THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Rifle Country

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old December 3, 2009, 11:07 PM   #1
rizbunk77
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 25, 2005
Posts: 183
saiga 5.45, me no likey...

I sold off another rifle and bought a Saiga 5.45 and I am disappointed. I can't recommend to anyone. I'd get a different caliber long before I bought another one of these. First the sight seems to be canted a little. Not much but just enough to cause notice unfortunately. Second the overall feel is just cheaper. Alot more so than my Saiga 308 which I love. They really cut weight similar to the effort the Brits put forth on the #5 Mark I rifles. I believe that cutting the barrel down in diameter that much really hurts accuracy, which by the way is very average, not so good. Also the mags do wobble on this one alot more than you would expect. The two stage trigger sucks compared to a good single stage AR trigger. especially in rapid fire. Thats about it I guess. If I was looking for a 5.45 I'd get a different caliber in one of these especially the 308.
rizbunk77 is offline  
Old December 3, 2009, 11:16 PM   #2
Daemon688
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 31, 2004
Location: MN
Posts: 805
I'll take it off your hands, $100 to get rid of that headache of yours.
Daemon688 is offline  
Old December 3, 2009, 11:34 PM   #3
nalioth
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 9, 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 4,488
"Two stage trigger" ?

Huh?

Don't you mean "multiple stage trigger" ? Parts 7, 8, 9 and 10 constitute the "trigger" in a factory Saiga.


"Mag wobble"?

Does it reliably feed? If not, it's a non-issue.

"Canted sights"?

Can you zero it? Have you tried to zero it? If it's so canted, it won't zero, it's a reportable issue. If you can zero it, it's fine.


If you wanted a "pretty" rifle, you went after the wrong brand.

If you wanted a functional and durable rifle, and didn't care how pretty it was, you got the right one.

Welcome to the world of Russian military firearms - ugly and functional.
nalioth is offline  
Old December 3, 2009, 11:35 PM   #4
RedLion
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 8, 2007
Location: Land of 10,000 lakes
Posts: 356
I'd give you $150
__________________
"If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich."
-John F. Kennedy

You can't separate peace from freedom because no one can be at peace unless he has his Freedom. -Malcolm X (1925 - 1965)
RedLion is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 12:00 AM   #5
OrangePwrx9
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 30, 2009
Location: North of the Fingerlakes-NY
Posts: 303
I happen to like my Saigas (7.62x39 & .223) as issued. But if they were as disappointing as your 5.45 is, I'd view them as project rifles and do the AK conversion on them. If nothing else, you'll end up with an AK education and a very nice trigger.

What have you got to lose?

Checkout Saiga-12.com for advice and tutorials.
Bob
OrangePwrx9 is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 12:35 AM   #6
rangerruck
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 12, 2006
Location: Texas, baby!
Posts: 8,351
how old is it? If 30 days or less, i would take it back to the dealer. that saiga in 545 should be the bee's knees- should be as accurate, or more so , than a 223 saiga. And mags shouldn't be loose, and sight should not be canted; this is a factory made product, in sporter version, right? not converted at all, correct?

I am about 99% sure, that the bbls for the 223, 762.39, and 545 , are all the same diameter, with the 308 being the thicker bbl.
rangerruck is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 12:51 AM   #7
nalioth
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 9, 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 4,488
Quote:
Originally Posted by rangerruck
this is a factory made product
Yes, a RUSSIAN military factory.

As far as they're concerned, if it functions reliably and can be zeroed, they've done their job. The very misunderstood "mag wobble" and canted barrel fixtures are common in all Kalashnikovs.
nalioth is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 02:22 AM   #8
tju1973
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 25, 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 458
Quote:
Originally Posted by nalioth View Post
Yes, a RUSSIAN military factory.

As far as they're concerned, if it functions reliably and can be zeroed, they've done their job. The very misunderstood "mag wobble" and canted barrel fixtures are common in all Kalashnikovs.
Agreed-- My WASR has no mag wobble with SK metals and Bulgy bullet side, but many others wobble a bit-- and they all function as designed...I was lucky to have a CIA monkey build with no canted sights, but unless they are so canted you have to Kentucky windage the heck out of them, I would go with it....AKs aren't target rifles, and a MOM (minute of man) is all they are designed to do...
tju1973 is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 02:30 AM   #9
THE DARK KNIGHT
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 3, 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,390
Sounds like you bought an AK for all the wrong reasons.
THE DARK KNIGHT is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 05:52 AM   #10
Afy
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 31, 2006
Posts: 2,295
Want a well put together commie rifle get the Vz 58 or the Cz 858 they will not disappoint you.
Afy is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 06:00 AM   #11
Nuke8401
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 11, 2008
Location: Quaker Hill, CT
Posts: 148
Post #3, NALIOTH,

Those look like parts out of an old bumper jack.

I'm just saying.

Needless to say I don’t know Squat about a saiga.
__________________
David
Beware of the dying jackass' last kick (dying jackass)
Talken don't get it done. (The Duke)
It’s never too late to learn how to do it the right way. (Hank)
Nuke8401 is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 09:03 AM   #12
rizbunk77
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 25, 2005
Posts: 183
I am just comparing to the milled arsenals I have owned, which might be unfair. Its a two stage trigger because its an *rsenal conversion, which makes it a little more frustrating. For that kind of money you expect a straight front sight. I think in retrospect if I had picked one up a felt it before I ordered I would have thought twice definitely.
rizbunk77 is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 09:53 AM   #13
SSN Vet
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 3, 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 3,489
so it sounds like you bought an AK, no?

comparing .308 to 5.45 doesn't make much sense... to me at least.

oh, well... sorry to hear you're not pleased with your new rifle
__________________
_____________________________________________
ain't no slack in Fast Attack!

Quote:
the 2nd amendment has very, very little to do with sport and much, much to do with freedom.

Maine Constitution
Article 1, Section 16. To keep and bear arms.
Every citizen has a right to keep and bear arms and this right shall never be questioned.
SSN Vet is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 10:24 AM   #14
Norinco982lover
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 14, 2008
Location: South Central Kansas
Posts: 643
So it is a converted Saiga?

If there is a problem with the sights than send it back to the manufacturer.

I love my converted Saiga 7.62x39... I strongly doubt I would EVER sell it.

~Norinco
__________________
You can't get into a boxing match with a Norinco 982!
Norinco982lover is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 10:29 AM   #15
dom1104
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 3, 2007
Posts: 1,136
welcome to AKs, where you settle for less and tell yourself its because its "russian" and not meant to be anything other than functional.

And somehow thats cool.

But seriously, thats really how it is, its a crapshoot. Sometimes you get a nice one, sometimes you get a not so nice one, they almost always function and are rarely impressive in any other area.
dom1104 is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 10:42 AM   #16
Norinco982lover
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 14, 2008
Location: South Central Kansas
Posts: 643
Quote:
welcome to AKs, where you settle for less and tell yourself its because its "russian" and not meant to be anything other than functional.

And somehow thats cool.

But seriously, thats really how it is, its a crapshoot. Sometimes you get a nice one, sometimes you get a not so nice one, they almost always function and are rarely impressive in any other area.
Spoken like somebody who probably hasn't put very many rounds thru a Russian AK.



What's not to love? This gun cost me about $500 for everything you see above. And I converted it myself. It is great.
__________________
You can't get into a boxing match with a Norinco 982!
Norinco982lover is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 10:55 AM   #17
rangerruck
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 12, 2006
Location: Texas, baby!
Posts: 8,351
sounds like you got it converted, from Arsenal? I would beotch to them to the high Heavens, tell them how you have bought their products before, and none are like this... Again, especially return it to wherever bought, if under 30 days old.
rangerruck is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 06:38 PM   #18
atlanticfire
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 15, 2007
Location: Eastern Shore
Posts: 751
Not a Saiga fan. . . . .Although the Russian Vepr is somthing esle.
atlanticfire is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 07:06 PM   #19
Hammerhead6814
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 6, 2009
Posts: 543
I'll top all of these guys. I'll give you $200 to take that headache from you.
__________________
I love the smell of cosmoline in the morning.

Buying an American car is buying a series of problems.
Hammerhead6814 is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 07:29 PM   #20
M1key
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 18, 2007
Location: SW
Posts: 361
$210 here...

I own one in 5.45...unconverted, sights slightly canted, zeroes okay, trigger a little rough, '74 mags lock-up snug. Mounted a 1-3x scope and promptly shot 1 1/4 groups with Silver Bear, Wolf, and Bulgarian Wasp...

Where are you gonna get a rugged shooter like that for under $400?

Last edited by M1key; December 5, 2009 at 09:18 PM.
M1key is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 11:01 PM   #21
rizbunk77
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 25, 2005
Posts: 183
nerves are getting to me now....can't deal with rifle drama very well. I had this up for sale but don't know what to do.
I really and I mean really like my Saiga 308. I unconverted it and I think if it had a 2 inch longer barrel and were issued to our troops in WWII Patton might have called it the best battle implement ever.

Last edited by rizbunk77; December 5, 2009 at 12:05 AM.
rizbunk77 is offline  
Old December 4, 2009, 11:52 PM   #22
atlanticfire
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 15, 2007
Location: Eastern Shore
Posts: 751
Im sorry. . . . . . . .
atlanticfire is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.