Quantcast
Which caliber for ranch hand - Page 2 - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Handguns: General Discussion

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 14, 2013, 11:01 PM   #26
DPris
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 4, 2007
Posts: 2,251
Well....if you're being facetious, then yeah- Randall's ML fired .45 Superlongs.
Otherwise, the guns were original 92s, which were never originally chambered in .45 Colt.
Denis
DPris is online now  
Old February 14, 2013, 11:07 PM   #27
Mainsail
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 16, 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,214
I got one in .44 magnum because I reload that caliber.

__________________
THIS IS CHARLESTON COMMAND POST WITH A DEFINITE PURPOSE LAUNCH DIRECTIVE, ALL CREWS REPORT “READY TO TAXI”.
Mainsail is offline  
Old February 14, 2013, 11:08 PM   #28
JEB
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 10, 2009
Location: Douds, IA
Posts: 1,047
i would go with the .357 version just for cheaper shooting
__________________
"a gun thats unloaded and cocked aint good for nothin!" --John Wayne-True Grit
JEB is offline  
Old February 15, 2013, 10:20 PM   #29
M2 Carbine
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 29, 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,576
Quote:
Everyone should buy and shoot whatever floats their boat. But I find optics on a .22 Ranch Hand a very strange combination. Just sayin'.
Strange combination?
Maybe not if your eyes are 75 years old.

I put the Red Dot on the 22 because it is capable of decent accuracy at some distance but not if I use the iron sights.
M2 Carbine is offline  
Old February 15, 2013, 10:30 PM   #30
M2 Carbine
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 29, 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,576
Good looking rig Mainsail.
M2 Carbine is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 12:03 AM   #31
ThusEver2Tyrants
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 29, 2013
Posts: 17
Thanks everyone for your input!!! Like I said its just cool and fun...no need for practicality. I have more serious rifles and handguns for serious work. And texanscott that is a great idea!!!

We have decided to go with the 357. I do not reload yet so I think it will be a lot cheaper for now. Hell maybe ill buy another in 45 down the road! Lol

Mainsail, that rig is beautiful...does it go on the side of the thigh? And where can I get a quality thigh rig for this thing?
ThusEver2Tyrants is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 09:16 AM   #32
BSA1
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 20, 2011
Posts: 1,259
Just a late thought before you go buy the .357 Magnum version. Magnum factory ammunition is expensive and for most shooters not much fun for regular target shooting and plinking. One of the biggest advantages of a firearm chambered in .357 magnum is it allows for use of .38 Specials which depending on the load selected is much cheaper and much easier to shoot.

One of the big disadvantages of lever action rifles is due to the nature of their design they do not feed .38 Specials well due to the shorter o.a.l. of .38's. If it is your intention to use .38's in this gun you are probably headed for a big disappointment.
BSA1 is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 10:33 AM   #33
M2 Carbine
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 29, 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,576
Quote:
If it is your intention to use .38's in this gun you are probably headed for a big disappointment.
Not necessarily. My Rossi handles 38 Special 158gr lead SWC just fine.
I'd guess I shoot at least a hundred 38 to one .357.

That's why I wanted a 22 Mare's Leg, because I was going through a LOT of 38 Special.



Come to think of it though, a lady friend has a full size lever action 38/.357 (I don't remember the brand).
When shooting 38 she has to be more forceful when closing the lever with 38 than .357, but the gun doesn't jam.
She has shot the gun little. I suspect the action will smooth out with use.
M2 Carbine is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 11:18 AM   #34
Mainsail
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 16, 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,214
Quote:
Mainsail, that rig is beautiful...does it go on the side of the thigh? And where can I get a quality thigh rig for this thing?
I got it at Cochise Leather, and it has a belt loop at the top. I got to hold the gun to the back of the passenger seat in my jeep or truck. We cannot carry a loaded long gun in a vehicle here, but handguns are OK with a CPL. I can also wear it as a belt holster at open carry events and maybe demonstrations down at the capitol.
__________________
THIS IS CHARLESTON COMMAND POST WITH A DEFINITE PURPOSE LAUNCH DIRECTIVE, ALL CREWS REPORT “READY TO TAXI”.
Mainsail is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 03:31 PM   #35
BCRider
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 15, 2008
Location: Pacific North"Wet" Coast of Canada
Posts: 5,041
The Rossi action only has issues with the .38Spls if the shooter tries to speed cycle the lever such as during faster cowboy action shooting.

To avoid the issue all that is needed is for the shooter to pause for the slightest noticable instant with the lever in the down and forward position to let the new round settle back on the elevator before completing the lever cycle to chamber the round. We're talking about an 1/8 to 1/10 of a second being enough with my own Rossi action .357.

It's not a bad option anyway as even this slight pause will tend to make folks focus on giving the lever the full travel and avoid short stroking.
__________________
Sent from my boat anchor desktop via my pizza greased fingers....
BCRider is offline  
Old February 16, 2013, 09:47 PM   #36
M2 Carbine
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 29, 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 6,576
Quote:
We're talking about an 1/8 to 1/10 of a second being enough with my own Rossi action .357.
OK, I see why my Rossi functions so well with 38 Special.

At 75 years of age I don't have to worry I'm shooting too fast.
M2 Carbine is offline  
Old February 17, 2013, 01:50 AM   #37
BCRider
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 15, 2008
Location: Pacific North"Wet" Coast of Canada
Posts: 5,041
M2, don't look back to quickly. I'm not far behind you....
__________________
Sent from my boat anchor desktop via my pizza greased fingers....
BCRider is offline  
Old February 17, 2013, 12:20 PM   #38
BSA1
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 20, 2011
Posts: 1,259
I guess it just boils down to expectations.

Problems with 92's chambered for 357 mag. feeding 38 Spl. are well known. While I think most will agree the Ranch Hand is meant for use as a fun and use on the range I personally would not make allowances for a design that require me to manipulate the action slowly and in a certain manner for it to feed correctly.

Fortunately this problem can be corrected by a knowledge gunsmith or sometimes by seating the bullet longer in 38's. Since the Ranch Hand is being sold as handgun maybe they have corrected this.

Last edited by BSA1; February 18, 2013 at 08:04 AM.
BSA1 is offline  
Old February 17, 2013, 12:49 PM   #39
scaatylobo
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 7, 2010
Location: Western NYS
Posts: 993
I had a choice

When I got mine I had a choice as they had them all in stock.

I was into SASS and still have a 'few' rounds of .45 LC around and a Marlin and Colt in that caliber,so that was the caliber I got.

Pleasant to shoot and I doubt there is anything in the N.American continent that will stand up to even a single hit by it.

I got THE holster that J.R. carried [ a copy of course ] and yes the gun is heavy but the 38/357 is actually heavier as there is more steel to the barrel and frame [ same size as the .45 LC ,but less steel removed in production ].

I have some Buffalo Bore and other real ammo for it and would not hesitate to take it deer hunting.But the standard 250 grainer lead will do the job - I am sure.

Hope you enjoy your's as much as I do mine.

Practical - who cares !!.
__________________
A bad day living,Beats a good day dead
scaatylobo is offline  
Old February 17, 2013, 01:00 PM   #40
Sav .250
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 5, 2007
Location: Central Fla
Posts: 2,172
The 45 cal is a cannon. If that`s the flavor of the day, load up on shells and have at it.
Sav .250 is offline  
Old February 17, 2013, 04:20 PM   #41
scaatylobo
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 7, 2010
Location: Western NYS
Posts: 993
.45 is a cannon ?

I disagree as I have at least a couple of hundred through mine and its easy to shoot one handed,just a bit heavy as I am not as young as when I used to shoot a 870 Rem. with pistol grip = one handed .
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1335711385831.jpg (48.7 KB, 13 views)
File Type: jpg zombie shoot2.jpg (130.5 KB, 8 views)
__________________
A bad day living,Beats a good day dead
scaatylobo is offline  
Old February 17, 2013, 04:44 PM   #42
bill3424
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 12, 2008
Posts: 148
.38/357 because I reload that particular round. It's a fun gun to shoot, that's for sure.
bill3424 is offline  
Old February 18, 2013, 11:13 AM   #43
SDGlock23
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 1, 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 226
.45 Colt for sure. The Puma '92 leverguns are pretty nice and can handle warm loads as well and come in a variety of different barrel lengths. I had one for a while and it was a good gun.

http://www.legacysports.com/products/puma_m92.html

You can accompany one with a Ruger Blackhawk convertible (.45 Colt and .45 ACP) model.
__________________
Repent America!!

http://www.be4thefire.com
www.tribulation-now.org
SDGlock23 is offline  
Old Today, 06:47 PM   #44
meanmrmustard
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 14, 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 3,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by BSA1 View Post
Actually, Randall's was a .44-40

I disagree. The rounds he was carry on his cartridge belt were 45 extra extra long. They were rare special made cartridges for only a few Old West bounty hunters knew about. <];-)
Those were 45/70s he carried, for Hollywood effect. Not the true cartridge the rifle chambered.

I'm slow to wit, I know.
__________________
Why, oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...
meanmrmustard is offline  
Old Today, 07:15 PM   #45
Deaf Smith
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 7, 2004
Location: here
Posts: 1,660
Let the lady take what she wants!!!

She want's a .45, well let her get one!

If I had my own ranch way out in the boondocks I'd just use my .44



Ok I love posting it's picture but...

Again, let her have her wish and get her a real good .45 the way she likes.

Deaf
__________________
“We can evade reality, but we cannot evade the consequences of evading reality” Ayn Rand
Deaf Smith is offline  
Old Today, 07:49 PM   #46
Z1D2
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 19, 2013
Location: in S, SE USA
Posts: 4
My choice.. 357
Z1D2 is online now  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.