Quantcast
Question(s) About (New) Pietta Dance And Brothers Pistol - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Blackpowder

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 5, 2016, 06:29 PM   #1
expat_alaska
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Location: Pe Ell WA
Posts: 305
Question(s) About (New) Pietta Dance And Brothers Pistol

I am addressing anyone who owns or has seen a new version of this, compared to Piettas that were sold a while back with a SB trigger guard.

DGW is selling a .44 version with a smooth (non-rebated) cylinder and a non-cut water table.

https://www.dixiegunworks.com/produc...5dhnnukoue2jl2

Does it have an 1851 Navy frame, or is it larger (as on the Dragoon size, like a Tucker and Sherrard)?

Does it have the Pietta "tail" or is it more like the newer, more "traditional" grip shape as found on the (2015 CN) G&G?

Here is a 2008 DGW customer review:

https://www.dixiegunworks.com/produc...5dhnnukoue2jl2

Any input would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance!

Jim
expat_alaska is offline  
Old March 6, 2016, 09:52 AM   #2
wcandres
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 7, 2015
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1
Wouldn't the water table need to be cut to accommodate the .44 cylinder?
wcandres is offline  
Old March 6, 2016, 10:23 AM   #3
Cowhide Cliff
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 6, 2015
Posts: 164
I have one that is about a year old.

It has the round trigger guard but it still has the Pietta tail. The profile of the grip frame is the same as the Navy frame but the grip frame does not have the notch under the bottom like the Navy.

The frame is not a Navy frame, the Dance frame doesn't have a recoil shield and appears slightly taller to fit the 44 dragoon style barrel.

The front sight is correct looking for the Dance.

Pietta did a pretty good job with it actually.
Cowhide Cliff is offline  
Old March 6, 2016, 11:53 AM   #4
Fingers McGee
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 5, 2009
Location: High and dry at Lake of the Ozarks, MO
Posts: 1,407
Quote:
Wouldn't the water table need to be cut to accommodate the .44 cylinder?
No. The frame would need to be big enough to provide clearance for the straight cylinder though.
__________________
Fingers (Show Me MO smoke) McGee; SASS Regulator 28654-LTG; NCOWS 3638; AKA Man of many Colt's; Rangemaster, Frontiersman, Pistoleer and stage writer extraordinaire, USArmy (Ret), NRA Endowment Life
Cynic: A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they should be - Ambrose Bierce
Fingers McGee is offline  
Old March 6, 2016, 12:54 PM   #5
Hellgate
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 11, 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 1,417
The 44 Dance (Pietta) cylinder is not stepped but is a little shorter than other 44 revolvers. I can barely get 30grs FFFg under the ball using an 1/8" lube wad so I shoot 27grs in it instead of 30 as in the Remingtons. Mine is 3-4 years old and had the flared Navy grips so I swapped them out for Pietta 1860 Army grips and paired it up with my 1860 Army for CAS/SASS shoots.
__________________
Gun control= OSHA for criminals
With over 15 C&Bs, I've been called the Imelda Marcos of Cap&Ball
Turning money into noise & smoke for over 50 years.
SASS #3302 (Life), Regulator, NRA Life
Hellgate is offline  
Old March 6, 2016, 02:10 PM   #6
expat_alaska
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Location: Pe Ell WA
Posts: 305
Cowhide Cliff:

Quote:
I have one that is about a year old.

It has the round trigger guard but it still has the Pietta tail. The profile of the grip frame is the same as the Navy frame but the grip frame does not have the notch under the bottom like the Navy.

The frame is not a Navy frame, the Dance frame doesn't have a recoil shield and appears slightly taller to fit the 44 dragoon style barrel.

The front sight is correct looking for the Dance.

Pietta did a pretty good job with it actually.
Thanks to Cliff and others.

Maybe I was not clear with my questions.

I realize that the Pietta Dance has no recoil shields.

I am curious if a Pietta 1851 Navy (or G&G) .36 barrel, cylinder, and wedge will fit the Pietta Dance frame.

Can anyone verify this (or not)?

Recently, IIRC on one or another forum, a gentleman had a Pietta Dance that would accept the aforementioned .36 parts, but I cannot recall where I saw that.

Regards,

Jim

Last edited by expat_alaska; March 6, 2016 at 02:36 PM.
expat_alaska is offline  
Old March 6, 2016, 09:50 PM   #7
Cowhide Cliff
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 6, 2015
Posts: 164
Quote:
Originally Posted by expat_alaska View Post
Cowhide Cliff:



Thanks to Cliff and others.

Maybe I was not clear with my questions.

I realize that the Pietta Dance has no recoil shields.

I am curious if a Pietta 1851 Navy (or G&G) .36 barrel, cylinder, and wedge will fit the Pietta Dance frame.

Can anyone verify this (or not)?

Recently, IIRC on one or another forum, a gentleman had a Pietta Dance that would accept the aforementioned .36 parts, but I cannot recall where I saw that.

Regards,

Jim
Ok I compared the Pietta Dance and G&G. The barrels will swap even though the 44 barrel is larger. The wedge is the same. The dance cylinder is larger diameter but the cylinders are the same length so the 36 cylinder will go on the Dance frame and does cycle however there is a much larger gap between it and the frame so I'm not sure the bolt is engaging the cylinder notches fully.

So yes the parts do swap but it doesn't really look right because the Dance frame is machined for the larger diameter cylinder.
Cowhide Cliff is offline  
Old March 7, 2016, 03:15 PM   #8
expat_alaska
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 4, 2010
Location: Pe Ell WA
Posts: 305
Thanks for the comparisons. Not exactly what I was hoping for, but I'll keep your observations in mind.

Sincerely,

Jim
expat_alaska is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.