Quantcast
Had a nightmare - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > NFA Firearms and Accessories

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 22, 2014, 01:20 PM   #1
armoredman
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 19, 2003
Location: proud to be in AZ
Posts: 15,692
Had a nightmare

Seriously. Had a dream right before I woke up that ATFE was "freezing" the National Registry to "clarify any errors" that may be on it. The minimum estimate was two years...Work me up in a cold sweat.
__________________
If total government control equals safety, why are prisons so dangerous?

http://czfirearms.us/ The original CZ Forum, new address.
armoredman is offline  
Old November 22, 2014, 02:10 PM   #2
Tirod
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 24, 2008
Location: SW MO
Posts: 2,900
And having two lawsuits against them on that subject wouldn't?

In the scope of national politics it wouldn't rate a mention on the 6:00 news. There would be a scuffle in Ferguson to cover it up.

Not to poke too hard, but do we discuss dreams any more than fantasy? Just sayin. But the prospect of the ATF being directed by the Chief Executive is slight, he's jerking Congresses chain on immigration and deflecting national attention from the results of the courts looking at Justice and what documents they will and won't release from Fast and Furious.

It's extensive and involves Eric Holder who again isn't very forthcoming about his involvment - and has already resigned. Duck and run.

Which should get us even further into politics which we don't discuss. And I'm not, at this level it's just current events, but others may demur and they get the last say
Tirod is offline  
Old November 22, 2014, 02:51 PM   #3
AlexanderA
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 27, 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,264
There are undoubtedly errors in the Registry. But "freezing" transactions is not going to purge the errors. Ultimately, the only way to clean the Registry and bring it into the modern information age is to declare an amnesty and have every existing NFA item re-registered. (An obvious side effect of this would be that a lot of things would come into the Registry that weren't there before. But that's OK. The argument that could be made to the antigunners is that it's better to have these items registered and tracked rather than having them continue to float around unregistered.)
AlexanderA is online now  
Old November 23, 2014, 09:56 PM   #4
Tirod
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 24, 2008
Location: SW MO
Posts: 2,900
There have been amnesties before, and I believe that opening up the registery in the face of two lawsuits claiming it shouldn't be closed would be evidence against the BATF (who is just doing what they were told by Congress.)

So Congress would have egg on it's face and POTUS would look pro machine gun. One is just a fact of life, but the other is something that won't ever happen in this administration. They would prefer to say that unregistered MG's are dangerously illegal and need to be turned in.

Anti gunners don't work things around to help the citizen, there game plan is to ban guns totally, not help keep what we have legally.

It's a "third rail" issue for the Administration and nothing good will come of it. Giving amnesty to illegal aliens plays better than amnesty to any MG owner for whatever reason.
Tirod is offline  
Old November 23, 2014, 11:00 PM   #5
armoredman
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 19, 2003
Location: proud to be in AZ
Posts: 15,692
I apologize Tirod, won't happen again.
__________________
If total government control equals safety, why are prisons so dangerous?

http://czfirearms.us/ The original CZ Forum, new address.
armoredman is offline  
Old November 23, 2014, 11:58 PM   #6
CapnMac
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 27, 2009
Location: DFW (formerly Brazos County), Texas
Posts: 875
Ok, am I incorrect in thinking that there was only ever the one NFA amnesty?
__________________
Standing guard even sitting behind a desk.

Occupational hazard of my occupation just not being around (with apologies to Bubba)
CapnMac is offline  
Old November 24, 2014, 08:17 PM   #7
medalguy
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: March 20, 2009
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2,834
I suppose in 1934 there must have been one, but I wasn't around for that one.
medalguy is offline  
Old November 24, 2014, 09:25 PM   #8
Arizona_Mike
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 15, 2013
Posts: 1,929
Perhapse the next President can waive the NFA for silencers and SBRs using "prosecutorial discression" or just delay implementation for a few years and then have an amnesty.

Mike
__________________
Handgun stance by Col. Cooper. Rifle stance by Col. Sanders.
Type 03 FFL, Stamp collector: 11 approved, 1 pending
MG: 1, SBR: 4, SBS: 3, Supp: 3/4
If it involves guns or paracord it does not count as macramé.
Arizona_Mike is offline  
Old November 28, 2014, 12:56 AM   #9
Tirod
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 24, 2008
Location: SW MO
Posts: 2,900
The President can sign a bill into law, anything short of that and it's not law. Congress made the NFA happen, the BATF enforces. Interfering with that chain of command gets the Executive Branch in serious trouble either way. There is a division of power, three branches, etc. Justice can't write law, just (mis) interpret it, Congress can't "enforce" law, just create them, and the President can only oversee the Executive Branch in how that is done - not ignore it outright or create new versions of it.

He may be getting away with the Fast and Furious issue for now, but Eric Holder isn't. Previous Presidents had issues, one resigned while in office.

It's quite a bit more complicated that popular myth makes it, the President can't wave a magic pen and take away our rights any more than give them. He's just the Lead Supervisor of a working government which Congress has burdened with tasks and responsibilities that must be performed.

In a very real sense, he has to fly to military bases and shake hands, or award medals to soldiers for actions that he may very well wish didn't happen.

He's only got the job for two more years, and then some other overambitious ego will try to get us to employ him. And when the Departments read him in to what he has to support in existing policy, then a lot of the campaign promises come up dead short.

The job really controls him more than he "controls" the country. Nobody "controls" America, it's a mob of quite self centered people who's first concern is themselves. We just back a player if we think it can get us what we want.

Open the registery or keep it closed, the President didn't stop the SIG Brace, didn't stop Illinois becoming a CCW state, didn't stop gun stores from opening in Chicago, didn't stop a lawsuit against a CA sherriff on shall issue, didn't stop Florida making suppressors legal to use hunting, didn't stop MO making Open Carry legal for CCW holders.

In the last 6 years things have gotten quite a bit better for us. He couldn't stop it one bit. He talks a good game but he hasn't done nearly as much underhanded damage as Cuomo or other legislators banning the possession and use of AR15's. Doesn't hold a candle to them.

I see President bashing as a complete waste of time. He doesn't make or break how we live our lives, just takes the blame when we insist, or the credit when it works out well.

And some candidates even say they invented the internet. Which should give good insight to just exactly how far the "presidential" class of people will go in trying to impress us.
Tirod is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.