|
|||||||
| Welcome to THR |
| You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: July 25, 2008
Location: Southwest MO
Posts: 617
|
Vepr 54r
Thanks.
__________________
VIVA LA CONSTITUTION!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: November 11, 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,033
|
From what I understand, the VEPR can safely fire any 7.62x54R ammo. However, keep in mind that the VEPR does not come with a muzzle brake. It may be very unpleasant to shoot unless you have one fitted.
__________________
Heart of the guardian, way of the warden, path of the exile. Autistic Gun Owner Asperger's does NOT cause violence. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 10, 2004
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,411
|
The VEPR, as far as I know, has the same receiver thickness of the PSL. Indeed, it is really just the Russian interpretation of the PSL. The issue with the PSL is that it was not DESIGNED for heavy ball simply because no military used it at the time (nor do they use it now). Just as the m1 Garand, M14, Swedish Ljungman, even the M16 were designed around certain loads, the PSL was intended to fire the military standard combloc round, which was 149 grains. Fire heavy stuff through the Garand and the oprod shatters. Ditto for the m14.
It has to do with the timing of the gas system and nothing to do with the strength of the firearm. In any case, MOLOT claims that the VEPR can fire any weight bullets. Since they say it's okay, then its okay.
__________________
Read Rise of the Dark Son!!http://www.amazon.com/Rise-Dark-Son-...4488373&sr=8-2 http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/rise...dle/1104139515 |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: November 11, 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,033
|
No, the VEPRs come with reinforced receivers and are overall much heavier duty. They're a better rifle, no question, but again, you really need to have it fitted with a muzzle brake or you'll be very unhappy after shooting it for a while.
__________________
Heart of the guardian, way of the warden, path of the exile. Autistic Gun Owner Asperger's does NOT cause violence. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 10, 2004
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,411
|
No, the PSL has the same reinforcements and same metal thickness as the VEPR. They use the same front trunions. They are riveted the same. They are in no way heavier duty.
__________________
Read Rise of the Dark Son!!http://www.amazon.com/Rise-Dark-Son-...4488373&sr=8-2 http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/rise...dle/1104139515 |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: July 9, 2010
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 1,081
|
The PSL and VEPR have different length receivers and gas systems. The PSL has a longer receiver and gas system, whereas the VEPR has a normal AK-length gas tube/receiver. The PSL gas system is set up for light ball, whereas the VEPR will work with all loads. By work I mean that it won't be damaged.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: July 3, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 24
|
the vepr has a thicker receiver to handle the heavier ammunition no problem. the only down side is they are not light with the thicker receiver and barrel.
http://forum.saiga-12.com/index.php?...-vepr-x54rpsl/ but they are a hoot to shoot.
__________________
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - George Orwell |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: July 9, 2010
Location: Santa Rosa, California
Posts: 1,081
|
As for the lightness-lets take caliber into consideration. For a .223, 7.62x39, or 5.45, the VEPR is really heavy. However, for a .308/7.62, its actually still pretty light (Especially if you take the thumbhole stock off).
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: July 25, 2008
Location: Southwest MO
Posts: 617
|
Ok, thanks everyone who chimed in. If anyone else has anything to add, please feel free to do so.
__________________
VIVA LA CONSTITUTION!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: February 4, 2007
Posts: 1,617
|
Wideners just got a load of 54 match ammo in.
__________________
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.” ― Winston S. Churchill |
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 10, 2004
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,411
|
The PSL is just fine with heavy loads if the gas system is adjusted to take the heavier loads. This is exactly the same approach with the FAL. Indeed, there is a simple mod that constricts the gas port diameter, making the rifle function with heavy ball without excessive wear. The PSL's gas port was optimized for light ball (which was standard ball - nothing heavier was used anywhere except as surplus made in the 1950's).
Receiver length is irrelevant, thickness is the same, and the trunions are virtually identical. I could open the gas port up on a VEPR and cause it to batter itself, too. The VEPR is not a more durable or better reinforced rifle and as a better rifle, the PSL is the most fielded sniper rifle in the middle east with greater numbers than the SVD or Yugo M76. The Iranians field an SVD copy and Iraq used a stamped-receiver Al-Kadesih which was more SVD than anything else. Even so, the PSL has been fielded in enough combat zones to establish its ruggedness. The VEPR is a sporter never fielded anywhere. Having said that in what seemed harsh towards the VEPR, I consider the VEPR a fine rifle and without modifications it can handle heavy ball. The point is not really to trash it, as it is a fine, rugged rifle. But the PSL is far more rugged than is credited here.
__________________
Read Rise of the Dark Son!!http://www.amazon.com/Rise-Dark-Son-...4488373&sr=8-2 http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/rise...dle/1104139515 |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: July 3, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 24
|
Deleted
__________________
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." - George Orwell |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: April 24, 2013
Posts: 21
|
I'd like to end the internet rumor that VEPRs have thicker receivers than PSLs. I measured my PSL at 1.5mm so what are the VEPRs measuring? Let me guess, 1.5mm. The VEPR does have a heavier contour barrel though.
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: September 21, 2012
Location: Kansas
Posts: 90
|
I'm not going to get caught up in the comparison debate, but I can say I've put about every type of 54r you can find through mine and she chews through it fine. Am planning on threading it for a brake though. Fun shooter in my opinion...
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: February 16, 2012
Posts: 26
|
There is a forum dedicated to the Vepr 54r at the Saiga12 forum website.
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: November 11, 2008
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,033
|
I opted for a VEPR .308 after I discovered the VEPR x54R doesn't use double-stack magazines. That's its Achilles heal, and one that's not easily fixed since the very few double-stack 7.62x54R magazines out there all have a bolt hold open feature, making them too long in the rear for the magazine well.
__________________
Heart of the guardian, way of the warden, path of the exile. Autistic Gun Owner Asperger's does NOT cause violence. |
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: November 15, 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 417
|
Yeah. That section gets about one post per week. In other words, it's dead. I think I saw some tumbleweed blowing through there the last time I paid a visit.
__________________
AK > AR |
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: April 24, 2013
Posts: 21
|
akfiles.com might have an active vepr forum. might be worth a shot.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
| IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER |
| Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages. |