Quantcast
Will this State Supreme Court's ruling on weapons transport set precedent? - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Social Situations > Legal

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 17, 2014, 02:22 AM   #1
usmarine0352_2005
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 21, 2005
Posts: 2,596
Will this State Supreme Court's ruling on weapons transport set precedent?

I know some state's laws on weapons transportation are ridiculous.



http://www.nhregister.com/general-ne...ons-conviction






Quote:
Connecticut Supreme Court overturns ex-Army medic’s weapons conviction

By Dave Collins, The Associated Press

Posted: 12/16/14, 5:17 PM EST


The Connecticut Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered the acquittal of a former Army medic who was sentenced to 15 months in prison for transporting a knife and police baton in his vehicle during a move out of state.

“The safe transportation of weapons protected by the Second Amendment is an essential corollary of the right to possess them in the home for self-defense when such transportation is necessary to effectuate that right,” Palmer wrote.
usmarine0352_2005 is offline  
Old December 17, 2014, 04:14 AM   #2
ugaarguy
Moderator
 
 
Join Date: March 19, 2006
Posts: 10,882
It will only set a precedent in CT since it's a state court ruling on state law.
ugaarguy is offline  
Old December 17, 2014, 10:37 AM   #3
Devonai
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 24, 2003
Location: East Granby, CT
Posts: 3,391
If only our neighbors to the north would follow suit.

In this case, any pro-2nd Amendment ruling is a huge victory in Connecticut, considering the current political climate. This ruling addresses a glaring Catch-22 in which a resident could legally purchase an item but have no way of legally transporting it home.
Devonai is offline  
Old December 17, 2014, 06:36 PM   #4
MisterMike
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 19, 2009
Location: Midwest USA
Posts: 752
Quote:
It will only set a precedent in CT since it's a state court ruling on state law.
That's correct, but it can be looked to for guidance in states that don't have clear precedent on the issue. Not binding, but potentially persuasive. Also, though I'm trying to figure out how this might play out, in some instances, the USSC has looked to legal developments among the states to determine standard to be applied at the federal level. Any win, anywhere, is a positive development.
__________________
-MisterMike
"Born to be Mild"
MisterMike is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.