Quantcast
Gun politics - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Social Situations > Legal

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old September 21, 2009, 05:24 PM   #1
Art Eatman
Administrator
  
 
Join Date: December 22, 2002
Location: Terlingua, Texas
Posts: 38,491
Gun politics

Check out these two websites:

http://www.gunvoter.org,

and

http://www.gun-politics.org
__________________
You're from BATFE? Come right in! I use all your fine products!
Art Eatman is offline  
Old May 11, 2010, 04:36 PM   #2
loadedround
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 18, 2006
Location: Valley Forge, Pa
Posts: 3,324
Gunvoter.org is a very interesting and informative site for those willing to take the time to read all the information given there. Thanks Art.
__________________
Walk softly and carry a big stick TR
Life Member NRA
One Nation Under God
loadedround is offline  
Old June 1, 2010, 10:24 AM   #3
Charles Davis
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 31, 2010
Location: greater Boston. MA
Posts: 29
Wink Gun Politics 101

Greetings all
As I understand it, there are approximately 80,000 legal gun owners in America. We use guns for target shooting, self defense, Hunting and collecting. Misuse of these guns is less then 0.2%.
There are approximately 4000 members in the "National Rifleman Association".

This tells me that approximately76,000 Americans need to seriously think about joining the "National Rifleman Association". The NRA is one of the most power full lobbys in America that fight for your constitutional right to "Keep and Bear Arms".
The NRA is one of the few ways the average American can make their voices heard.
Wake up America and smell the coffee
Ancient Dragon
Charles Davis is offline  
Old June 1, 2010, 11:02 AM   #4
Tim the student
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 1, 2009
Location: IA
Posts: 3,427
Charles, where are you getting your numbers?
Tim the student is offline  
Old June 1, 2010, 11:12 AM   #5
JoeMal
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 30, 2009
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 1,569
Quote:
Charles, where are you getting your numbers?
Fo' real

Only 80k legal gun owners? Seriously? And only 4k in the NRA? Those sound suuuuuuper low IMO
JoeMal is offline  
Old June 1, 2010, 11:12 AM   #6
JonB
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 18, 2006
Location: Tampa
Posts: 837
Those numbers are definitely incorrect.

I thought the NRA had over 4 million members. There are around 40k concealed pistol permit holders in South Dakota alone.
JonB is offline  
Old June 1, 2010, 12:15 PM   #7
armoredman
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 19, 2003
Location: proud to be in AZ
Posts: 15,622
80,000 legal gun owners in Phoenix alone...probably.
__________________
If total government control equals safety, why are prisons so dangerous?

http://czfirearms.us/ The original CZ Forum, new address.
armoredman is offline  
Old June 15, 2010, 06:12 PM   #8
RP88
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 1, 2008
Posts: 2,698
I think he accidentally divided all his numbers by a hundred, because the amount of gun owners out there is between 70-90 million, if I recall correctly; basically 40-50% of the adult population.
__________________
Remember: Friendly fire - isn't.
RP88 is offline  
Old June 15, 2010, 06:25 PM   #9
Tim the student
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 1, 2009
Location: IA
Posts: 3,427
I don't know if I would believe that 40-50% of the population owns guns. That seems pretty high to me.
Tim the student is offline  
Old June 15, 2010, 06:56 PM   #10
shockwave
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 8, 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,175
Just offhand, NRA membership is likely between 4 and 5 million. This comment, from the board meeting cited, is interesting:

Quote:
statistically, NRA membership is reported at a higher level by gun owners than is actually the case. NRA is one organization that people will claim to be a member of, even if not in actual fact.
That's hard for me to understand. Annual dues are around $35. That's a box of .357. Anyone who owns firearms and cherishes their 2nd Amendment rights should join the NRA, because when push comes to shove, they are the organization that most protects us from government regulation. They are far more effective in this regard than any president or member of Congress.

If you don't want to see us go down the same path Canada, England, and Australia have taken, join the NRA today and keep your dues current.
__________________
"Bushido is all very well in its way, but it is no match for a 30-06."
shockwave is offline  
Old June 15, 2010, 07:18 PM   #11
Carl N. Brown
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 10, 2005
Location: Kingsport Tennessee
Posts: 6,766
40 to 50% of the population live in households that have guns. The range has been pretty steady for decades, some surveys showing more or less than others. "Do you own a gun" gets a different response than "Does anyone in your household own a gun".

The DOJ National Institute of Justice, National Survey on the Ownership and Use of Firearms (survey conducted 1994, report written 1997): "In 1994, 44 million Americans owned 192 million firearms, 65 million of which were handguns. Although there were enough guns to have provided every U.S. adult with one, only 25 percent of adults actually owned firearms; 74 percent of gun owners possessed two or more."

Since 1994 there have been over 100 million NICS background checks, the majority reflecting approved gun purchases, maybe a fourth representing new owners, the majority representing purchases by gun owners.

The difference between % of gun owners and % of households owning guns has led to some disputes. Gary Kleck reported that 40% of defensive gun use DGU was by women, but Tom Smith disputed that, saying only 20% of gunowners were women. Of the DGUs by women known to me, half were with a gun owned by the woman, the other half were with a gun owned by someone else in the household.
__________________
Cogito me cogitare; ergo, cogito me esse.
Carl N. Brown is offline  
Old June 15, 2010, 07:40 PM   #12
Tim the student
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 1, 2009
Location: IA
Posts: 3,427
Quote:
40 to 50% of the population live in households that have guns.
That seems reasonable. As you alluded to, owning guns is much different than living with them.
Tim the student is offline  
Old June 24, 2010, 11:17 AM   #13
Art Eatman
Administrator
  
 
Join Date: December 22, 2002
Location: Terlingua, Texas
Posts: 38,491
Please discuss the data, the numbers, etc. We don't need political philosophy or politics.
__________________
You're from BATFE? Come right in! I use all your fine products!
Art Eatman is offline  
Old June 24, 2010, 11:19 AM   #14
bearcreek
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 4, 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 253
More than 211,000 concealed carry permits have been issued so far in Ohio alone.
bearcreek is offline  
Old July 30, 2010, 08:59 PM   #15
bluemailman53
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 11, 2009
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 13
Last number I heard was 250,000 permit holders in Tennessee.
bluemailman53 is offline  
Old August 3, 2010, 10:36 PM   #16
gun guy
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 2, 2010
Location: new mexico
Posts: 276
this is probably going to upset some folks, too bad, there are many organizations besides the NRA, my father was an endowment member, i was a member for a time. in my opinion the nra is a self serving organization that is mainly concerned with the church going bunny hunter. i have NEVER seen an honest gun review in that rag, rather an expanded commerical for their advertisers, when is the last time for example you saw them talk about raven firearms, or hi point, etc. if its not a high dollar snob weapon, it doesnt exist to them. further, once you join, every month you are bombarded with alarmist mailings, begging for money, do they protect gun rights? some, those of their sponsors. any gun they dub unworthy, they cave in on, while doing lip service to firepower weapons, they sell those down the river as well. have you ever seen them test any of silva daniels guns? no. oh they kinda have to feature the m-16 and m-14 systems, our troops use them. after sending the nra untold dollars, upon his death, and those of other loyal members, that fought for this country, and supported the nra, they couldn't be bothered doing 1 line in their rag out of respect. i would reccomend GOA, since they are not in an ivory tower, they dont look down on the younger generation of gun owners and new views.
gun guy is offline  
Old August 4, 2010, 12:35 PM   #17
RonBernert
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 29, 2009
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 183
Art Eatman: " Please discuss the data, the numbers, etc. We don't need political philosophy or politics."

I thought the whole thread was under GUN POLITICS??

The NRA annual membership of $35.00 is reasonable for what they provide.. It's the constant asking for more money that annoys me enough not to re-up.

Sometimes, I wonder if the NRA plants a little controversy to get the general membership worked up enough to donate more....
__________________
What's this? Are you reading this? Glad I didn't put anything too personal down here...
RonBernert is offline  
Old September 11, 2010, 05:03 PM   #18
IllHunter
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 10, 2006
Location: ChicagoLand
Posts: 474
The other side;

I'm married, been so all my life! I can say this with authority, nobody agrees with anyone about everything. Beside spouses, this applies to organizations. You say GOA, I say NRA. And I say 4.? Million of us can't be wrong. We're the eight hundred pound gorilla in congress and you say you don't like the gun reviews!!!! You don't get it. The issue is lobby power. When GOA calls congress, I don't see them getting their panties in a wad. But if the head of ILA calls I'll bet most congress critters take the call. If you don't think it beehooves you to join, then you just don't think.
__________________
Quote:
When I joined, I swore to protect and defend the Constitution. No one ever said I was relieved of that oath.
IllHunter is offline  
Old November 15, 2010, 03:37 PM   #19
therewolf
member
 
 
Join Date: November 12, 2010
Location: Pasco Cty, Florida
Posts: 258
There's over 71,000 legal CONCEALED WEAPONS PERMITS in Pasco County, Florida, alone.

I may believe there are 80 MILLION legal gun owners in America,(much closer to the 35% of the total population mark) but there's way more than 80K legally carrying a concealed weapon just in Florida...
therewolf is offline  
Old November 15, 2010, 04:05 PM   #20
GNLaFrance
Registration in progress
 
 
Join Date: June 29, 2008
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 68
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Eatman
Please discuss the data, the numbers, etc. We don't need political philosophy or politics.
The name of this forum is "THR > Social Situations > Legal > Gun Politics". If you don't want politics discussed here, why did you start this thread by linking to two sites that are all about guns and politics?
__________________
Guy N. LaFrance
Maryland Shall Issue, National Rifle Association, Second Amendment Foundation, Grand Army of the Frontier, National Congress of Old West Shootists
Vous pouvez voir par mes vÍtements que je ne suis pas un cowboy.
GNLaFrance is offline  
Old December 12, 2010, 01:38 PM   #21
hotajax
member
 
 
Join Date: August 21, 2010
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 177
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Art Eatman
Please discuss the data, the numbers, etc. We don't need political philosophy or politics.

The name of this forum is "THR > Social Situations > Legal > Gun Politics". If you don't want politics discussed here, why did you start this thread by linking to two sites that are all about guns and politics?
Please explain why there is to be no discussion of politics in the "Gun Politics" forum.
hotajax is offline  
Old January 3, 2011, 02:06 PM   #22
woodguru
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 3, 2011
Posts: 4
No politics in gun politics....

It's just an oxymoron....?

NRA has drifted pretty far away from it's heyday, I get pretty annoyed with the fearmongering tactics, we get enough of that from a certain like minded political sector.

The purpose of a forum like this is to share observations and pool group wisdom and resources.
woodguru is offline  
Old January 4, 2011, 10:20 PM   #23
Rumline
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 12, 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 6
One thing I've seen on other forums for discussing controversial topics (politics / religion) is they created a separate sub-forum that was only visible to registered members who opt-in to be able to access it. That way people who are easily offended or otherwise don't want to see that stuff don't have to, and anybody who takes action to participate can. Also if someone misbehaves themselves in there too much, it's easy to pull their access to that subforum.

It'd be extra work for the moderators, but maybe if there's enough interest they'd entertain the idea?
Rumline is offline  
Old January 4, 2011, 11:18 PM   #24
rbernie
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: January 21, 2004
Location: Plain Ol', Texas
Posts: 18,767
Quote:
Please explain why there is to be no discussion of politics in the "Gun Politics" forum.
This is not a Gun Politics forum. This is a Legal forum, for the discussion of Legal issues associated with the RKBA.

Art provided links to external sites, and stated an expectation that the RKBA content of those sites be discussed without regard or comment to party or political affiliations. That is consistent with the forum rules that each of you agreed to when you joined THR.

It's really that simple.
__________________

Support THR by becoming a Contributing Member. Texans should be a member of the Texas State Rifle Association.
-
Trying to alter human behavior by regulating objects has been historically proven a fools errand, and yet is the fundamental underlying premise of gun control.
-
A conclusion is not a destination, it's simply a convenient place to stop thinking.
-
Reading a thing doesn't automatically make it so, and repeating it doesn't necessarily make it any truer.

-
I cried because I had no shoes, until I met a man who had no class.
rbernie is offline  
Old January 7, 2011, 01:14 PM   #25
KBintheSLC
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 30, 2007
Location: Stalingrad, CA
Posts: 3,174
Just out of curiosity, why don't we have a gun politics section here on THR? After all, gun rights and politics go hand in hand these days. I can't see how burying our heads in the sand about the issues will help promote our rights. If there is a dedicated section for it, it will greatly cut down on the number of closed/wasted threads around here.
__________________
I don't mind a courtroom full of attorneys working hard on my behalf. I do mind a legislature full of attorneys working hard on their own behalf. http://brasstard.com
KBintheSLC is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.