|
|||||||
| Welcome to THR |
| You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: October 24, 2011
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 270
|
Any SIG P938 owners?
I'm wondering if any of you out there own one of these fine-looking guns, and if so how do you carry it? I started off pocket carrying a G26 but in the end, it was just too big. Uncomfortably wide for pocket carry. Not too long, not too tall, just too thick. Does the 938 suffer from the same deficiency, or does it lend towards being a nice pocket gun? Obviously it's not as small as an LCP, but it doesn't necessarily have to be, either. |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: July 28, 2007
Location: central Florida
Posts: 426
|
I have one, and I want to love it so bad, but it is not reliable enough for me. Been back to Sig. Still failure to extract every 100 or so rounds, and that is a hard one to clear quickly. Some stovepipes too. It is also hard on my hand, due to placement of safety cutting into base of thumb and trigger finger during recoil.
Everything else I like, good trigger, great sights, accurate. I just can't deal with a pistol that won't go bang all the time. I have used up 700 rounds of my dwindling 9mm ammo trying to break it in and I gave up. I know some others have had better luck, but search around and my story isn't unusual. For that price it should be reliable. Just my experience, not knocking anyone who got a good one. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: October 26, 2010
Location: dixie, but some call it florida
Posts: 90
|
Is your a 2013 made? Just curious as I read the pre 2013s were problematic, like the 1st gen p238s....supposedly they got 'em fixed now. Granted this is reading, I got no idea....but I do have 2 p238s and both went back to sig...one had to go back 2 times, but...now they run.
Thanks in advance for the feedback.
__________________
-NRA benefactor life member - Gun owners of america life member - Second amendment foundation life member - Florida carry member - Knife rights member |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: June 14, 2010
Posts: 27
|
I have one, my wife has one, a friend has one. All dead nuts reliable and would buy them again in a heartbeat.
They make an excellent pocket carry firearm, just make sure you get a quality holster. Which model are you looking at? |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Posts: 631
|
Works fine in a jeans pocket in a Ritchie pocket holster. Loaded with six 124 grain Gold Dots in the holster as pictured, the overall weight is 23 ounces. The double mag pouch with 2 loaded six round magazines weighs 10.4 ounces.
![]() If you go that route, be sure to get a recently manufactured gun. I had problems with a 3 digit serial numbered gun, but Sig replaced it with a recent gun that has been 100% for about 375 rounds. Run it fairly wet (a common suggestion for Sigs in general) with the lube that comes with the gun, use full power ammo, and don’t try to go through a Thunder Ranch class without cleaning. Doing these things could forestall the usual gripes I have seen about the gun. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: July 28, 2007
Location: central Florida
Posts: 426
|
I got it in 2012. You make me hopeful though, so I will send it back again. If it will run, I would happily pay a smith to round the back edges of the safety levers.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: December 13, 2011
Location: Austin
Posts: 220
|
I have one but use an iwb holster for it.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: April 9, 2013
Location: Sharon PA
Posts: 24
|
I got mine Jan 13. I put 200 rounds thru it and had 0 problems. Tullammo 115, bulk 124, and federal 147 jhp. I read that sig recommends 124 grain, so although I had no problems, I tried black hills 124 hp. That is what I carry in mine and I'm confident with it. Get the extended mag if you can. Still conceals well, and your pinky wont be left out. Ive been using 1911 iwb holsters and they work great. Even my open bottom cz75 holsters work great although the cz is wider.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: southeast AR
Posts: 2,727
|
I have one. Took it out and put 50 rounds through it before I cleaned or lubed it. Out of the box, I had 3-4 failures. Brought it home, cleaned and lubed it. Never a failure of ANY kind since. Accurate, reliable, easy to conceal AND full-sized 9mm. Nice.
I carry it IWB crossdraw in a home-made holster. Love the thing.
__________________
<--------------------------------> 1911 |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: December 29, 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 5,332
|
This gun is on my short list. How is it to shoot?
__________________
Pilot |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: October 24, 2011
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 270
|
Quote:
Maybe if I manage to lose weight and get in shape like I've been telling myself I'm going to do for the last 5 years I'll end up with a P220 or a bobtailed commander, but that's not likely. Plus, I've just always wanted to own a SIG. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: June 14, 2010
Posts: 27
|
Low pants and love handles?
Try the Comp-Tac Infidel holster. I carry a P220 SAS in one and can almost forget it is there at times. Pocket carry will drag your pants down same as IWB. the P938 is light which helps a bit but getting the weight off your hip and into your pocket does little to help keep your pants up. A good belt should help quite a bit. The thing that really hooked me on the P938 is it shoots like a full size pistol. Nice sights, decent grips and after a few hundred rounds a pretty decent trigger. As with most things Sig has been releasing, they let the consumer do a lot of their beta testing. The P938 should have all the bugs worked out of it by now. |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: April 9, 2013
Location: Sharon PA
Posts: 24
|
Its all metal, so its fairly easy on recoil. The night sights are easy to bring back on target. A little snappy, but I love the trigger. Not DA. Carry cocked and locked 1911 style.
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: April 24, 2013
Posts: 11
|
I got a P938 that was made early 2013 and it has not had one hiccup. I love this little 9mm and also have the P238. I have all kinds of holsters for both but I use the Remora holster the most. ImageUploadedByTapatalk1368194207.432450.jpg
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: October 8, 2006
Posts: 45
|
Right out of the box my 938 stovepiped on every shot. I dumped it fast. Replaced it with a Kahr Mk Nine Elite which is totally reliable.
__________________
The meek shall inherit the Gulag. |
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Posts: 631
|
Born on date for the Sig? I tried a "broken in" .45 Kahr once with hardball and had 3 completely different types of problems in under 25 rounds. Then I went on a Kahr forum and read pages and pages of pinned "self-fixit" tips to deal with all the problems I encountered. It made my first P938 look like a precision instrument.
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: July 1, 2005
Location: Warrenton, MO
Posts: 243
|
I just picked up a P938 today, the Blackwood model. It's a 24xxx serial number so I'm thinking it's recent manufacture.
Already have a P238 Copperhead model that's a great shooter so I'm hoping this one will be as well. I'll lube it up before shooting it tomorrow.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
| IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER |
| Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages. |