Quantcast
whats so special about the HK P7? - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Handguns: Autoloaders

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old January 15, 2010, 10:18 PM   #1
Voland
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 5, 2008
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 277
whats so special about the HK P7?

Every time I see this pistol mentioned, people rave about it. It looks kinda odd to me. What makes this guy so good?

Thanks!
V.
Voland is offline  
Old January 15, 2010, 10:23 PM   #2
Quiet
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 29, 2007
Location: bouncing between the 909 & the 702
Posts: 3,050
__________________
"If someone has a gun and is trying to kill you, it would be reasonable to shoot back with your own gun.” - Dalai Lama (Seattle Times, 05-15-2001).
Quiet is online now  
Old January 16, 2010, 12:18 AM   #3
owlhoot
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 10, 2005
Posts: 922
I carried a P7 as an off duty weapon over 25 years ago. At the time it was the smallest, lightest 9mm on the market. It was extremely accurate and dependable and the trigger pull was very good. I wish I still had mine.
owlhoot is online now  
Old January 16, 2010, 12:47 AM   #4
earlthegoat2
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 28, 2008
Location: SE GA
Posts: 4,514
The ones who rave about it are the vocal minority. Generally speaking it is not that popular. Those who own them though praise them highly. As an owner of one myself, I agree with all the praise.

You can click my sig line to learn more about them. It is slightly biased towards the P7 but there is a great deal of information about their shortcomings as well.
__________________
Someone will always know more than you...unless your on the internet. Then everyone knows more than you.

Read The Snubby Revolver by Ed Lovette
earlthegoat2 is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 06:46 AM   #5
Peter M. Eick
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 28, 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,035
As others have pointed out, you either love them or hate them. I love mine. I have 3 of them. They are accurate, reliable and safe for carry. The key thing is that they used to be very expensive. Over $1000 used for a nice one. So folks that hated them, hated the price not the gun. Now that they are cheap because of the imports are flooding in, you have to wonder how many of those folks would have a different opinion.

Handle one some day. Feel the quality. They are lifetime investments in machined steel, not some injected modeled piece of plastic that some folks rave about yet I consider worthless.

See the difference?
__________________
10mm and 357SIG, the best thing to come along since the 38 super!
Peter M. Eick is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 07:24 AM   #6
usp9
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 17, 2005
Location: Bowling Green, Va
Posts: 3,574
Quote:
whats so special about the HK P7?
It's very thin, thus easy to conceal.
Small and compact, yet duty worthy.
It's very accurate, points naturally, thus makes shooting well easier.
It's very reliable.
It's very well made, quality material and machining.
Nice trigger.

Quiet, I've never seen that ad before...nice find and post.
__________________
"Remember the Alamo"
"December seventh, a date which will live..."
"Let's roll"
"Go Hokies"
usp9 is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 09:52 AM   #7
Voland
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 5, 2008
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 277
Well, they sound very practical and being sig, quality. I'm going to the indoor range today and hopefully they have one I can shoot.

Thanks all for the info. Also, it appears that theres another thread very similar to this one in the autoloaders so I am going to go read that one as well...

V.
Voland is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 10:00 AM   #8
highorder
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 7, 2007
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 4,349
Quote:
Well, they sound very practical and being sig, quality.
You mean HK quality, right?
__________________
"If I said it, I must have meant it; so I owe him an apology, or nothing at all." -Hunter S Thompson
highorder is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 10:11 AM   #9
AK103K
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 27, 2002
Posts: 5,747
I think those who have them know what they are, and those that dont, or who havent spent any real time with one dont.

The only things about them I found lacking, were that you pretty much have to dedicate yourself to the platform if you want to use it as a weapon. Its really not something you want to be switching back and forth with. Holster selection was the other, but that isnt as much of a problem today as it was when I had mine. You do have to make sure the holster covers and doenst contact the mag release though. If not, you'll keep finding the mag that was in the gun, on the front seat of your car (or worse, clattering to the ground just outside) when you get out.

Other than that, they are great pistols.
__________________
"If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?"

“The enemy is anybody who's going to get you killed, no matter which side he is on.” - Joseph Heller
AK103K is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 10:39 AM   #10
PX15
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 21, 2004
Location: SE Georgia
Posts: 1,522
AK103K:

And the concern for having the mag. accidentally released is only a consideration in the P7M8.

As I'm sure you know the mag. release on the P7 is in the European "heel" style, and cannot be accidentally released as can those of the P7M8.

I believe a considerable number of folks new to HK P7 ownership came by their P7's when the surplus Lower Saxony Police imports hit the market last year.

I know I could never afford a P7M8, but CDNN made it possible for me to get my first "A" grade P7, and my appreciation for that pistol encouraged me to "thin the herd" somewhat to finance another two..

As good as the P7 is, and I'd be the first to say it is very, very good. I have found, for my needs, the HK P2000sk is a better daily carry choice..

I think any "gun lover" (who loves the 9mm platform) needs to at least check out the P7, or P7M8.. Some folks instantly fall in love with the "squeezecocker", some absolutely hate it.

But you never hear anyone who has actually held, and shot one, say it's not a top quality pistol.

No offense,

Jesse

__________________
"Laus Deo"


(PX/PX15/Laserlips) all me..
PX15 is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 10:49 AM   #11
AK103K
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 27, 2002
Posts: 5,747
No, your right, the straight up P7 or PSP has the heel release.

Mine was a P7M13.

It wasnt expensive at all either, I only paid $450 for it new.
__________________
"If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?"

“The enemy is anybody who's going to get you killed, no matter which side he is on.” - Joseph Heller
AK103K is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 11:41 AM   #12
mokin
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 13, 2007
Location: Western Colorado
Posts: 916
An interesting thread.

I have been an HK fan for a long time so when I was in the market for a new pistol I looked at the P7. I remember when it came out it was highly praised. I guess the big deal was that the pistol had the trigger pull of a single action but you could still carry the pistol with a round in the chamber. This was in the days when law enforcement carried revolvers and folks were afraid to carry a 1911 cocked and locked. However, in the years since the P7 came out a lot of other pistols have come out in more calibers. For instance, I don't think Glock was around nor the .40 S&W. Although I ended up going with another pistol (I have since purchased a Browning High Power and a Glock) the P7 still intrigues me and I'd like to shoot one sometime.
mokin is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 03:58 PM   #13
Rexster
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 25, 2007
Location: SE Texas
Posts: 2,876
There is a current P7 discussion in the autopistol forum here on THR.
__________________
Have Colts, will travel.
Rexster is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 04:58 PM   #14
NinjaFeint
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 2, 2009
Location: CT
Posts: 649
I hate to say it but I have been underwhelmed by this pistol. I heard so many things about it, then I shot a friends and it was just another gun. I understand the innovations it made at the time it came out but the only difference I noticed is "squeeze cockin".

I think it is just one of those things, it's either that special kind of cool for you or it isn't. For me it isn't but I will say it's a well made gun. Thing is, there are a lot of well made guns I would rather have. If it does it for you then all the more power to you.

To the OP, put your fingerprints on one and see how it feels for you. Just my two cents.
__________________
“Individually, we are one drop. Together, we are an ocean.” ~ Ryunosuke Satoro
NinjaFeint is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 06:32 PM   #15
TheDriver
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 26, 2007
Location: KY
Posts: 214
I don't really care for the operation, and swapping mags with the heel release is a pain.

HOWEVER - it is CRAZY accurate, and very obviously well-made.
TheDriver is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 07:39 PM   #16
Manco
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 28, 2009
Posts: 1,988
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter M. Eick View Post
As others have pointed out, you either love them or hate them.
I guess there are exceptions to every rule because while I like this design concept in theory, I can't say that I strongly "love" it or hate it. Admittedly, I've never fired a P7, but since I could never get completely comfortable with grip safeties on other handguns, I seriously doubt that I'd find squeezing the cocking lever any better. It's a personal thing, but the concept is still a good one and very practical for many people, in my opinion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter M. Eick View Post
Handle one some day. Feel the quality. They are lifetime investments in machined steel, not some injected modeled piece of plastic that some folks rave about yet I consider worthless.

See the difference?
Funny, I used to detest the very notion of plastic pistols until I tried several and ended up buying one that I've been very happy with ever since.
Manco is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 07:52 PM   #17
oneounceload
member
 
 
Join Date: April 24, 2008
Location: Hot and Humid FL
Posts: 15,710
My P7 is an excellent gun, capable of better accuracy than I am, well made, good looking, and just fun to shoot
oneounceload is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 08:18 PM   #18
earlthegoat2
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 28, 2008
Location: SE GA
Posts: 4,514
I am a primary revovler shooter. The transition to the P7 took nothing at all. Depressing the cocking lever is not something that needs to be learned if you do in fact squeeze on the grip when firing any pistol.

The fact that the cocking lever functions to cock the pistol, decock the pistol, act as the slide release, and is a manual safety is where confusion in the manual of arms starts to set in. It is nice that you can take it off safe and cock the striker at the same time as well as decock it and put it on safe at the same time and with the same motion. It is truly a slide release as opposed to the slide lock lever that is typical on other pistols. It is the only pistol that has a slide release that is designed to be used as a slide release unlike on another pistol where the slide lock lever CAN function as a slide release but in a cumbersome way. Most do not know it but these pistols are designed to be slingshotted after inserting a fresh magazine and not by pressing down on the slide release lever.

The P7 method is faster and easier. Like I say though, there also is a host of disadvantages that can be read up on elsewhere. Like clicking the link below.

Or this one.
__________________
Someone will always know more than you...unless your on the internet. Then everyone knows more than you.

Read The Snubby Revolver by Ed Lovette
earlthegoat2 is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 08:46 PM   #19
AK103K
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 27, 2002
Posts: 5,747
Quote:
Depressing the cocking lever is not something that needs to be learned if you do in fact squeeze on the grip when firing any pistol.
Well, sort of. You do have to "cock" the pistol, which initially takes extra effort than just a normal grip. Once you pass that break point, it takes no effort at all to keep the gun cocked.

This is one reason I think its not a good idea to switch back and forth between the P7's and all others. With the P7's, your brain needs to be wired for that initial cocking.
__________________
"If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?"

“The enemy is anybody who's going to get you killed, no matter which side he is on.” - Joseph Heller
AK103K is offline  
Old January 16, 2010, 08:51 PM   #20
Rodentman
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 22, 2008
Location: MN
Posts: 813
I had mine refinished by Robar in Phoenix. I consider the $ have in it comparable to a high quality pistol such as a current HK or Sig model. I don't think the $700 I paid + $300 for the refinishing to be outrageous. It will definitely outlast me.

__________________
A Korth is a Korth of Korth of Korth.

Member NRA
Rodentman is offline  
Old January 19, 2010, 12:19 AM   #21
Tom2112
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 18, 2010
Posts: 7
The P7 is definitely and interesting gun. I would love to have a P7M13 or even an M8. I don't think I would bother with the A models and the odd magazine release. I've fired my friend's P7M8 and it is a sweet pistol. I've always been an HK fan, so I'm probably biased. But even so, I wouldn't carry the P7. I never fel comfortable with the squeeze cocking. Despite the ever-so-slight amount of pressure it takes to keep it cocked, I found it distracting and annoying. I'd still like to have one, as they are a landmark in firearm innovation.
Tom2112 is offline  
Old January 19, 2010, 12:38 AM   #22
rmfnla
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 14, 2007
Posts: 700
I'm another who was not impressed.

I was a working gunsmith when these were introduced so I had no trouble getting range time with one. Nicely made, but it just didn't hit me with the "gotta have one" stick.
__________________
"Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here..."

NRA Life Member
rmfnla is offline  
Old January 19, 2010, 12:46 AM   #23
HorseSoldier
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 13, 2006
Location: Anchorage, AK
Posts: 5,297
I've never been quite sold enough on them to fork over the money for one, but I played with the half dozen my last unit had in our foreign weapons set whenever I got the chance. I thought they were remarkably accurate and fast handling, though the manual of arms took a little getting used to. Much more interesting than HK's pistols since they discovered polymer frames and such.
HorseSoldier is offline  
Old January 19, 2010, 01:06 AM   #24
Starcheck55
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 20, 2008
Posts: 164
A more elegant weapon for a more civilized age.
Starcheck55 is offline  
Old January 19, 2010, 08:19 AM   #25
jimk66
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 30, 2006
Location: Florida, USA
Posts: 142
P7's

Just fire a couple of magazines thru a P7 or P7M8 and the unbelievable little pistols will speak for themselves. No words will be necessary except where a fellow might find one.
JimK
jimk66 is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2016 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.