THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Rifle Country

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old February 29, 2004, 12:18 AM   #1
Edward429451
member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado
Posts: 2,261
Bullet Porn? (Naked AP Pics)

I've heard and read about the steel rod penetrators that are inside the SS109's and M2AP's but never actually seen a cross section of one so decided to have a look see for myself. Very interesting so decided to share.

62g SS109
10.6g penetrator.

163g M2AP
79.4g penetrator.

Attached Images
File Type: jpg ss109m2ap2.jpg (31.5 KB, 2514 views)
Edward429451 is offline  
Old February 29, 2004, 01:28 AM   #2
son of a gun
member
 
 
Join Date: September 22, 2003
Location: ClearWater Florida USA
Posts: 366
I read some where that The US military Has 7.62x51 depleted Uranium bullets.
son of a gun is offline  
Old February 29, 2004, 10:25 AM   #3
Third_Rail
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 10, 2004
Posts: 4,984
Is that a 30-06 in the middle? That penetrator looks NOTHING like the ones that are in mine, that looks badly broken/oxidized/corroded.... The penetrators in mine are nice tungsten rods, nice and pointy.
__________________
Giving up the right to arms is a mistake a free people get to make only once. I will not make that mistake.

Government always thinks everything is about leadership. It never is. It's about the people. - Standing Wolf
Third_Rail is offline  
Old February 29, 2004, 01:46 PM   #4
Edward429451
member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado
Posts: 2,261
Quote:
Is that a 30-06 in the middle? That penetrator looks NOTHING like the ones that are in mine, that looks badly broken/oxidized/corroded....
The M2AP was pulled from 30/06 and the loaded round is 7.62 Nato. It does show some damage having had the jacket melted off of it. The best I could do with what I had to work with.

How'd you get yours out? Those bullets are constructed tough!
Edward429451 is offline  
Old February 29, 2004, 05:28 PM   #5
Third_Rail
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 10, 2004
Posts: 4,984
I clipped the boattail off with pliers, which took about 5 minutes. A few soild whacks with a hammer on the tip sent the core out.... another one I opened by getting large end clippers and clamping them down on the groove and twisting while applying pressure. The bullet then simply seperated with a tug on the ends. Easy enough!
__________________
Giving up the right to arms is a mistake a free people get to make only once. I will not make that mistake.

Government always thinks everything is about leadership. It never is. It's about the people. - Standing Wolf
Third_Rail is offline  
Old February 29, 2004, 07:24 PM   #6
Starpower
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 26, 2003
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 121
Bullet porn

Ya know, if ya putta bullet ina furnace, it'll splode? (Credit Bill Cosby, circa 1966)
__________________
The only thing required for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. Burke

Starpower
Starpower is offline  
Old February 29, 2004, 08:33 PM   #7
Edward429451
member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado
Posts: 2,261
Ya know if ya put oxy/acet flame ona bullet, it just melts away? (Ed circa 04)

Sounds like I did it the hard way. I pre drilled the bottom cap with a teeny drill bit (the thought of 'splode' crossed my mind) and held it with pliers upright so the lead could drain. An impatient whack or 2 on the nose with a hammer prolly damaged it while hot. Jus a lil more heat and the jacket disappeared.

Mostly just wanted to see how much rod was in them. The M2 was impressive.
Edward429451 is offline  
Old February 29, 2004, 08:46 PM   #8
uglygun
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 16, 2003
Posts: 528
Here's what those 163grn cores look like after nearly passing completely through a piece of 1 1/4 inch steel plate fired out of a 300WinMag...

uglygun is offline  
Old February 29, 2004, 09:17 PM   #9
telewinz
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,307
WOW, look at the boobs...err I mean bulges on that steel plate!
__________________
Speak softly and carry a megaphone
but turn it off when Bush is discussed
.
telewinz is offline  
Old February 29, 2004, 09:37 PM   #10
Third_Rail
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 10, 2004
Posts: 4,984
Mental note: reload .300 win magnum with 30-06 AP bullets. WOW....
__________________
Giving up the right to arms is a mistake a free people get to make only once. I will not make that mistake.

Government always thinks everything is about leadership. It never is. It's about the people. - Standing Wolf
Third_Rail is offline  
Old February 29, 2004, 09:57 PM   #11
Nick1911
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 16, 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 797
Just curious; is AP ammo still avaliable? I don't know why, but I always though it was "restricted" or some non-sence. I'd like to buy a few 'just because'

(Ed, I'm not trying to hi-jack your thread or anything, just curious )
Thanks
Nick
Nick1911 is offline  
Old February 29, 2004, 10:10 PM   #12
ShaiVong
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 25, 2002
Location: Raccoon City, USA
Posts: 995
I think the 'AP' stuff has something to do with handgun calibers... SS109 is not considered AP.. But that doesnt explain the 30.06 stuff floating around; or the AP you can buy off of ammoman.. I'm not exactly sure what the rule is.
__________________
AWB: Requiem aeternam dona eis, Domine.
ShaiVong is offline  
Old March 1, 2004, 12:33 AM   #13
Arkady
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 241
Neither is the ATF, and they regulate the stuff.

I'll summarize to the best of my ability--
AP ammo exists only in handgun rounds. Sadly, 7.62x39, .308, and many other rifle rounds are considered to be handgun rounds because somewhere, there exists a single shot pistol chambered for them. (Thank you TC, et al.) What AP ammunition consists of is determined by the materials used in the core, as well of the ratio of jacket weight to core weight (i think that the jacket can only weigh 25% of the total, but i'm not sure).

Most things harder than lead are considered verboten--steel, tungsten, Uranium (shame, too... i know i've got some somewhere )

ATF specifically exempts SS109 and M2 bullets from the prohibition. Likely because of the amount of surplus in the case of M2, and because the penetrator in an SS109 bullet weighs less than 25% of the total weight of the bullet (again, i'm guessing on this one--i read it on the internet, for what it's worth).
__________________
Oderint dum metuant.
Arkady is offline  
Old March 1, 2004, 02:09 AM   #14
artherd
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 7, 2003
Location: An Elevated Position in the Bay Area, PRK
Posts: 2,514
Holey... 1.25" plate!? that's... impressive.

Time for a .300Weatherby Mag or .300RUM
artherd is offline  
Old March 1, 2004, 09:57 AM   #15
Edward429451
member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado
Posts: 2,261
Nick, you can order the M2AP as pulled slugs for reloading from HiTechammo.com for 12 bucks per hundred.

If you don't reload you will have to find them at a gunshow for .25 to .50 cents apiece. (someone PM'ed me wanting to sell some loaded rounds...forget who, maybe they'll PM you with the same offer after seeing your interest.)
Edward429451 is offline  
Old March 1, 2004, 01:50 PM   #16
uglygun
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 16, 2003
Posts: 528
Yeah, the 163grn bullets smoke from a 300WinMag. I too have wondered what they would manage to achieve if fired from a 300RUM or something like a 30/378.

My final load is now putting a hole clean through the plate from a distance of 70-80 yards, fairly warm charge of 4138 that I worked up to from starting. The loads pictured were my 2nd load over starting, the bumps on the plate without penetrators sticking through were the starting load.

I figure I'm getting near 3200fps which is a good deal more than a 30-06 could deliver. Can't help but wonder what a 300RUM would spank them out at, probably 3400fps or so.


I have had some tests done where I used 150grn AP bullets, those things are crap. It was my hope that the 150s would perform better due to higher muzzle velocities but the cores are of a more mild steel construction and they welded/fused to the steel target plate not even bumping the back of the plate out in a manner similar to my starting load with the 163grn bullets.

Construction differences between the 150 and the 163 are pretty interesting as well. 163grn WWII bullets use a small bit of lead at the tip ahead of the steel alloy core, possibly to do a certain amount of splash damage to the steel before the tungsten alloy core begins to penetrate into the steel(very notable crater pattern to the 163s on steel compared to other bullets). The 150s have a portion of lead located at the base of the bullet and I don't think it does anything beneficial when it comes to performance on target, maybe the lead at the rear of the bullet makes it more accurate though providing weight at the aft of the bullet.

Core construction is also markedly different. The 163 cores have a body that is sort of cylinderical along it's length and a tip that seems to sharpen into a conical point. The 150grn cores seem to have a rounded ogive that makes up a good portion of it's length. Upon impact I can't help but wonder if the 163grn core design help to assure that the core penetrates in a straight path, the 150s I suspect are yawing upon impact and it could have something to do with the much more rounded point. But it also probably has a LOT to do with the rediculous 300WinMag velocities which are causing my 150s to melt to crapola.

Interestingly though, if you go out to the FAS.org site and look up the pics they have of the M993 and M995 bullet construction it makes use of a core that is very similar to that I've seen in the 163grn cores.



Next up for the 300WinMag once I get a new steel target plate, I'm gonna try the Barnes copper solids in 125grn and 150grn weights to see how performance ranks between that of an all lead core bullet and a AP cored bullet. Hoping for better than 3500fps with the 125grn copper solids.



Somebody with a 22-250, 220Swift, or 22Cheetah needs to get out there with the SS109 bullets and put them on some steel to see if that little tiny "penetrator" tip is worth a darned.
uglygun is offline  
Old March 1, 2004, 04:47 PM   #17
SDC
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 8, 2003
Location: People's Republic of Canada
Posts: 2,710
Here's a couple of shots of some of the AP, semi-AP, and "sort-of" AP ammo I've sectioned for my collection: L-R, 12.7x108mm Soviet API, .50 Browning SLAP-Tracer, .50 Browning SLAP, .55 Boys Anti-Tank, 13mm Mauser T-Gewehr, .50 Vickers, .50 BMG M8 API bullet, .50 BMG M2 AP bullet, .50 BMG Mk 211 Mod 0 API bullet, .50 BMG M20 APIT bullet, .30-06 Springfield M2 AP, 8mm SmK-Leuchtspur (AP-Tracer), .303 British AP-Incendiary, and 7.62x54R Russian API.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mvc-001x.jpg (174.4 KB, 2356 views)
__________________
Gun Control in Canada: Keeping the streets safe for muggers, rapists, and other violent criminals since 1934.
SDC is offline  
Old March 1, 2004, 04:56 PM   #18
SDC
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 8, 2003
Location: People's Republic of Canada
Posts: 2,710
Next, L-R: XM645 SPIW flechette, 5.56mm NATO SS109, .357 Mag Arcane, 5.7x28mm FN P90, PMC Ultramag w. bronze projectile, Remington "Metal-Piercing" FMJ, early-style KTW w. steel-core, later KTW w. bronze core, unknown steel-core, .38 Spl THV, .38 Spl Omni-Shok, .45 Auto THV, 9mm THV, 9mm saboted "arrow-head" AP, 9mm steel-core in brass base-cup, and 5.45x18mm Soviet PSM.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg mvc-002x.jpg (181.9 KB, 3923 views)
__________________
Gun Control in Canada: Keeping the streets safe for muggers, rapists, and other violent criminals since 1934.
SDC is offline  
Old March 1, 2004, 05:30 PM   #19
Third_Rail
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 10, 2004
Posts: 4,984
Thumbs up

Nice collection!
__________________
Giving up the right to arms is a mistake a free people get to make only once. I will not make that mistake.

Government always thinks everything is about leadership. It never is. It's about the people. - Standing Wolf
Third_Rail is offline  
Old March 1, 2004, 09:28 PM   #20
cpileri
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Posts: 1,277
steel cores

What is the diameter of the steel core in the 50bmg AP/API? the 30cal cores?
any others that you have measured?
thanks,
C-
__________________
...under the name of liberalism, they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation...- Norman Thomas, Socialist Party Candidate 1940-48,co-founder ACLU
--WTB:G17,10/22,Marlin45-70,12gaRem1100,AR lower
cpileri is online now  
Old March 1, 2004, 10:06 PM   #21
Edward429451
member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Colorado Springs Colorado
Posts: 2,261
Good info uglygun. So these M2AP cores are tungsten?

SDC....that's some serious bullet porn! How did you section those so nice, and with intact cores?

I have one of those KTW's in 9mm. I've always heard that they was hollow all the way into the tip. I guess not.
Edward429451 is offline  
Old March 1, 2004, 10:30 PM   #22
uglygun
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 16, 2003
Posts: 528
Don't know if they are truely tungsten but perhaps some kind of alloy.

I suspect as much as they are remaining intact and in good shape after passing through a sizeable chunk of steel of fairly decent hardness. The steel plate I'm shooting at doesn't appear to be mild steel but it isn't of hardness comparable to true armour plate, somewhere in between.


I need to get something like a 1/2 inch thick piece of true hardened armour plate to shoot at to re-evaluate the performance of these bullets. I've shot at heavy duty truck leaf springs in the past and seen SS109 not even leave so much as a dent in the metal, something like that would probably be suitable for testing the 163grn bullets to see how they do. Same goes for the 150grn bullets as well, if the target is of high enough hardness the 150grn bullets which I suspect are mild steel should fail miserably to something harder like a tungsten alloyed bullet.
uglygun is offline  
Old March 1, 2004, 11:04 PM   #23
Third_Rail
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 10, 2004
Posts: 4,984
They're tungsten.... the amount of water they displace for a given weight checks out; I'm talking just the core, not the full round, btw.
__________________
Giving up the right to arms is a mistake a free people get to make only once. I will not make that mistake.

Government always thinks everything is about leadership. It never is. It's about the people. - Standing Wolf
Third_Rail is offline  
Old March 1, 2004, 11:19 PM   #24
Gewehr98
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Posts: 5,987
Arkady, it wasn't the Thompson/Center Contender that spelled the end...

ATF never had a problem with single-shot pistols like the Contender, Encore, Wichita, XP-100, and so forth. What they did have a problem with was Olympic Arms and their OA-93 autoloading pistol, based on an AR-15, when they produced the prototype chambered in 7.62x39, and threatened to put it into production. This was right around the same time in 1993 that those $100 Norinco SKS rifles, and 1000 rds. steel-core ammo for $100 showed up on the market. The industry pleaded with Olympic Arms not to make the gun. ATF warned that if the gun was produced they'd ban the 7.62x29 steel-core ammo. Olympic Arms disregarded the pleas and warnings, placing ads in Shotgun News for their new 7.62x39 autopistol. The rest, as they say, is history.

Read about it on Dean Speir's Gun Zone website:
http://www.thegunzone.com/762x39.html
__________________
"Bother", said Pooh, as he chambered another round...

Neural Misfires
Gewehr98 is offline  
Old March 2, 2004, 12:13 AM   #25
Nick1911
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 16, 2003
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 797
hmm... so does that mean that no one ever built a semi-auto 30-06 handgun? (omg, that sounds like a visit to the ER...)
Nick
Nick1911 is offline  
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.