Quantcast
What's your "never buy" gun? - Page 16 - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Social Situations > General Gun Discussions

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 29, 2009, 12:55 AM   #376
jbkebert
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 30, 2009
Location: Kansas
Posts: 2,594
I know I may get some hate for this but a Glock or anything by DPMS. They are both good gun companies. I just have no interest in owning one except to turn a quick profit.
jbkebert is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 12:59 AM   #377
WardenWolf
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 11, 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,261
Glock. They sit a bit too close to safe pressure limits for my comfort. In other words, I think they're underengineered even compared to many other polymer-framed guns. I'd rather have a gun where a minor ammo problem isn't likely to destroy it.
__________________
Heart of the guardian, way of the warden, path of the exile.

Autistic Gun Owner
Asperger's does NOT cause violence.
WardenWolf is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 01:08 AM   #378
GotCoffee
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 25, 2009
Location: West Central S.DAK
Posts: 47
Glock!
__________________
"Decaffeinated coffee is kind of like kissing your sister"~Bob Irwin
GotCoffee is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 01:21 AM   #379
wankerjake
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 6, 2008
Location: Flagstaff AZ
Posts: 1,533
Another Llama
Another Taurus
Another Rossi
Hi-Point



Quote:
Anything made by Ruger.
You guys are seriously missing the boat. Seriously.
__________________
"I can skin a buck and I can run a trot line, and a country boy can survive."

"Once you quit hearing sir and ma'am, the rest is soon to follow."
wankerjake is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 01:23 AM   #380
ThrottleJockey
member
 
 
Join Date: January 25, 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 659
Chalk my vote for glock. Maybe to turn it for a quick profit, but only to someone I don't like.
ThrottleJockey is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 01:29 AM   #381
BhmBill
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 27, 2009
Location: Vegas
Posts: 591
I haven't ran across anything i'd NEVER own.

I had a Phoenix Arms HP22 with every extra part they made for them (both barrels, lock, extended grip mag, blah blah). You get what you pay for. Don't expect a $125 gun to work as well as a $750 one. It was fun, but it only wanted to work properly with super duper hyper high velocity .22 rounds. It started breaking and getting loose after a few hundred rounds.

I don't care for Glocks either. Absolutely hate the design, the feel, the looks. They're not fun to shoot.


I wholeheartedly have to disagree with alot of members choices... I have a 9mm Hi-point carbine (aftermarket stock... couldnt stand the factory stock) that's deadly accurate and the only time it had problems was using aftermarket mags. I had a Norinco Mak90 that was incredible and I only sold it out of necessity (my brother now has one of their knockoffs of the Rem 870 and it's every bit as good as my 870). I had a Taurus in .357/.38 that I really wish I had now, I guess I got one of the "good" ones, it was never anything but great. My Marlin 1895 Guide Gun in .45-70 was sold out of necessity and I miss it more than any other gun i've sold.
BhmBill is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 01:33 AM   #382
tarugs
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 29, 2009
Location: North Texas
Posts: 10
Taurus PT145 - hit or miss (based on others claiming theirs work fine), unfortunately mine is a miss and it is a PITA brand new right of the the box (after cleaning packing grease of course).
tarugs is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 02:23 AM   #383
JB Books
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 17, 2008
Posts: 65
All the cheapies including:

Taurus
Rossi
Kahr
Kel Tec
NAA

I have owned a couple of Norinco .45 pistols that were great shooters.
JB Books is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 03:21 AM   #384
ACBMWM3
member
 
 
Join Date: December 28, 2008
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 308
I realize Taurus revolvers can sometimes be crap. But Ive owned several Taurus autos and have NEVER had an issue.
a 24/7 Pro is usually my choice for a daily carry.
ACBMWM3 is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 03:53 AM   #385
garyhan
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 14, 2003
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 359
Any muzzle loader that looks like a modern gun.
Any handgun more powerful than .44 mag.
Pistol grip shotguns.

These are personal preferences only. No reflection on those who like them.

gary
garyhan is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 10:31 AM   #386
Mr White
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 9, 2006
Location: Central PA
Posts: 2,207
Anything made by:

Jennings
Bryco
Lorcin
Century

Other than that, I'm easy.
__________________
Ready on the right? Ready on the left? All ready on the firing line. Shooters may commence fire!
Mr White is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 10:57 AM   #387
Nero_Atrum
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 26, 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 134
davis, jeminez, jennings, bryco, raven or those hideous gold dersert eagles especially the tiger stripe one.
__________________
Quote:
With enough suicidal intent, there is no reason it cannot work once.
-SlamFire1
Nero_Atrum is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 11:33 AM   #388
Noboundaries
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 28, 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 4
I just skimmed this entire thread and I believe the only manufacturer I didn't see slammed was Browning. In fact it got praise for the .22 Buckmark.

I currently own guns by S&W, Taurus, Ruger, and on April 1st, Browning. The first three manufacturers all had "issues" that were easily fixed by something as easy as an ammo change (Ruger Mk 1), as simple as a gunsmith adjustment (S&W), or as annoying as a factory return for warranty work (Taurus). Time will tell if the Browning will have any issues or not. A Ruger .357 purchased last Fall is still being broken in. It may need to be returned to the factory for an adjustment.

I love all my guns. I won't count on flawless performance until I've identified and eliminated the flaws. Once that's happened, one gun is as good as another and they've performed flawlessly. I've never had a gun that couldn't be fixed, but I'm sure they exist.

Flaws that need fixing are the reason you need to own more than one gun. At least, that's the reason I give my wife.
__________________
Note to politicians and anti-gun citizens: "I offered my life in service to my country to defend your right to speak your mind and live the way you want to live. I did not serve so you could act in a way to deny me the same opportunities."
Noboundaries is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 11:56 AM   #389
nitetrane98
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 23, 2008
Location: Longview, TX
Posts: 534
I was just going to add that Browning appears to be the clear winner, except the "any gun in 9mm".
My "never buys" are pretty brand neutral. No plastic and when I grip it my little finger has to be on frame, not mag extension.
I like Hi Power's, Challengers and 1911's for that reason.
nitetrane98 is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 12:25 PM   #390
bessemerbob
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 20, 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 73
Remington 700 line,,,,, Overpriced for the gun your getting!
bessemerbob is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 01:22 PM   #391
ilbob
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 14, 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 7,129
Quote:
Any smith and wesson revolver or any 30.06 with a wood stock.
I love my two 1903s. They are classics.

And who would not like a python? kind of the ultimate revolver.
__________________
bob
Disclaimers: I am not a lawyer, cop, soldier, gunsmith, politician, plumber, electrician, or a professional practitioner of many of the other things I comment on in this forum.
http://ilbob.blogspot.com/
ilbob is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 01:33 PM   #392
Gamera
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 26, 2009
Location: SC/GA
Posts: 513
No Ruger Autos please!
__________________
Quote:
Sounds more like you called 1911, which was on the scene much faster.
Gamera is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 02:04 PM   #393
oldFred
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 27, 2009
Location: Winder, GA
Posts: 139
Kimber hands down. I would never buy one of those JAM-O-MATICS!
oldFred is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 02:10 PM   #394
NCsmitty
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 29, 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 5,270
I would never buy an AR or AK. Over priced and over rated.

NCsmitty
__________________
Sic Semper Tyrannis

"thus always to tyrants"
NCsmitty is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 02:17 PM   #395
MTMilitiaman
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 28, 2005
Location: Missoula, Montana
Posts: 2,420
Guns I will probably never buy:

AR15 of any sort in any configuration--I have no use or need for a rifle that feels and sounds like a pogo stick.

And for political reasons, I will never purchase or never purchase another:

Colt
Ruger
Smith and Wesson

And for as long as they continue to use and support HS Precision...

Remington
Savage
__________________
M1A--because volume is fine, but accuracy is final.
MTMilitiaman is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 02:53 PM   #396
Hostile Amish
member
 
 
Join Date: June 7, 2008
Posts: 522



Hostile Amish is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 03:12 PM   #397
jcwit
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 19, 2007
Location: Great state of Indiana
Posts: 6,800
I don't have a never buy list. If it goes bang and the price is right its mine. I've got everything from .22 & .25 Ravens to custome made rifles. There're all good.

Even have a Hoban rifle if anybody knows what that is without using google. LOL

I also wonder how some of the major makers stay in business when they are on a never buy list.

Even have one of the Kimber Custom (jam-o-matic) that never misses a beat, one of my favorites.
jcwit is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 03:23 PM   #398
Lewis130
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 23, 2008
Posts: 79
No Glocks. I refure to spend money on something when the designers haven't even made an attempt at aesthetics. The plastic aspect doesn't endear me to them either. Or the lack of a safety. Or their popularity with gangsters and mall ninjas. Or their dull meaningless names. Or their egotistical capital letter 'GLOCK' spelling. Or the goddamn brick like aesthetics. Give me a 1911 any day of the week.
__________________
"Well officer, I was out on my boat..."
Lewis130 is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 03:32 PM   #399
JonB
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 18, 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 836
Anything made by Ruger.

Never have owned and never will even consider anything Ruger. You can usually buy better, but not pay more.
JonB is offline  
Old March 29, 2009, 03:49 PM   #400
CoRoMo
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 21, 2007
Location: Colorafornia
Posts: 8,633
Mosin Nagant
__________________
The Second Amendment of our Bill of Rights is my concealed weapons permit, period!
Ted Nugent
CoRoMo is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.