Quantcast
How could SCOTUS decide against carry and strict scrutiny? - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Social Situations > Legal

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Today, 02:12 PM   #1
usmarine0352_2005
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 21, 2005
Posts: 2,490
How could SCOTUS decide against carry and strict scrutiny?

.
I believe that most pro-2nd Amendment people believe that there is very little chance of SCOTUS denying that the 2nd Amendment allows carry outside the home.

The 2nd Amendment states:

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.”


Nowhere does the 2nd Amendment say "within the home" and no other Constitutionally protected right is restricted to the home. So, I'm wondering what argument could be used against carry outside of the home. I think most anti's have used the safety of the public reasoning.

I was also wondering if SCOTUS takes on a carry outside of the home case and rules in favor of carry outside the home, does that make it automatically then need strict scrutiny applied to it?



1.) What would a SCOTUS ruling defining the 2nd Amendment as only pertaining to inside the home say? What argument would they use?


2.) If SCOTUS does rule that the 2nd Amendment applies to carry outside the home does that automatically apply strict scrutiny to it from then on?

3.) Do you think a SCOTUS ruling on a 2nd Amendment carry case would have the same judges from Heller v. DC voting the same way pro/anti 2nd amendment as they did previously or do you think we would gain some or lose some for the 2nd Amendment?
.

Last edited by usmarine0352_2005; Today at 02:22 PM.
usmarine0352_2005 is online now  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.