Quantcast
Help me choose - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Handguns: Autoloaders

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

View Poll Results: Which would you choose?
Springfield XD 9 14 22.95%
Glock 22 Gen 2 1 1.64%
Taurus PT 1911 9 14.75%
Glock 23 Gen 3 20 32.79%
Springfield XDM .45 17 27.87%
Voters: 61. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 24, 2014, 12:14 AM   #1
Bad_Wolf
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 23, 2014
Posts: 12
Help me choose

Hello everyone,

Been reading on here a while and decided to register so I can get some opinions about my next purchase.

First, a little background: I've owned a variety of handguns over the years but sold most of my collection (long guns and handguns) a few years ago when things got tough. Now I'm looking to get started again.

Since I've owned a wide variety of makes, calibers, etc., over the years I can make an argument either way for the guns I'm looking at. I'll add that I've owned some version of all of these and have no issues with any. There aren't any that I don't like, don't shoot well (for me anyway).

So here's what I'm looking at. Let me know your thoughts and reasons behind them:

(In no particular order)

1. Springfield XD-9, ported barrel, new. 520.00

2. Taurus PT1911, used 520.00

3. Glock 23 Gen 3 New 490.00

4. Glock 22 Gen 2 used 400.00

5. Springfield XDM .45 new 580.00

Let me know what you think and why. I can make a case for all of them, just wanted some different views. I don't have a dog in this fight so if you see something you hate let me know ( and let me know why)

Thanks in advance
Bad_Wolf is offline  
Old September 24, 2014, 01:10 AM   #2
AustinTX
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 16, 2010
Posts: 42
Honestly, you have all the important information needed to make the best decision. There has to be one here that you shoot better than the rest. That's the one you should buy. With one exception, there's no technical / mechanical reason to disqualify any of them, so all you're going to get are people making unhelpful arguments for the brand to which they feel most attached.

But I will argue that you should eliminate the Taurus from consideration. Taurus guns are stuffed with low-quality internals, and the company continues to have the worst QC of any major gun maker. The odds of your need to work with their shoddy CS are high. And even if the gun doesn't have problems out of the gate, I would be extremely uncomfortable relying on an emergency tool with so many low-quality, weak-link essential components.
__________________
Beretta Billennium (x4) | 92 Steel I (x3) | 92G Elite II | 92FS (x4) | 8045F | 84BB—SIG P210-5 HF | P210-5 | P210-6 HF | P210-6 (x2) | P49—SIG Sauer P226 X-Six | P226 X-Five | P229 | P220—HK P7M10 (x2) | USP Elite—Colt Gold Cup NM (x2) | Python (x4) | Officer's Model Match | Officer's Model | Police Positive Special | Police Positive | Official Police—Browning Hi-Power—USFA 1910—Valmet Lahti L-35—Mauser Luger | HSc | 1910/14—S&W Model 41 | Model 57 (x2) | Model 48—Benelli B76—MAB PA-15—Freedom Arms M83—Walther PPS—Glock 17—Savage 1917—Ruger P89DC—CZ 52 | 52—Radom Tokarev TT-33 | Tokarev TT-33—Izhevsk Makarov—Arsenal Makarov—FEG ACK—Kahr P380
AustinTX is online now  
Old September 24, 2014, 01:24 AM   #3
JeeperCreeper
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 23, 2014
Location: Under A Rock
Posts: 130
Roll the dice

I think they are all good guns. So any that you choose will not be a bad choice.

I picked the PT1911. I like 1911's and I think any 1911 is serviceable. Parts are everywhere. If you want a good deal, look at the Rock island Armory 1911's by Armscor. The will be cheaper and arguably better (opinion). I like hammer fired, all steel guns. 1911's are gorgeous and feel great. The aren't the best design out there, but it just feels right shooting them. The sound of a 1911 firing just sounds like "America" to my ears. That's why I like the 1911

I would vote the XD's for second. They fit my hand nicely and the triggers are great for a striker gun (opinion). Arguably as reliable as a Glock.

I vote Glocks last. They are great guns, with a great reputation and aftermarket. However, to own one you must join a cult and sell your soul to the Austrian Glock Devil. They do everything good, but nothing special for me (opinion). I also don't like the unsupported chambers and polygonal rifling, but if you shoot factory ammo, then forget I even mentioned it.

Good luck, again, every choice will be a good one so have fun regardless!!!
__________________
Contrary to popular belief, Jesus would not have carried a Glock...
JeeperCreeper is offline  
Old September 24, 2014, 06:48 AM   #4
bannockburn
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 24, 2007
Posts: 7,488
Well a lot depends on how the gun itself feels in your hand and how comfortable you are with the gun's size and ergonomics. Out of the choices you have listed I would probably go with the Glock 23 in that it's a good size for both range use and concealed carry, there's lots of factory support available, as well as aftermarket accessories.
__________________
"An elegant weapon for a more civilized age."-Obi Wan Kenobi
bannockburn is offline  
Old September 24, 2014, 07:03 AM   #5
ritepath
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 17, 2010
Location: SWVA
Posts: 577
I hate ported barrels and grip safeties. I don't like glock or taurus.

Of those listed I'd have to go with the G23 except I'd pick it up in the form of a CZ p-07, or M&P.

Or find a G20...
ritepath is offline  
Old September 24, 2014, 07:08 AM   #6
MyGreenGuns
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 27, 2011
Location: Pacific NW, USA
Posts: 488
I voted XD9. I love mine. Its my absolute favorite pistol.

I didn't care much for the XD(m) versions. It seemed like they tried to dress it up and make it "cool".

I would cast a 2nd vote for the 1911. I'm enjoying mine. I have almost as much fun disassemble/reassemble as I do shooting it.

The Glocks? Well, they're Glocks. If you've shot one, you've shot em all.
__________________
Springfield XD9 - S&W 637 - Charter Undercover - Norinco 1911A1 - Cobray Mod. R - Rem 870 - Ruger 10/22 - Marlin Mod. 60 - Mosin M44 - Mosin M91/30 (4 GreenGuns)

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin
MyGreenGuns is offline  
Old September 24, 2014, 08:16 AM   #7
NGIB
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 11, 2007
Location: Hinesville, GA
Posts: 881
Why any 9mm has a ported barrel is beyond me.

This being said, hard to provide advice without knowing what the intended purpose is. Home defense, carry gun, just a range blaster? Give more info and you'll get better opinions...
__________________
Proud to be a veteran and still serving. (USAF retired, Army civilian)

When you lose your right to self-determination, through legislation or taxation, servitude is soon to follow - NGIB
NGIB is offline  
Old September 24, 2014, 08:19 AM   #8
TarDevil
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 29, 2009
Location: NC Coast
Posts: 1,094
Of the guns you listed...

+1 what bannockburn said.
__________________
"...remember the ultimate goal was to be smart enough not to shoot but good enough that if you have to shoot you can solve your problem."
Clint Smith
TarDevil is online now  
Old September 24, 2014, 09:00 AM   #9
JTQ
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 6, 2009
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 3,701
They all will probably be fine, but my question would be why this group?

Quote:
1. Springfield XD-9, ported barrel, new. 520.00
The XD9 is a pretty good gun. Why do you want a ported barrel? What's wrong with a regular XD9?


Quote:
2. Taurus PT1911, used 520.00
There are lots of 1911's available, why the Taurus? Their reputation is not good.


Quote:
3. Glock 23 Gen 3 New 490.00

4. Glock 22 Gen 2 used 400.00
Remember, the reason we have Gen 4 Glocks at all is because of the previous Generations of .40S&W Glocks. If you want a Glock in .40S&W you would be better off with a Gen 4. Any reason you're not interested in a G17/G19? You mention the XD9 above so apparently 9mm is an OK choice. Glocks best guns are typically the 9mm models, G17/G19/G34.


Quote:
5. Springfield XDM .45 new 580.00
Probably a good gun, but .45 ammo will be more expensive than 9mm or .40S&W.
JTQ is offline  
Old September 24, 2014, 05:22 PM   #10
460Kodiak
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 12, 2011
Location: In a place.....by cool stuff.
Posts: 2,805
I chose the XDM .45. GLOCKS are fine, but I prefer XDM's and I simply wont spend my money on a Taurus.

The XD 9 is fine too, but I'm a 45 shooter.
__________________
Me........ "I need a screen name."
Friend.... "What's your favorite cartridge?"
Me........ "460 magnum."
Friend.... "You should be 460Kodiak....... yeah"
Me........ "Great...... now I have to grow a mullet."
460Kodiak is offline  
Old September 24, 2014, 06:18 PM   #11
frankiestoys
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 16, 2009
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 785
None of your choices are bad except I might pass in the Taurus...have you looked at any Sig's ?'I recently picked up a 2022 in 9mm and I've been very pleased with it (429$) and its a lot of gun! I'm not a Glock fan ( and yes i owned a couple) there just not for me .The SA are is a good choice ,they seem to get a lot of praise of your choices I would go with the SA but go check out the Sig too.
__________________
GO NAVY !
frankiestoys is offline  
Old September 24, 2014, 06:31 PM   #12
MICHAEL T
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 3, 2004
Location: outback Kentucky
Posts: 5,315
NO Taurus 1911 or any Taurus . I have owned 3 and only 1 worked from box .Factory service terrible was my experience .

NO ported barrels need apply
__________________
http://bersachat.com #1 board on net for Bersa pistols and now American Classic 1911's have their own place

http://www.americanclassic1911forum.com
MICHAEL T is offline  
Old September 24, 2014, 09:02 PM   #13
jhb
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 26, 2010
Location: dixie, but some call it florida
Posts: 189
I voted before I read the details. I voted xd9......but im switching my vote since you want the ported barrel version to the xdm45.

I sure like glocks but in 9mm, .357sig, .45acp, and 10mm forms.

I like xds but not ported.

I love 1911's but not taurus.
__________________
-NRA benefactor life member - Gun owners of america life member - Second amendment foundation life member - Florida carry member - Knife rights member
jhb is offline  
Old September 24, 2014, 09:35 PM   #14
Bad_Wolf
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 23, 2014
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by JTQ View Post
They all will probably be fine, but my question would be why this group?
2 reasons: I've owned all of them in some form or fashion over the years and had good luck. Also, price

Quote:
Originally Posted by JTQ View Post
The XD9 is a pretty good gun. Why do you want a ported barrel? What's wrong with a regular XD9?
It's not really that I want a ported barrel, just happened to see one at a decent price. Don't have strong feelings one way or the other when it comes to this


Quote:
Originally Posted by JTQ View Post
There are lots of 1911's available, why the Taurus? Their reputation is not good.
Again, availabilty. Just happened to see it, really. I've owned several 1911's from colt and springfield down to rock island armory. I've had more issues with the higher end guns than the low end, so the taurus name didn't scare me. Not in love with it or anything, just had good luck in the past with lower end guns. Having read a little more about them it does give me pause, but still on the fence.


Quote:
Originally Posted by JTQ View Post
Remember, the reason we have Gen 4 Glocks at all is because of the previous Generations of .40S&W Glocks. If you want a Glock in .40S&W you would be better off with a Gen 4. Any reason you're not interested in a G17/G19? You mention the XD9 above so apparently 9mm is an OK choice. Glocks best guns are typically the 9mm models, G17/G19/G34.
What's changed between gen 2 and 4? I see they added finger grooves and I know some (not sure what gen) have adjustable backstraps but other than that what improvements/changes were made? I had a gen 2 glock 22 and never had an issue. Also, I'd consider the 17/19 as well. No problems with 9mm in general.

[/QUOTE]
Bad_Wolf is offline  
Old September 24, 2014, 09:37 PM   #15
Bad_Wolf
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 23, 2014
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by frankiestoys View Post
None of your choices are bad except I might pass in the Taurus...have you looked at any Sig's ?'I recently picked up a 2022 in 9mm and I've been very pleased with it (429$) and its a lot of gun! I'm not a Glock fan ( and yes i owned a couple) there just not for me .The SA are is a good choice ,they seem to get a lot of praise of your choices I would go with the SA but go check out the Sig too.
ONly issue with the sig is the da/sa trigger. Never have liked those (by any manufacturer). I know they make a fine weapon though
Bad_Wolf is offline  
Old September 24, 2014, 09:40 PM   #16
Bad_Wolf
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 23, 2014
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by MICHAEL T View Post

NO ported barrels need apply
Just out of curiosity, why no ported barrels? I've have little experience with them but none of it bad. I see several people with the same opinion on ported barrel, just wondering why
Bad_Wolf is offline  
Old September 24, 2014, 09:45 PM   #17
Bad_Wolf
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 23, 2014
Posts: 12
That's the hard part, I'm decent (not great but decent) with any/all of them. If I had to pick one, I'd probably say the 1911 is my favorite. But the glocks and springfields never fail (in my experience at least). I love how slim the 1911 is and carried a full sized one concealed with no issues. I like that the XD I can tell in the dark if there's a round in the chamber and whether it's cocked or not. Grip reminds me of 1911.
Bad_Wolf is offline  
Old September 24, 2014, 11:30 PM   #18
JTQ
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 6, 2009
Location: NW Florida
Posts: 3,701
Quote:
What's changed between gen 2 and 4? I see they added finger grooves and I know some (not sure what gen) have adjustable backstraps but other than that what improvements/changes were made?
The key feature to the Gen 4 guns is the dual recoil spring. The G22 and G23 really needed it, the other guns G17/G19/G20/G21 etc, really don't.

From Hilton Yam at Modern Service Weapons

http://modernserviceweapons.com/?p=171

Quote:
Same with .40 – the M&P was designed for the .40, with steel chassis for increased rigidity and none of the durability or function issues of the Glock 22. Oddly, the 9mm was shoehorned into the M&P platform rather than the reverse which is true for Glock, and it is therefore the weakest model of the M&P.
http://modernserviceweapons.com/?p=7556#more-7556

Quote:
If you are shooting .40 because of departmental constraints, then the playing field has leveled out a bit with the production of the Gen4 Glock, which offers a purpose built dual recoil spring system which significantly softens the recoil and promotes greater longevity than the Gen3 guns. Function with attached weapon lights is also dramatically improved in the Gen4. Only 2 years ago, the clear choice in .40 was the M&P, but now users have the added option of the Gen4 Glock 22 or 23.
JTQ is offline  
Old September 25, 2014, 02:59 AM   #19
JDR
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 11, 2013
Posts: 356
I would like to write in my Gen4 Glock 21 .45 ACP, I think it is way better than my Gen4 Glock 22. My 21 shoots steel, aluminum, and (of course) brass case ammo with ease. It's great to be able to shoot a .45 with ammo that is cheaper than most brass-case 9mm ammo!

Last edited by JDR; September 25, 2014 at 01:50 PM.
JDR is offline  
Old September 25, 2014, 03:51 AM   #20
Cee Zee
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 23, 2012
Posts: 1,948
I have a XDm in .40S&W and a Taurus PT-145 Millennium Pro which is a .45 ACP. The Taurus is a far superior gun in almost every way. It's more accurate and has been more dependable. What else is there? Do I think it will last 150 years? No I don't. But I've put about 5000 rounds through it without a single problem of any kind. When I bought my XDm it had a serious feeding issue (I bought it used with a no questions asked return policy though so I sent it in to SA to get it fixed and it has worked perfectly since). But the SA still isn't as accurate and I don't think a XDm in .45 would fire multiple rounds in a hurry without losing a good bit of accuracy. The Taurus I have recoils straight back into my hands and that makes firing double taps and more an easy proposition.

Still Taurus has spotty quality control. Most people get good examples (check out the Taurus board sometime). If you get a good one chances are it will stay that way a while. I bought mine with a 30 day no questions asked guarantee from my LGS though. Without that I may not have bought it. I actually had it in my mind to buy a Glock that day. I just can never fan a Glock that feels good in my hand. But I wouldn't have even considered buying one without that guarantee. I would now though.

I've never regretted buying my Taurus. I used it to check out some suspicious activity just tonight. It is an amazing package actually. It holds a lot of ammo in a small space and it has never let me down. But whether it will stay that way as long as some of your other choices is another matter. BTW I don't think my SA is built to last 100 years like some guns are, but it's done 5 years without a hitch. No guarantees you will get another one as good but I love mine.
Cee Zee is offline  
Old September 25, 2014, 03:12 PM   #21
vaalpens
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 14, 2014
Posts: 177
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bad_Wolf View Post
ONly issue with the sig is the da/sa trigger. Never have liked those (by any manufacturer). I know they make a fine weapon though
It also depends on your price range. SIG's are normally a bit more expensive unless you go for SP2022 (great gun), P250 (DAO) or maybe even the new P320 (striker fired). I would rather buy a Sig CPO (certified pre-owned) before buying a used gun, unless you are able to check everything out on the used gun.
vaalpens is offline  
Old September 25, 2014, 05:44 PM   #22
Teachu2
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 17, 2012
Location: Keene, CA
Posts: 1,560
I have around three dozen handguns, and the only exact duplicate is a pair of G23s (out of 12 Glocks). They are extremely versatile, as they are the same size as a G19 but capable of shooting 9mm, .40, or .357Sig with a quick and simple barrel change. Mine both work great with the original 40/357 mags, even with 9mm ammo. Easy to shoot to combat accuracy, reliable as can be, small enough to carry concealed.
Teachu2 is offline  
Old September 25, 2014, 09:10 PM   #23
TfflHndn
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 27, 2013
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Posts: 250
I'd go with the 1911, because I like them. I have had no problem with Taurus, but second the recommendation above that you look at Rock Island for a good quality 1911 for not a lot of money. Glock grips just don't fit my hand well, so I don't own any. I won't buy a gun that I won't enjoy shooting. Too many good alternatives that I will enjoy.
__________________
******
USMC '83-'88
Captain of Marines
Pacific Division Individual Rifle Champion '85
All-Marine Matches '85
Pacific Division Rifle & Pistol Team Gold Medalist, '87
Pacific Division Individual Pistol Silver Medal, '87
TfflHndn is offline  
Old September 25, 2014, 09:56 PM   #24
wlewisiii
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 1, 2010
Location: Hayward, WI
Posts: 1,596
None of the above. Try this instead:
Rock Island Tactical Full Size .45 ACP ~$450
__________________
"You better watch out, what you wish for
It better be worth it, so much to die for."
Hole
wlewisiii is offline  
Old September 25, 2014, 10:16 PM   #25
tarosean
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 22, 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 3,622
None of the above. But any world "work".
tarosean is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.