Quantcast
Vepr 54r - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Rifle Country

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 18, 2012, 04:29 AM   #1
Cactus Jack Arizona
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 25, 2008
Location: Southwest MO
Posts: 617
Vepr 54r

Hey everyone. I've not had much luck finding forums regarding the VEPR 54R rifle. Unlike the PSL, which is built for light ball ammo only, I'd like to know if heavy ball (185 - 200gr) can be safely and consistently used in the VEPR. It says that the VEPR has a thicker receiver and barrel and that the receiver has been sturdied-up with reinforcements. Anyone have any ideas on the matter?

Thanks.
__________________
VIVA LA CONSTITUTION!!!!!!
Cactus Jack Arizona is offline  
Old November 18, 2012, 09:32 AM   #2
WardenWolf
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 11, 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,033
From what I understand, the VEPR can safely fire any 7.62x54R ammo. However, keep in mind that the VEPR does not come with a muzzle brake. It may be very unpleasant to shoot unless you have one fitted.
__________________
Heart of the guardian, way of the warden, path of the exile.

Autistic Gun Owner
Asperger's does NOT cause violence.
WardenWolf is offline  
Old November 18, 2012, 09:50 AM   #3
Ash
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 10, 2004
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,411
The VEPR, as far as I know, has the same receiver thickness of the PSL. Indeed, it is really just the Russian interpretation of the PSL. The issue with the PSL is that it was not DESIGNED for heavy ball simply because no military used it at the time (nor do they use it now). Just as the m1 Garand, M14, Swedish Ljungman, even the M16 were designed around certain loads, the PSL was intended to fire the military standard combloc round, which was 149 grains. Fire heavy stuff through the Garand and the oprod shatters. Ditto for the m14.

It has to do with the timing of the gas system and nothing to do with the strength of the firearm.

In any case, MOLOT claims that the VEPR can fire any weight bullets. Since they say it's okay, then its okay.
Ash is offline  
Old November 18, 2012, 10:10 AM   #4
WardenWolf
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 11, 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,033
No, the VEPRs come with reinforced receivers and are overall much heavier duty. They're a better rifle, no question, but again, you really need to have it fitted with a muzzle brake or you'll be very unhappy after shooting it for a while.
__________________
Heart of the guardian, way of the warden, path of the exile.

Autistic Gun Owner
Asperger's does NOT cause violence.
WardenWolf is offline  
Old November 18, 2012, 01:03 PM   #5
Ash
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 10, 2004
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,411
No, the PSL has the same reinforcements and same metal thickness as the VEPR. They use the same front trunions. They are riveted the same. They are in no way heavier duty.
Ash is offline  
Old November 18, 2012, 02:07 PM   #6
Cal-gun Fan
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 9, 2010
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 1,081
The PSL and VEPR have different length receivers and gas systems. The PSL has a longer receiver and gas system, whereas the VEPR has a normal AK-length gas tube/receiver. The PSL gas system is set up for light ball, whereas the VEPR will work with all loads. By work I mean that it won't be damaged.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by benzy2 View Post
For my room clearing, I'll take an Xbox controller over a PS3 controller. It's a little bulkier, but I'm a bit faster with it.
Cal-gun Fan is offline  
Old November 18, 2012, 04:17 PM   #7
navystang
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 3, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 24
the vepr has a thicker receiver to handle the heavier ammunition no problem. the only down side is they are not light with the thicker receiver and barrel.

http://forum.saiga-12.com/index.php?...-vepr-x54rpsl/

but they are a hoot to shoot.
__________________
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - George Orwell
navystang is offline  
Old November 18, 2012, 05:26 PM   #8
Cal-gun Fan
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 9, 2010
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 1,081
As for the lightness-lets take caliber into consideration. For a .223, 7.62x39, or 5.45, the VEPR is really heavy. However, for a .308/7.62, its actually still pretty light (Especially if you take the thumbhole stock off).
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by benzy2 View Post
For my room clearing, I'll take an Xbox controller over a PS3 controller. It's a little bulkier, but I'm a bit faster with it.
Cal-gun Fan is offline  
Old November 18, 2012, 07:43 PM   #9
Cactus Jack Arizona
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 25, 2008
Location: Southwest MO
Posts: 617
Ok, thanks everyone who chimed in. If anyone else has anything to add, please feel free to do so.
__________________
VIVA LA CONSTITUTION!!!!!!
Cactus Jack Arizona is offline  
Old November 19, 2012, 08:30 AM   #10
mshootnit
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 4, 2007
Posts: 1,617
Wideners just got a load of 54 match ammo in.
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.”
― Winston S. Churchill
mshootnit is offline  
Old November 21, 2012, 08:34 PM   #11
Ash
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 10, 2004
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,411
The PSL is just fine with heavy loads if the gas system is adjusted to take the heavier loads. This is exactly the same approach with the FAL. Indeed, there is a simple mod that constricts the gas port diameter, making the rifle function with heavy ball without excessive wear. The PSL's gas port was optimized for light ball (which was standard ball - nothing heavier was used anywhere except as surplus made in the 1950's).

Receiver length is irrelevant, thickness is the same, and the trunions are virtually identical. I could open the gas port up on a VEPR and cause it to batter itself, too.

The VEPR is not a more durable or better reinforced rifle and as a better rifle, the PSL is the most fielded sniper rifle in the middle east with greater numbers than the SVD or Yugo M76. The Iranians field an SVD copy and Iraq used a stamped-receiver Al-Kadesih which was more SVD than anything else. Even so, the PSL has been fielded in enough combat zones to establish its ruggedness. The VEPR is a sporter never fielded anywhere.

Having said that in what seemed harsh towards the VEPR, I consider the VEPR a fine rifle and without modifications it can handle heavy ball. The point is not really to trash it, as it is a fine, rugged rifle. But the PSL is far more rugged than is credited here.
Ash is offline  
Old May 6, 2013, 08:49 PM   #12
navystang
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 3, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 24
Deleted
__________________
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - George Orwell
navystang is offline  
Old May 7, 2013, 12:40 AM   #13
-Jake-
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 24, 2013
Posts: 21
I'd like to end the internet rumor that VEPRs have thicker receivers than PSLs. I measured my PSL at 1.5mm so what are the VEPRs measuring? Let me guess, 1.5mm. The VEPR does have a heavier contour barrel though.
-Jake- is offline  
Old May 7, 2013, 02:28 AM   #14
ShooterGuy
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 21, 2012
Location: Kansas
Posts: 90
I'm not going to get caught up in the comparison debate, but I can say I've put about every type of 54r you can find through mine and she chews through it fine. Am planning on threading it for a brake though. Fun shooter in my opinion...
ShooterGuy is offline  
Old May 7, 2013, 06:34 AM   #15
jodavk
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 16, 2012
Posts: 26
There is a forum dedicated to the Vepr 54r at the Saiga12 forum website.
jodavk is offline  
Old May 7, 2013, 09:46 AM   #16
WardenWolf
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 11, 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,033
I opted for a VEPR .308 after I discovered the VEPR x54R doesn't use double-stack magazines. That's its Achilles heal, and one that's not easily fixed since the very few double-stack 7.62x54R magazines out there all have a bolt hold open feature, making them too long in the rear for the magazine well.
__________________
Heart of the guardian, way of the warden, path of the exile.

Autistic Gun Owner
Asperger's does NOT cause violence.
WardenWolf is offline  
Old May 7, 2013, 10:13 AM   #17
Adam123
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 15, 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 417
Quote:
Originally Posted by jodavk View Post
There is a forum dedicated to the Vepr 54r at the Saiga12 forum website.
Yeah. That section gets about one post per week. In other words, it's dead. I think I saw some tumbleweed blowing through there the last time I paid a visit.
__________________
AK > AR
Adam123 is offline  
Old May 7, 2013, 12:49 PM   #18
-Jake-
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 24, 2013
Posts: 21
akfiles.com might have an active vepr forum. might be worth a shot.
-Jake- is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.