Quantcast
What's your "never buy" gun? - Page 53 - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Social Situations > General Gun Discussions

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 16, 2011, 11:53 PM   #1301
dev_null
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 27, 2002
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 1,338
Glunk. Yeah, I know, lotsa folks love them. But that's my answer and I'm sticking to it.
__________________
I am the flame that burns in every heart of man, and in the core of every star. I am Life, and the giver of Life, yet therefore is the knowledge of me the knowledge of death. (AL II:6)
dev_null is offline  
Old December 17, 2011, 12:25 AM   #1302
shiftyer1
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 26, 2008
Location: central texas
Posts: 1,503
I would never buy a little raven .25 for 75 bux but I would for 20. I don't think I have a never buy gun if it's usable and the price is right i'll buy it. Sometimes even if it's not usable and I think I can fix it and the price is right i'll buy it. Could end up as a shed gun or maybe trade fodder or a quick profit. If a gun is in X condition today and worth X then it will still be worth X if not more down the road in the same condition as bought.

This does not apply to buying new guns.
__________________
If we weren't supposed to eat animals, they wouldn't be made of meat!!!!!!
shiftyer1 is offline  
Old December 18, 2011, 07:40 PM   #1303
Texasjim
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 18, 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 21
Firestorm Gov. Model. I would of done better to spend that money on a over priced brick, samething in the end.
Texasjim is offline  
Old December 19, 2011, 08:00 AM   #1304
sidibear
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 19, 2009
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 94
Anything ever made by Competitor. Owned two of them and the ejector lock failed. They said to send the failed part back as it has a lifetime warranty. That was back in 2009 and still to this day despite many emails and phone calls, have never received any parts back. I sold the two peices of junk for a lot less than I paid but was happy to be rid of them.
Nice idea but their customer service sucks big time.
sidibear is offline  
Old December 19, 2011, 08:17 AM   #1305
Batty67
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 8, 2011
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 319
Glock for me as well. I've yet to hold a Glock that felt good in my hand. Ever.
Batty67 is offline  
Old December 20, 2011, 01:33 AM   #1306
1858remington
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 5, 2004
Location: Delaware
Posts: 299
Anything by:
1.Davis
2.Bryco
3.Jennings
4.RG
5.Cobra
6. Hi-point

The Colt 2000, Ruger large caliber semi auto's, S&W sigma series, Desert Eagle 44 & 50.
1858remington is offline  
Old December 20, 2011, 01:01 PM   #1307
WinThePennant
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 8, 2011
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,036
I went to the range recently. Thought I'd give the 1911 another shot.

Awful.

Never buy another one.
WinThePennant is offline  
Old December 20, 2011, 09:47 PM   #1308
pricedo
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 13, 2008
Posts: 84
All of our now nonexistent textile & light manufacturing jobs have gone to China but why the heck worry about that until they replace the Statue of Liberty with a big brass statue of Chairman Mao.

No big deal!

Like the song says:

DON'T WORRY - BE HAPPY
pricedo is offline  
Old December 20, 2011, 10:05 PM   #1309
pricedo
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 13, 2008
Posts: 84
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaxonPig View Post
Springfield Armory for screwing investors a few years ago and Ruger for Bill stabbing us in the back when he sided with Schumer et al in the 1994 assault weapon ban.
I think old Bill was getting senile when he did that.
pricedo is offline  
Old December 20, 2011, 10:38 PM   #1310
Mikey Idaho
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 6, 2011
Location: Idaho Falls, ID
Posts: 104
These are in order from hates to just dislikes
-Bullpup
-High Point
-lightweight 357 snubnose
-AR-15 pattern rifles (will own one eventually but I'm just sick of hearing them spoken of as gods and the only option when buying a rifle, much prefer my mini-14 for general use)
-Glock (not bad, just way overhyped, would immediately trade for an M&P if I wanted polymer striker fired)
Mikey Idaho is offline  
Old December 21, 2011, 01:26 AM   #1311
Armchair Bronco
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 28, 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 227
I had a 20 gauge Mossberg bolt action shotgun that I used as my first trap gun for about a year.

The barrel had these vertical ports cut near the C-Lect choke @ the front of the barrel. When I had a hard left or right flying bird, I'd end up spraying the adjacent shooters in the squad with hot gasses and plastic shards from the wad.

The gun itself looked pretty cool on the trap line, but I will never again own another Mossberg bolt action shotgun with vertical ports on the barrel.
Armchair Bronco is offline  
Old December 22, 2011, 02:10 AM   #1312
brushwolf
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 25, 2009
Location: WASHINGTON
Posts: 15
what do any of you think about the new ruger number 1? Was looking for a single shot for mountain deer hunting in up state ny.
brushwolf is offline  
Old December 22, 2011, 02:14 AM   #1313
brushwolf
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 25, 2009
Location: WASHINGTON
Posts: 15
oops;; I would never buy another Tarus P1911 45 acp. Have Colt 70 series gold cup..sweet. IMHO
brushwolf is offline  
Old December 22, 2011, 02:36 AM   #1314
Tdodge7
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 31, 2011
Posts: 22
Anything with a flappy trigger safety, but especially glock for popularizing the stupid thing. There's a handful of pistols I would love to own but never will because I can't stand those stupid triggers.
Tdodge7 is offline  
Old December 22, 2011, 07:07 AM   #1315
Deus Machina
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 24, 2007
Location: Brandon, Florida
Posts: 1,999
Heck, if Hi-Point made a gun that would accept the CZ mags I have or the Glock mags I can get by the crate, I'd own a few. Garage, car, tacklebox...

But I've ruled out a large number of striker-fired pistols. The odd safeties don't bother me--it's that they feel like they don't have so much of a trigger as a marshmallow.
__________________
When you get angry enough, grab your rifle and run outside. If you're the only one there, it's not time yet.
Deus Machina is offline  
Old December 22, 2011, 07:34 AM   #1316
Hit_Factor
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 20, 2011
Location: St. Joseph, MI
Posts: 315
Wilson Combat, I have my reasons and can't support them in any way.
Hit_Factor is offline  
Old December 22, 2011, 09:07 AM   #1317
TexasBill
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 26, 2009
Location: Texas Gulf Coast
Posts: 1,120
Glock: They just don't feel right in my hand.
Kahr: I won't support Reverend Moon.
Kimber: Too much money for a gun that still needs tweaking.

Any pistol with a beavertail - I've never owned a pistol that needed one and I'll never buy a pistol that has one.

Any pistol with a "trick" trigger. Another strike against Glock and the reason I won't buy a S&W M&P.

Lightweight .357 Magnum revolver: Just because it's possible to make them doesn't mean it's a good idea. But I am sure there are people who either consider excessive recoil a test of manhood or actually enjoy it and to them I commend the Scandium S&W J-frames and the Ruger LCR.
__________________
No Glocks, no Kimbers, and still no regrets.
A government truly of the people, by the people and for the people would not disarm the people.
TexasBill is offline  
Old December 22, 2011, 10:00 AM   #1318
Tcruse
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 24, 2011
Posts: 336
Quote:
Originally Posted by Batty67 View Post
Glock for me as well. I've yet to hold a Glock that felt good in my hand. Ever.
Try a Gen 4 17 if you have not already done so. I have heard from two 'I would never buy a Glock' persons that when picking up the gen 4 17, could not believe how good the gunfit their hands. One of them was a retired LE thatis doing gun instruction at the local range. The other was person that was trying out a Springfield XDM.

As far as a gun I would never buy is an all metal gun, the polymer guns have been proven to be better. Of course, there might be an exception for the new Ruger 1911 in the future.
Tcruse is offline  
Old December 22, 2011, 10:27 AM   #1319
mdauben
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 11, 2011
Location: Huntville, AL
Posts: 1,920
My "Never" list:
  • Any centerfire autopistol chambered in a cartridge smaller than .380 (weak, unreliable guns with no advantage over a .380)
  • Any In-line muzzle loader with modern optics (if you are going to hunt the black powder season, stop cheating!)
  • Any gun chambered in .40S&W (a compromise round I see no use at all for)
__________________
Mike

Election 2014: When you vote, remember how your Congressmen and women voted on the issues important to you.
mdauben is offline  
Old December 23, 2011, 04:30 AM   #1320
mrcooper
member
 
 
Join Date: June 16, 2009
Location: N.E. Oregon
Posts: 84
Anything made by WINCHESTER
mrcooper is offline  
Old December 23, 2011, 04:15 PM   #1321
walker944
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 21, 2006
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 640
Quote:
A bolt-action shotgun--I just don't see the point.
I would definitely have to agree with that. I got one for Christmas when I was about 15. I was so disappointed that it wasn't a pump. It's the only gun I have since sold, that I got in my youth. Still have the Winchester .22, and the Winchester 30.06. Just couldn't bear to keep that ugly Mossberg bolt action shotgun, though.
__________________
"We inherited our freedom. Now it's up to us to fight for it." -- Jed Eckert (Red Dawn 2012)
walker944 is offline  
Old January 15, 2012, 10:32 PM   #1322
wiringlunatic
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 29, 2011
Posts: 34
Ok, three weeks out and I'm going to revive this thread again... oh well, here goes. If it's cheap enough and looks like I can have fun with it or use it, I'd buy it. That said, I really have no desire for the AR/AK type rifles. Personally, I'd rather take my time and place my shots carefully with a good bolt action. I generally don't like anything that feels like cheap junk in my hands. This would include things like plastic stock shotguns, Mossberg 500's with slides that rattle loud enough to flush game, etc.

Never fired a Glock (probably will Tuesday) but I'm sure they're fine guns. That said, I'd never want one for CCW. Or any other semi. My CCW is a Taurus 85 in .38 Special complete with wood grips and a 4" barrel. My wife carries a "bicycle" model H&R topbreak chambered in .32 S&W short. I also have a Rohm RG-10x that a friend gave me that someone had cut the barrel shorter. I made a sight for it and am in the process of truing it up. I would sooner trust the Rohm .22 for self defense than any semi. Just my preference. I've been startled by a pheasant while hunting and learned how one can fumble a gun while under the influence of adrenalin. Semis seem to me to be too complicated and too many things to get right (hold it tight enough, hit this switch, that lever, the button on the left NO THE LEFT!, and if it doesn't go off, smack it on your hand, rack the slide, and try again.) This is fine for people who use them frequently under high stress situations, such as military and cops, but I likely will never need it. If I use my CCW in a high stress situation once in my lifetime it will be a lot. I'm too afraid I'd screw it up. If I go for my Taurus, and forget to cock it and pull the trigger, it still goes bang. If a round is bad and I just pull the trigger again, it goes bang. If I pull it out and in the stress of the situation I pull the IWB holster out with it, the holster is open on the bottom and my finger fits on the trigger inside the leather and it still goes bang. I would like to get one or more semis someday, because they look like fun for the range, but when push comes to shove, I want one thing that WILL work EVERY TIME and that's my wheelguns.

There are a few other guns I really wouldn't want, like that obnoxious 870 carbine in .30-06 I fired before. Sloppy pump action for close hunting speed with a cartridge designed for distance. Short barrel for close woods hunting and a scope that slowed your sighting down too much. Add to that that it had a heavy cartidge with a light gun and it basically tried to run away every time you shot it -- unfortunately your shoulder was in it's way so it tried to run through/over you. Someone else mentioned the .500 snubbie -- never shot one, never want to. My wife's .32 can generate a lot of muzzle flip with its 1" or so barrel, no desire to find out what one that big feels like.
wiringlunatic is offline  
Old January 16, 2012, 11:43 AM   #1323
Mr transformer
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 21, 2011
Posts: 48
Guns I will never buy……….

Rem 700 series, or anything closely related to them.
Keeping the weapon pointed in a safe direction is just part of it. Make sure to keep your ear protection on at all times when you have a live round in the chamber. It going off at random with the safety on when your head is close to the muzzle is quite painful to your ears. Especially if it is slung over your back with the muzzle by your left shoulder.


AK, WASR or variant.
I am sorry but a weapon primarily built out of sheet metal just doesn’t cut it.

And in the same variant… Any gun with the primary moving parts made of plastic.

Snub nose revolvers.
Self explanatory.

Carbine rifles, if it can be avoided in any way.
If I ever buy an AR variant, it will at least have a 24 inch barrel on it. It is plain stupid to cut the end off a barrel, then try to affix things on the end to reduce the flash, and blast when it wouldn’t even be a problem if you hadn’t cut the end of the freaking barrel off in the first place

Last edited by Mr transformer; January 16, 2012 at 12:12 PM.
Mr transformer is offline  
Old January 16, 2012, 11:53 AM   #1324
Tdodge7
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 31, 2011
Posts: 22
The SKS is milled, not sheet metal.
Tdodge7 is offline  
Old January 16, 2012, 12:04 PM   #1325
Ghost Tracker
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 8, 2006
Location: Kentucky Backwoods
Posts: 1,449
I'LL ALWAYS AVOID, uh, wait, no...okay, uh, I'LL NEVER AGAIN...oh heck, I'm likely wrong about that, uh, Y'ALL CAN BET YOUR LAST DOLLAR THAT I WILL NEVER AGAIN USE THE WORDS "ALWAYS" or "NEVER" BECAUSE THEY ALWAYS COME BACK TO BITE ME IN (or very near) MY WALLET.
I hope y'all live long enough to find the humorous truth in my rigid decision.
__________________
REMEMBER BOYS & GIRLS, ONLY YOU (AND STRIP MINING) CAN PREVENT FOREST FIRES!

The New Politically Insensitive Smokey Bear
Ghost Tracker is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.