Brainwashed by the Movies - THR

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Handguns: Revolvers

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Thread Tools
Old July 8, 2014, 01:02 PM   #1
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Posts: 769
Brainwashed by the Movies

I like many others are brainwashed into loving the looks of a 4 5/8" BL on a S/a Old Western styled revolver!
I blame the Movies because most old Colts had the long barrels for making power and having a good sight radius. The movies and "Fast Draws" made us think the other way.
Besides, the revolvers DO look good like that! Even Remingtons and the old BP C&B revolvers take on a new life with short barrels!

I bought my Stainless Vaquero in 4 5/8" because I wanted the smaller, easier to hide/Holster revolver. It handles GREAT too! If I bought a .45 Vaquero, it'd be a 7 1/2" just for nostalgias sake plus sights and max power.
The Colt and S&W DA revolvers in4" were common on Police belts nd to most buyers so naturally we went for the shorter S/A, it was a "familiar"...
Good or bad thing, it's a fact and I am pretty sure things won't change so ammo makers need to make ammo around this barrel length for preformance's sake.
We got influenced pretty easily but it wasn't necessarily a bad thing as a great many shooters choose one!
Kinda like that "Gangster" pointing a gun sideways, How DUMB!
ZVP is offline  
Old July 8, 2014, 02:47 PM   #2
Join Date: April 24, 2007
Posts: 8,895

I don't know for sure but the western movies and TV series of my misspent youth notwithstanding, I just have always liked the looks of the 4 5/8" barrel on a SAA. To me it makes the whole gun appear well balanced and aesthetically pleasing to the eye. Which is strange in relation to my collection of single action revolvers in that most of my more traditional single actions (Ruger Vaquero, Ruger Single Six, and Beretta Stampede) sport 5 1/2" barrels, while my less traditional single actions (Ruger Blackhawks), have my preferred 4 5/8" set-up.

I think to me it's all great and I enjoy all of my single action revolvers no matter what their barrel length is.
"An elegant weapon for a more civilized age."-Obi Wan Kenobi
bannockburn is offline  
Old July 8, 2014, 09:08 PM   #3
Driftwood Johnson
Join Date: December 18, 2011
Location: Land of the Pilgrims
Posts: 1,735

The most popular barrel length for the SAA by sales was the 5 1/2" barrel. That is what I see most often in the old Westerns. Frankly, I think a 5 1/2" barrel looks boring. I do have a soft spot for the 4 3/4" length though (Ruger makes it 4 5/8). This 2nd Gen was made in 1968.

This Bisley was made in 1906 or 1909, I forget exactly when right now.

Driftwood Johnson is offline  
Old July 9, 2014, 03:26 AM   #4
Lucky Derby
Join Date: August 23, 2006
Location: Colorado Rockies
Posts: 2,131
Those are some nice Colts Driftwood.
America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves. Abraham Lincoln
Although personally I am quite content with existing explosives, I feel we must not stand in the path of improvement. Winston Churchill
Lucky Derby is offline  
Old July 9, 2014, 06:08 AM   #5
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: southeast AR
Posts: 3,062
WOW! I have an exact twin to your Bisley-same barrel length, same 'finish', etc. Mine is lettered and shipped in 1907-caliber 32-20.
critter is offline  
Old July 9, 2014, 12:28 PM   #6
Join Date: May 26, 2007
Posts: 8,139
Not really an area where I'm knowledgeable, but it is my understanding that the Army wanted the longer 7 1/2 barrel for cavalry use. It was intended as their primary weapon and the longer barrel was fine on horseback. They used it at some pretty long ranges as I understand and why they wanted the long barrel.

The shorter barrels seems more popular with civilian use.

If I'm wrong wouldn't mind someone correcting me.
jmr40 is offline  
Old July 9, 2014, 02:29 PM   #7
Join Date: December 11, 2011
Location: Statesboro,Georgia
Posts: 920
Matt Dillon on Gunsmoke preferred the 7 1/2" barrel!
"No possible rapidity of fire can atone for habitual carelessness of aim with the first shot." Theodore Roosevelt
jimbo555 is offline  
Old July 9, 2014, 03:00 PM   #8
Arkansas Paul
Join Date: March 18, 2009
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 6,413
Frankly, I think a 5 1/2" barrel looks boring.
I agree. I like the 4 3/4" myself. There's just something about the barrel that ends at the ejector rod housing that looks perfect to me.

And seriously, what does 3/4" extra really do in real world terms?
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences of attending too much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it - Thomas Jefferson
Arkansas Paul is offline  
Old July 9, 2014, 03:57 PM   #9
Ed Ames
Join Date: August 21, 2006
Location: Tejas Norte
Posts: 3,013
I can't blame tv or movies since I was born after most of that went off the air/died as a movie genre. But I do generally like the shorter barrels on single actions.

I actually have a nuanced preference. I think the shorter the distance between trigger and top, the longer the barrel should be to look good.

In other words, a gun with no top strap (e.g. 1860 c&b), or with a compact frame (many of the American top breaks), looks great with a longer barrel but seeme odd when shortened. A taller gun (1873, blackhawk, etc) looks unbalanced and odd with the long barrel, but looks great with 3-?/? to 4-?/? barrel.

People are strange...
Don't hide arms, get sidearms!

Last edited by Ed Ames; July 9, 2014 at 04:03 PM.
Ed Ames is offline  
Old July 9, 2014, 04:02 PM   #10
Join Date: May 17, 2003
Location: London, Ont.
Posts: 8,761
More firearms are sold because a guy saw it in a movie than you can shake a stick at. I have an M1 Rifle and Carbine because of 'Combat'. And desperately need a pair of consecutively numbered Vaqueros because of Roy Rogers. Saw 'em at a Canadian shop last year. $2500 Cdn. Need both kidneys. snicker.
It's not brainwashing. It's training.
"...intended as their primary weapon..." No cavalryman would ever consider a revolver as his primary weapon. That'd be his sabre. Geez.
"...This Bisley was..." Made for target shooting. That was the idea behind 'em.
Sunray is offline  
Old July 9, 2014, 04:04 PM   #11
Join Date: December 29, 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 6,759
I preferred 5 1/2", and when given a choice, that is what I bought.

Accuracy is a skill acquired through constant practice.
SlamFire1 is offline  
Old July 9, 2014, 07:35 PM   #12
Join Date: August 6, 2011
Posts: 643
The SAA, with a 5.5" barrel was referred to as the "Artillery Model". It was usually issued to infantry and artillery members who needed side arms.
pendennis is offline  
Old July 9, 2014, 09:52 PM   #13
dogtown tom
Join Date: January 15, 2006
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 3,835
Sunray .... I have an M1 Rifle and Carbine because of 'Combat'. ...
The only machine gun I've ever really wanted was the Thompson that Vic
Morrow carried.
Need a FFL in north Dallas/Plano/Allen/Frisco/McKinney ? Just EMAIL me!

$20 transfers ($10 for CHL, active military, police, firefighters or schoolteachers)
dogtown tom is offline  
Old July 10, 2014, 12:00 AM   #14
Join Date: May 12, 2004
Location: Rocky Mts
Posts: 1,879
Many of us are likely swayed by things we've seen and liked. I tend to gravitate towards easy to carry. I've had various longer barreled SA revolvers, but they've ended up being traded off or cut down to 4 5/8". I had a 5 1/2" cut also, as I had plenty of good leather for that size, and none for 5 1/2" guns. The 4 5/8" guns are about perfect for all day carry and not getting in the way, or pushing up on chairs or vehicle seats or the ground when sitting. Same with 4" DA guns. The longer ones are a little nicer for shooting, but for carry, the shorter ones mentioned are my favorites.

"It amazes me that people "think" themselves into helplessness."
Bartholomew Roberts

"...always endeavour to raise your own standards."
Arfin Greebly

Isn't it amazing how many people post without reading the thread?

Last edited by Malamute; July 10, 2014 at 12:06 AM.
Malamute is offline  
Old July 10, 2014, 12:50 AM   #15
Contributing Member
Join Date: January 2, 2008
Location: N. Central PA
Posts: 393
I like cowboy movies and even if they are historically incorrect, I think the firearms in them are pretty neat. The real cowboys and outlaws and lawmen would have loved to own and use the guns we see on TV.
sigsmoker is offline  
Old July 10, 2014, 09:05 PM   #16
Driftwood Johnson
Join Date: December 18, 2011
Location: Land of the Pilgrims
Posts: 1,735
Howdy Again

The original barrel length of the Colt SAA was 7 1/2". We can talk about sight radius and long range shooting and all that, but personally I have always felt that the long barrel was a holdover from percussion days. With a C&B revolver you needed a loading lever long enough to get enough leverage to shove a ball into the chambers. You needed enough leverage to deform the ball as it went into the chamber mouth. Most large frame C&B revolvers had barrels 7 or 8 inches long just so a reasonably long loading lever could be housed underneath. When cartridge revolvers came along, it was natural to make them with long barrels too, since that is what Colt and Remington were used to making. My take on it anyway.

The original 7 1/2" Colts had gotten pretty worn by the 1890s, so most were sent back to Colt or Army armorers to be refreshed. Many of the barrels were cut down to 5 1/2" at that time. That is the origin of the 5 1/2" barrel. Many were issued to artillery units, hence the name Artillery Model. This is a collector's term only, there never was an Artillery Model listed in the Colt catalog.

I agree. I like the 4 3/4" myself. There's just something about the barrel that ends at the ejector rod housing that looks perfect to me.

And seriously, what does 3/4" extra really do in real world terms?
The 4 3/4" barrel was the shortest standard length barrel with Colt because that is the length of the ejector housing. The ejector housing and its associated parts were the same with all three standard barrel lengths; 7 1/2", 5 1/2", 4 3/4". A shorter barrel than 4 3/4" would require a different ejector rod assembly. Notice that the really short Storekeeper's Models usually do not have an ejector.
Driftwood Johnson is offline  
Old July 10, 2014, 09:21 PM   #17
Join Date: March 19, 2009
Location: New Orleans, LA
Posts: 2,273
Thys why I always liked Clint Eastwood movies, more realism with firearms.

"I shoot my gun at the moon like a primitive hick!" ~ dammitism
DammitBoy is offline  
Old July 11, 2014, 10:59 AM   #18
Join Date: October 15, 2004
Posts: 679
"And seriously, what does 3/4" extra really do in real world terms? "

Shooting looking OVER the sights and gun the extra 3/4 inch seems to give a better sense of just where the barrel is pointing. And sight radius...more, muzzle rise...less.
MartinS is offline  
Old July 11, 2014, 10:20 PM   #19
Join Date: April 29, 2004
Location: Birmingham AL
Posts: 952
"Matt Dillon on Gunsmoke preferred the 7 1/2" barrel!"--jimbo555
At 6'7" he could make it work!
Powder smoke- The smell of FREEDOM!
Registration? NEVER!
shep854 is offline  
Old July 11, 2014, 10:27 PM   #20
Join Date: April 9, 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 475
I don't know about y'all, but we didn't watch "Gunsmoke"...we watched "Marshall Dillon" when I was a kid!
NRA Life Member
jmace57 is offline  
Old July 12, 2014, 04:09 AM   #21
Join Date: May 2, 2006
Location: Lincoln Park, Mi.
Posts: 904
Paladin also carried a colt with a 7 1/2" barrel.

For the honor of the Dinocrome!

1911. For when 911 just isn't fast enough.

"Be wary of Strong Drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors...
And miss!" - L. Long
Kaeto is offline  
Old July 12, 2014, 11:31 PM   #22
Join Date: May 23, 2014
Location: NE Louisiana
Posts: 6
I remember spending the night at my grandparents house in the late '50's and watching "Have Gun Will Travel at 8:30, then Marshall Dillon at 9. Grandma did not like Paladin pointing his revolver at us! LOL
skypilot1941 is offline  
Old July 12, 2014, 11:57 PM   #23
Join Date: April 29, 2004
Location: Birmingham AL
Posts: 952
One of my dad's iron-clad rules was that WE WATCHED WESTERNS!!
Powder smoke- The smell of FREEDOM!
Registration? NEVER!
shep854 is offline  
Old July 13, 2014, 03:08 AM   #24
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 5,750
SASS # 38375 {''Willyboy''}
THR Remington Club #14
NRA Life Member
''Make yourselves sheep, and the wolves will eat you...'' - Benjamin Franklin
BHP FAN is offline  
Old July 13, 2014, 08:26 PM   #25
Join Date: April 30, 2009
Posts: 235
Movies? TV?
Well maybe.
I think I was more brainwashed by my Fanner 50's.
BaltimoreBoy is offline  

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:40 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.