Quantcast
Double-barrel defensive shell length? - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Shotguns

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

View Poll Results: If you had a double barrel for home defense, what shell length would you use?
2 3/4" standard 47 90.38%
3" magnum 5 9.62%
Voters: 52. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 9, 2014, 11:22 PM   #1
Cooldill
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 19, 2011
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,355
Double-barrel defensive shell length?

Hey guys! I know the 12 gauge double barreled shotgun is not exactly... the most popular defensive shotgun option out there, but I know some guys (and gals) love a good double barrel shotgun for home defense uses. What I'm asking is this:

What shell length do you use for your defense neeeds? Do you use 2 3/4", or 3" magnum shells? This provided your shotgun can accept 3" shells of course. If not, would you use the 3" shells IF your shotgun could take them?

I know 2 3/4" buckshot loads are the standard defensive shotgun shell length in 12 gauge, but I figure that with a double barrel why not have the extra payload of the 3" shells? You aren't going to be limiting the guns capacity like you would with a tube-fed shotgun, and you only need one more follow up shot before a reload so recoil seems a moot point.

So what do you guys think? I am currently in the market for a short double barrel shotgun for home defense. I am a #1 buckshot kind of guy for this purpose, but am unsure weather or not I should use 2 3/4" 16 pellet #1 buck shells or the larger 3" 24 pellet buckshot shells.

I'd love to hear your guys opinions on this, thanks so much!

PS: Please don't post things like "a double barrel shotgun is bad for home defense" and all that. This thread is not about that, but about weather or not you would use magnum shotshells for defense if all you had was a double barrel. Thanks!
Cooldill is offline  
Old October 9, 2014, 11:32 PM   #2
scaevola
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 8, 2010
Location: A bit north of Glitter Gulch
Posts: 42
Inside the house where my wife might need to use it?

or
__________________
“Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the Jolly Roger and begin to slit throats”. - H. L. Mencken.
scaevola is offline  
Old October 9, 2014, 11:35 PM   #3
Cooldill
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 19, 2011
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,355
^

A .65 round ball shotgun load? That's like a modern Brown Bess LOL! I need to pick me up some of them!!! !
Cooldill is offline  
Old October 10, 2014, 01:30 AM   #4
rcmodel
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2007
Location: Eastern KS
Posts: 49,978
Ever shoot a 3" mag 00 Buck in a double barrel shotgun?

I thought not!

They kill all right, on both ends.

Flip a coin with the BG, and see who has to shoot it first!!!
The other guy will probably win.

rc
__________________
Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
Or all your primers in a glass jar!
rcmodel is online now  
Old October 10, 2014, 06:49 AM   #5
MCgunner
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 3, 2005
Location: The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Texas
Posts: 23,497
I keep my 20 gauge coach gun stoked with 3 buck 2 3/4". Don't need 12 gauge, let alone 3", for home security.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!"
Ben Franklin
MCgunner is offline  
Old October 10, 2014, 07:12 AM   #6
19-3Ben
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 5, 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 4,644
If you need more than the two shots at HD ranges, it won't be for lack of power of the 12ga 2 3/4" shells. If you need more, you need more capacity, not more power. It would be because you missed the target, not because the round wasn't powerful enough. Going to 3" or even a 3.5" would not make up for missing the target.

To put it more succinctly, if you do your part, the 2 3/4" shells have enough power to get the job done. If you don't to your part, the 3" shells aren't going to help.
__________________
"You only live once, but if you do it right, once is enough." Mae West
19-3Ben is offline  
Old October 10, 2014, 07:28 AM   #7
Sav .250
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 5, 2007
Location: Central Fla
Posts: 2,500
No matter the length (assuming they "fit" your shotgun, either will do the job!
Sav .250 is offline  
Old October 10, 2014, 08:48 AM   #8
lemaymiami
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 15, 2010
Posts: 1,010
The basic 2 3/4" round with 9 00buck pellets is the absolute standard for close quarters defense (less than 15 meters). There's a reason it's the standard issue in any agency that equips its officers (or guards) with riot configured shotguns. It's all I carried in my poppers for more than 20 years. Nothing beats it, period.

That round in any 12guage shotgun is a fight ender....
lemaymiami is offline  
Old October 10, 2014, 08:30 PM   #9
ZVP
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Posts: 654
Agreed, no use trying "Cute" little 12ga Mini shells, the standard "00"Buck 2 3/4" shell is devastating!
Recoil isn't that bad either.
I also use 2 3/4" #3Buck in my 20ga SxS and it's good!
Those are pretty much readilly available loads ( especially th 12ga) so you can get em with little effort. No use going exotic.
Remember, if you ever need the damn gun, use what the Pro's use! It's gonna be serious, fast, and sloppy. You're going to be more scared than ever, and you BETTER be able to hit!
Pratice!
ZVP
ZVP is offline  
Old October 10, 2014, 08:50 PM   #10
788Ham
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 24, 2010
Location: Hills west of Denver
Posts: 3,122
I got a Weatherby pump 18 1/2" 12 ga. about a month ago, 6 rounds total. I've got 2 3/4" #4 shot in mine, plenty devastating at HD ranges, the 36 cal balls in 00 buck seemed a tad bit much at HD range. YOMV
788Ham is offline  
Old October 10, 2014, 09:43 PM   #11
rcmodel
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2007
Location: Eastern KS
Posts: 49,978
Standard 00 Buck is just about perfect from a penetration standpoint.

I had occasion to get some inside knowledge from an Army doctor at Ft. Carson in 1968.

A stockade guard shot a prisoner in the back at less then 10 yards with standard Winchester 00 Buck while the prisoner was in the act of climbing over the wire.

My friend the Surgeon found 9 through & through holes in the body.
And all 9 00 Buck pellets were recovered inside his T-Shirt on the off side down around his belt line.

It don't get no better then that from an over-penetration and stopping standpoint.

The surgeon carried them in his pocket & played pocket pool with them for some time afterwards.

We called him Caption Queeg from then on!

rc
__________________
Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
Or all your primers in a glass jar!
rcmodel is online now  
Old October 10, 2014, 09:45 PM   #12
armedwalleye
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 23, 2011
Location: Central MN
Posts: 154
not gonna count

but in 00buck, from 2 3/4 to 3, what do you really pick up? 2 pellets?
In #1, more pellets, but if you can't hit 'em with 16 of em, is 8 more gonna save yer bacon?
Dunno for sure, but probably pick up another couple bucks in price on a 5 round box....
armedwalleye is offline  
Old October 10, 2014, 10:47 PM   #13
rcmodel
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2007
Location: Eastern KS
Posts: 49,978
You will gain 2-3 pellets, and insufferable recoil in a double-barrel.
Neither are necessary, or desirable.

rc
__________________
Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
Or all your primers in a glass jar!
rcmodel is online now  
Old October 10, 2014, 10:54 PM   #14
rbernie
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: January 21, 2004
Location: Plain Ol', Texas
Posts: 18,887
Three inch shells give you significantly more recoil, blinding muzzle flash, and no real terminal advantage. No thanks.

There have been more than a few 'defensive shell' comparison threads done here - a search through the forum may yield some additional useful information to anyone that's interested....
__________________

Support THR by becoming a Contributing Member. Texans should be a member of the Texas State Rifle Association.
-
Trying to alter human behavior by regulating objects has been historically proven a fools errand, and yet is the fundamental underlying premise of gun control.
-
A conclusion is not a destination, it's simply a convenient place to stop thinking.
-
Reading a thing doesn't automatically make it so, and repeating it doesn't necessarily make it any truer.

-
I cried because I had no shoes, until I met a man who had no class.

Last edited by rbernie; October 10, 2014 at 11:40 PM.
rbernie is offline  
Old October 11, 2014, 12:03 AM   #15
Warp
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 22, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 6,382
I would use a reduced recoil Federal flight control wad buckshot round in either #1 or 00

Quote:
Originally Posted by armedwalleye View Post
but in 00buck, from 2 3/4 to 3, what do you really pick up? 2 pellets?
In the standard Remington shells you gain 3. From 12 --> 15.
__________________
"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."
― Edmund Burke

“In any moment of decision, the best thing you can do is the right thing. The worst thing you can do is nothing."
― Theodore Roosevelt
Warp is online now  
Old October 11, 2014, 12:49 AM   #16
ImperatorGray
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 17, 2011
Posts: 44
Some years back a new shooter brought over the shotgun he'd just bought for the End Of Rule Of Law he was expecting to start within a few weeks. With it, he proudly plunked down multiple boxes of three-inch shells he'd purchased for it and asked me what I thought.

I told him I thought he'd never fired a magnum 12-gauge round, judging by the fact that he didn't have any of standard length. He said I was right but that his understanding from some survivalist website or other was that they were necessary for a shotgun to be useful in a defensive role.

End of the day, after firing a round or two, he left all his ammo with me so that I could introduce others to it before they bought it for themselves.

And yes, standard rounds will do the job just fine.
ImperatorGray is offline  
Old October 11, 2014, 12:54 AM   #17
Warp
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 22, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 6,382
A double barrel, single shot, pump, etc, shotgun will have a lot of recoil (vs semi auto, which will have a lot but less).

I put a Knoxx recoil reducing stock on my pump (it really works, noticeably, at reducing recoil).

I still don't have any 3" shells in the tube or on the side saddle.

They are just...painful and slow and unnecessary.



The 16 pellet 2 3/4" #1 buckshot is a GREAT choice.
__________________
"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."
― Edmund Burke

“In any moment of decision, the best thing you can do is the right thing. The worst thing you can do is nothing."
― Theodore Roosevelt
Warp is online now  
Old October 11, 2014, 02:11 AM   #18
silicosys4
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 29, 2012
Posts: 1,840
Lots to be said about the federal flight control 2 3/4 in #1 buck. I plan on picking up a few boxes the next time I come across them.



http://www.theboxotruth.com/the-box-...ol-1-buckshot/
silicosys4 is offline  
Old October 11, 2014, 05:00 AM   #19
USAF_Vet
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 6, 2011
Location: Gun Lake, Michigan
Posts: 4,032
2 3/4".
__________________
Burn the land and boil the sea
You can't take the sky from me.

Brown coats unite!
USAF_Vet is offline  
Old October 11, 2014, 09:30 AM   #20
Warp
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 22, 2008
Location: Georgia
Posts: 6,382
Quote:
Originally Posted by silicosys4 View Post
Lots to be said about the federal flight control 2 3/4 in #1 buck. I plan on picking up a few boxes the next time I come across them.

[IMG]http://cdn.theboxotruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/56-09.jpg[IMG]

http://www.theboxotruth.com/the-box-...ol-1-buckshot/
At 75 feet through a cylinder choke 18" Rem 870

POI = POA

__________________
"The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing."
― Edmund Burke

“In any moment of decision, the best thing you can do is the right thing. The worst thing you can do is nothing."
― Theodore Roosevelt
Warp is online now  
Old October 11, 2014, 12:03 PM   #21
Nom de Forum
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: September 22, 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,529
I used to own a cheap Chinese Double 12 gauge that was fairly heavy at approximately 9lbs. It had working exposed hammers (not the fake hammers on another brand) and a sliding firing pin safety. It was the only double I really felt was safe to leave loaded. If you don't own any really heavy recoiling (5000+ ME) rifles one way to discover how heavy recoil effects you is to simultaneously fire two 3" Brenneke Slugs. Other than doing that or hunting heavy game (not deer) or SD against bears I do not know why 2.75 would not be more than enough for SD against humans.
__________________
NRA Endowment Member

SAF Life Member

I support The CalGuns Foundation
Nom de Forum is offline  
Old October 11, 2014, 12:09 PM   #22
mavracer
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 9, 2007
Location: wichita
Posts: 3,522
I'll pile on 2 3/4" is all I need, I have a mix of flite control 00 buck and regular old 9 00 buck
__________________
rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6.
INTEGRITY- the ability to do the right thing even when no one will know.
mavracer is offline  
Old October 11, 2014, 02:16 PM   #23
Frostbite
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 18, 2013
Location: Québec
Posts: 192
I voted 2 3/4" because after shooting a good number of both during an highly motivated session my shoulder clearly preferred them and the cardboard boxes could not tell the difference. 2 3/4" 00 buckshot is available, it can be inexpensive and it is clearly efficient.
__________________
Le guerrier qui cultive sont esprit polit ses armes.

-Stanislas de Boufflers
Frostbite is offline  
Old October 11, 2014, 05:30 PM   #24
Black Knight
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 19, 2006
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 1,301
The 2 3/4" shell is plenty for home defense. My HD shotgun is a Remington 870 Wingmaster loaded with 00 low recoil Buckshot. This load was originally designed for close quarters combat by tactical teams. It was created to give good performance at shorter distances with rapid repeat shots without sore shoulders.
Black Knight is offline  
Old October 11, 2014, 08:10 PM   #25
AKElroy
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 11, 2009
Location: Past & Future Republic of Texas
Posts: 2,940
I have a Rossi Coach with 18" tubes. It has a very slender stock, and weighs a very whispy 6 or so pounds. Shooting 3" magnum loads nearly broke my color bone. I have a decelerator on that gun, I was wearing a shooting vest with a heavy pad, and I folded an empty ammo box and tucked it in tight. It was still ridiculous. I was still hurting enough two weeks later to make dove hunting with a soft shooting 1100 painful enough to quit. Never again.
__________________
Question with boldness. Hold to the truth. Speak without fear.

Last edited by AKElroy; October 11, 2014 at 08:19 PM.
AKElroy is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.