't find my way around a K frame but you all know the nuances.
So Old Fuff if you saw something in the pictures of that gun on gunbroker that has you sitting there saying to your computer screen Thomas {Catalina25} you're a dope, then please enlighten me. Please
Two more quick things if you read the serial number on this gun you can see right above the serial number, but, upside down a number stamp into the frame. It's Yonkers Raceway's control number.
Also my ex-wife that would be my second as I rarely see my first and don't ever ask about my third well she took the ride with me to get the gun and it was much appreciated. Not that she'll ever know cause she ain't gonna read this and well I'll never tell her. Ah the games we play. Thanks guys Be cool and be safe TKM
Catalina25 is offline  
Old July 20, 2008, 12:37 AM   #169
Oro
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 22, 2007
Location: WA state
Posts: 3,496
Quote:
38-2, SN BNT 33##. Curious why this isn't a "638" like current production models that look identical to these eyes, anyway...
Downrange,

A 38-2 is a carbon steel Bodyguard. It can be blued or nickel-plated from the factory. A "6" prefix on a S&W indicates a stainless steel, not carbon steel gun, whether it's a two or three digit s/n. If your 38-2 looks like a 638, that's because the 638 has been bright polished (or your 38 is a little hazed/worn!).

Does that make sense?
Oro is offline  
Old July 20, 2008, 01:08 AM   #170
Downrange
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 27, 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 59
Thanks kamerer. I don't think this gun is carbon steel. It says "Airweight" on the barrel, and feels as light as my 642. I thought all the Airweights had aluminum alloy frames? Anyway, it sure feels light, and it doesn't look like any nickel finish I've ever seen. It looks exactly like my 642.
So color me a bit confused. It does shoot to point of aim and feels tight and great, so I'm happy.
Downrange is offline  
Old July 20, 2008, 01:25 AM   #171
Oro
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 22, 2007
Location: WA state
Posts: 3,496
Downrange,

Color me tired after a long gun show and working some horses for a show next week. Your's is a hybrid gun, the frame is alloy and the cylinder is steel.

What I was trying to say and made a hash of it was that your gun is available in blue or nickel, with an alloy frame and carbon cylinder. The 638 has a different alloy frame, and a stainless cylinder - since it's not "blue-able" it gets a "6" model name. Yours must be nickel, and you are looking at a picture of brightly polished stainless 638 that looks like your nickel one. That is my best guess. Also, the newere 638s are on the "improved" J frame (j magnum), and i think the 38-2 is on the original J frame.

modern J-frame varieties get pretty tricky. As if the old ones were a piece of cake to begin with.
Oro is offline  
Old July 20, 2008, 01:48 AM   #172
cmp944
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Posts: 3
.357 Mag
4"
Square
2K1511
Model 19-3
Fin BT
Stock T
Special features P-913
Adjustable rear sight
cmp944 is offline  
Old July 20, 2008, 02:22 AM   #173
Oro
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 22, 2007
Location: WA state
Posts: 3,496
That's 1970. I'm not sure about the "BT" and the special feature. Can you post a picture of the box label? "BT" as a finish means bright, so maybe that was the special feature. Most 19s had a "standard" or "brush" blue finish, though it varied by year as to what that consisted of. Interesting.
Oro is offline  
Old July 20, 2008, 10:47 AM   #174
cmp944
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Posts: 3
Hi Kamerer,

I am unable to post pictures at this time but I did email you two pictures from my cell phone.

Thanks
Chris
cmp944 is offline  
Old July 20, 2008, 10:33 PM   #175
CajunBass
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 2, 2005
Location: North Chesterfield, Virginia
Posts: 4,763
Model 19-4.

357

4"

Nickle

Target sights, trigger, hammer, and grips.

50K0077
__________________
For God so loved the world that He gave his only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him, should not perish, but have everlasting life.
John 3:16 (NKJV)
CajunBass is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.