Quantcast
Identity and Date of Manufacture of Colt Revolvers - Page 3 - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Handguns: Revolvers

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 6, 2013, 08:03 PM   #51
Old Fuff
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 23,608
Since R.L. Wilson went out of the picture Colt's don't seem to be interested in outside researchers. Instead they would rather sell the information. If you call their Customer Service Department at (800) 962-2658 and give them the model and serial number they'll tell you the year it was made, and nothing more. The person you're talking with will be reading off a computer screen and may or may not have any in-depth knowledge of the subject.
Old Fuff is offline  
Old January 10, 2013, 09:45 AM   #52
lr45lc
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 4, 2011
Location: Albuquerque N.M.
Posts: 26
Thanks Old fuff, I asked my brother he said it also has 38 under the s/n I'm in NM he's in ohio so I can't look at the gun up close.
lr45lc is offline  
Old January 11, 2013, 01:15 PM   #53
dwstone1227
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 6, 2012
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 76
38 Colt Police Positive Special

a) 38 Special CTG
b) 4 " barrel
c) Wood grips, rounded and all wood (no metal) across bottom.
d) 6 shot
e) Fixed sights.
f) 26324M. Bottom of grip is all wood, no serial number
g) 26324M under the crane.
There is no number under the barrel or face of the cylinder. There is no serial number at bottom of grip.
h.) On left side of barrel: Police Positive Special, 38 Special CTG

This is one very nicely maintained revolver. I bought it back in about 1980 for $75. I never had to time to shot much. It may have 50 rounds through it total. I recently sent my wife and kids to a local NRA instructor along with all my guns for training. The instructor refused to use this gun. Instead he came back with his own revolver and used it. After the training session he showed me an guesstimate of value for this gun. This gun is now a Safe Queen. I bring it out of it's original box once in while just to hold it and smile. My son has already claimed this revolver as his inheritance.

Thanks in advance for the information on this gun. Sorry to bore you with the history of this gun, but this story brings smiles to me.

dwstone1227




Last edited by dwstone1227; January 11, 2013 at 01:57 PM. Reason: Attached pictures
dwstone1227 is offline  
Old January 11, 2013, 07:04 PM   #54
Old Fuff
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 23,608
You have a .38 Colt Police Positive Special, and the serial number dates it to having been made in 1997. The model was introduced in 1908, and discontinued in 1998 - one year after the one you have.

The name comes from "Police" indicating its obvious use, and "Positive" to show that it has Colt's famous positive hammer block that makes it unquestionably safe to carry with all the chambers loaded.

In later years it was cataloged to be available with 4, 5 or 6-inch barrels, while the snubby version with a 2-inch one is called the Detective Special.

The revolver in itself is not uncommon, but so late production, "in the box," is.
Old Fuff is offline  
Old January 11, 2013, 11:20 PM   #55
dwstone1227
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 6, 2012
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 76
Wow. Time does fly. I would have sworn I had this gun longer than that. Thanks for the information.
Dwstone1227
dwstone1227 is offline  
Old January 18, 2013, 12:13 PM   #56
DGilby85
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 18, 2013
Posts: 1
Colt Anaconda Bad Barrel Serial Numbers

I called a contact at Colt who informed me that Anacondas with serial numbers MM32463 and under are considered early production models that have the accuracy issues.
DGilby85 is offline  
Old January 18, 2013, 08:11 PM   #57
radar1972
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 4, 2013
Location: Georgia
Posts: 77
While everyone's posting 'old Colts', I'll include a couple pix of my father-in-law's Colt Army Special. He bought it from a pawn shop in 1942. Checks of the serial number at proofhouse.com indicate it was manufactured in 1919.

We fired it at the range today.




radar1972 is offline  
Old January 29, 2013, 09:09 AM   #58
almarwol
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 29, 2013
Posts: 1
I have a Colt Agent .38 caliber snub nose 6 shot w/ sn 123947. Finish is flat black and has shrouded ejector w/ wood handles. Need to see when manufactured. database from Colt not conslusive.
almarwol is offline  
Old April 11, 2013, 09:35 PM   #59
sinisterkid
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 11, 2013
Posts: 1
I just joined THR forum because I have been offered to purchase a vintage Colt revolver. Not sure if I'm supposed to start a new thread, but I figured this would be a good start. I believe I have a Colt Banker's Special in .38 S&W. It is nickel finished w/walnut grips. Serial number is 168XXX, and according to proof house, manufactured in 1926. All of my research today verifies that this revolver meets all the correct criteria:

2 in. barrel
half-moon sites
ser. #168XXX
Nickel finish
square butt (walnut checkered)
hammer spur checkered
correct patent marks: ends with "Oct. 5, 1926"

Here's the kicker guys---This gun appears 98-99% condition on finish! Right grip panel has front corner broken off......looking at the inside of the frame where the cylinder locks up, I swear this gun has possibly NEVER been fired! Can anyone help me out? i.e. what should I offer the seller (an honest price--my wife's boss (it belonged to his father who passed away last year). He has no clue, "just a handgun". Will post pics this weekend.
Thanks......

Last edited by sinisterkid; April 11, 2013 at 09:41 PM. Reason: pics
sinisterkid is offline  
Old April 11, 2013, 10:31 PM   #60
Old Fuff
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 23,608
The Colt Bankers Special was a variant of the .38 Police Positive model with a 2" barrel. It was apparently introduced in 1928 at around serial number 177,000. It came about as the result of an inquire from the U.S. Postal Service that needed a small lightweight .38 revolver to arm personal working on railroad mail cars.

This would seem to cut your revolver out of the picture, but it is known that the company made a fair number of Police Positive .38's on special order that had shorter lengths then the cataloged 4", 5" and 6". At the same time a lot of similar revolvers were made into aftermarket snubbies by someone with a handy hacksaw. Some clear pictures might help us to tell, or you can pay Colt a substantial fee to research their shipping records to determine the original finish and barrel length. If it turned out that it was indeed a factory-made pre-Bankers Model the value would be increased enough to more then pay for the factory letter. If it is a cut-off the value would suffer.
Old Fuff is offline  
Old June 1, 2013, 04:59 PM   #61
ka2rzo
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 1, 2013
Posts: 9
Not sure what it is

Hey guys,

I've acquired a seriously modified Colt and am hoping someone can help me find out what this puppy started out as. Past refinishing removed almost all markings (rampant colt, model, patents, butt, etc.) except for "A.C." on right side just above grip (R.A.C., maybe?), S/N and a small star on the front of the cylinder.

Pics are attached since I have no idea what's been replaced on this gun except for the frame. Any info would be much appreciated!

a) .45 ACP
b) 7 1/2"
c) See pics
d) 6
e) Front fixed, rear adj.
f) No makings on bottom of grip, lanyard ring cut off and hole plugged
g) Crane has 492XX with an 'X' above, crane cutout has 492XX with a 'Z'
below.

[IMG][/IMG]

[IMG][/IMG]



ka2rzo is offline  
Old June 1, 2013, 05:28 PM   #62
JRH6856
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 5, 2011
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 3,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by ka2rzo View Post
Hey guys,

I've acquired a seriously modified Colt and am hoping someone can help me find out what this puppy started out as. Past refinishing removed almost all markings (rampant colt, model, patents, butt, etc.) except for "A.C." on right side just above grip (R.A.C., maybe?), S/N and a small star on the front of the cylinder.

Pics are attached since I have no idea what's been replaced on this gun except for the frame. Any info would be much appreciated!

a) .45 ACP
b) 7 1/2"
c) See pics
d) 6
e) Front fixed, rear adj.
f) No makings on bottom of grip, lanyard ring cut off and hole plugged
g) Crane has 492XX with an 'X' above, crane cutout has 492XX with a 'Z'
below.
It looks like a Colt New Service. If so, the 492xx SN would place the manufacture date in 1911.
__________________
"The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" US Constitution, 2A, 1791
“Rights are not supposed to be open to popularity contests." Rachel Maddow, 2013

The only thing you can count on being set in stone is your epitaph...if you're lucky
JRH6856 is offline  
Old June 1, 2013, 05:31 PM   #63
Old Fuff
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 23,608
This one is going to take some looking into, but the number 49,2xx is Colt's serial number, and the frame at least dates from 1911 - so it isn't a Model 1917, and in 1911 they weren't making a New Service in .45 ACP. On the other hand, the cylinder latch thumbpiece dates from the 1930's. At the time the frame was made the longest cataloged barrel length was 7 1/2" so it could be an original (but highly modified) barrel.

More later.
Old Fuff is offline  
Old June 1, 2013, 05:58 PM   #64
JRH6856
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 5, 2011
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 3,805
1911 is a far as I got before the pieces stopped fitting.
__________________
"The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" US Constitution, 2A, 1791
“Rights are not supposed to be open to popularity contests." Rachel Maddow, 2013

The only thing you can count on being set in stone is your epitaph...if you're lucky
JRH6856 is offline  
Old June 1, 2013, 06:59 PM   #65
ka2rzo
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 1, 2013
Posts: 9
What's really bugging me is the "A.C." stamp on the right side. If that's a scrubbed version of R.A.C., how did it end up on a 1911 NS? Is this some earlier model of Colt DA revolver and not a New Service?
ka2rzo is offline  
Old June 1, 2013, 09:02 PM   #66
JRH6856
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 5, 2011
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 3,805
The adjustable rear sight probably makes it a Shooting Master (which is a New Service with adjustable sights). Early ones were chambered in .44 Russian or .44 Special. Later ones in .45 M1909 (M1909) and .45ACP (M1917). Serial # is definitely 1911 which predates the 1917 service chambering in .45ACP, so it could be a M1909 with a M1917 cylinder.

What does the R.A.C. signify to you?
__________________
"The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" US Constitution, 2A, 1791
“Rights are not supposed to be open to popularity contests." Rachel Maddow, 2013

The only thing you can count on being set in stone is your epitaph...if you're lucky
JRH6856 is offline  
Old June 1, 2013, 09:13 PM   #67
ka2rzo
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 1, 2013
Posts: 9
Rinaldo A. Carr. He was an Army inspector at the Colt factory which made me wonder why his initials would be on a civilian gun.
ka2rzo is offline  
Old June 1, 2013, 09:25 PM   #68
JRH6856
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 5, 2011
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 3,805
If it is an M1909, that would make sense. The M1909 was an Army model. But I see what you mean. His tenure ended in 1909.
__________________
"The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" US Constitution, 2A, 1791
“Rights are not supposed to be open to popularity contests." Rachel Maddow, 2013

The only thing you can count on being set in stone is your epitaph...if you're lucky
JRH6856 is offline  
Old June 1, 2013, 09:27 PM   #69
ka2rzo
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 1, 2013
Posts: 9
Plus, it had a lanyard ring but someone cut it off. Did the civilian guns have lanyard rings? Not sure. So between the military inspector's mark and the lanyard ring, I was wondering if maybe this started out as a military pistol.
ka2rzo is offline  
Old June 1, 2013, 09:33 PM   #70
JRH6856
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 5, 2011
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 3,805
If it is a M1909, it is a military pistol. The M1909 was replaced by the M1917. Both were Colt New Service military models.

Frank Baker apparently replaced Carr in 1909. Do you see any FB marks anywhere?
__________________
"The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" US Constitution, 2A, 1791
“Rights are not supposed to be open to popularity contests." Rachel Maddow, 2013

The only thing you can count on being set in stone is your epitaph...if you're lucky
JRH6856 is offline  
Old June 1, 2013, 09:45 PM   #71
Old Fuff
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 23,608
The rear sight is not one made by Colt, and New Service and Shooting Master target revolvers had a flat, not rounded topstrap.

I don't think the cylinder started life as a .45 ACP, because there isn't enough clearence at the back for a half-moon clip (or so it seems in the picture). A New Service cylinder chambered in .455 Eley (an English cartridge) seems more likely, and these were cataloged in 1911.

R.A.C. was U.S. Army Inspector, Rinaldo C. Carr, who was a sub-inspector at Colt's between 1889 and 1916. Among others he inspected Models 1873 (reworks) between 1902 to 1907, 1909 New Service between 1909 and 1911, and 1911 pistols between 1914 and 1915.

Model 1909 New Service revolvers were purchased by the Army, Navy and Marine Corps with Colt serial numbers that were as high as the 53,000 range but in mixed lots with civilian commercial guns in between. All of the military production had 5 1/2" barrels and were chambered in .45 Colt (not .45 ACP).
Old Fuff is offline  
Old June 1, 2013, 09:57 PM   #72
JRH6856
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 5, 2011
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 3,805
OK, then Carr is good for the 1911 date. (No surprised that Fuff has better records that Proofhouse.)

But that does look like a Shooting Master sight doesn't it? Possibly added when the gun was rebuilt as a 45ACP and refinished?
__________________
"The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" US Constitution, 2A, 1791
“Rights are not supposed to be open to popularity contests." Rachel Maddow, 2013

The only thing you can count on being set in stone is your epitaph...if you're lucky
JRH6856 is offline  
Old June 1, 2013, 10:44 PM   #73
Old Fuff
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Arizona
Posts: 23,608
Quote:
But that does look like a Shooting Master sight doesn't it?
Not even close. The Shooting Master and New Service Target models had a flat topstrap that had a small dovetail at the back for the rear sight. The sight itself could only be moved for windage (side to side) after you loosened a screw.

Elevation was built into the front sight. You loosened a screw and the blade could, within limits, be rotated higher or lower.

Quote:
Possibly added when the gun was rebuilt as a 45ACP and refinished?
At this point I don't think it's a 1917 .45 ACP cylinder. There isn't enough clearence between the breechface and cylinder for a half-moon clip and the thin rim on the back of the .45 ACP case. If it's short-chambered and not a .45 Colt I would say a .45 Eley/Webley (possibly rechambered). Still looking, but right now I think it was made up from a collection of parts. The work and refinishing was done most likely during the late 1940's or 1950's.

My views are open to change pending more investigation.
Old Fuff is offline  
Old June 1, 2013, 10:53 PM   #74
JRH6856
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 5, 2011
Location: Flower Mound, TX
Posts: 3,805
Quote:
right now I think it was made up from a collection of parts.
Sounds like something I'd try to do.
__________________
"The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" US Constitution, 2A, 1791
“Rights are not supposed to be open to popularity contests." Rachel Maddow, 2013

The only thing you can count on being set in stone is your epitaph...if you're lucky
JRH6856 is offline  
Old June 2, 2013, 08:09 PM   #75
ka2rzo
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 1, 2013
Posts: 9
JRH6586: No FB mark, but gun was heavily scrubbed in the past.

Old Fuff: You're right on the money about the chambering. It's very finicky and won't close on full moonclips, so I have to use halfmoon clips. So you think this thing is a rechambered Eley? I'll buy that.

Thanks a bunch, guys!
ka2rzo is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2016 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.