Quantcast
Photographing loaded cartridges - Page 2 - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Ammunition, Gear, and Firearm Help > Handloading and Reloading

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 13, 2013, 03:27 PM   #26
ryan3465
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 12, 2012
Location: Central Maine
Posts: 74
Here's one I took today. Lighting seems to be a big part of it, as well as appropriate background. My iPhone doesn't take the best close ups, but my fiancé's tmobile sidekick takes the best close up shots I've ever seen from ANY camera.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (106.5 KB, 99 views)
ryan3465 is offline  
Old February 20, 2013, 03:18 PM   #27
TexasShooter59
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 11, 2008
Location: North Texas
Posts: 224
Post #13 should have said "iPad3", not 2. iPad2 does not take very good photos in my opinion.
TexasShooter59 is offline  
Old June 13, 2013, 09:31 PM   #28
William May
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 13, 2013
Posts: 1
What is that bullet on the far left, it looks familiar but it's been such a long time since I have seen one.
William May is offline  
Old June 13, 2013, 11:30 PM   #29
hostjunkies
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 31, 2013
Posts: 80
Quote:
Originally Posted by William May View Post
What is that bullet on the far left, it looks familiar but it's been such a long time since I have seen one.
The bullet on the left is "unobtainium"
hostjunkies is offline  
Old June 14, 2013, 09:20 AM   #30
Walkalong
Moderator
 
 
Join Date: November 20, 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 30,072
Was for a while anyway.

Use lots of light, take lots of pics, and look for the best one. I might take 5 to get one good one, or 50.

__________________
Do you ever wonder why nobody ever robs the bag man for the mob? No, you don't.

"Oh bother" said Pooh, as he chambered another round. Author unknown.
Walkalong is offline  
Old June 14, 2013, 10:20 AM   #31
Reloadron
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 6, 2012
Location: Cleveland, Ohio USA
Posts: 1,579
Quote:
Use lots of light, take lots of pics, and look for the best one. I might take 5 to get one good one, or 50.
I tend to be more in the 50 to 100 to get one good one myself.

Ron
Reloadron is offline  
Old June 14, 2013, 10:37 AM   #32
RandyP
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 28, 2009
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,086
Some VERY impressive photos have been posted here - congrats guys!

I confess I just set my Canon "A" series Powershot on Auto and Macro and hope for the best -LOL
__________________
Lee Classic 4-hole turret. Lee breech-lock single stage. Presently reloading .380, 9mm, 7.62 Nagant and 45ACP.
RandyP is offline  
Old June 14, 2013, 11:19 AM   #33
Salmoneye
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 26, 2012
Location: Vermont
Posts: 895
I came out of the 70's and 80's with a bunch of nice Pentax K-Mount Asahi glass, so I now run Pentax digital backs...

Started with an ist-D, and moved up to a K-x...
Salmoneye is offline  
Old June 14, 2013, 12:46 PM   #34
Clark
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 3, 2003
Location: Where I5 meets the rain forest
Posts: 3,826

This pic I took on Sept 12, 2003 uses a wood color back ground to mimic the brass.
My hand also has about the same reflection as the brass.
Since then I have learned how to use Gamma correction.
Gamma correction works like night vision on under exposed digital pics [does not work on film images].
Most pics of objects benefit from some gamma increase.
Scans of light pencil sketches benefit from reduced gamma that makes the pencil marks darker.
I keep all pics in IrfanView.
That program is free.
http://www.irfanview.com/

1) Select "image" from the menu bar
2) Select "color correction"
3) This will display the original and the pic to be corrected.
4) Slide the "gamma correction" bar until the corrected pic looks best.
5) Click on "ok"
6) Save
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Gamma correction 6-14-2013.jpg (117.6 KB, 29 views)
File Type: jpg Gamm correction 6-14-2014.jpg (77.9 KB, 25 views)
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books." "Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought?
Clark is offline  
Old June 14, 2013, 02:48 PM   #35
Odd Job
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 16, 2006
Location: London (ex SA)
Posts: 3,541
Also, a flatbed scanner can be used for items that are almost flat, such as headstamps and primers.
You just have to make sure you have cleaned the scanner glass and take care not to scratch the glass when you set the cartridge case down on it (watch out for firing pin impressions especially).

The main thing to be sure of is use a high enough scanning dpi (dots per inch). Most scanners these days can do at least 1200 dpi, which is what you need if you are going to post a headstamp on the forum at a matrix of at least 700 x 700. Otherwise it comes out too small.

Here's one I did earlier. I didn't even clean the case, I just scanned it directly on my Epson 4870 scanner at 1200 dpi:

__________________
For questions about cartridges (especially unusual ones, or ones you simply can't identify), pay a visit to http://iaaforum.org/forum3/
Odd Job is offline  
Old June 14, 2013, 03:04 PM   #36
TexasShooter59
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 11, 2008
Location: North Texas
Posts: 224
Cool!

TexasShooter59 is offline  
Old June 14, 2013, 09:00 PM   #37
Reloadron
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 6, 2012
Location: Cleveland, Ohio USA
Posts: 1,579
Pretty nice job using the scanner. Never gave using the scanner a thought till I saw that.

Thanks
Ron
Reloadron is offline  
Old June 14, 2013, 09:02 PM   #38
Reloadron
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 6, 2012
Location: Cleveland, Ohio USA
Posts: 1,579
@ Clark

Haven't used it in awhile but yes, Infranview is one of the best free software applications for doing photo work. I would always suggest that to people so thanks for the reminder.

Ron
Reloadron is offline  
Old June 14, 2013, 10:25 PM   #39
Hondo 60
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 6, 2009
Location: Manitowoc, WI
Posts: 3,601
Some of you guys are wasting time at your day jobs.

I'm in awe of some of these GREAT shots.
__________________
Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway - John Wayne
<><
When you're holdin a hammer, everything looks like a nail - Bryan Glover
Hondo 60 is offline  
Old June 15, 2013, 08:35 AM   #40
Clark
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 3, 2003
Location: Where I5 meets the rain forest
Posts: 3,826


Odd Job,
That took me about an hour to figure out how to do that

This may only work with my computer, Paint, and my HP Photosmart 4200 scanner/copymachine/printer/card reader/can opener

Before starting high resolution scan:
A) Practice low resolution to map what corner of the control panel applies to what corner of the scanner.
B) The first high resolution scan will reveal dust all over the scanner. Clean the scanner.
C) Turn off the lights in the room for a black background, turn the lights on for a white background.

1) Paint
2) Pull down from "file" in menu bar
3) click on "from scanner or camera"
4) If it looks like the right printer, click "ok"
5) adjust size of screen to be scanned by moving corner of picture, to reduce scan time.
6) Click on "adjust the quality of scanned picture"
7) roll up "resolution dip" from default 200 to 2400
8) Click "ok"
9) click "scan"
10) when the high resolution slow scan is done, click on dotted square in side menu bar.
11) draw a square around case head image
12) pull down "image" in menu bar
13) click on "crop"
14) save to desktop
__________________
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books." "Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought?
Clark is offline  
Old June 15, 2013, 09:02 AM   #41
Kuyong_Chuin
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 31, 2013
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 55
These three were taken with a Kodak Easy Share Z990 on super micro mode. It is just a split shot lead sinker that was lubed up and shoved through my M44 barrel.




There is a mod here (Oleg Volk) that takes real good close up photos of ammo among other things. I should know, not only was he my professor for several classes, I count him as a friend even though I do not get to see or talk to him as much as I would like too, but he has photographed one of my rifles and ammo from it.

Last edited by Kuyong_Chuin; June 15, 2013 at 09:12 AM.
Kuyong_Chuin is online now  
Old June 15, 2013, 09:15 AM   #42
Mohave-Tec
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 28, 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 59
Subdued light at my left shoulder


Angle your light. Shadows give depth.


Mix of natural and electric light. Tripod. Shallow depth of field. Remote shutter release.
Mohave-Tec is offline  
Old June 15, 2013, 10:52 AM   #43
TexasShooter59
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 11, 2008
Location: North Texas
Posts: 224
I'm liking this thread! (Photography was my very first hobby at age twelve. It still is a hobby, but not nearly as active these days.)
TexasShooter59 is offline  
Old June 15, 2013, 11:08 AM   #44
Mohave-Tec
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 28, 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 59
Every image in this thread properly conveys a message. The images are what the photographer was seeing and in a properly conveyed message, I, the one the message is being conveyed to, understand what it is the photographer is trying to say to me. But I can't fathom how many times I've seen images where someone is trying to impress a fact upon me/us that all I can say is ***. A guy wants to sell one of his 50 guns in his $40,000 dollar collection and doesn't own a $20 Wal Mart camera; instead takes a cell phone picture, into the light to portray the shaded side of his blurry image....and does this over and over again. How can somebody be this lacking in insight. LOL.
Mohave-Tec is offline  
Old June 15, 2013, 03:57 PM   #45
Walkalong
Moderator
 
 
Join Date: November 20, 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 30,072
That gets me as well, folks selling pricy guns with crappy pics, when it is so easy to get at least decent ones. II never look twice at an auction with bad pics anymore. Good pics don't lie.
__________________
Do you ever wonder why nobody ever robs the bag man for the mob? No, you don't.

"Oh bother" said Pooh, as he chambered another round. Author unknown.
Walkalong is offline  
Old June 16, 2013, 01:50 PM   #46
Reloadron
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 6, 2012
Location: Cleveland, Ohio USA
Posts: 1,579
OK, time for a spoof picture and some humor:



Smart bullest as they know what they are.

Ron
Reloadron is offline  
Old June 17, 2013, 08:42 PM   #47
Hondo 60
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 6, 2009
Location: Manitowoc, WI
Posts: 3,601
Reloadron - that's awesome
__________________
Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway - John Wayne
<><
When you're holdin a hammer, everything looks like a nail - Bryan Glover
Hondo 60 is offline  
Old Yesterday, 12:50 AM   #48
James2
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 27, 2009
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 755
Quote:
What type of cameras do you guys use? Can a smartphone work well, or does it require a 'real' camera?
I have 2 digital cameras and also a smart phone camera. It is amazing how good the phone camera is. I do not hesitate to take pics with it. Even those need to be reduced for posting. Some photo editing software is in order. I find myself taking pics often with the cell phone, likely because it is always with me. Getting a good shot has lots to do with good lighting and composition. Play with it and you may be surprised even with a phone camera.
__________________
James
James2 is offline  
Old Yesterday, 01:37 AM   #49
rcmodel
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2007
Location: Eastern KS
Posts: 41,899
Quote:
and also a smart phone camera. It is amazing how good the phone camera is.
See, that's my puzzlement??

There are many brands of Smart Phones.

An Internet search for 'best smart-phone camera' a few weeks ago yielded one that was best for outdoor daylight landscapes.
Another was best for indoor shots in the dark, and yet another was best for natural skin tone portraits with flash.
And then there was the other one that was 'best' for outdoor nighttime landscapes, with flash. And another without flash.

So what brand of smart phone are you talking about that is doing so good for you, for everything??

rc
__________________
Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
Or all your primers in a glass jar!
rcmodel is offline  
Old Yesterday, 07:20 AM   #50
Mohave-Tec
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 28, 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 59
Pentax dSLRs
Mohave-Tec is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.