Quantcast
Muzzleloader hunting in Colorado(New Thread) - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Shooting Activities and Venues > Hunting

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 31, 2014, 06:09 PM   #1
bwhntr53
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 31, 2014
Posts: 3
Muzzleloader hunting in Colorado(New Thread)

A work buddy and I both drew Colorado cow elk only muzzleloader permits this year (2014). I have read a lot about PowerBelt bullets, weight of bullets, etc. I have a TC Impact 50 cal. I have worked up to 120gr. of Triple 7 powder, that I am going to use with the .270gr. Platinum. I have also read elsewhere that the .270gr will not be enough bullet weight for elk. I am going to be limiting my shots to 100 yards and less. In Colorado, scopes are not allowed on muzzleloaders, so I have installed the PeepRib Peep Sight. Along with a fiber optic front sight. According to the PowerBelt ballistic chart, should be in the 1505+ velocity range at 100 yards with a KE of 1358+ ft. lb. Maybe a little on the light side on elk for some. But this is the load that I have chosen. Leaving on Sept 9th. Season opens Sept. 13th. Stay tuned.

bwhntr53
bwhntr53 is offline  
Old September 1, 2014, 12:59 PM   #2
Patocazador
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 8, 2012
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 1,789
I've heard quite a bit about inconsistent performance with Powerbelts. For elk you ought to try a 260 or 300 gr. Scorpion PT Gold. Excellent accuracy AND performance.
__________________
Life's short, have some fun.

Bob
Patocazador is offline  
Old September 1, 2014, 01:22 PM   #3
bwhntr53
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 31, 2014
Posts: 3
Scorpion PT Gold

I have heard a lot about the PowerBelt, also. With the peep sight I am getting 1.5" groups at 50 yards. Cleaning after every shot. Not great for some, but acceptable for me. Possibly because I am using a peep sight, with 61 year old eyes. And will be limiting my shot distance, due to I owe that to the animal that I am hunting. With my Bushnell 3x9 scope, I get greater groups with Hornady sabots. Sabots are not allowed in Colorado. If the trip was not so close, I would try the Scorpion PT Gold. Hopefully I will obtain good expansion results with the .270 Platinum.
bwhntr53 is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.