![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
member
Join Date: December 22, 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,430
|
Colt M16A2vs Colt AR15?
Are these two made on the same machinery?
How close are they? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: December 25, 2002
Location: Utah, inside the Terraformed Zone
Posts: 6,954
|
Well, I'm unfamiliar with the individual Colt sporters. However, the obvious differences are the lack of a burst-fire function and the barrel weight.
To date (and as far as I know...I plead ignorance with Colt's postban sporters), every 20" AR-15 from a major manufacturer has a "heavy" barrel. Many assume that this means an M16A2 weight barrel, which is heavier than the barrel of the A1. (As an odd aside, some in the Army that I know assume that the barrel of the M16A3 and A4 is heavier than the A2, but this is not the case.) This is not true. Most "sporter" 20" ARs have VERY heavy barrels, bordering (IMHO) on the ridiculous, and adding much unnecessary weight to what was supposed to be a lightweight weapon. Some assume that you can order 20" ARs with an A2 weight barrel, but again, this doesn't seem to be the case. Bushmaster now sells a pre-ban-spec (i.e., with bayo lug and flash hider) "Government Profile" barrel, but unless you have a preban AR and the equipment/skill necessary to headspace a barrel, it's not a route I can recommend. The other option is to get a heavy barrel turned down, though I don't know how this will effect handguard fit or how much it will cost. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Dixieland
Posts: 6,643
|
It's cheaper to leave the bbl staright under the handguards than to machine it to the military contour. I agree that the heavy bbls destroy the balance of what was once a light handy weapon. It's for the children!
I have a colt factory preban Sporter that has the A2 configuration bbl. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: March 23, 2003
Location: thehighroad.us
Posts: 1,483
|
Nightcrawler, I think Bushmaster will build a rifle to your specs if you special order from them.
There are several differences in the action between the AR-15 and M16. This page from AR15.com shows some pictures of how some parts differ. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
member
Join Date: December 22, 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,430
|
I'm talking strictly Colt firearms.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: December 25, 2002
Location: Utah, inside the Terraformed Zone
Posts: 6,954
|
Quote:
But please don't be mistaken. I was merely pointing out what I fell is rather silly, espeically in this age where lookalikes of military weapons are all the rage (hence the fake M4s). You'd think that SOMEone would make a lookalike of an M16, but apparently no one does. In any case, I have no desire for one. I've hauled an M16 around enough that I don't need one in my house, too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: April 24, 2003
Location: By the ocean
Posts: 475
|
At one time there was very little difference between the Colt m16 and AR 15 (SP1). Basically the fire control parts and bolt carrier. the barrels and receivers were bassically the same although Colt continued to use the non forward assist upper on the AR15 well after the M16 had a forward assist.
__________________
Catch a wave and you're sitting on top of the world. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: June 2, 2003
Location: Bucks Co., PA
Posts: 56
|
Hey there SodaPop,
In addition to the semi internals, my pre-ban AR-15A2 has a big screw up front that hinges the upper and lower receivers instead of a push-pin like on the M16A2. Colt put the screw on there for some PC reason. Other than that, identical to the M16A2 with regard to sights, bolt forward assist, bayonet lug, gov't. profile barrel (thinner under the handguards), and flash hider. My Bushmaster has push-pins fore and aft, nothing PC about it at all. Makes for swapping uppers much, much easier.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|