Quantcast
avoiding ear damage with powerful rifles - Page 7 - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Rifle Country

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 26, 2014, 10:29 PM   #151
hso
Moderator
 
 
Join Date: January 3, 2003
Location: 0 hrs east of TN
Posts: 43,338
Quote:
Maybe even active ANRs.
Quote:
Do they respond quickly enough to be effective against gunshot noise?
ANRs work for machine noise, but don't work for impact/explosion/gunshot. There is currently no noise canceling technology responsive enough for gunshots so the best you can do is wear properly inserted HIGH NRR plugs under muffs.
__________________
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has."
Margaret Mead
******************
Please Read The Forum Rules

TheHighRoad exists to provide a higher grade of discussion than is found on some other gun forums so antis and undecideds can see that gun owners and RKBA advocates are not the reckless misanthropes they tell everyone we are. Personal attacks, group stereotyping, macho chest-thumping, and partisan hackery are low road and hurt all of us.
hso is offline  
Old July 1, 2014, 09:52 PM   #152
Big Shrek
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 16, 2014
Location: Florida Panhandle
Posts: 261
Even a hat with an ear flap is better than nothing at all, but get the plugs & muffs too.
Its a whole lot better than having to ask folks to repeat themselves...

I did a lot of 80's rock concerts & shooting all sortsa fun stuff over the decades...
Remember those old Army ballcaps with the flap?? That was often all I used with an M60...

I definitely don't catch as much as I used to...although I do hear odd noises quite clearly...
cracks my Wifey up that I can't hear her, but I can hear a creak from a door half a block away...
Protect yer ears...eventually, they'll have problems...
the more you do now, the less you'll have to miss later.
__________________
A firearm should be a tool in the hands of a deadly weapon, not a deadly weapon in the hands of a tool.
Big Shrek is offline  
Old July 1, 2014, 10:33 PM   #153
Hullraiser
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 29, 2014
Posts: 189
I've had tinnitus for years and always use some type of protection when shooting anything over a 22 short. It's not always convenient but necessary. The best is to use plugs and muffs. Over last weekend , I grabbed a SKS to rid my pond of a large snapping turtle from the deck. I quickly grabbed some electronic muffs only and now the ringing has increased again. In the future I'll make time to insert the plugs first. I would still use even if I had a suppressor
Hullraiser is offline  
Old July 10, 2014, 04:43 PM   #154
KSDeputy
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 20, 2009
Location: NE KS
Posts: 80
Hearing loss is real. I am a retired deputy sheriff with 30 years of service. When I first joined the office we went to the range and used no ear protection, no eye protection. No one knew back then that shooting with no ear protection caused cumulative permanent hearing loss. I must wear $ 3,500 hearing aids. My right ear is much worse than the left. I am right handed, and went to the range 4x a year for many years until someone discovered how dangerous it was to shoot without ear protection. It was too late for me and many other deputies. Please ALWAYS use ear and eye protection when shooting, save your hearing. Do not let something fly out and take your eye(s) out either. Take care of yourself, no one else will.
KSDeputy is offline  
Old July 16, 2014, 10:43 AM   #155
ClayinAR
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 14, 2008
Posts: 138
My hearing doctor says part of the damage is caused by concussion, no hearing protection works against that.
Plugs and muffs do help, but understand that big guns are going to do damage regardless.
Too late for me.
ClayinAR is offline  
Old September 12, 2014, 09:28 AM   #156
zfk55
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 7, 2009
Location: Lost Prairie Montana
Posts: 299
My entire shooting life (55 years) I was always conscious of the need for hearing protection with firearms, but.......... Using a hearing aid, I now have 85% hearing in my left ear and 10% in my right ear. I was stupid enough not to equate DB's from firearms to the recording studio control room.
20 years of sound engineering mostly rock music in the control room left me as I am today.
zfk55 is offline  
Old September 16, 2014, 09:00 PM   #157
Hullraiser
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 29, 2014
Posts: 189
I had always thought the pointed foam rubber ones on the flexible band would be handy. After using the pair I got they seem to do very little in noise reduction. Plus you can't use muffs with them because of sealing.
Hullraiser is offline  
Old October 12, 2014, 06:04 PM   #158
MattinVa
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 29, 2011
Location: Southeastern, Virginia
Posts: 4
conduction from butt stocks through bones to the nerves

Gentlemen,
Regarding the fact that we experience hearing damage "due to conduction from butt stocks through bones to the nerves", I would like to add a bit more information... The stiffer the stock the more it works like a tuning fork and damages to the cilia in your inner ear...

The absolute WORST stocks for this problem are McMillan Fiberglass Units WITH the addition of Kevlar as a stiffener while maintaining light weight. I found this by using several of the McMillan/Remington Custom Shop KS Stocks. The KS standing for Kevlar Synthetic.

Wooden stocks deaden the transmission of vibrations. As does heavier fill from McMillan. Laminated wood is likely your best choice but not ideal for all weapons. The simplest and best solution is an Eagle stock pack. It insulates your jaw bone and protects your hearing.

Like an idiot I would note that often I would have a tinnitus spike while dry firing my rifle on the bench. It didn't click fully until my irritating tinnitus became life changing tinnitus. I've been through TRT, many sets of attenuators, and I am experiencing tinnitus now that is louder than ever before... The only option is find another ENT, mine retired for a career in Country Music of all things, and get going on the Jasterbroff TRT regimen once again.

I was advised by my first tinnitus clinic, the one that is under new management, to sue both McMillan and Remington. I had carried my 40XB-KS into the office, and yes I got some weird looks from fellow patients, and the audiologist did fairly detailed testing on the stock. I refused to sue as it is not my cup of tea, however, I was PISSED to learn Kelly McMillan was fully aware of the problem. Furthermore he will include a piece of .25" foam for anyone who asks for it...

At any rate be careful with super stiff kevlar infused synthetic stocks as they can really damage your hearing and worse lead to chronic tinnitus. I've had it bad for the last 13 years and it prevents sleep, concentration, etc. without drug therapy. It was bad enough that I would go 2-3 days without falling asleep and then get a few hours out of sheer exhaustion. Only through pharmacology do I ever get a decent nights sleep...

I run Surefire Ear Plugs with Sordin Supreme electronic muffs. Peltor 6s are junk as are Pro Ears...imho

My .338 Cans, of which I have two, are AAC Ti TiTan QDs. The best 20 ounces you've ever added to a lapmag. imho...
My favorite can is a Gemtech .17 HMR unit on an Anschutz 1717. Really makes that chambering a sweet heart...

Regards, Matt Garrett
MattinVa is offline  
Old November 27, 2014, 07:39 PM   #159
Eral Flinn
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 27, 2014
Posts: 3
ears

Have you considered an Elite Iron for your gun(provided it is legal in your State). High quality and will ~30 DB.

C-7 Z51
__________________
C-7 Z51
Eral Flinn is offline  
Old November 29, 2014, 06:09 PM   #160
kkayser
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 27, 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 80
not my gun

It is not my gun but others on the range. The loudest gun I shoot is an AK 47 without a suppressor. I think the shooter gets the least noise because he is behind the muzzle. Others, on the sides, are the ones that suffer.
kkayser is offline  
Old January 5, 2015, 01:50 PM   #161
mc223
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 18, 2006
Location: Just Down the Road
Posts: 860
.....................Huh..........................?
__________________
The internet is like that: one person chokes to death on a french fry and suddenly french fries are deadly
mc223 is offline  
Old March 19, 2015, 08:25 PM   #162
Sovblocgunfan
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 10, 2015
Location: Spring TX
Posts: 47
to post 160: That's silly. Other guns affect, but yours affects you too. Behind or beside, damage still can occur. If you are a right handed shooter, it affects your left ear more. With me it did, anyway.

I read through a pretty good chunk of this thread and empathize with a bunch of you. Mine isn't so bad compared to some of you vets, but I still have some asymmetrical hearing loss and permanent tinnitus. The ringing in my ears always went away after some time, but it took one shot with an M44 to make it permanent...
Sovblocgunfan is offline  
Old June 14, 2015, 10:56 AM   #163
Vernon1
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 29, 2014
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42
Your Hearing Is Not Going To Come Back

I was an aircraft mechanic in the USAF.

I retired after many years from DL.

I retired after many years at LUV.


Wear the plugs AND the muffs.

No sunglasses with the muffs please-ruins the sound seal.

Many jokes are made about hearing. However, it is not funny one bit when it is YOUR hearing that has been damaged.
Vernon1 is offline  
Old June 18, 2015, 04:17 PM   #164
12Pump
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 10, 2013
Posts: 143
I have a question (or an idea) to a make a gun such as AR15 a bit "quieter", at least to those to the sides. I know a linear muzzle break could be used, but they can cost $30 and up. They direct the noise forward. But wouldn't a regular pipe fitted over the barrel accomplish the same thing? My current rifle has an A2 type muzzle break which directs the blast in every direction but down. I was considering the idea of getting a length of pipe that I could fit over the muzzle break and maybe up to 4" forward of that. It could also extend all the way back over the barrel to the front site post for a more even look.

Upon firing, the muzzle blast would be contained in the pipe for 4" beyond the muzzle break and directed forward. Isn't this basically how a linear break functions?

FYI, I haven't tried it yet, hence my reason for asking first.
__________________
"Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name (Jesus Christ) under heaven given among men by which we must be saved. Acts 4:12
12Pump is offline  
Old July 13, 2015, 12:32 PM   #165
Joe_N
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 27, 2015
Posts: 16
About 30 to 35 years ago I went shooting with a friend. He brought everything from a .22 to a .44 mag and they were all loud but he had a .41 mag that had a different sound from the rest. The .41 had a higher pitched, sharper report and it hurt my ears every time it was fired which was often. My ears have been ringing ever since that one outing. I now use the foam plugs and a pair of muffs with a rating of NRR 30. I go to an indoor range occasionally and tried the muffs only but realized that was not enough and so doubled up with the foam plugs and muffs.

A downside to the foam plugs. A few years ago I had a really bad ear ache and ended up at the doctor's office. He found the ear wax was mashed in my ear canals and putting pressure on my ear drum. The nurse washed out my ears and that solved my ear ache. I couldn't explain to the doctor how that had happened though he accused me of using a Q-tip to clean my ears which I don't do. Later I realized it was caused by the foam plugs I was using occasionally at work when in noisy environments. I tend to produce an excess amount of ear wax so now I make sure to wash them out occasionally.
Joe_N is offline  
Old July 15, 2015, 06:57 PM   #166
kkayser
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 27, 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by 12Pump View Post
I have a question (or an idea) to a make a gun such as AR15 a bit "quieter", at least to those to the sides. I know a linear muzzle break could be used, but they can cost $30 and up. They direct the noise forward. But wouldn't a regular pipe fitted over the barrel accomplish the same thing? My current rifle has an A2 type muzzle break which directs the blast in every direction but down. I was considering the idea of getting a length of pipe that I could fit over the muzzle break and maybe up to 4" forward of that. It could also extend all the way back over the barrel to the front site post for a more even look.

Upon firing, the muzzle blast would be contained in the pipe for 4" beyond the muzzle break and directed forward. Isn't this basically how a linear break functions?

FYI, I haven't tried it yet, hence my reason for asking first.
I am quite sure that will work. Someone at the range had barrel tuner on the end of the barrel. The gun made almost no sound on the firing line.
kkayser is offline  
Old July 15, 2015, 08:35 PM   #167
Ranb
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 15, 2003
Location: WA, USA
Posts: 892
If you put something on the muzzle to reduce noise, mostly likely it will be considered a silencer in the eyes of the BATFE. If you live in the USA, then you have to obtain a license or pay the $200 tax prior to making one.

Ranb
Ranb is offline  
Old July 16, 2015, 05:33 PM   #168
B!ngoFuelUSN
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 7, 2011
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 353
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hullraiser View Post
I had always thought the pointed foam rubber ones on the flexible band would be handy. After using the pair I got they seem to do very little in noise reduction. Plus you can't use muffs with them because of sealing.
I find them useless as well. It might be the shape of the head and the ear canal. I made an early post in this thread that, I believe, was very useful. But re the ear canal, whenever I insert foam plugs they don't go 'in' (towards the center of my head), but rather 'up' and 'in' at a 45 degree angle. Whether this is common I do not know but because of that, the plugs with a behind-the-neck connector cannot possibly work.
And of course, as you note, they cannot work with (electronic) noise-reducing ear phones which I always use in tandem with the plugs.
Years in aviation, including private aviation/aerobatics with a noisy recip just in front of your knees and lots of miles on a motorcycle has taxed my hearing. I still pass all standard tests but I have the sense that I am approaching the borderline of nominal and I do everything I can to keep it that way.
BTW if anyone in the headphone biz is listening, I wish they could find a way of making a small cut or canal or even a small area of even softer and more flexible and conforming foam where the sides of your eye glasses/protection pass through and in to the cups. There is an obvious difference in decimal level when I wear eyeware and without (just testing, I always wear eye protection) because of the very small gap caused by the eyewear. This seems like an opportunity to upgrade the design of these devices.
B

Last edited by B!ngoFuelUSN; July 16, 2015 at 05:41 PM.
B!ngoFuelUSN is offline  
Old July 17, 2015, 10:26 AM   #169
kkayser
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 27, 2012
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 80
sports glasses are usually held on with elastic around the back of the head. Safety eye shields are also held on with elastic.
kkayser is offline  
Old July 17, 2015, 10:52 PM   #170
bcb2
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 15, 2009
Posts: 15
To counter the ANTI's. How can all the anti-signing Sheriff's not be held liable for the irreversible permanent hearing damage caused by their actions?????
bcb2 is offline  
Old July 19, 2015, 09:47 AM   #171
hso
Moderator
 
 
Join Date: January 3, 2003
Location: 0 hrs east of TN
Posts: 43,338
The only way to prevent hearing loss from any loud noises is to wear hearing protection as PPE. The only way to maximize the protection is to wear the highest rated plugs and muffs together and properly (no gap in the ear cup pads, properly inserted plugs). Electronic shooting muffs do not cancel the noise, they're only cutting the microphones off at the detection of the report from the firearm.

If you're shooting and have the option, the addition of a suppressor reduces the noise from the firearm. If you live where suppressors are not an option, the addition of a muzzle device that projects the blast forward helps direct the noise forward of the shooter (these are not suppressors as they direct the noise and do nothing to reduce the noise level).

All firearms require the use of hearing protection. The maximum protection comes from properly using the maximum NRR plugs with muffs.
__________________
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has."
Margaret Mead
******************
Please Read The Forum Rules

TheHighRoad exists to provide a higher grade of discussion than is found on some other gun forums so antis and undecideds can see that gun owners and RKBA advocates are not the reckless misanthropes they tell everyone we are. Personal attacks, group stereotyping, macho chest-thumping, and partisan hackery are low road and hurt all of us.
hso is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.