Quantcast
What's your "never buy" gun? - Page 4 - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Social Situations > General Gun Discussions

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 4, 2008, 10:28 PM   #76
B yond
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 6, 2006
Posts: 1,268
I will never buy a defensive weapon with a grip safety.

I read a report and several articles about a police officer who shot and killed a suspect after his hands were severely cut (we're talking to the bone), and he was barely able to pull the trigger. The perp was trying to get the rifle out of the officers cruiser at the time. That officer would be dead right now if he'd had to work a grip safety to make his weapon go boom. Wal-mart parking lots...dangerous places.

I wouldn't mind a tricked out 1911 for a target shooter/competition gun, but I'd never carry one.

No XDs until they ditch the grip safety. No Uzis (don't like the firing from open breach anyway).

Oh, and I'd never buy a weapon with that mod that makes it inoperable unless the shooter is wearing a special magnetized ring. No thank you.

I must say I love my Ruger, my Hi-Point, my NAA mini, My AR-7, and my H&R even though they all get bashed on threads like this.
__________________
It isn't the bullet with your name on it you have to worry about, it's the one that says "or current resident."
B yond is offline  
Old October 4, 2008, 10:39 PM   #77
B yond
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 6, 2006
Posts: 1,268
Quote:
Any wheel gun.....I just think their outdated. (But they are good choices for the elderly and anyone weak handed etc..etc..)
Or anyone who wants to shoot wadcutters, wants to load their own without worrying about cycling the action, wants to shoot shot shells, or wants to be able to shoot more than one shot underwater.
__________________
It isn't the bullet with your name on it you have to worry about, it's the one that says "or current resident."
B yond is offline  
Old October 4, 2008, 10:53 PM   #78
cliffy
member
 
 
Join Date: August 11, 2008
Location: Southwestern Michigan
Posts: 644
Kimber equals Quality

Why hedge regarding a few bucks, when you'll likely own it forever or trade-in swiftly a lesser Semi-Auto caliber? Kimber is King for the hard-earned dollars spent. .45 ACP because NOTHING else compares for semi-auto PROWESS. Surely a .454 Casull rules the roost powerwise, but a semi-auto .454? If James Bond had access to a decent .45 ACP, he wouldn't have played life-or-death games with a Walther PPK .380 mini-pistola. 9mm Parabellum is the very LEAST amount of power that could consistantly save your life. You'll note I mentioned MINIMAL amount of power and ONLY with proper bullets and maximum handloads. People under the influence of certain drugs appear to have super-human, if short-lived, strength. Set them immediately straight with a sturdy, convincing .45 ACP offering. If one expects a handgun to protect one's self, don't play seriously deadly games with your life. cliffy
cliffy is offline  
Old October 4, 2008, 10:55 PM   #79
Scott7891
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 30, 2007
Posts: 68
hunting/civilian/target style firearms- they all look the same, they dont seem to me to have the durability, longevity, and history of military-style firearms, and i dont hunt or enter in shooting competitions

AR's-too unreliable and underpowered for my taste unless it is an AR with a gas piston and fires 6.8 SPC then you might convince me otherwise. like someone already said im an AK man.

H&K pistols- others stated that quite eloquently plus I hear they are unreliable for the cost

Glocks- didnt like the feel of it, ugly, grips too thick, way overrated

Tec-9-POS from Sweden. Its already obvious how bad it is.

thats all i can think of now
Scott7891 is offline  
Old October 4, 2008, 10:59 PM   #80
franx1911a
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 19, 2008
Posts: 21
I think its kind of funny how almost every major (and minor) brand has been named. On the list of disdain, I owned an older Taurus PT92 in the early 90's, truly regret selling it. It was extremely accurate, beautiful trigger, truly regretted having to part with it. I purchased a new replacement last year.... what a POS !!! I don't know about the Hi Point pistols, but I have a 9mm and .40 carbine, and love them both, no FTF problems in over 800 rounds each now. I owned a 3rd Gen Glock 22 that I couldn't get rid of fast enough, ugly, brutal to shoot. I have several Springfield 1911's that I hope to take to the afterlife with me. Had a Colt 1911 that even a couple trips back to Colt couldn't make right. And now I have recently become a Sig Snob and while having one P220 that I couldn't re-sell fast enough, I have another along with two P245's that I must fight my wife for both carry and range time. I have hated S&W for years, but recently shot a friends Model 19, just an old gun that has never been "worked".... truly a Gem! The bottom line is I am starting to think that aside from individual preference, personal "fit" to the gun, etc that it almost depends more on the day of the week and if the QC guy was hungover, than the brand of the gun.
Sorry for rambling on and on and on and on and on....
franx1911a is offline  
Old October 4, 2008, 10:59 PM   #81
nwilliams
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 10, 2006
Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 4,343
I am ashamed to say that I purchased a Vulcan Arms V94 a few years ago

NEVER AGAIN !!!

I had the POS about three months and had to send it back for repairs about two weeks after I bought it. After I got it back a month later I spent another month trying to sell it. All in all I put about 400 rounds through it and I don't think it ever got through one full mag without jamming. Without a doubt the biggest POS gun I have ever owned. I wish I had been a member of the online firearms community back then before I bought it, then maybe I would have done the proper research first and avoided making a huge financial mistake. At least I learned my lesson, now I do research before I buy.
__________________
Quote:
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government – Thomas Jefferson
nwilliams is offline  
Old October 4, 2008, 11:00 PM   #82
gvnwst
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 17, 2008
Location: Somewhere.........
Posts: 2,615
.408 cheytac intervention. why buy a overrated, not so great anyhow piece of crap? one that the price is marked up $6,000 higher than it should be. the barrett model 99 in
.416 can do everything better in a rifle 1/3 the price.
gvnwst is offline  
Old October 5, 2008, 11:19 AM   #83
tinygnat219
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 3, 2006
Location: The Land of Northern Hospitality and Southern Efficiency
Posts: 2,920
Taurus: Any of their Revolvers, Auto pistols, or rifles. Junk Pure junk.

H&K: For various reasons including high-prices, spotty quality, and attitude.

NAA Mini-Revolvers: For uses other than plinking. Why people want a single action, small-triggered, 5 shot rimfire revolver as a self-defense weapon I will never understand.
tinygnat219 is offline  
Old October 5, 2008, 12:17 PM   #84
loneviking
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 28, 2008
Location: Carson City, NV.
Posts: 977
Quote:
Quote:
Any wheel gun.....I just think their outdated. (But they are good choices for the elderly and anyone weak handed etc..etc..)

Or anyone who wants to shoot wadcutters, wants to load their own without worrying about cycling the action, wants to shoot shot shells, or wants to be able to shoot more than one shot underwater.
Or wants to shoot a gun that truly has some power to it---like the .357, 44 spcl, 44 mag and 45 long Colt..etc.

Or doesn't want to have to learn the 'tap,rack, bang' drill because they want a gun that doesn't fail to feed, nor fail to eject but goes 'bang!' every time they pull the trigger.
__________________
Beware the old man with one well worn gun!
loneviking is offline  
Old October 5, 2008, 12:29 PM   #85
Blofeld
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 25, 2008
Posts: 288
Davis-Cobra-Raven pistols, had a Davis blow up on me.

Kel Tec P11, if you have to polish anything to make it work out of the box, re-think the purchase.
Blofeld is offline  
Old October 5, 2008, 12:51 PM   #86
CoreyI35
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 17, 2008
Posts: 4
I don't get the HK "because they hate me" references. What am I missing?
CoreyI35 is offline  
Old October 5, 2008, 01:38 PM   #87
PotatoJudge
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 17, 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,306
Corey:
http://larrycorreia.wordpress.com/20...d-we-hate-you/
__________________
Ask me anything... and I'll tell you how we do it in Texas.
PotatoJudge is offline  
Old October 5, 2008, 01:52 PM   #88
Leif Runenritzer
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 27, 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 232
Any rifle that fits the legal definition of a pistol.

Nor would i ever buy anything that profited Heckler and Cough. Assuming i were made of money, would i buy a PTR 91F? Yes, it's American-made. Would i buy a used HK91? Yes, it's discontinued. A used USP? No, because someone else will buy it, possibly instead of buying one new.
__________________
Éþel byþ óferléof æghwylcum men, gif hé mót ðær rihtes and gerysena on brúcan on bolde bléadum oftast.
Freedom is my single issue.
Leif Runenritzer is offline  
Old October 5, 2008, 02:25 PM   #89
Rifleman 173
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 24, 2007
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 411
I will never again own another Ruger Mini-14 carbine in .223 caliber. Those things are just not stable enough for good accuracy. As you shoot them, the point of impact changes with every round as it gets warmer. There is no point of aim equals point of impact for long with one of them.
Rifleman 173 is offline  
Old October 5, 2008, 02:48 PM   #90
novaDAK
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 16, 2006
Posts: 1,030
Quote:
Anything Ruger. Awful history, fugly nasty guns. They may work, but so do the Hi-Points and the old P-series Rugers have the same blockiness, cheapness, and weight.
no sane person would ever put Hi-Point and Ruger on the same level. Hi-points can't compare to Rugers at all.

As for this thread, I'd have to say I'll never buy a Taurus or Rossi in the future ever again. I bought a Taurus revolver on a whim but then started reading the horror stories about their customer service. Sold the gun at a 50 dollar loss a week later. I don't have the time, patience, nor money to deal with their customer service if I ever needed it.
novaDAK is offline  
Old October 5, 2008, 02:50 PM   #91
possum_128
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 2, 2007
Posts: 58
Sig, CZ's, don't care for them, goods guns I know, just don't like them.
possum_128 is offline  
Old October 5, 2008, 02:54 PM   #92
jahwarrior
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 9, 2007
Location: Scranton, PA
Posts: 1,052
i will never buy a Jennings, Jimenez, or Lorcin. i will never again buy a Cobra/Davis. i will never buy a Glock.
__________________
I drink your milkshake!!!
jahwarrior is offline  
Old October 5, 2008, 02:59 PM   #93
Shear_stress
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 27, 2005
Location: Neither here nor there
Posts: 2,611
I've found that a lot of my "never guns" lose that distinction the instant I find one for sale at a discount.

That said, there are lot of guns that I shy away from: plastic-framed pistols (a pistol with a frame that doesn't require machining and finishing shouldn't be sold at the same price as one that does), and 11.5" barrel rifles with 4.5" muzzle extensions (just pay for the tax stamp already!)

Last edited by Shear_stress; October 5, 2008 at 03:38 PM.
Shear_stress is offline  
Old October 5, 2008, 03:02 PM   #94
Gator
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 23, 2003
Location: Stuck in Crook Co., IL
Posts: 2,233
Norinco and Polytech.

Those are really the only ones I can think of that I wouldn't touch at any price, even if they were free. Anything else I'd at least try.
__________________
"A noble spirit embiggens the smallest man."
Gator is offline  
Old October 5, 2008, 03:16 PM   #95
JR47
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 16, 2008
Location: N. Georgia
Posts: 1,158
I'd have to add Kimber to that list. 1911.com has a love-hate relationship going on for Kimber. It seems that most of them need a trip back, but "they'll fix it." Like the P11, if it needs to be buffed before it's reliable, count me out.
JR47 is offline  
Old October 5, 2008, 03:24 PM   #96
anymanusa
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 8, 2007
Location: Beautiful South
Posts: 322
why all the hate for Rugers? I have a P345 and I think it's pretty damn slick. Looks to be very well engineered, has bullet in chamber indicator, very comfortable to hold... etc. What's wrong with a Ruger?

On the op's question, Glocks. They are like Berkinstock sandals. They are designed for your hands (or feet in the case of the sandals) to conform to them, not for them to fit you. If that wasn't clear, let me just state: the rake angle on the handle of a Glock is horrible off. Point one in front of you and your wrist has to kink uncomfortably to hold it straight.

I also don't ever care to own any pump action, or lever action, or double barrel anything.

Quote:
Anything Ruger. Awful history, fugly nasty guns. They may work, but so do the Hi-Points and the old P-series Rugers have the same blockiness, cheapness, and weight.
Are you off your meds (no offence intended)? This gun is beautiful, and handles very well too. I just don't see what all the hate is for Rugers.

__________________
"This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration. Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient and the world will follow our lead into the future!" -Adolf Hitler 1935
anymanusa is offline  
Old October 5, 2008, 03:42 PM   #97
ljnowell
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 21, 2008
Location: The Peoples Republic of IL
Posts: 3,538
Quote:
why all the hate for Rugers? I have a P345 and I think it's pretty damn slick. Looks to be very well engineered, has bullet in chamber indicator, very comfortable to hold... etc. What's wrong with a Ruger?

On the op's question, Glocks. They are like Berkinstock sandals. They are designed for your hands (or feet in the case of the sandals) to conform to them, not for them to fit you. If that wasn't clear, let me just state: the rake angle on the handle of a Glock is horrible off. Point one in front of you and your wrist has to kink uncomfortably to hold it straight.

I also don't ever care to own any pump action, or lever action, or double barrel anything.


Quote:
Anything Ruger. Awful history, fugly nasty guns. They may work, but so do the Hi-Points and the old P-series Rugers have the same blockiness, cheapness, and weight.

Are you off your meds (no offence intended)? This gun is beautiful, and handles very well too. I just don't see what all the hate is for Rugers.
oh the irony. You slam someone for not liking rugers, then bash glock because of your personal preferences. Thats funny.
__________________
If the mentally deficient are not allowed to own guns then why should they be allowed to make gun laws?
ljnowell is offline  
Old October 5, 2008, 03:53 PM   #98
anymanusa
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 8, 2007
Location: Beautiful South
Posts: 322
Quote:
oh the irony. You slam someone for not liking rugers, then bash glock because of your personal preferences. Thats funny.
I think you're making it something it isn't. I said Glocks are uncomfortable to hold without kinking your wrist
Quote:
Glocks--ugly, feel bad in my hand
Quote:
Glocks - Cant stand the way they feel in my had
and I know a lot of people who say the same thing. What I don't know is why people on this thread say that they don't like Rugers. The Rugers were described as 'aweful nasty and bad history' ~paraphrased guns.

I'm asking for some real explanation of why the Ruger isn't right for some of these people. Not an 'I think it sucks' answer.

I read this on the other page, and it also made no sense to me whatsoever. Anyone care to dumb this down so I can understand it?

Quote:
Engineers that don't understand the fundamental concept of tolerance stack are why.
tolerance stack are why??? WTH?
__________________
"This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration. Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient and the world will follow our lead into the future!" -Adolf Hitler 1935
anymanusa is offline  
Old October 5, 2008, 03:59 PM   #99
anymanusa
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 8, 2007
Location: Beautiful South
Posts: 322


Look at the difference in rake angle. Granted you can find a Ruger with that same bad angle if you look hard enough, but I don't know if you can find a Glock with the good angle without incurring additional cost.

Sorry if this is off topic or on a tangeant, I'll stop now.
__________________
"This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration. Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient and the world will follow our lead into the future!" -Adolf Hitler 1935
anymanusa is offline  
Old October 5, 2008, 04:01 PM   #100
RustyShackelford
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 27, 2006
Posts: 1,064
Firearms I'd avoid...

I'd avoid the following brands/models;
Kahr, Kel-Tec, High Point, Davis, Auto-Ord, Bersa, Daewoo, Ivry Johnson, Star, Patriot Arms.
I may think of a few more later on.

Rusty S
__________________
"Watch out!" "Where ever you see US flags, you'll see guns."
-Duane "Dog" Chapman
www.dogthebountyhunter.com
RustyShackelford is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.