|
|||||||
| Welcome to THR |
| You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1276 | |
|
Member
Join Date: August 5, 2005
Location: 44°N x 69°W
Posts: 11,609
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1277 |
|
Member
Join Date: March 9, 2013
Posts: 3
|
Well, I have not put the monogrips on yet, because, quite frankly, I just love, love the looks of this little gun just the way it is. I will suffer through the discomfort a bit longer. That and I don't want to screw it up if I do it wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
#1278 |
|
Member
Join Date: August 25, 2006
Posts: 2,557
|
SwissArmyDad - the recoil bite is a good reason to reload, or at least seek out lighter bullets and standard pressure loads. My 125gr lead loads don't really sting to shoot, unlike a 125gr +p or 158 gr +p.
I carry 125 gr JHP, usually Speer Gold Dot, in standard pressure. They are very accurate, and effective.
__________________
Life is too short to hunt with an ugly dog. - me If you can't hit a snake at 20 feet with a 12 gauge, you ain't gonna hit a dove, either. -McGunner |
|
|
|
|
#1279 |
|
Member
Join Date: October 1, 2009
Posts: 35
|
The Hogue monogrips make it a different, better gun for me.
The main problem I had with the originals was there was nothing between the web of my hand and the metal backstrap. Recoil sting + awkward grip. Not only do I feel less recoil with the Hogue, but the gun fits my hand better for a faster drawing grip and more control. I also have better finger placement on the trigger. (long fingers) |
|
|
|
|
#1280 |
|
Member
Join Date: March 11, 2013
Posts: 6
|
Do you give up pocket carry with the Hogues?
|
|
|
|
|
#1282 |
|
Member
Join Date: March 9, 2013
Posts: 3
|
Does anyone use shooting gloves? I went online and saw regular ones, fingerless ones and some with gel inserts in the palm. I have never used them but am just wondering. I wouldn't want anything to take away the feel of the gun.
|
|
|
|
|
#1283 |
|
Member
Join Date: January 26, 2008
Posts: 24
|
IWB or OWB with monogrips. Too big to pocket carry except cargo pocket or jacket pocket.
|
|
|
|
|
#1284 | |
|
Member
Join Date: January 22, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,898
|
Larger grips will be harder to fit/conceal in your pocket. Pachmayr compact grips on my 642 mean the end of the grip can sometimes be slightly visible from the correct angle, when that was almost never the case using the stock grip.
Quote:
A 'shooting glove', IMO, isn't something I'd use too much for a defensive pistol because if I can't handle the recoil, I would figure I need to do something to the grip or ammo or gun choices, as there would be no padded glove in a defensive use
__________________
"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." ― Edmund Burke “In any moment of decision, the best thing you can do is the right thing. The worst thing you can do is nothing." ― Theodore Roosevelt |
|
|
|
|
|
#1285 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 21, 2004
Location: "Land of (dis)Enchantment"
Posts: 3,921
|
Just contacted S&W. Mine needs to go back. Cracked frame.
__________________
Lew Wallace was an optimist. I want my country back! |
|
|
|
|
#1286 |
|
Member
Join Date: March 11, 2013
Posts: 6
|
Does anyone use the Hogue Bantams and still pocket carry? I bought the 642 mainly for pocket carrying and would like to try a different grip, but really don't want to give up pocket carry.
|
|
|
|
|
#1287 | |
|
Member
Join Date: January 3, 2011
Posts: 467
|
Shot the 442 no lock yesterday. Carrying in a Mika pocket holster with Buffalo Bore now. Ran some 5-5-5 drills on an outdoor range with the CT-405 grips.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1288 |
|
Member
Join Date: September 2, 2011
Posts: 103
|
Finally, I have waited four months for this revolver to arrive. I am very happy with it, I changed the grips because they fit my hand better, I know less concealment, but they just feel that much better. With the factory grips my groups were averaging about six inches to the left, consistent, but to the left. with the pachmayr grips I was averaging about two to three inches to the left, once again consistent, but to the left. What do you guys think, is it my lack of practice with this gun or is it slightly off, causing it to shoot to the left. I am right handed by the way. For slow shots I stage the trigger slowly to the second click when the cylinder is fully locked up, then finish with a slow squeeze.
|
|
|
|
|
#1289 |
|
Member
Join Date: October 1, 2009
Posts: 35
|
Hogue grips/pocket carry
I pocket carry with the Hogue monogrips. The butt of the grip is still well inside the pocket and perfectly concealed on me.
I use a Mika holster. I'm usually wearing either tactical pants or work pants, both of which have DEEP FRONT POCKETS, which I think is the key. My own height and weight is probably also a factor. I've found it doesn't work so well with regular cargo pants, definitely not jeans. |
|
|
|
|
#1290 |
|
Member
Join Date: April 24, 2003
Location: Pinson, AL
Posts: 3,022
|
I found a way to pocket carry my OEM-gripped 642-2 in a Mika pocket holster without having to frequently pull my britches up. I carry my 351PD instead! Here is my 'new guy':
![]() That thing is lite - and I found a use for the screwcap poly bottles - they hold seven Hornady 45gr FTX Critical Defense .22 WMR for reloads. I only average carrying it once every week or two, even though I know a BG/attacker would eventually notice seven leakage holes. My 642 is still my main carry. Stainz |
|
|
|
|
#1291 |
|
Member
Join Date: January 3, 2011
Posts: 467
|
West.22, the S&W manual that ships with the 642 and 44e states, in bold, that you should not stage the trigger.
Instead of staging the trigger, try gripping the revolver a little higher with your dominant hand and fire it with one smooth and consistent trigger pull. After a few sessions I am sure your groups will improve. |
|
|
|
|
#1292 |
|
Member
Join Date: September 2, 2011
Posts: 103
|
Thanks Tony, I will give that a try next time, the trigger and reading the manual.
|
|
|
|
|
#1293 |
|
Member
Join Date: January 3, 2011
Posts: 467
|
We need some pics of it now
![]() The 642 and 442 are really handy. They do take a bit of practice. You might consider picking up some light target loads like Remington umc lead-less .38 to get your technique squared off prior to shooting hotter +p loads. In most cases shooting to the left indicates anticipation of recoil.. That or the way you are squeezing the trigger is causing your hand to let the front sight drift which is exascerbated by the short barrel. Although a bit pricy, laser sights are great training tools because you can practice dry-firing and observe what is happening to the laser and hence the front site. If you practice dry firing, still be aware of where you are pointing the gun! Another point to note is that time and practice will smooth out the burrs on the action and likely smooth out that trigger pull. A drop of oil through the grip-frame can go a long way as well. To be honest, I still struggle with accuracy and so I make it a point to train my J frame whenever I'm out at the range. Good luck and report back soon
|
|
|
|
|
#1294 |
|
Member
Join Date: September 2, 2011
Posts: 103
|
When I staged the trigger my groups were consistently off to the left, this picture is of my groups when I used the method that the manual states should be used, and that Tony reminded me of. group shot at about 24 feet. Thanks again Tony.
|
|
|
|
|
#1295 |
|
Member
Join Date: January 3, 2011
Posts: 467
|
That is actually some pretty sweet shooting! Congrats also on getting the no-lock version of the 642. That is definitely the way the gun was meant to be made. I bet you would fare pretty well with some 5-5-5-5 (5 rounds in 5 seconds from 5 yrds and within a 5 inch circle) drill challenges.
Stainz, I am hereby charging you with violation of the 642 thread, evidenced by introduction of the 351PD. Your punishment will be forfeit of all firearms to a 642 club lottery and 10 lashes. I call dibs on your UDR. |
|
|
|
|
#1296 |
|
Member
Join Date: September 2, 2011
Posts: 103
|
I could have had a lock version the first day at the store, but I did my best to be patient for the no lock, and in the end it paid off. Only took four months.
|
|
|
|
|
#1297 |
|
Member
Join Date: August 25, 2006
Posts: 2,557
|
Tony -
We allow other Jframes here. We're not that Pharisaic about things. Stainz is, after all, an officer in this club. Frankly, I'm finding myself strangely jealous of that 351PD.
__________________
Life is too short to hunt with an ugly dog. - me If you can't hit a snake at 20 feet with a 12 gauge, you ain't gonna hit a dove, either. -McGunner |
|
|
|
|
#1298 |
|
Member
Join Date: January 3, 2011
Posts: 467
|
Sixgunner has dibs on the 351!
|
|
|
|
|
#1299 |
|
Member
Join Date: April 29, 2013
Location: CT
Posts: 3
|
New member, new 442
Hi! Just joined today after reading so many great posts on this thread... And buying yet another j-frame.
![]() I'll post a pic when i figure out how. |
|
|
|
|
#1300 |
|
Member
Join Date: April 24, 2003
Location: Pinson, AL
Posts: 3,022
|
First... Welcome, Dr. K, to the madness here! A 442 is a fine example, indeed - congratulations! What will you 'carry' in it? Also, what will you 'carry' it in?
Second... is it safe for me to come out of hiding? What is the statute of limitations here on posting a non-642/442 picture? I knew that 351PD would get me in trouble... I should get 'special status' for this picture: ![]() What is 'special' about an S&W 632 Pro, SKU #178046? They didn't start delivering them until 9/11 - and they are gone now. Some neat features - no IL - loads/fires: .32 ACP, .32 S&W, .32 S&WL, .32 H&RM, and .327 Fedral Magnum. Shown, (L-R) 2 each: .32 S&WL 96gr; .327 FM 115gr Speer GD; and .327 FM 100gr Federal JSP. The first two are mild while the latter two pair make +P 158gr LHPSWC's in a 642/442 seem mild! The real irony - try as I might - the 642 is still my 24/7 EDC protector! Stainz |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
| IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER |
| Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages. |