Quantcast
How to ship firearms - Page 3 - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Social Situations > Legal

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 11, 2013, 07:20 PM   #51
salmonfisherman
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 11, 2013
Posts: 1
from the sound of things it is illegal to ship my AR rifle to myself in another state.
salmonfisherman is offline  
Old September 11, 2013, 11:21 PM   #52
NavyLCDR
member
 
 
Join Date: December 14, 2005
Location: Stanwood, WA
Posts: 7,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by salmonfisherman View Post
from the sound of things it is illegal to ship my AR rifle to myself in another state.
Not illegal at all. Just against UPS and FEDEX company policy. Since an AR-15 is still considered to be just an ordinary rifle by the US Post Office, you can mail it to yourself, in care of another person, in another state via US Postal Service so long as the rifle is still legal to possess in the destination state.
NavyLCDR is offline  
Old September 24, 2013, 09:31 PM   #53
JRWhit
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 13, 2012
Location: MO
Posts: 672
As a soon to be new guy to the dealers club. Are there any other requirements when a firearm is sold via internet, and then shipped to an ffl.
If i got this right, after verifying the other dealers ffl, I ship to them enclosing a copy of DL or FFL copy. What records are required from my end. Info on the FFL shipped to only, or also info on the actual purchaser of the firearm?
Is there any sort of transfer form when shipping to the FFL from an FFL?
JRWhit is offline  
Old September 25, 2013, 02:41 PM   #54
dogtown tom
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 15, 2006
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 3,468
Quote:
JRWhit As a soon to be new guy to the dealers club. Are there any other requirements when a firearm is sold via internet, and then shipped to an ffl.
If you ship a handgun via USPS you are required to submit a USPS Form 1508 to the post office.


Quote:
If i got this right, after verifying the other dealers ffl, I ship to them enclosing a copy of DL or FFL copy.
If you are a dealer it is a long standing courtesy to include a copy of your FFL with the shipment. Many dealers ask for nonlicensees to include a copy of their DL.


Quote:
What records are required from my end.
You record the disposition in your bound book.


Quote:
Info on the FFL shipped to only, or also info on the actual purchaser of the firearm?
The bound book only cares about disposition to licensees (you'll get a copy of their FFL) or to nonlicensees (they'll complete a 4473).

When I ship to the buyer, the box is addressed to the receiving dealer and the buyers name and phone# is included.



Quote:
Is there any sort of transfer form when shipping to the FFL from an FFL?
No.
Most will include an invoice or packing slip.
__________________
Need a FFL in north Dallas/Plano/Allen/Frisco/McKinney ? Just EMAIL me!

$20 transfers ($10 for CHL, active military, police, firefighters or schoolteachers)
dogtown tom is offline  
Old November 6, 2013, 11:44 PM   #55
PowerShot
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 6, 2013
Posts: 5
So I just received by UPS some mail-order ammo from a place in South Carolina, and it came in a box with these markings (photo attached):

Basically, a large black and white diamond sticker with another label-sticker underneath that reads

UN 0012
SMALL ARMS
AMMUNITION
INERT PROJECTILE

.. and also printed underneath that, onto the cardboard, the phrase "UN IDENTIFICATION NUMBER".

Does the "UN" refer to United Nations, meaning its proper for me to be sitting here with my mouth hanging open, or is it something else?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_1461.jpg (46.2 KB, 12 views)
PowerShot is offline  
Old November 7, 2013, 12:25 AM   #56
NavyLCDR
member
 
 
Join Date: December 14, 2005
Location: Stanwood, WA
Posts: 7,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by PowerShot View Post
So I just received by UPS some mail-order ammo from a place in South Carolina, and it came in a box with these markings (photo attached):

Basically, a large black and white diamond sticker with another label-sticker underneath that reads

UN 0012
SMALL ARMS
AMMUNITION
INERT PROJECTILE

.. and also printed underneath that, onto the cardboard, the phrase "UN IDENTIFICATION NUMBER".

Does the "UN" refer to United Nations, meaning its proper for me to be sitting here with my mouth hanging open, or is it something else?
Yes, it means United Nations Identification Number. Why should your mouth be hanging open? It's a new labeling system that has been agreed upon by all the member nations for hazardous materials so that every country can recognize the markings. It standardizes everything from compressed gasses, toxic materials, explosives, radiation hazards, etc.

The UN Identification Number is the specific item being shipped, in this case small arms ammunition.

This system replaces the ORM-D markings that used to be United States specific.
NavyLCDR is offline  
Old November 7, 2013, 03:34 AM   #57
PowerShot
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 6, 2013
Posts: 5
Mouth hanging open because ...

1) The ammunition shipment was internal to the United States (not international)

2) Numerous other shipments this year from other suppliers had no such UN markings.

3) Most importantly, the UN is intractably corrupt and openly hostile to human liberty and the US constitution. That they are allowed to have any part in defining how ammunition is transported within the United States is an obvious foot-hold for control.

Changing stickers and labels is useless, but does serve to propagandize the population to the idea that the UN somehow has a legitimate role in ammunition distribution (hence control), as a sort of advertising.

Was my ammunition purchase reported and logged in a United Nations database? No way to know. No redress since they are unelected and unaccountable.

Last edited by PowerShot; November 7, 2013 at 03:59 AM.
PowerShot is offline  
Old November 7, 2013, 05:02 AM   #58
NavyLCDR
member
 
 
Join Date: December 14, 2005
Location: Stanwood, WA
Posts: 7,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by PowerShot View Post
Mouth hanging open because ...

1) The ammunition shipment was internal to the United States (not international)
The US is simply adopting internationally recognized labelling for hazardous materials so that when we receive hazardous materials shipments from other countries also agreeing to the labeling scheme, firefighters and other emergency personnel have a greater chance of know what that shipment that is on fire on the interstate contains regardless of what country it came from.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PowerShot View Post
2) Numerous other shipments this year from other suppliers had no such UN markings.
Earlier this year the new international markings were optional. Either now, or in the near future, they become our mandatory standard.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PowerShot View Post
3) Most importantly, the UN is intractably corrupt and openly hostile to human liberty and the US constitution. That they are allowed to have any part in defining how ammunition is transported within the United States is an obvious foot-hold for control.
I tend to agree with the first sentence. The second sentence is nothing more than conspiracy theory with very little support to it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PowerShot View Post
Changing stickers and labels is useless, but does serve to propagandize the population to the idea that the UN somehow has a legitimate role in ammunition distribution (hence control), as a sort of advertising.
Changing stickers and labels serves a very real purpose. It reduces cost, for one thing. An international shipment received into the US or transported outside the US will no longer have to be relabelled to meet the new country of destination's standards because they will likely be the same. It also reduces the chances of mislabelling. You may think it is useless until water is used to extinguish a fire which causes an explosion because the shipment contained a water reactive material that was either mislabelled or the firefighters could not understand the non-standard labelling.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PowerShot View Post
Was my ammunition purchase reported and logged in a United Nations database? No way to know. No redress since they are unelected and unaccountable.
The new hazardous material marking requirements in no way, shape or form has any affect on this consipracy theory.
NavyLCDR is offline  
Old November 7, 2013, 09:15 PM   #59
PowerShot
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 6, 2013
Posts: 5
The shipments are internal to the US, not international. Do other countries in fact label it the same way as per the United Nations?

How many water reactive shipments have caught fire because firefighters couldn't read the label? Ammunition is not such a substance. What hazard is there in a box of ammunition that warrants special attention? The flammable gunpowder is individually wrapped about as securely as one could imagine, small amounts each separately sealed in brute-tough little containers. I bet a bottle of mouthwash is more likely to burn.

Calling something a conspiracy theory doesn't affect its truth or falsity. Curious thing to say given the UN's history of disarming populations, attempting to disarm populations, and discussing how best to disarm populations.

At least we agree the UN is intractably corrupt and hostile to human liberty and the US Constitution -- things that point away from conspiracy to disarm popu ... oh, wait ...

http://www.gunsandammo.com/2013/09/2...-means-to-you/

Still don't know if mail order ammunition is being reported to a UN database, if not by sellers, by the shippers. US Post Office photographs each piece of mail and retains the record, the question is where else does the information go.

Last edited by PowerShot; November 7, 2013 at 09:24 PM.
PowerShot is offline  
Old November 13, 2013, 05:16 PM   #60
mgkdrgn
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 21, 2008
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 3,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by PowerShot View Post
The shipments are internal to the US, not international. Do other countries in fact label it the same way as per the United Nations?

How many water reactive shipments have caught fire because firefighters couldn't read the label? Ammunition is not such a substance. What hazard is there in a box of ammunition that warrants special attention? The flammable gunpowder is individually wrapped about as securely as one could imagine, small amounts each separately sealed in brute-tough little containers. I bet a bottle of mouthwash is more likely to burn.

Calling something a conspiracy theory doesn't affect its truth or falsity. Curious thing to say given the UN's history of disarming populations, attempting to disarm populations, and discussing how best to disarm populations.

At least we agree the UN is intractably corrupt and hostile to human liberty and the US Constitution -- things that point away from conspiracy to disarm popu ... oh, wait ...

http://www.gunsandammo.com/2013/09/2...-means-to-you/

Still don't know if mail order ammunition is being reported to a UN database, if not by sellers, by the shippers. US Post Office photographs each piece of mail and retains the record, the question is where else does the information go.
As a former HazMat shipping specialist ....

The lessons learned that put the HazMat regs we have in place today were paid for in blood. They are not there because some pencil neck government official had nothing better to do that afternoon.

Ammunition is NOT sent via the mail, so there is nothing for the Post Office to photograph.

And please cite where you learn that all common carriers, including FedEx, UPS and USPS photograph every thing they ship and store it in some database somewhere? I must have missed that class.
mgkdrgn is offline  
Old November 14, 2013, 08:33 AM   #61
Mike1234567
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: July 6, 2010
Location: Alamo City
Posts: 4,085
I must agree with PowerShot on this one. The USA should not be adapting ANYTHING the UN proposes within our own borders. I very much dislike the UN labels if for no other reason than the propagandizing effect PS referred to. Shipments across borders, yeah okay. Within our own borders, stop meddling with US.

One tiny scratch can lead to horrible infection...
Mike1234567 is offline  
Old November 14, 2013, 04:32 PM   #62
jimmyraythomason
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 19, 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 7,092
Quote:
The USA should not be adapting ANYTHING the UN proposes within our own borders.
Absolutely! Stay out of domestic American matters.
Quote:
Within our own borders, stop meddling with US.
Ditto!
__________________
Pet peeves;"If you don't carry your gun like I do you're irresponsible","if you don't use the lube,cleaner and preservative that I do...you don't know guns","if you don't agree with my favorite gun scribe/guru,you are obviously uninformed".....just to name a few.
jimmyraythomason is online now  
Old November 16, 2013, 11:32 PM   #63
dogtown tom
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 15, 2006
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 3,468
Oh good grief.
The amount of paranoid stupidity in this thread is mind numbing.


__________________
Need a FFL in north Dallas/Plano/Allen/Frisco/McKinney ? Just EMAIL me!

$20 transfers ($10 for CHL, active military, police, firefighters or schoolteachers)
dogtown tom is offline  
Old November 23, 2013, 09:30 PM   #64
medalguy
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: March 20, 2009
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2,686
To slightly change the direction of this thread, guys, remember that FedEx EXPRESS is a separate company with different regulations and tariffs than FexEx GROUND/HOME service. They share very little except the FedEx name.

There, fixed it Tom. Sorry.

Last edited by medalguy; November 27, 2013 at 12:34 AM.
medalguy is offline  
Old November 24, 2013, 06:50 PM   #65
dogtown tom
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 15, 2006
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 3,468
Quote:
medalguy To slightly change the direction of this thread, guys, remember that FedEx EXPRESS is a separate company with different regulations and tariffs than UPS GROUND/HOME service. They share very little except the FedEx name.
__________________
Need a FFL in north Dallas/Plano/Allen/Frisco/McKinney ? Just EMAIL me!

$20 transfers ($10 for CHL, active military, police, firefighters or schoolteachers)
dogtown tom is offline  
Old November 25, 2013, 12:59 PM   #66
jimmyraythomason
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 19, 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 7,092
Quote:
The amount of paranoid stupidity in this thread is mind numbing.
Sorry but I don't equate a legitimate concern for the loss of national sovereignty to any international entity with "paranoid stupidity".
__________________
Pet peeves;"If you don't carry your gun like I do you're irresponsible","if you don't use the lube,cleaner and preservative that I do...you don't know guns","if you don't agree with my favorite gun scribe/guru,you are obviously uninformed".....just to name a few.
jimmyraythomason is online now  
Old December 4, 2013, 07:06 PM   #67
dceagle
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 4, 2013
Posts: 1
Shipping to self from California

I have a second home in California, where I lawfully own a shotgun and a handgun. I am selling the California house and need to ship both shotgun and handgun to myself at my home in Virginia. I have read most of the posts on this thread and it appears I can ship shotgun to myself through USPS without making any declarations, but I will want insurance--do I have to declare firearm for insurance purposes to USPS--if not what do I declare for insurance purposes?

Also it appears that I can ship handgun through either UPS or FEDEX to myself in care of another, with adult signature required, as long as I declare to either UPS or FEDEX that I am shipping a firearm? Is that correct? Does anyone know if California law places any additional limits on my ability to ship the handgun to myself in Virginia through either UPS or FEDEX?

I do not have any Federal Firearm license.

Thanks for assistance.
dceagle is offline  
Old December 4, 2013, 07:26 PM   #68
dogtown tom
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 15, 2006
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 3,468
Quote:
dceagle .....do I have to declare firearm for insurance purposes to USPS--if not what do I declare for insurance purposes?
Pay and print your shipping label online at usps.com If you try and do it at the counter expect a hassle.



Quote:
Also it appears that I can ship handgun through either UPS or FEDEX to myself in care of another, with adult signature required, as long as I declare to either UPS or FEDEX that I am shipping a firearm?
While Federal law allows you to do this, UPS and FedEx have changed their policies and will no longer accept nonlicensee to nolicensee shipments.
If you try and do so without telling UPS/FedEx you violate Federal law for failing to notify the carrier of an interstate shipment to a nonlicensee.






Quote:
Does anyone know if California law places any additional limits on my ability to ship the handgun to myself in Virginia through either UPS or FEDEX?
I would worry more about Federal law being violated in California.....ship to a VA dealer and transfer it via 4473.
__________________
Need a FFL in north Dallas/Plano/Allen/Frisco/McKinney ? Just EMAIL me!

$20 transfers ($10 for CHL, active military, police, firefighters or schoolteachers)
dogtown tom is offline  
Old December 4, 2013, 08:14 PM   #69
oneounceload
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 24, 2008
Location: Hot and Humid FL
Posts: 13,113
Or bring it with you when you return to VA
__________________
"Support our troops; we'll need them to overthrow our government"

"When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty."
Thomas Jefferson
oneounceload is online now  
Old January 20, 2014, 01:18 PM   #70
stringed
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 20, 2014
Posts: 1
Re shipping handgun via FedEx

Dogtown Tom,

Maybe their regulations have changed, but FedEx does not now allow individuals to ship firearms to themselves or other unlicensed individuals. Only to licensed importers, licensed manufacturers or licensed dealers. On their website is states
FedEx Express will transport and deliver firearms as defined by the United States Gun Control Act of 1968, between areas served in the U.S., but only between:
Licensed importers; licensed manufacturers; licensed dealers; licensed collectors; law enforcement agencies of the U.S. or any department or agency thereof; and law enforcement agencies of any state or any department, agency or political subdivisions thereof; or
Where not prohibited by local, state and federal law, from individuals to licensed importers, licensed manufacturers or licensed dealers (and return of same).
stringed is offline  
Old January 20, 2014, 02:41 PM   #71
ScottS
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 22, 2003
Location: Live Free or Die
Posts: 387
Quote:
Dogtown Tom,

Maybe their regulations have changed, but FedEx does not now allow individuals to ship firearms to themselves or other unlicensed individuals. Only to licensed importers, licensed manufacturers or licensed dealers. On their website is states

FedEx Express will transport and deliver firearms as defined by the United States Gun Control Act of 1968, between areas served in the U.S., but only between:
Licensed importers; licensed manufacturers; licensed dealers; licensed collectors; law enforcement agencies of the U.S. or any department or agency thereof; and law enforcement agencies of any state or any department, agency or political subdivisions thereof; or
Where not prohibited by local, state and federal law, from individuals to licensed importers, licensed manufacturers or licensed dealers (and return of same).
Yet another use for a C&R FFL.
ScottS is offline  
Old February 4, 2014, 12:17 PM   #72
perpster
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 22, 2005
Posts: 622
Question Shipping Firearm Magazines: Restrictions?

Want to send unloaded firearm magazines (pistol and/or rifle) from one US state to another US state. They are of legal number-of-rounds-capacity in both states. Neither sender nor receiver (the shippee, not the firearm part) are FFL.

Can this be done via US Postal Service? Common Carrier? Any particular rules, declarations, etc.?


If same scenario as above, but I want to ship them to myself in another state (in which I do not reside but will be visiting for lawful shooting purposes), can this be done via US Postal Service? Common Carrier? Does it matter, or is it preferable, to address them to myself at the other state address (at which I do not reside but will be visiting), or to myself "care of" someone who resides at that other state address? Any particular rules, declarations, etc.?

One question in addition to the above: If I send to myself, not "care-of", and want proof of delivery (such as Delivery Confirmation if use USPS Priority Mail), how would that work -- who could sign for delivery addressed to me if I'm not there? Does it work like any non-firearms-related shipment, in that anyone present can sign for it?

Thanks. Searched threads for this but did not find.
perpster is offline  
Old February 4, 2014, 03:56 PM   #73
NavyLCDR
member
 
 
Join Date: December 14, 2005
Location: Stanwood, WA
Posts: 7,691
No restrictions on mailing empty magazines at all. If you did happen to send them to a state where their possession is illegal, you could possibly be charged by that state (and you would have to be extradited) with conspiring with the recipient to enable them to commit a crime.

No different then sending a replacement screw - just because it is intended for use in a firearm.
NavyLCDR is offline  
Old February 7, 2014, 01:01 AM   #74
PowerShot
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 6, 2013
Posts: 5
Quote:
And please cite where you learn that all common carriers, including FedEx, UPS and USPS photograph every thing they ship and store it in some database somewhere? I must have missed that class.
If the USPS is organized enough to do it …

US Postal Service Logging All Mail for Law Enforcement (NY Times, 2013-Jul-3):

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/04/us...anted=all&_r=0

"… Mr. Pickering was targeted by a longtime surveillance system called mail covers, a forerunner of a vastly more expansive effort, the Mail Isolation Control and Tracking program, in which Postal Service computers photograph the exterior of every piece of paper mail that is processed in the United States — about 160 billion pieces last year. It is not known how long the government saves the images.

Together, the two programs show that postal mail is subject to the same kind of scrutiny that the National Security Agency has given to telephone calls and e-mail …"
PowerShot is offline  
Old February 7, 2014, 03:55 PM   #75
Mike1234567
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: July 6, 2010
Location: Alamo City
Posts: 4,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by PowerShot View Post
Mouth hanging open because ...

1) The ammunition shipment was internal to the United States (not international)

2) Numerous other shipments this year from other suppliers had no such UN markings.

3) Most importantly, the UN is intractably corrupt and openly hostile to human liberty and the US constitution. That they are allowed to have any part in defining how ammunition is transported within the United States is an obvious foot-hold for control.

Changing stickers and labels is useless, but does serve to propagandize the population to the idea that the UN somehow has a legitimate role in ammunition distribution (hence control), as a sort of advertising.

Was my ammunition purchase reported and logged in a United Nations database? No way to know. No redress since they are unelected and unaccountable.
I tend to agree with these types of posts. I don't like "other nations" having anything to do with "USA internal affairs" when they have nothing to do with "international affairs". We have enough interference from "our own" government, thank you very much. "Economic globalization" is one thing and "NWO" is quite another... or is it? Yeah, okay... never mind.
Mike1234567 is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.