Quantcast
Which 1911 should I get? - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Handguns: Autoloaders

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 7, 2014, 05:26 PM   #1
acman
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 16, 2014
Posts: 36
Which 1911 should I get?

Hello I will be getting a 1911 soon and I would like to hear some opinions about which one to get. I have large hands and a budget of roughly 1000 dollars. I have been looking at Ruger, Colt, and Springfield. I will be using it for target practice. Thanks.
acman is offline  
Old August 7, 2014, 05:42 PM   #2
460Kodiak
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 12, 2011
Location: In a place.....by cool stuff.
Posts: 2,665
I suggest looking at Sig Sauer and S&W too.
__________________
Me........ "I need a screen name."
Friend.... "What's your favorite cartridge?"
Me........ "460 magnum."
Friend.... "You should be 460Kodiak....... yeah"
Me........ "Great...... now I have to grow a mullet."
460Kodiak is offline  
Old August 7, 2014, 06:25 PM   #3
1prcntr
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 10, 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 92
+1 on the Sig. Look at the Traditional models if you do not want the square Sig profile slide. You get a lot of features for a good price. The trigger on my Tac-Ops Traditional was much better feeling to me than the Rugers, Colts I've handled at my LGS. Springfields were good as well. Also, hard to beat a Range Officer for an entry level 1991 in my opinion. I just picked up an STI Duty One 5.0 for just a few dollars more. All I can say is "wow". Just be ready for the ailments of the 1911 bug.......
1prcntr is offline  
Old August 7, 2014, 06:48 PM   #4
JTQ
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 6, 2009
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 3,565
Quote:
acman wrote,
I will be using it for target practice.
Springfield Range Officer.

I actually spend a lot of bandwidth trying to talk folks out of the Range Officer due to the guns adjustable sights. I don't think they belong on a 1911 and the sight cut is different than on a fixed sight model severely limiting your after market sight options. However, if you are only going to use it for target practice, there is an advantage to having adjustable sights and the Springfield Range Officer would be an excellent choice for that application.
JTQ is online now  
Old August 7, 2014, 07:20 PM   #5
jhb
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 26, 2010
Location: dixie, but some call it florida
Posts: 161
I like my colts....but then again I like my tisas 300 and change gun too. Go to lgs with lots of stock and brands and put them in your hand and see which makes sense to you.
__________________
-NRA benefactor life member - Gun owners of america life member - Second amendment foundation life member - Florida carry member - Knife rights member
jhb is online now  
Old August 7, 2014, 08:15 PM   #6
Sauer Grapes
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 19, 2009
Location: S.E. PA.
Posts: 1,030
I have a couple Colts, Springers and a S&W. No complaints with any of them. Accuracy wise, the Colt Gold Cup and the SA Range Officer are probably a little better than the others. I'd hate to live on the difference though.
__________________
I have all the guns I need, just not all that I think I need.
Sauer Grapes is offline  
Old August 7, 2014, 08:38 PM   #7
OneSevenDeuce
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 5, 2014
Posts: 71
Springfield makes a darn good product for the money. I've been lusting over the new Range Officer Compact for a while now. I also have a Kimber Custom HD II. Some people seem to have something against Kimbers, but I've never had a problem with any of the ones I have owned, and I would never get rid of my HD II.
OneSevenDeuce is offline  
Old August 7, 2014, 08:44 PM   #8
Hurryin' Hoosier
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 22, 2012
Location: Columbus, Indiana
Posts: 568
Quote:
Originally Posted by acman View Post
Hello I will be getting a 1911 soon and I would like to hear some opinions about which one to get. I have large hands and a budget of roughly 1000 dollars. I have been looking at Ruger, Colt, and Springfield. I will be using it for target practice. Thanks.
I had a slightly tighter budget with which to operate and got an Auto-Ordnance 1911A1. But, I'll tell you what - I'd just as soon have it as guns costing twice as much.
__________________
"We're not going to Moscow. It's Czechoslovakia. It's like going into Wisconsin."
Hurryin' Hoosier is offline  
Old August 7, 2014, 09:09 PM   #9
tommy.duncan
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 30, 2013
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 358
I agree with the Colt and Kimber, my cheap beater is a Regent. It is accurate and it fires anything I put into the mag.
__________________
"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds."
Albert Einstein

10mm Club Member #56
tommy.duncan is offline  
Old August 7, 2014, 10:55 PM   #10
Steve CT
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 19, 2011
Location: Central CT
Posts: 446
I own two 1911's, a Dan Wesson PM-1S and a substantially modified Springfield LW Commander. For a "target" type gun (adjustable rear sight) I'd look at the Range Officer.

I think the Ruger SR 1911 is the best value available right now in the 1911 market
__________________
http://www.danwessonforum.com/
Steve CT is offline  
Old August 7, 2014, 10:59 PM   #11
wlewisiii
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 1, 2010
Location: Hayward, WI
Posts: 1,547
RIA Tactical FS and $500 in ammo to learn how to use it.

Then see if you actually want anything more expensive.
__________________
"You better watch out, what you wish for
It better be worth it, so much to die for."
Hole
wlewisiii is offline  
Old August 7, 2014, 11:02 PM   #12
Vonderek
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 9, 2006
Posts: 1,275
If you are only going to get one, get a Colt
Vonderek is offline  
Old August 8, 2014, 12:33 AM   #13
raze
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 3, 2011
Location: Danbury, Ct
Posts: 84
Springfield range officer or sti Trojan/ Spartan. Or keep your eyes out for used one scored a lightly used les baer thunder ranch special for 1k not too long ago
raze is offline  
Old August 8, 2014, 04:03 AM   #14
JDR
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 11, 2013
Posts: 285
I have a Dan Wesson Valor Black Duty Coat finish which is a fantastic range pistol, I shoot some really great targets with it, I bought this one used for a good price. I have an SW1911 that is also a very good range gun. I also agree that the Ruger SR1911 is probably the best 1911 value on the market right now, I have a commander length that is just a great range and carry pistol.
JDR is offline  
Old August 8, 2014, 05:58 AM   #15
zerobarrier
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: November 17, 2013
Location: Northwest PA
Posts: 474
I have a Kimber and love it. Plus they have like 20+ different models with 3", 4", or 5" barrels.
zerobarrier is offline  
Old August 8, 2014, 06:28 AM   #16
bannockburn
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 24, 2007
Posts: 7,199
I love all of my Colts along with my SA M1911A1. At the lower end of the price spectrum I think RIA offers a good value for your money.
__________________
"An elegant weapon for a more civilized age."-Obi Wan Kenobi
bannockburn is offline  
Old August 8, 2014, 06:40 AM   #17
critter
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: southeast AR
Posts: 3,003
Do not overlook the Ruger SR1911. Really good gun for the money.
__________________
<-------------------------------->
1911
critter is offline  
Old August 8, 2014, 07:33 AM   #18
Fiv3r
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 30, 2009
Posts: 915
I've got a loaded Springfield1911 with adjustable sites. I didn't think I would like the non-combat sites, but it resulted in the most accurate tack driving pistol in my collection. While they aren't snag-free, its draws and points naturally.
Fiv3r is offline  
Old August 8, 2014, 07:38 AM   #19
frankiestoys
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 16, 2009
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 772
STI Trojan , Sig and Springfield
__________________
GO NAVY !
frankiestoys is offline  
Old August 8, 2014, 09:24 AM   #20
maxxhavoc
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 8, 2008
Posts: 114
Personally, I would handle a few and see what you like/don't like about them feature-wise and let that narrow the options.

For instance, I don't like commander hammers or beavertails. The older full-size hammer looks better, and if I want to use it to cock/decock it just works better. If I carry it, the beavertail pokes into my side.

I also prefer not to have a full-length guide rod on a fullsize. Extra weight, extra effort to clean, never noticed any incredible accuracy benefits.

Adjustable sights are great for a range gun, but if you take it camping/hiking fixed sights are more reliable and less likely to snag.

Sight picture is a huge difference as well. GI sights are virtually snag-free coming out of a holster but the sight picture is pretty bad.

Flat/Arched mainspring housing - you have to hold and shoot one to know which you prefer.

Firing pin safety - some have it, some don't. May make it safer, may make it less reliable. I prefer the non-safety variety.

I have Kimber, RIA, and Springfield 1911's. All are equally reliable, Springfield is the most accurate, and RIA and Springfield have lifetime warranties. I would not hesitate to buy another Springfield or RIA again.
maxxhavoc is offline  
Old August 8, 2014, 09:37 AM   #21
Captain33036
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 20, 2009
Posts: 308
I have had a few 1911's and I wish I had kept every one of them. RIA, Kimber, SA, SIG, Colt, STI.

Do not think you will find a Colt for under 1000 that would be the best range gun.

STI's are great guns, great shooters, but each of mine were difficult to do any work on. Nothing was drop in. And...keep in mind that STI's have ramped barrels....field stripping is a PITA, compared with other 1911's. The Trojan would probably be your best bet. Not sure if they are under 1000.

Had two SIG's and they were very accurate. However, one had the slide slightly angled to one side and SIG's have the same series 80 safety system that Colt has.

Kimber's get a bad rap, I do not know why. I have had one in each of their 3 sizes. All were great shooters and probably the best value. They also all had the best triggers out of the box.

The Springfield Armory Range Officer is tough to beat. I have one in 9mm and had one in .45 acp. Cannot beat the accuracy, out of the box. Each was so 1911 standard, that every part I ever got was completely drop in.

[Side note: Unlike the RO series, lower model SA's did not all have great triggers and I am unsure of their slide to frame fit. The RO line is supposedly put together differently]

Currently, my pride of ownership 1911 is a Colt. My range gun is a SA RO 9mm. Now, highly modified.

You should be able to get a SA RO for $800. Then spend the $200 on a tritium or FO front sight, Les Baer match hammer/sear and VZ grips. Later, Cerakote the slide and frame and it will look like a higher end SA.

Hope this helps

Best

J
Captain33036 is offline  
Old August 8, 2014, 10:12 AM   #22
Mainsail
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 16, 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,632
I vote Sig Sauer. I own two of them now and they have all the features you want and need, and none of the ones you don't. No plastic MSH, no ambi safety, no FLGR. Great fit & finish, perfect function, fantastic trigger.

Great for the range and carry.
__________________
"When I cleaned up my diction, I had nothing left to say."
Mainsail is offline  
Old August 8, 2014, 11:35 AM   #23
Delmar
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 26, 2002
Location: Cedar Bluff, VA
Posts: 1,888
I received a brand new Colt Series 80 blued Government model for Fathers Day this year, and I was very impressed with the overall fit and accuracy of the weapon.
Fixed 3 dot sights line up well and are easy to see and no malfunction in the 800 rounds or so of mixed LSWCs and various HPs.
There was just a touch of creep in the trigger press and I carefully stoned that away.
I did add a flat bottomed firing pin stop as a personal preference but it didn't need it for reliability. It did help the ejection pattern-originally it scattered the empties over a wide area but now puts them in a small circle.
Delmar is offline  
Old August 8, 2014, 11:44 AM   #24
sfed
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 16, 2012
Posts: 108
Chalk up one more vote for the Sig Sauer 1911, has to be one of the more accurate ones available. Just my opinion.
__________________
_________________
When seconds count the police are only minutes away
NRA Lifetime Membership
sfed is offline  
Old August 8, 2014, 06:44 PM   #25
tuj
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 2, 2011
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 1,544
My vote is STI Trojan. I see no reason to go for a Series 80 type gun when the 70 is perfectly safe.

BTW, I have an STI Spartan and field stripping is in no way a PITA; it is completely like any other standard 1911.
tuj is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.