Quantcast
NY anti-gun/violence activist sentenced for bringing gun into school - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Social Situations > General Gun Discussions

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old September 23, 2014, 02:37 PM   #1
usmarine0352_2005
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 21, 2005
Posts: 2,578
NY anti-gun/violence activist sentenced for bringing gun into school

If I'm correct he helped write the new stiffer gun penalties for guns at schools.


What a joke. I'm sure the next law-abiding CCWing parent that accidentally brings their gun into the school will get the exact preferential same treatment.





http://wivb.com/2014/09/22/community...gun-in-school/




Quote:
Community activist sentenced for bringing gun to school

By Emily Guggenmos, News 4 Reporter Published: September 22, 2014, 6:06 p

BUFFALO, N.Y. (WIVB) An anti-violence activist caught carrying a firearm into an elementary school in February has been given a conditional discharge.

A judge says if Dwayne Ferguson completes 100 hours of community service and stays out of trouble, he will not face more serious charges possessing a firearm on schools grounds.

Last February, Ferguson sparked a scare at Harvey Austin Elementary School when a man noticed his weapon and called police. Students were held on lockdown for around three hours while police swept the school. It was during a second search that Ferguson was found with a weapon.
usmarine0352_2005 is offline  
Old September 23, 2014, 05:19 PM   #2
wally
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 2, 2004
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 10,584
There you have it in a nutshell, laws should only apply to serfs, not the Elite.

This makes my blood boil!
__________________
Your commitment to Freedom and Liberty is measured by your tolerance for others doing things you disapprove. NRA Endowment Member, 2007.
NRA Patron Member, 2009. NRA Benefactor Member 2012. There is no "race" or "ethnicity" section on the NRA membership application, unlike the Federal 4473 form to purchase a firearm!
wally is offline  
Old September 23, 2014, 05:49 PM   #3
AlexanderA
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 27, 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,174
Makes perfect sense to me -- you'd have a "monopoly of force" if you could disarm everybody except yourself.

It helps if you are the person who decides who's "worthy" to have a gun. Write the rules, and you can carve out exceptions for yourself.
AlexanderA is offline  
Old September 23, 2014, 09:25 PM   #4
TMCCOY
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 12, 2014
Posts: 50
It's always been about control for the liberals.
TMCCOY is offline  
Old September 23, 2014, 11:00 PM   #5
Bartholomew Roberts
Moderator Emeritus
 
 
Join Date: December 26, 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,656
Good thing he isn't a single mom in New Jersey, right? He might see some felony prison time then.
__________________
Texas gunowners should belong to TSRA.
Bartholomew Roberts is offline  
Old September 24, 2014, 05:06 PM   #6
herrwalther
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 1, 2013
Posts: 1,600
I don't see this thread being open very long. Like most antis, THEY can have guns and bodyguards. Just not everyone else.
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
OEF Veteran
herrwalther is offline  
Old September 24, 2014, 09:20 PM   #7
Bobson
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 9, 2011
Location: Snohomish County, Washington
Posts: 3,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by herrwalther View Post
I don't see this thread being open very long.
I'm surprised it hasn't been closed yet. However, while not much more than a "what a load of bs" thread, it does serve to illustrate - effectively, I think - that gun control advocates aren't looking to prevent in crime or violence; rather, it really is about control, and "they" will be exempted.

And IMO, that's a very important truth to make known. I'd leave it open for that, if nothing else, but I'm not calling the shots. :P
__________________
"As for me and my house, we will serve the LORD." - Joshua 24:15

"Men fight for liberty and win it with hard knocks. Their children, brought up easy, let it slip away again; poor fools. And their grand-children are once more slaves." - Edward Murrow
Bobson is offline  
Old September 24, 2014, 10:12 PM   #8
wojownik
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 15, 2009
Posts: 1,182
The stunning inconsistencies and hypocrisy with this case bear further examination. I hope this thread does stay open, if we can have some measured discussion.

- supporters of this individual are making the same argument that many pro 2a activists make - that because Ferguson was armed he was potentially in a position to help if there was another person with gun or active shooter in the school. I read several quotes precisely that effect in local Buffalo newspapers.

- has Ferguson made any statement explaining why he as such a staunch supporter of the NY Safe Act and gun control in general feels compelled to carry a firearm himself?

- other questions to watch since these is a Class A misdemeanor ... Does he lose his firearms? Does he lose both his pistol and carry permits? Since he was allowed to plead to a misdemeanor, the NY Safe Act penalties conveniently (including those for carrying on school grounds) do not appear to apply. However, a Class A misdemeanor is a "serious offense" within the meaning of NY penal law (Section 400.00, and as defined under 265.00). As such, he should lose his licenses ... let's see.

This Ferguson case merely illustrates the double standard of many in the anti crowd. Those pushing for increased gun-control, are conversely (or perversely) the ones who apparently believe such laws don't apply to them .

Mr. Ferguson asserts that he “forgot” he was carrying his gun. Well, if he really forgot he had it then it wouldn't be very good for self-defence, now would it? And if he didn't really forget, well that's all whole different story (at least in terms of his credibility) ...

There are a number of other inconsistencies with his story which changes in the reporting leading up to and during the trial.

Last edited by wojownik; September 24, 2014 at 11:31 PM.
wojownik is offline  
Old September 25, 2014, 06:20 AM   #9
lxd55
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 1, 2014
Posts: 251
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMCCOY View Post
It's always been about control for the liberals.
that is it in a nutshell. do as I say not as I do.
lxd55 is offline  
Old September 25, 2014, 08:58 AM   #10
Art Eatman
Administrator
  
 
Join Date: December 22, 2002
Location: Terlingua, Texas
Posts: 38,654
since it's not really about guns as guns...

__________________
You're from BATFE? Come right in! I use all your fine products!
Art Eatman is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.