Quantcast
Will we know if SCOTUS grants cert on Drake v. Jerejian on Friday? - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Social Situations > Legal

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old April 15, 2014, 06:00 PM   #1
usmarine0352_2005
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 21, 2005
Posts: 2,505
Will we know if SCOTUS grants cert on Drake v. Jerejian on Friday?

So SCOTUS is debating whether to grant cert on Drake v. Jerejian this Friday.


Does that mean we'll know if they grant cert on Friday or if they are just debating whether to grant cert or not and if they do it will be announced at a later date?
usmarine0352_2005 is offline  
Old April 15, 2014, 07:51 PM   #2
Frank Ettin
Moderator
 
 
Join Date: April 29, 2006
Location: California - San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 6,929
AFAIK the results of Friday conferences are made public on the following Monday.
__________________
"Though boys throw stones at frogs in sport, the frogs do not die in sport, but in earnest." Bion (Greek poet, ca. 100 BCE)
Frank Ettin is offline  
Old April 16, 2014, 06:17 AM   #3
swinokur
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 11, 2009
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 816
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


this

watch www.scotusblog.com
swinokur is offline  
Old April 16, 2014, 02:31 PM   #4
usmarine0352_2005
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 21, 2005
Posts: 2,505
So Friday do they discuss it in closed doors or do non-SCOTUS judges make arguments?
usmarine0352_2005 is offline  
Old April 16, 2014, 05:07 PM   #5
Frank Ettin
Moderator
 
 
Join Date: April 29, 2006
Location: California - San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 6,929
AFAIK, the Friday conferences are SCOTUS Justices only. Any arguments have been made in the petitions, any replies and any amici briefs.
__________________
"Though boys throw stones at frogs in sport, the frogs do not die in sport, but in earnest." Bion (Greek poet, ca. 100 BCE)
Frank Ettin is offline  
Old April 16, 2014, 08:52 PM   #6
Somewhere in NM
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 16, 2012
Posts: 45
Four justices need to vote in favor to grant cert.
Somewhere in NM is offline  
Old April 16, 2014, 09:18 PM   #7
usmarine0352_2005
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 21, 2005
Posts: 2,505
Perhaps with the splits in the circuits this case will be granted cert on Friday. Hopefully. We'll see. It seems to be a solid case with a good complainant.
usmarine0352_2005 is offline  
Old April 17, 2014, 09:37 PM   #8
Somewhere in NM
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 16, 2012
Posts: 45
Very hard to predict which cases the SCOTUS will agree to hear. Only a small percentage make it.
Somewhere in NM is offline  
Old April 18, 2014, 02:57 AM   #9
usmarine0352_2005
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 21, 2005
Posts: 2,505
.

This sheds some light on how SCOTUS works.





http://www.njherald.com/story/252736...gun-carry-case



Quote:

.
Will Supreme Court hear Fredon man’s gun carry case?

Posted: Apr 17, 2014 10:31 AM CST Updated: Apr 17, 2014 11:33 PM CST

By JOE CARLSON

The U.S. Supreme Court will make a decision regarding whether to hear the case of a Fredon man’s quest to carry a handgun outside his home in the coming days. This morning, the court has scheduled a conference to make a decision whether to hear the case, titled Drake v. Jerejian.

Lawsuit namesake John Drake said the court should decide by tonight whether to hear the case, but he has been told the decision might not be made until Monday. “Sometimes a decision is not even made on Friday or Monday,” Drake’s attorney, Alan Gura, of the Alexandria, Va.-based law firm Gura & Possessky, said on Thursday. “It is possible that they don’t make a decision and re-list the case for the next conference.” The next conference day is scheduled for April 25.

According to SupremeCourtHistory.org, when the justices convene this morning, “the Chief Justice opens the discussion, summarizing each case. The senior Associate Justice speaks next, and comment passes down the line. To be accepted for review, a case needs only four votes, fewer than the majority required for a decision on the case itself.”

.
.
usmarine0352_2005 is offline  
Old April 20, 2014, 08:07 PM   #10
usmarine0352_2005
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 21, 2005
Posts: 2,505
.


Do you know if the results are Monday morning or afternoon normally?

.
usmarine0352_2005 is offline  
Old April 20, 2014, 09:00 PM   #11
bhesler
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 9, 2011
Posts: 123
Morning. http://www.scotusblog.com/ says the orders from the conference will be out around 9:30 am
bhesler is offline  
Old April 20, 2014, 09:16 PM   #12
usmarine0352_2005
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 21, 2005
Posts: 2,505
Quote:
Morning. http://www.scotusblog.com/ says the orders from the conference will be out around 9:30 am

Thanks!
usmarine0352_2005 is offline  
Old April 21, 2014, 10:47 AM   #13
Frosty Dave
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 12, 2013
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 57
The PDF is up, and I don't see it on the list. I guess the "good news" is, it's not in the "CERTIORARI DENIED" list either. I guess that means we wait until another day?

http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/c...14zor_c0n2.pdf
Frosty Dave is offline  
Old April 21, 2014, 10:49 AM   #14
usmarine0352_2005
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 21, 2005
Posts: 2,505
Apparently so. I guess it might be picked up next session. Better than denied.
usmarine0352_2005 is offline  
Old April 21, 2014, 03:57 PM   #15
raz-0
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 26, 2002
Location: NJ
Posts: 786
it has been re-listed for 4-25, so news on 4-28.

It could imply tons of stuff, so nothing really new in terms of speculation. On the down side, the leader of the relist pack has been relisted every conference for the last 7 months. so.....
__________________
M&P Forum
raz-0 is offline  
Old April 21, 2014, 04:21 PM   #16
usmarine0352_2005
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 21, 2005
Posts: 2,505
Quote:
It could imply tons of stuff, so nothing really new in terms of speculation. On the down side, the leader of the relist pack has been relisted every conference for the last 7 months. so.....

What's this mean?
usmarine0352_2005 is offline  
Old April 21, 2014, 04:21 PM   #17
Sam1911
Moderator
 
 
Join Date: October 22, 2007
Location: Central PA
Posts: 26,254
http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=750222
__________________
-- Sam

"...with liberty and justice for all." (Must be 18. Void where prohibited. Some restrictions may apply. Not available in all states.)
-D. Stanhope

Sights Practical Shooters -- IDPA

My Knife Showroom
Sam1911 is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.