Quantcast
Anyone else going back to the 9mm?? - Page 7 - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Handguns: Autoloaders

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 11, 2013, 09:59 AM   #151
Tcruse
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 24, 2011
Posts: 259
The problem wih all of these caliber discussions is that you can find a case to support any of the choices and a case where any of them failed to perform. I rhink that to be meaningful you have to consider what your environment is and what you shoot the best. For example, if you are a LEO and think that you may be shooting thru car windshields, then the 357SIG may be a better choice than 9mm. But we also have to understand that there are overlap between the different calibers. The hottest 9mm will overlap the lower end of the 357SIG performance range. For non-LEO shooters it appears that the choice is 9mm or .45ACP in this area. 380ACP. 40SW, 357SIG, .45GAP, and 10mm are at least one level down as demostrated by the range brass that I pickup. For a while back last year it looked like the 5.7 would move up into the common level, but the ammo shortage has killed it chance for now at least. 380 seems to be increasing.

If I were expecting large 4 legged problems, then 10mm would be higher on my list. Nice thing about 10mm is that most of the guns will also shoot .40S&W with only minor changes.

One thought is that most shooters do not practice enough or attent enough training. If our president would like to reduce violence, why not take some of the wasted government money and provide low cost training and ammo. I would think that NSSF and the NRA would be willing to help setting up such projects. Maybe make ammo tax deductable. (Yes, I know time for the tin foil).
Tcruse is online now  
Old May 12, 2013, 09:18 PM   #152
gym
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 9, 2007
Posts: 4,291
I am only in 9mm and 45cal after 45 years of screwing around with every caliber out there. I have 2 of each, one M&P 9c and Glock 26, and a Glock 30 and XDS, for carry. Got rid of 38, 32, 380 and 40 was the last one to go/ I shoot those two better than the rest
gym is online now  
Old May 12, 2013, 09:23 PM   #153
1SOW
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 28, 2007
Location: South Texas
Posts: 3,411
Never left. Versatile caliber that's inexpensive enough to shoot excessively. :-)
1SOW is offline  
Old May 14, 2013, 04:39 PM   #154
Target008
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 13, 2010
Posts: 22
I have hopped from one caliber to the next like a frightened rabbit and while i miss the 20rnd mags for my m9 i have found my love in the 1911 the only auto i can hit with. and since capacity is so limited for me i stick with 10mm/45 super
Target008 is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.