Quantcast
BFR revolvers and your experience? - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Handguns: Revolvers

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 11, 2013, 10:37 PM   #1
el Godfather
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 4, 2012
Posts: 1,064
BFR revolvers and your experience?

Dear THR:
Recently, I have been thinking about picking up a BFR in .500 SW magnum. What is your experience and opinion about BFR's quality compared to other manufacturers that make .500?

Thank you
__________________
Never be a tyrant. Never live under a tyrant.
el Godfather is offline  
Old February 12, 2013, 09:28 AM   #2
el Godfather
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 4, 2012
Posts: 1,064
----no one here has experience with BFRs?
__________________
Never be a tyrant. Never live under a tyrant.
el Godfather is offline  
Old February 12, 2013, 10:29 AM   #3
Hammerdown77
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 29, 2010
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 601
I have a BFR in 500 JRH. It is very accurate, and fit and finish are a notch above most factory Rugers. It slots nicely in the spot between Ruger and a used Freedom Arms.

For about $900 new (I paid less, closer to $800) they are an excellent deal in a precision single action.

Personally, I would not get the 500 S&W. It's just too much gun (size, weight, unneeded cartridge). But that's me. I prefer the 500 JRH, as it still uses a normal size 5-shot cylinder on the smaller frame (not the long frame like the 500 Smith).
However, if you don't handload, that's probably not the best option.


Last edited by Hammerdown77; February 12, 2013 at 10:37 AM.
Hammerdown77 is offline  
Old February 12, 2013, 11:32 AM   #4
CraigC
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 27, 2006
Location: West Tennessee
Posts: 8,867
No personal experience but they are very well reputed. Stronger and more accurate than a Ruger yet much more affordable than Freedom Arms. IMHO, the .500JRH is all the big bore you'll ever need. No, it doesn't yield the impressive velocities the S&W does but experienced sixgunners know that's not necessary to be effective.
__________________
"Wise men learn by others’ harms; fools by their own." - Benjamin Franklin
CraigC is online now  
Old February 12, 2013, 01:12 PM   #5
Hammerdown77
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 29, 2010
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 601
I'd also like to point out the regular factory offering from BFR in 500 JRH comes with a 5.5" barrel (measured from the front of the frame). Mine is one of the "mistake" guns that still has the 7.5" barrel. I could send it back to MR for free for a barrel swap, but I just haven't decided if I want to or not. Might just have it cut down when I send it to Jack Huntington for his grip frame modification.

The 5.5" gun is much handier in the field, but that extra barrel hanging out front, along with the scope, sure helps tone down the recoil of a 440 grain slug at 1350+ fps....
Hammerdown77 is offline  
Old February 13, 2013, 01:04 AM   #6
ArchAngelCD
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 25, 2006
Location: PA, USA
Posts: 13,822
I only like one guy who has a BFR and it's in 450 Marlin. That is one big revolver but what can you expect when it fires a 450 Marlin round? The revolver is very well made and the fit-in-finish is very good. He is very happy with that revolver and says it's well worth the money.
__________________
Remember boys and girls, gun control only prevents law abiding Americans from owning guns because the Bad Guys don’t obey the laws, no matter how restrictive or lenient the laws are!
ArchAngelCD is offline  
Old February 13, 2013, 08:51 PM   #7
22-rimfire
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 11, 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 9,524
I have a 6 1/2" 480/475 BFR and I like it (short cylinder). It is still pretty new to me and have only shot 480 Rugers so far in it. It seems to be very well made with close tolerances, sort of a Ruger+. It is pretty much all the BIG bore I want.

Added: Magnum Research measures their BFR barrels from the front of the frame versus at the forcing cone. Hence, the barrel is a little longer than what you might expect from a Ruger or Smith. I had a hard time finding a 6 1/2" as you mostly find 7 1/2" in my caliber choice. I would choose a caliber with the short cylinder versus the long cylinder.

Last edited by 22-rimfire; February 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM.
22-rimfire is offline  
Old February 13, 2013, 09:34 PM   #8
g_one
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 24, 2011
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 269
I've been seriously considering getting the 30-30, to go with my Marlin lever action. Maybe tax money...

Seriously though, loading that thing up with 30-30 handloads with those leverevolution flex tips would make for one hell of a revolver
__________________
The Revolution: A Manifesto // techdirt
g_one is offline  
Old February 14, 2013, 12:23 AM   #9
22-rimfire
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 11, 2005
Location: TN
Posts: 9,524
Max Prasac author of "Big Bore Revolvers" says that Magnum Research's BFR revolvers are "outstanding revolvers delivering reliable performance at a reasonable cost". Taffin doesn't discuss the BFR revolvers much in his book "Bore-Bore Handguns". Prazac says that "today's consumer would be very hard pressed to find a higher quality and more accurate firearm without spending twice what the BFR sells for". He of course is referencing custom revolvers and the Freedom Arms revolvers.

I would seriously think about whether you want the long or short frame BFR and a caliber that is chambered for it.

Last edited by 22-rimfire; February 14, 2013 at 12:28 AM.
22-rimfire is offline  
Old April 29, 2013, 08:21 PM   #10
usurp31
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 22, 2011
Location: Dallas
Posts: 23
g_one; did you look more into the BFR in 30-30? I've been thinking about going that route myself.
usurp31 is offline  
Old April 29, 2013, 08:27 PM   #11
bigdaa
member
 
 
Join Date: April 12, 2013
Location: Goleta, CA
Posts: 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammerdown77 View Post
I have a BFR in 500 JRH. It is very accurate, and fit and finish are a notch above most factory Rugers. It slots nicely in the spot between Ruger and a used Freedom Arms.

For about $900 new (I paid less, closer to $800) they are an excellent deal in a precision single action.

Personally, I would not get the 500 S&W. It's just too much gun (size, weight, unneeded cartridge). But that's me. I prefer the 500 JRH, as it still uses a normal size 5-shot cylinder on the smaller frame (not the long frame like the 500 Smith).
However, if you don't handload, that's probably not the best option.

That's a damn nice looking rig right there!
I own a 500 8 3/8 and what you say is true. It's a big mo fo.
While I have not fired a BFR, I have the Freedom in 454. What a beaut!!!!!!!!
If that BFR is anything like the Freedom, it's got my nod and I look forward to handling one.
bigdaa is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.