Quantcast
Will a .17HMR damage or even be noticeable on reactive steel targets? - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Rifle Country

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 15, 2013, 10:13 PM   #1
CoyoteSix
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 21, 2012
Location: Idaho
Posts: 294
Will a .17HMR damage or even be noticeable on reactive steel targets?

Easy question. Will a .17HMR damage or, on the flip side
, even be audible when shot at a steel reactive target?
__________________
A hit with a .22lr beats a miss with .45ACP!

Sig please make a good .22lr version of the P238!
CoyoteSix is offline  
Old June 15, 2013, 11:35 PM   #2
firesky101
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 21, 2011
Location: California
Posts: 1,379
depends on what the steel is made of and the distance you shoot it at. Mild steel will pit when hit with anything moving like a .17hmr does. Heck I have deformed mild steel with .22lr if you shoot it enough. AR500 at 50yds probably no problem at all.
__________________
Yes, it's the apocalypse alright. I always thought I'd have a hand in it.
firesky101 is offline  
Old June 15, 2013, 11:56 PM   #3
Gtscotty
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 2, 2007
Location: The great state of Georgia
Posts: 562
I like to pop the 200 yard gong with my hmr every now and then. There's certainly no damage at that distance, but I can hear the hit with reactive ear muffs over plugs.
__________________
NRA Life Member

Lost in the Bermuda Tetrahedron...
Gtscotty is online now  
Old June 16, 2013, 03:01 PM   #4
JHansenAK47
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 25, 2007
Location: Utah
Posts: 509
17 hmr will surprise you with it's ability to penetrate. That said i've never had any trouble with my AR500 targets just one mild steel one that was meant for 22lr.
JHansenAK47 is offline  
Old June 16, 2013, 10:19 PM   #5
benatilstate
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 9, 2007
Location: Metamora Illinois
Posts: 549
I destroyed a rimfire rated spinning metal target. 1 shot at 50 yards and it had a nice divot from the lil .17 pill. At that point, I said what the heck and put a bigger hole all the way through it with a .30-06.

So short answer - if its only rated for rimfire, yea, it will probably destroy it, but most any centerfire rifle target should be fine.
__________________
My current collection:
Crosman/Benjamin 397, Marlin 60 .22lr, Ruger Red Label 20ga, Browning Buckmark .22lr, Remington 700 SPS Varmint .308, Springfield 1911, Saiga 7.62x39 (converted), Ruger 10/22, Beretta A300 Outlander.
benatilstate is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.