![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 678
|
Factors for reliability--and who's got them
What do you think are the factors that account for a handgun's reliability--or lack thereof? And which manufacturer best takes these into account?
For example: Feed ramp angle chamber support relationship between magazine-top level and chamber Feed ramp on frame or on barrel Method of action of safety (blocking sear or trigger) Method of cycling (locked/blowback) Magazine quality
__________________
"Kid, watch out for the 'conservative' who decries big government and then tells you what you can put in your body, when you should pray, and where you can put your johnson. And kid, follow the money." |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: December 27, 2002
Location: Kanuckistan
Posts: 46
|
Quote:
I concur. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 678
|
OK, OK, forget the manufacturers. What about the factors themselves? I will say one thing about your P7: the relationship between the top cartridge in the magazine and the chamber probably contributes to feeding reliability.
I also think it's interesting that the 1911 was designed to have a gap between the feed ramp and barrel.
__________________
"Kid, watch out for the 'conservative' who decries big government and then tells you what you can put in your body, when you should pray, and where you can put your johnson. And kid, follow the money." |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 397
|
My Glock G-22 was used when I bought it. I've put over 20,000 rounds thru it. I honestly can't remember a single failure with factory ammo. I have never replaced a part on this pistol (I did add a LazerMax).
I've also had other Glocks with perfect records but fewer rounds. Flame away. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|