Quantcast
40S&W / 10mm sabot rounds using 9mm/30 cal bullets? - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Ammunition, Gear, and Firearm Help > Handloading and Reloading

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 10, 2010, 03:57 PM   #1
bds
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 10, 2010
Posts: 10,622
40S&W / 10mm sabot rounds using 9mm/30 cal bullets?

I recall reading an article on 308/30-06 sabot rounds using .223 projectiles that produced insane terminal ballistics.

Anyone hear or do any testing on 40S&W/10mm sabot rounds using 9mm/30 caliber bullets?

I know that .357 Sig and 9x25 Dillon rounds exist.

The use of sabots would make use of more readily available 40S&W/10mm brass without a barrel change.
__________________
- I only do what the voices in my wife’s head tell her to tell me to do
- Accuracy is everything and holes on target speak volumes
- Vendors offering 5% THR discount
- Revelation 19:11
bds is offline  
Old October 11, 2010, 02:24 PM   #2
cougar1717
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 19, 2007
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 625
I believe you are thinking about the Remington Accelerator rifle ammo, which I'm pretty sure has been discontinued. I have seen setups for using .224 bullets in a 7.62x25, but finding sabots in the correct size may be difficult. At least .224 to .308 was available and .44 to .500 is readily available due to muzzleloading, but .355 to .400 is an oddball size. Either way, the biggest problems you will encounter will be 1) getting a semi-auto to feed correctly and 2) accuracy. Those issues are averted by using bullets of the correct diameter for the cartridge.
__________________
Because even the good things I do aren't enough. http://gospeljourney.com/
cougar1717 is offline  
Old June 20, 2015, 01:53 PM   #3
bds
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 10, 2010
Posts: 10,622
With 3D printers, couldn't I make some 40-9mm sabots?

I know I could push 124/125 gr bullets to 1450+fps with 9 Major loads but would feel uncomfortable reusing those brass.

With 40S&W/9mm sabots, brass is more plentiful and readily reusable. I am thinking at least 357Sig level velocities with 124/125 gr bullets.

Any thoughts?
__________________
- I only do what the voices in my wife’s head tell her to tell me to do
- Accuracy is everything and holes on target speak volumes
- Vendors offering 5% THR discount
- Revelation 19:11
bds is offline  
Old June 20, 2015, 02:09 PM   #4
ReloaderFred
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 28, 2005
Location: Oregon Coast
Posts: 5,184
I experimented with the sabot loads in rifles back in the late 1980's, but never found them viable in the accuracy department. That was using .308 to .224 sabots. I've still got some of the sabots from that venture around here someplace.

I don't believe I've ever seen a .38/9mm to .400/10mm sabot, but I suppose you could make them on a 3D printer. My concern would be the material they were made from. If it's too soft, it will strip through the rifling and any chance at accuracy would be lost.

I've got both 357 Sig and 9x25 Dillon handguns, and that's a whole lot easier to do than sabots. Of course, that's just my opinion, and it didn't cost anything, so it's worth what you paid......

Hope this helps.

Fred
__________________
After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn't do it. - William S. Burroughs
ReloaderFred is offline  
Old June 21, 2015, 12:26 AM   #5
rsrocket1
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Posts: 1,025
The accelerator lives on!

3500 fps in 30-30 or 4200 fps in 30-06

I've been toying with the idea of trying these out for a while, but have run into too many other projects in the mean time (muzzle loading with sabots, shotgun slug loading, powder coating).

You can buy .45 cal sabots for 40 cal bullets but I don't know how they would behave in an autoloader.
rsrocket1 is offline  
Old June 22, 2015, 06:13 AM   #6
tightgroup tiger
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 20, 2011
Location: Peidmont/Triad, NC
Posts: 1,884
I had the same experience Reloader Fred had. They were pretty lacking in the accuracy dept.

I had 30-30 accelerators, they had reduced recoil and about a 5" group at 100 yds from a 1 MOA rifle. After I saw that I re-directed the money I was spending and moved on to a different project.
tightgroup tiger is offline  
Old June 22, 2015, 03:00 PM   #7
g.willikers
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 25, 2007
Posts: 1,027
bds,
Why not give it a try.
The worst that can happen is that the experiment will keep you off the streets and out of the bars for awhile.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious, son, it ain't no how permanent."
g.willikers is offline  
Old June 22, 2015, 03:19 PM   #8
bds
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 10, 2010
Posts: 10,622
g.willikers, I need to buy a 3D printer first or have someone make them for me.
bds is offline  
Old June 22, 2015, 03:30 PM   #9
Malamute
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 12, 2004
Location: Rocky Mts
Posts: 2,078
In the 80's there was somebody making sabots in 44/38 size. The local gun shop guy had some given to him to try by the manufacturers, he gave them to me. I followed the directions, including having the gun as clean as possible, and followed their load data. Accuracy was pretty poor, and left plastic crud in the bore of my Smith 29.

Good luck if you try it, so far nobody has gotten it right, or consistantly right and giving reliable results in a variety of guns, including Remington.

I imagine the type of plastic, or more likely teflon, would have to be just right.
__________________
"It amazes me that people "think" themselves into helplessness."
Bartholomew Roberts

"...always endeavour to raise your own standards."
Arfin Greebly

Isn't it amazing how many people post without reading the thread?
Malamute is offline  
Old June 23, 2015, 09:56 AM   #10
rsrocket1
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Posts: 1,025
Quote:
I imagine the type of plastic, or more likely teflon, would have to be just right.
Makes sense. I use sabots in my muzzleloader and they are the most accurate projectiles I've shot (so far). However, the sabots are already firmly engraved in the rifling as the bullet goes down into the muzzle and there is no transition from a cartridge into the barrel.
rsrocket1 is offline  
Old June 23, 2015, 03:47 PM   #11
50 Shooter
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: SoCal PRK
Posts: 2,344
The problem with accuracy is due to centering the bullet in the sabot and keeping it centered all the way out the barrel.

I have some military .50 BMG Sabot rounds, they're made to extremely tight tolerances. Not these after market ones that are loose and wobble in the sabot. If you can't get these types of tolerances then don't waste your time and money.

I have about a dozen (factory) .30-06 accelerators if anyone wants to buy them, PM me to keep it out of the thread.
__________________
Generals gathered in their masses
Just like witches at black masses
Evil minds that plot destruction
Sorcerers of death's construction
In the fields the bodies burning
As the war machine keeps turning
Death and hatred to mankind
Poisoning their brainwashed minds, oh lord yeah!
50 Shooter is offline  
Old June 23, 2015, 03:54 PM   #12
TimSr
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 13, 2015
Location: Wayne co. Ohio
Posts: 543
I still have a box of 30-30 accelerators. I also used the 30-06 ones. You get .223 velocities with 30 carbine accuracy which is why they were discontinued. The .308" 100gr Plinkers and Varminters, and 30 carbine bullets were more accurrate from my 30-30 and '06.

I don't see the point in using them for pistol rounds. If you want 9mm, get a 9mm and buy 9mm ammo at fraction of the cost of handloading sabots.
TimSr is offline  
Old June 23, 2015, 05:55 PM   #13
Elkins45
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 25, 2009
Location: Northern KY
Posts: 2,235
How about paper patching a .358 bullet up to .401? How thick is cardstock? A couple of wraps might do it.

I had an idea to make homemade sabots from paper mâché and glue, but like many of my ideas it remains just a thought experiment at this point.
__________________
NRA Endowment Member

Just because a handful of people on the Internet share an opinion doesn't prove it is correct.
Elkins45 is offline  
Old June 23, 2015, 08:05 PM   #14
bds
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 10, 2010
Posts: 10,622
My goal was to duplicate 9 Major loads which push 124 gr bullet to 1450+ fps but without abusing brass that I feel uncomfortable reusing and instead use plentiful 40S&W brass which will be readily reloadable with cheaper 9mm bullets. I was thinking of using RMR HM bullets rated to 1500 fps.

I can work on alternate sabot ideas until 3D printing option is available.

And this would be for pistol loads to 15 yards for fun/plinking so MOA rifle accuracy won't be necessary.
bds is offline  
Old June 24, 2015, 10:46 AM   #15
moxie
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 30, 2002
Location: Erath Co., TX
Posts: 2,863
While you might get that few extra hundred fps (external ballistics) with a sabot, the "terminal ballistics," or effect of the bullet on the target, might actually suffer if the bullet isn't designed to function at that impact velocity. Depending on design, it could over/under penetrate, fragment, or skew radically off to one side or the other. If all you are doing is plinking or punching holes in paper, terminal ballistics is irrelevant.
__________________
"If you have to shoot...shoot...don't talk." Tuco

U.S. Air Force Munitions, 1969-1992
Vietnam, 1972-1973
moxie is offline  
Old June 24, 2015, 11:49 AM   #16
TimSr
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 13, 2015
Location: Wayne co. Ohio
Posts: 543
Quote:
My goal was to duplicate 9 Major loads which push 124 gr bullet to 1450+ fps but without abusing brass that I feel uncomfortable reusing and instead use plentiful 40S&W brass which will be readily reloadable with cheaper 9mm bullets. I was thinking of using RMR HM bullets rated to 1500 fps.

And this would be for pistol loads to 15 yards for fun/plinking so MOA rifle accuracy won't be necessary.
This explanation is even more perplexing to me.

I'm getting 1350fps with 124gr SWC out of my 9mm now. What is it you would like this saboted 9mm bullet do from a .40 at 15 yards at 1450fps that mine won't do at 1350? I sounds like you are going to a lot of trouble and expense to save buying 9mm brass, which ranges are giving away at scrap prices.


FYI, you are going to have a tough time trying to 3d print with the type plastic used for sabots.
TimSr is offline  
Old June 24, 2015, 12:18 PM   #17
blarby
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: February 25, 2011
Location: JC, Oregon
Posts: 4,851
I think drilling the sabots out of Delrin would be much faster and cheaper than a 3d printer.

I'd be worried about chamber pressure turning your printer sabots into dust.

They've already necked down a 40 to 35, BDS.... it's called the 357 sig
__________________
www.gunrunnerarms.com
blarby is offline  
Old June 24, 2015, 12:32 PM   #18
Elkins45
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 25, 2009
Location: Northern KY
Posts: 2,235
Sounds like you just need to buy an aftermarket 357 Sig barrel.
__________________
NRA Endowment Member

Just because a handful of people on the Internet share an opinion doesn't prove it is correct.
Elkins45 is offline  
Old June 24, 2015, 12:34 PM   #19
Trek
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 22, 2011
Posts: 35
TimSr,
Did you actually chronograph the 30-06 accellerators and find that they only give about 3100 FPS velocity? The specifications I read say that they will deliver over 4000 FPS velocity, which is about 22 Swift velocities, not 223 velocities.
Trek is offline  
Old June 24, 2015, 12:48 PM   #20
Trek
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 22, 2011
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimSr View Post
This explanation is even more perplexing to me.

I'm getting 1350fps with 124gr SWC out of my 9mm now. What is it you would like this saboted 9mm bullet do from a .40 at 15 yards at 1450fps that mine won't do at 1350? I sounds like you are going to a lot of trouble and expense to save buying 9mm brass, which ranges are giving away at scrap prices.


FYI, you are going to have a tough time trying to 3d print with the type plastic used for sabots.
TimSr,
Wow! How are you getting 1350 FPS for a 225 Gr SWC bullet out of a 9x19 (9mm Luger) Cartridge? What length barrel are you using? Are you going over published Maximum Loads? My reloading manuals show just over 1150 FPS max for any 124 or 125 grain bullet.

1350 FPS is close to 357 SIG velocities.
Trek is offline  
Old June 25, 2015, 06:24 PM   #21
Mad Chemist
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 6, 2005
Location: OR
Posts: 1,048
3N37 can get you over 1200fps with a 124gr jacketed bullet while staying within their published data.
http://www.vihtavuori.com/en/reloadi...-mm-luger.html

I have pushed it a bit higher. For me the brass began to guppy at about .7gr over max from a G19. You will definitely need to exceed max to get to 1350 in 9x19mm but it can be done. Of course the only "safe" way to do it is from and overbuilt "9mm Major" gun.

If i were planning on doing it again I would use VV3n37, VV3n38, HS-6, Power Pistol, or Autocomp.

Sorry, I won't publish any potentially dangerous data.
Mad Chemist is offline  
Old June 26, 2015, 07:16 AM   #22
bds
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 10, 2010
Posts: 10,622
Since I am planning to shoot USPSA matches again, I will be putting aside Glock 20SF purchase until after retirement (which got delayed by 2 years due to job change/promotion).

I am for 9mm Major and had plans to use AutoComp with Glock 22 and KKM/Lone Wolf 40-9 conversion barrels with thicker chamber/barrel so pressure was less of a concern. But since I probably won't reload 9mm Major brass, I am definitely leaning more towards 40S&W with 165/180 gr bullet for major PF loads.

If I end up doing any testing with 40S&W sabot rounds with 9mm bullets, I will post my range report here.
__________________
- I only do what the voices in my wife’s head tell her to tell me to do
- Accuracy is everything and holes on target speak volumes
- Vendors offering 5% THR discount
- Revelation 19:11
bds is offline  
Old June 26, 2015, 09:09 AM   #23
TimSr
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 13, 2015
Location: Wayne co. Ohio
Posts: 543
Quote:
TimSr,
Did you actually chronograph the 30-06 accellerators and find that they only give about 3100 FPS velocity? The specifications I read say that they will deliver over 4000 FPS velocity, which is about 22 Swift velocities, not 223 velocities.
Your numbers are more realistic. The point is they were trying to turn a .308 into a flat shooting varmint rifle, but couldn't achieve varmint rifle accurracy.
TimSr is offline  
Old June 26, 2015, 09:14 AM   #24
TimSr
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 13, 2015
Location: Wayne co. Ohio
Posts: 543
Quote:
TimSr,
Wow! How are you getting 1350 FPS for a 225 Gr SWC bullet out of a 9x19 (9mm Luger) Cartridge?

I'm not. Its a 125gr SWC over 8.0gr Blue Dot from a S&W 439. A cast bullet of same weight and similar contruction will usually achieve higher velocity over the same load as a jacketed bullet.
TimSr is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.