Quantcast
avoiding ear damage with powerful rifles - Page 6 - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Rifle Country

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 3, 2013, 10:41 PM   #126
Ignition Override
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 15, 2007
Location: The Mid-South.
Posts: 4,342
Have our younger veterans noticed a definite loss of hearing from fights with insurgents?

Can't imagine the deafening sounds in alleyways, but inside a house must be the worst.
Ignition Override is offline  
Old November 16, 2013, 10:21 PM   #127
Thunder Struck
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 23, 2013
Location: New Orleans, La
Posts: 17
Say it again in my good ear???

I have ringing in my ears as i type. I have mistreated my ears alot not knowing any better. I use to listen to head fones at night before i went to sleep, I've been shooting since i was 3, use to run a 6 head wood moulder for years. Now i would wear hearing protection sometimes , much more as i got older and yes doubling up alot. The worst hearing problem i had was when i was deer hunting. Looking East out of a 4' x 6' shooting box, i turned and looked west and there was a deer herd 30 yards from my box. 20 of them just standing there grazing and looking up at the box. I slowly adjusted my self and picked one, the only problem was the muzzle was still inside of the box. When i shot it felt like somebody jabbed a ice pick in each ear at the same time. My left ear got the worst of it. I swear i got a mild concusion from that. Then one day i got the bright idea to put a muzzle brake on my rifle since i love long range shooting. I figured i could use all the help i could get. It doesn't kick much at all now but that SOB is sooooo loud and it sends a shockwave like a triangle, backwards and forwards. It is a rem 700 270wsm, i am trying to retire it but it is so dam accurate its scary and hard to. I am looking at ear/head gear and think ive made my mind up for this up comng hunting season. Also i find that even thou i am hard of hearing(people mumble) my ears are sensative. Things(sounds) hurt my ears and other people say it doesn't bother them. Dunno if its because i've damaged my ears and they are tender???
Thunder Struck is offline  
Old November 17, 2013, 04:30 PM   #128
Comrade Mike
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 17, 2013
Posts: 721
I double up on hearing protection no matter what. I like my ears.
Comrade Mike is offline  
Old November 17, 2013, 04:41 PM   #129
Mastrogiacomo
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 31, 2002
Location: Boston
Posts: 2,349
I have moderate, sloping to severe hearing in my left ear, and severe, sloping to profound sensorineural loss in my right ear. My mother had Rubella when she carried me so it's been this way from birth although it's getting worse as I age. I love to shoot so to protect my hearing, I'm getting custom made ear plugs through my audiologist and will look to get better ear muffs to wear on top of that.

Laura
Mastrogiacomo is online now  
Old December 20, 2013, 08:15 AM   #130
marvinlozano
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 27, 2013
Posts: 1
of course, protect your ears well to avoid regrets later

nudist

Last edited by marvinlozano; December 23, 2013 at 06:08 AM.
marvinlozano is offline  
Old December 21, 2013, 02:47 PM   #131
crashyoung
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 10, 2013
Location: Lowell Michigan
Posts: 15
I second what Thunder Struck says...

After years of use and abuse, before hearing protection was easily available, and working 30 years at an airport with big LOUD jets, my ears have a constant ring as well.
The fact that I love LOUD RocknRoll never had an effect tho...

I SAID, SPEAK LOUDER WHEN I CUP MY EARS, SONNY!
crashyoung is offline  
Old December 26, 2013, 12:35 PM   #132
kkayser
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 27, 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 61
remove brakes

Muzzle brakes increase the sound pressure at the ear drum about 100%, for the shooter. Others, more. With loud firearms, I don't think there is a point where "no" damage to hearing occurs. The less sound pressure, the better. People vary widely in their tolerance to noise. If you have any ringing or other hearing disturbances after shooting, you are damaging your hearing.
kkayser is offline  
Old December 26, 2013, 03:08 PM   #133
Trent
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: December 6, 2010
Posts: 8,403
Quote:
Originally Posted by moonzapa View Post
I lost most of the hearing in my left ear while sighting in a .338-06 Ackley Improved at my local range. I believe it was either a Barrett .338 Lapua or a .50 cal bolt action rifle that was fired next to me. I tried to ignore the blast but my ear really hurt. I was using foam ear inserts and I only wish I would have gotten a heads-up from the Barrett shooter that I may want to opt for Mickey Mouse ears.
Big thunderboomers combined with big muzzlebreaks are a recipe for hearing loss. In my early 20's I shot a lot of 50 BMG, and have tinnitus now. Muffs aren't enough, especially if you are spotting for a 50 BMG rifle with a muzzle break.

Anyone who shoots 50 BMG needs to be considerate and conscious of bystanders, and the state of their hearing protection.

When I pull RSO duty at competitions, even though the rules of the shooting range I shoot at say "eye and hearing protection is highly recommended", I set up the rules on competitions so it is *not* optional when I'm running the line. I have removed people (even paying members of the range who were spectating) from the immediate vicinity before when they refuse to put on hearing protection.

I don't let people who are participating remove hearing or eye protection until the range is cold and all firearms are cleared and hands-off. I also visually confirm every competitor has eyes and ears before giving the command to commence fire. People are forgetful creatures, and I have yet to run a match where someone hasn't had to be reminded to put on ears or eyes. I don't want 10 or 12 high powered rifles going off all around someone without ears or eyes!

I do the opposite sometimes; forget to remove them during cease fire. Last month one of the competitors nudged me and said "range is cold, take off your ears, you are yelling at people."

I said "Damn right I'm yelling. These ears help me keep my voice volume up where it should be so people pay attention and hear me give commands."

__________________
Tyrant:
1. a sovereign or other ruler who uses power oppressively or unjustly.
Example: http://www.whitehouse.gov/
Trent is online now  
Old December 29, 2013, 02:25 PM   #134
varanid
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 29, 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 12
Quote:
I wonder how our GIs had to feel who had to shoot one of those Garands all day ????? Never saw one of them with a plug or muffs on the ears. Wonder how they felt about that ?
Literally every veteran I know has different degrees of hearing loss.
varanid is offline  
Old January 1, 2014, 04:46 AM   #135
Swampman
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 15, 2011
Location: The Bayous of East Texas
Posts: 847
DOUBLE UP!

The best method I've found is a good set of earplugs combined with a decent pair of amplified muffs.

The amplified muffs allow you to hear range commands clearly through the earplugs, but cut out to provide increased hearing protection whenever shots are fired.

Pretty much the best of both worlds, increased hearing protection and increased safety.
__________________
7.62 NATO, It's kinda like 5.56 NATO, but for men....
Swampman is offline  
Old January 4, 2014, 10:53 AM   #136
jimsouth
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 4, 2014
Posts: 66
I had a Model 70 .243 - and even with good Silencios - after the range - I always had a ringing in my ears. Hardly a big caliber - but always the ringing. Not so with my old 03 Springfield - go figure.
jimsouth is offline  
Old January 16, 2014, 07:31 PM   #137
teetertotter
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 8, 2009
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 184
I am with Swampman, ear plugs + good set of amplified muffs. With .22 rifle, I use just the amplified ear muffs outdoors.

For our club indoor range with 10 stations with poor acoustics, it is the ear plugs with plain earmuffs rated at 31db for winter practice sessions.
__________________
www.beloitrifleclub.org
teetertotter is offline  
Old January 16, 2014, 11:01 PM   #138
bainter1212
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2012
Posts: 875
Quote:
Originally Posted by varanid View Post
Literally every veteran I know has different degrees of hearing loss.
I asked my grandfather once (a Korean War vet) if all of that gun and artillery fire had affected his hearing. He said he wasn't quite sure but his ears would be ringing bad after every bit of prolonged combat - he figured he probably suffered some damage but he is lucky not to have tinnitus or hearing aids.

A couple of years ago, my grandmother and aunts got it into their heads that grandpa had bad hearing and needed hearing aids. My uncle and I thought that was odd, because my grandpa never says "what?" or asks you to repeat yourself. So grandma made him go get a checkup.
Next time I saw him, I asked him how his checkup went. He picked up the results from the table and waved them proudly, saying his hearing was very good. My grandma had a grumpy look on her face and said it was "all a bunch of bull".
I joked that grandpa had achieved the dream - he can tune out women at will!
I swear my grandpa never laughed louder since I have known him.

I learned later that studies have shown this to be true....that men teach themselves to tune out a woman's voice after years and years.

As far as I stand......I suffered some high frequency loss after working on the flightline for several years in the Air Force. A few years later, I had regained most of it......but not all. Goes to show you that there is short term AND long term loss, but all in all damage is damage and if your ears ring, you just damaged them.
bainter1212 is offline  
Old January 22, 2014, 12:21 AM   #139
46R
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 29, 2009
Location: N Texas
Posts: 16
Definitely double up on your hearing protection, and if you really want to keep your hearing, then don't be afraid to spend some money on the best hearing protection too. Maybe even active ANRs.

I fly a small experimental airplane (extremely noisy inside) as another hobby, and happily spent nearly a thousand dollars on a premium ANR headset for that.

As a result of protecting my hearing all my life, including back in the 1980's when I used to run sound for live rock bands, now at 52 yrs old, I can still hear faint sounds at nearly the full 20Hkz upper limit. Too bad my vision hasn't fared nearly as well as I've aged... I'm going to be getting bifocals for my next eye exam
46R is offline  
Old January 22, 2014, 11:12 AM   #140
kkayser
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 27, 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 61
Does active noise reduction reduce the maximum sound pressure on the eardrum? Do they respond quickly enough to be effective against gunshot noise?
kkayser is offline  
Old January 27, 2014, 10:14 PM   #141
stargeezer
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: September 4, 2012
Location: Illinois
Posts: 94
Quote: Peterotto
VA denied his hearing loss claim as well.

There can be no question of the cause of hearing loss in the military. Aren't there lawyers ready to get rich fighting these claims? They can't lose.
************************


I guess you're not a vet trying to get a case through the VA system. Here's the deal and you won't believe it, but you cannot use a lawyer to fight a case with the VA. The only help a vet can get is through one of the service organizations like the DAV, PVA, and so on. The NSO (National Service Officers) that work with these groups are not lawyers but are trained and certified by the VA to represent vets, free of charge, and assist them in getting the benefits they deserve.

Now, if it sounds fishy the these folks (who do a great job) are trained by the VA and the organization they work for are to only ones who is allowed to help vets by federal law, I'd sure agree.

Now, I double up too, even for 5.56 - 22's not so much. I'm a combat vet and I have tinnitus from Vietnam.
__________________
US Navy 1973-75
US Army 1982-87 Retired
stargeezer is offline  
Old February 16, 2014, 06:27 AM   #142
kilibreaux
member
 
 
Join Date: February 11, 2014
Posts: 115
It's not a problem when you shoot OUTDOORS! A lot of people go to ranges with corrugated steel overhead cover that acts like a noise amplifier and yes, touching off a .50 BMG under such circumstances can be detrimental to hearing, however, shooting outdoors...OUT doors, I've not had a problem with the pressure-wave of rifles. Now my .460 Magnum does send a sonic shock-wave directly into the left ear that can cause genuine pain, but a single foam earplug solves the problem.
One of the worst handguns I've ever shot is the Glock 17C...truly horrific sound-pressure impulse that seems aimed directly into the ears...even out in the open!
kilibreaux is offline  
Old February 23, 2014, 09:33 PM   #143
Corn-Picker
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 1, 2013
Location: Morgantown, WV
Posts: 126
As they say, nothing's too good for a veteran, so that's what you'll get.

According to the OSHA literature, accoutning for the real-world (not lab rated) effectiveness of hearing protection, even doubling up isn't necessarily enough to prevent damage. According to these calculations a 308 Winchester with 20" barrel is still over 140 dB, even with foam plugs and muffs. If I had my own range I would build one of those rain-barrel based silencers. Luckily I'm in a state that allows shooting/hunting with suppressors, so I plan to buy a 30 cal, 22 cal, and 22 cal rimfire suppressor within the next few years. I still plan to double up on the range, but I would like to be able to fire a half dozen shots per year at deer without hearing protection, because walking around the woods with electronic muffs is a bit of a PITA.
Corn-Picker is offline  
Old February 24, 2014, 03:04 AM   #144
Swampman
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 15, 2011
Location: The Bayous of East Texas
Posts: 847
@ Corn-Picker
I love cans, but even the best of them won't make a full power .308 or 30-06 truly hearing safe.

I've never had a problem hunting with a good set of stereo amplified muffs (aside from looking like a total dork ).

I really like 'em for walking up hogs, they allow me to hear low grunts and movement that I wouldn't hear otherwise.

An added benefit is that you'll hear how much noise you're really making as you move and they'll help you improve your stalking techniques and noise discipline.
__________________
7.62 NATO, It's kinda like 5.56 NATO, but for men....
Swampman is offline  
Old March 12, 2014, 06:52 PM   #145
d'zaster
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 24, 2013
Posts: 27
What? same here....
d'zaster is offline  
Old March 15, 2014, 04:45 AM   #146
kilibreaux
member
 
 
Join Date: February 11, 2014
Posts: 115
The only reason the .50 BMG causes aural discomfort is because when encountered they are being shot on a range underneath a corrugated steel roof that acts to amplify sound.
Shoot a .50 BMG out in the open and you'll wonder why all the hype about noise.
kilibreaux is offline  
Old March 24, 2014, 09:34 PM   #147
mainecoon
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 25, 2012
Posts: 179
The problem with hearing pro and guns is that the noise is part of the joy of shooting. I'll shoot protected for most of the day and then take off the muffs for a couple shots just to enjoy the sound.
mainecoon is offline  
Old April 4, 2014, 02:00 PM   #148
greyghost01
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 31, 2014
Posts: 36
I was one of the dumb ones, Grew up shooting no ear plugs at all, Loud motorcycles, screw guns, routers, you name it loud music, But today I double up, its to late my hearing is terrible but I don't want it worse so wear hearing protection today. My 300 WM had a brake on it people would get up and leave at the range when I started shooting it. Didn't bother me at all. 357 mag is bad on ears also.
greyghost01 is offline  
Old April 27, 2014, 03:24 PM   #149
teetertotter
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 8, 2009
Location: Janesville, WI
Posts: 184
I use amplified muffs outdoors with .22 rifles. I have no HP rifles.

The indoor range, when people are shooting loud pistols, I have ear canal ones and then put on my 35db muffs over them.

If I did shoot HP, it would be with my indoor protection criteria.

Mowing grass...etc ....ear protection has always been there too. Family history/genes has been deafness or sever loss of hearing, mostly women.
__________________
www.beloitrifleclub.org

Last edited by teetertotter; April 27, 2014 at 03:30 PM. Reason: add some words
teetertotter is offline  
Old May 22, 2014, 02:22 AM   #150
Frank44
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 11, 2013
Posts: 69
After a day at the range with a 30-06 or 308, my ears still ring if I've only warn muffs. Doubling up with ear plugs is the way to go for me.
Frank44 is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.