Quantcast
R-P Brass in 38 Spl. - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Ammunition, Gear, and Firearm Help > Handloading and Reloading

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 4, 2015, 06:29 PM   #1
kcofohio
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: December 16, 2013
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 710
R-P Brass in 38 Spl.

I recently bought some CFE Pistol and am working on lead bullet loads for testing. Since it is testing, in 38 Spl., I used some mixed brass. CBC, R-P, S&B, and WCC. The bullets were Missouri's 125 gr. 12 BHN.

On the 2nd firing, in the 3rd round, the cylinder wouldn't rotate. First thoughts was either high primer or I short stroked the trigger. After a bit of looking things over, I saw powder on the crane. I had a bullet jump the crimp. Then 2, then 3.

I thought I had a good crimp on the bullets. Got home and went ahead and increased the crimp and reloaded the ones I did shoot. Plus the ones that the bullet pulled out.

That is when I noticed the Remington brass, after resizing, would move the Lee Pro disk with charge bar, a lot less than the other brass. And barely any neck tension. I even removed the deprimer and resized again with the same results. Usually this happens when the brass is cracked at the mouth. And all the brass is within .010" in length of each other.

I have used Remington brass in several other calibers. This is a first.

Has anyone else seen this before?
__________________
Who is it that determines what is socially acceptable?
If you say man, what will the future man deem acceptable?
kcofohio is offline  
Old January 4, 2015, 06:36 PM   #2
Walkalong
Moderator
 
 
Join Date: November 20, 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 37,521
Remington brass tends to be thinner than other brands. Not good or bad by its self. Some people prefer it. But, you need a tight enough sizer to get adequate neck tension with some bullets.
__________________
Do you ever wonder why nobody ever robs the bag man for the mob? No, you don't.

"Oh bother" said Pooh, as he chambered another round. Author unknown.
Walkalong is offline  
Old January 4, 2015, 06:45 PM   #3
MutinousDoug
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 24, 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 726
When I used to shoot Bullseye in the 80s and 90s, I mixed any brass in my practice 45ACP loads and never noticed a difference in group size or placement. Except for R-P brass. There is a limit to how much you can crimp ACP rounds because they headspace on the case mouth. With (most) R-P brass, I could push lead, semi-wadcutter bullets into the case by hand adter crimping. All my brass is sized on RCBS carbide dies and I use Win, Fed, Starline, IMI, Blazer, CCI, PMC, you name it, without problem. Either the R-P brass is thin at the mouth or there is a lot of spring-back after sizing.
I give scavenged R-P brass to anyone who will take it.
MutinousDoug is offline  
Old January 4, 2015, 06:55 PM   #4
kcofohio
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: December 16, 2013
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 710
Walkalong, is that across most/all of their calibers of brass?

I have loaded R-P in 9 & 45, never noticed it before. Maybe those dies are tighter?! Fortunately, I only have a few of them in 38. They'll go into the bad brass jug.

Thanks!
__________________
Who is it that determines what is socially acceptable?
If you say man, what will the future man deem acceptable?
kcofohio is offline  
Old January 4, 2015, 07:02 PM   #5
Walkalong
Moderator
 
 
Join Date: November 20, 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 37,521
The RP .45 ACP brass was where I first had an issue. RCBS sent me a tighter sizer.
__________________
Do you ever wonder why nobody ever robs the bag man for the mob? No, you don't.

"Oh bother" said Pooh, as he chambered another round. Author unknown.
Walkalong is offline  
Old January 4, 2015, 07:08 PM   #6
Kp321
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 12, 2012
Location: West Texas
Posts: 704
I have had the same experience with RP brass and RCBS carbide dies. Worse on nickel plated than plain brass. I saved the RP brass for use with .452 lead bullets. No problems there with the extra .001". The RP brass is thinner than other brands but the die also seems to be a little loose. I have since swapped to Dillon dies and have had no further problems.
Kp321 is online now  
Old January 4, 2015, 07:14 PM   #7
Jim Watson
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Posts: 18,829
My early experience with RP cases was not good.
Plated .38 Special tended to crack at the mouth in 3-4 loadings.
.45 ACP was thin and would not give good bullet pull.

I have not had problems with recent production, but as Kp says, my Dillon .45 die may be tighter than the RCBS and I don't accumulate many plated cases.
__________________
We hear: "There is no such thing as a stupid question."
But: "What did I just buy and what is it worth?" comes awful close.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old January 4, 2015, 07:56 PM   #8
Rule3
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 26, 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,703
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcofohio View Post



That is when I noticed the Remington brass, after resizing, would move the Lee Pro disk with charge bar, a lot less than the other brass. ?
I do not follow/understand the above ??

What does the Pro disk charge bar have to do with anything? After rezing, the powder through die is what flares the brass and drops the powder either by charge bar or disk. If it does not move completely to cover the drop hole you would have no powder or squib. This would not effect you bullet crimp unless it is set so much that it is over flaring,

When it goes to the seating die is when it will seat and crimp if you have it set to crimp or then go on the the FCD.

Just size a piece of brass and before flaring see if a bullet will start before you use the powder/flair die

For a 38 Special to jump a crimp on a lead bullet, how much crimp are you using and what kind of load??

I have Rem brass that has been load untold amount of times.
__________________
NRA- RSO
Rule3 is offline  
Old January 4, 2015, 08:08 PM   #9
kcofohio
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: December 16, 2013
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 710
Rule3, the powder-through-die had less resistance with the R-P brass. So the Pro Auto Disk didn't slide in as far to drop the powder.
__________________
Who is it that determines what is socially acceptable?
If you say man, what will the future man deem acceptable?
kcofohio is offline  
Old January 4, 2015, 08:18 PM   #10
OYE
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 17, 2010
Posts: 401
Quote:
For a 38 Special to jump a crimp on a lead bullet, how much crimp are you using and what kind of load??
That certainly makes sense. I haven't seen any recalls on Remington brass. Has there been any and when ? Would like to hear of it as we prefer it in all calibers(with Star being about it's equal in pistol calibers). We have always kept careful brass usage records to back that up as well. Takes the guesswork out of it. OYE
OYE is offline  
Old January 4, 2015, 08:50 PM   #11
joneb
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: August 19, 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,651
For 38spl I use R-P brass with cast .358-.3585" diameter bullets and RCBS dies with good results.
joneb is offline  
Old January 4, 2015, 09:12 PM   #12
kcofohio
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: December 16, 2013
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 710
The load is CFE Pistol 6.0 gr. at 1.445" with MBC Cowboy #2 125 gr.

It had to do with neck tension, or lack of.

As for the crimp. The crimp folded into the depth of the crimp groove.

I don't remember how I came into these casings. So, I have no idea when Remington made these. As I stated in the OP, CBC, S&B, and WCC casings were also loaded in the same process.
__________________
Who is it that determines what is socially acceptable?
If you say man, what will the future man deem acceptable?
kcofohio is offline  
Old January 4, 2015, 09:24 PM   #13
Rule3
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 26, 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,703
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcofohio View Post
Rule3, the powder-through-die had less resistance with the R-P brass. So the Pro Auto Disk didn't slide in as far to drop the powder.
I have been using one for many years in about every handgun and 4 rifle calibers. The powder through die will effect your flair it has nothing to do with neck tension or crimp.

Now if you are implying that there is less resistance are you saying that the brass is so weak or pliable that this is what then causes less neck tension or a crimp not holding? Sure would have to be very very weak brass.

A picture of the crimp would be helpful. Just can not grasp how a certain piece of brass or two could be that weak and not be cracked, But not being there and seeing it just a guess.
__________________
NRA- RSO
Rule3 is offline  
Old January 4, 2015, 09:29 PM   #14
mboe794
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 29, 2012
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 300
I dont know, but RP brass works fine for me in 38 special?? In fact it is one of my preferred brands in most calibers. I have shot many +P loaded XTPs in RP brass through an airwieght Jframe. I never noticed an issue. I use Lee dies in 38.
mboe794 is offline  
Old January 4, 2015, 09:48 PM   #15
CrackedBrass45
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 26, 2014
Posts: 11
Mboe794 and I share the exact same results. Xtp's, dies everything.
CrackedBrass45 is offline  
Old January 4, 2015, 09:51 PM   #16
kcofohio
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: December 16, 2013
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 710
Rule3, I understand about the neck tension, which is created by the resizing die, that the powder-through die only is adjusted for bell mouthing.

The through die had less resistance from the Remington brass and slipped further into the casing. Therefore, the powder hopper slide didn't travel the normal distance.

Here is a picture. The cartridge on the left is R-P, and on the right is W-W.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 38Spl1.jpg (48.0 KB, 37 views)
__________________
Who is it that determines what is socially acceptable?
If you say man, what will the future man deem acceptable?
kcofohio is offline  
Old January 4, 2015, 09:53 PM   #17
Sky King
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 9, 2010
Posts: 75
I have the same problem with R-P brass. Not enough neck tension. Since I reload for .380acp, I tried that sizing die. Works perfectly. So now I use the .380acp die whenever I reload R-P brass.
Sky King is offline  
Old January 4, 2015, 10:33 PM   #18
OYE
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 17, 2010
Posts: 401
Quote:
I never noticed an issue. I use Lee dies in 38.
Quote:
Mboe794 and I share the exact same results. Xtp's, dies everything.

Same here. What a coincidence !!!!!!

Quote:
It had to do with neck tension, or lack of.

If you feel this is a RP brass issue, you owe it to other reloaders to report the problem to Remington ASAP. It's definitely a safety issue. OYE
OYE is offline  
Old January 4, 2015, 10:43 PM   #19
gamestalker
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 10, 2008
Location: SW Arizona
Posts: 8,017
I've actually run into this more than once, and it was almost always R.P. brass, thin stuff. Not all of it is that thin though, just now and then I come across some excessively thin one's. But I can always detect when I'm resizing an R.P. case, they don't produce as much resistance.

GS
gamestalker is online now  
Old January 4, 2015, 10:53 PM   #20
kcofohio
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: December 16, 2013
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 710
Quote:
Originally Posted by OYE View Post
Same here. What a coincidence !!!!!!




If you feel this is a RP brass issue, you owe it to other reloaders to report the problem to Remington ASAP. It's definitely a safety issue. OYE
As I stated earlier, I have no idea how I came into this brass. What lot # could I offer Remington. It could be from last year, or 10 years ago.

People, this thread was not to attack Remington. As I stated before, I have used 9s and 45s in R-P with good results. It was something I had never ran into before and was wanting input. And that I got.
__________________
Who is it that determines what is socially acceptable?
If you say man, what will the future man deem acceptable?
kcofohio is offline  
Old January 5, 2015, 01:25 AM   #21
OYE
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 17, 2010
Posts: 401
Well since gamestalker is having similar problems with RP brass, and it's issues with bullets pulling due to recoil in a 38 special, it certainly does bring up safety issues. I didn't detect anyone bashing RP brass. Anyway I may take it upon myself to report it to Remington.

So let me get the facts straight.

1. Running into what appears to be extremely weak RP 38 special brass that will not hold enough tension on a bullet when properly crimped. The bullets vibrate out of the case and jam the revolver cylinder.

2. Purchase date and price is unknown.

3. Approximate age of brass is unknown.

4. Number of times brass has been fired is unknown.

5. Brass is of unknown origin.

This should be enough to get their attention and possibly initiate a recall, but if there is anything else, please let me know. OYE


PS: If they ask why it's being used at all, what should I tell them ?
I wonder what they'll say when I hang up ?
OYE is offline  
Old January 5, 2015, 01:34 AM   #22
ArchAngelCD
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 25, 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 18,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by kcofohio View Post
Rule3, I understand about the neck tension, which is created by the resizing die, that the powder-through die only is adjusted for bell mouthing.

The through die had less resistance from the Remington brass and slipped further into the casing. Therefore, the powder hopper slide didn't travel the normal distance.

Here is a picture. The cartridge on the left is R-P, and on the right is W-W.
In that picture the Rem case has a much heavier crimp than the Win case. IMO it's too much crimp and sometimes too much crimp will case poor neck tension.
__________________
Remember boys and girls, gun control only prevents law abiding Americans from owning guns because the Bad Guys donít obey the laws, no matter how restrictive or lenient the laws are!
ArchAngelCD is online now  
Old January 5, 2015, 02:11 AM   #23
gamestalker
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 10, 2008
Location: SW Arizona
Posts: 8,017
I've had problems with their 38 spcl, .357, and 9mm brass being too thin. It's not like a constant occurrence, just something that happens from time to time, and it seems to be R.P. brass most, if not, every time.

It doesn't really ever cause me any great inconvenience or risk of a mishap, cause I can always tell before I even prime the brass, if it has inadequate neck tension. Either the sizing die or the powder / expander die will expose the problem for me early on. At that point I take a corresponding jacketed bullet, and I try to shove it in the case mouth by hand, if I can get it into the case mouth at all, that brass gets set aside to be measured.

And hey, I have no idea how many times the offending brass has been loaded, how old it is, or it's origin. About the only history I can provide, is that I load nothing but full tilt jacketed stuff. And that I use a firm roll crimp on all my wheel gun loads, and zero taper crimp on the AL rimless brass.

GS
gamestalker is online now  
Old January 5, 2015, 02:43 AM   #24
Reefinmike
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 17, 2012
Posts: 864
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rule3 View Post
I have been using one for many years in about every handgun and 4 rifle calibers. The powder through die will effect your flair it has nothing to do with neck tension or crimp.

Now if you are implying that there is less resistance are you saying that the brass is so weak or pliable that this is what then causes less neck tension or a crimp not holding? Sure would have to be very very weak brass.

A picture of the crimp would be helpful. Just can not grasp how a certain piece of brass or two could be that weak and not be cracked, But not being there and seeing it just a guess.
in my experience the last 10k rounds of 38 using my autodisk, Thin brass, short brass, and brass with cracked necks(very apparent on the press) all contact the expander further up, resulting in less disk travel. Long or thick brass(dated WCC headstamp 38 brass comes to mind) tends to throw the powder measure much further as it it contacts the expander lower down.

Side note- it is also important to periodically break down and clean your auto disk to reduce resistance of the parts. Over time you will gradually need to adjust the die deeper to get the disk to travel 100%. as you do this, you will get more case belling. Long story short, the less resistance in travel that the disk has, the lower the "weight" on the case mouth/expander which leads to less case belling. Cleaning your powder drop tubes can help, but where I found the main source of the problem was grime that built up in between the auto disk thrower arm and the body of the measure. tweaking the spring tension screw that joins them may also tweak the disk travel.
__________________
H̶P̶3̶8̶ ̶w̶h̶e̶r̶e̶ ̶a̶r̶t̶ ̶t̶h̶o̶u̶
Reefinmike is offline  
Old January 5, 2015, 02:43 AM   #25
OYE
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 17, 2010
Posts: 401
Quote:
I've had problems with their 38 spcl, .357, and 9mm brass being too thin. It's not like a constant occurrence, just something that happens from time to time, and it seems to be R.P. brass most, if not, every time.

It doesn't really ever cause me any great inconvenience or risk of a mishap, cause I can always tell before I even prime the brass, if it has inadequate neck tension. Either the sizing die or the powder / expander die will expose the problem for me early on. At that point I take a corresponding jacketed bullet, and I try to shove it in the case mouth by hand, if I can get it into the case mouth at all, that brass gets set aside to be measured.

And hey, I have no idea how many times the offending brass has been loaded, how old it is, or it's origin. About the only history I can provide, is that I load nothing but full tilt jacketed stuff. And that I use a firm roll crimp on all my wheel gun loads, and zero taper crimp on the AL rimless brass.

Got it. Good stuff ! We'll pass that along to Remington. Anybody else ?

OYE
OYE is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.