Quantcast
Building Up Worn Out Parts - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Ammunition, Gear, and Firearm Help > Gunsmithing and Repairs

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 28, 2013, 05:25 AM   #1
GlockFu
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 6, 2009
Posts: 44
Building Up Worn Out Parts

Hello,

I have started working on old single action and double action revolvers. I've been basically buying broken revolvers to fix and restore them. They are mostly antiques and the majority of the problems are just due to worn out sears, gears or parts that rub against each other.

What are good methods to build these parts back up as there obviously aren't readily available replacement parts?
GlockFu is offline  
Old July 28, 2013, 08:12 AM   #2
Boxhead
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 18, 2006
Location: Bouncing between Geoje Korea, The Texas Hill Country and Far North Idaho
Posts: 595
You must learn the supreme art of TIG welding. Once done all is possible. I hire mine out.
Boxhead is offline  
Old July 28, 2013, 09:16 AM   #3
4v50 Gary
Moderator
  
 
Join Date: December 20, 2002
Posts: 16,558
There are two schools of thought.

First is if the gun is collectible, you buy a used or reproduction part and fit it. You save the worn part and return it to the customer. You can also make a part from stock. Make a template and transfer it onto the stock. Cut, grind or file and then stone to fit. You may need specialized files to do hammer notches.

Second school is TIG welding and fitting the old part.
__________________
TFL Aluminium. Molon Labe!
4v50 Gary is offline  
Old July 28, 2013, 09:58 AM   #4
Longhorn 76
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 17, 2012
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 113
I am certain TIG is better, but I use a small jeweler's oxy/acetylene torch to build them up.

Works well on the old parts, don't know about MIM stuff.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
Longhorn 76 is offline  
Old July 28, 2013, 10:07 AM   #5
carbine85
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 1, 2007
Location: Southwest, Ohio
Posts: 1,369
You can usually find machine shops that will replace metal and do proper heat treatment if its needed. Some can provide a 95% match of the steel originally used. If the part gets blued the finish will match better. If it stays in the white it might not matter.
carbine85 is offline  
Old July 28, 2013, 02:44 PM   #6
Jim K
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 31, 2002
Posts: 15,462
It is darned hard to find a good welder to work on small parts. Most of the ones around here are not worth a hoot on anything smaller than a new tooth for a backhoe.

Jim
Jim K is offline  
Old July 28, 2013, 03:39 PM   #7
4v50 Gary
Moderator
  
 
Join Date: December 20, 2002
Posts: 16,558
There is no better. It all depends on cost-effectiveness. Sometimes all it takes is a small weld and a lot of filing to make the part work. However, as pointed out earlier, if you have an all matching Colt Single Action Army that has a bobbed hammer, do you really want to alter a part for an otherwise original gun? I would set aside the bobbed hammer and put a replacement on it. That way the owner can enjoy it and still retain its historic value.

Bottom line: What is the customer willing to pay for?
__________________
TFL Aluminium. Molon Labe!
4v50 Gary is offline  
Old July 28, 2013, 05:12 PM   #8
GlockFu
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 6, 2009
Posts: 44
I know these are newbie question but can someone tell me more about TIG welding and using a small jeweler's oxy/acetylene torch? I've heard of using a TIG welder before but never new exactly how it would work to accomplish building worn out parts.

How exactly does TIG welding work to build up parts? Are you basically melting steel onto the part or are you welding an additional piece of metal onto the part?

When you are done TIG welding, building up the part and then reshaping the weld with a file or stones, do you then have to heat treat the material you added?

How Would you use a small jeweler's oxy/acetylene torch to build them up? Would this be the equivalent to melting more steel onto the part and then reshaping it with a file?

Last edited by GlockFu; July 28, 2013 at 05:19 PM.
GlockFu is offline  
Old July 28, 2013, 06:49 PM   #9
Longhorn 76
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 17, 2012
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 113
With a torch, I am just building up small areas, like the sear of the trigger. I use steel for this. On Colt parts, I have not had any problems. I can harden them if desired. Then file or grind to fit.

TIG can be better, because it allows you to build up with other metals than steel. I built up a Python trigger with Hastalloy once, and it made the smoothest trigger I ever did. It was so hard and tough that it polished like a mirror.

Old Smith parts were only surface hardened, so I would use something like Casenit to duplicate that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
Longhorn 76 is offline  
Old July 28, 2013, 09:34 PM   #10
Kp321
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 12, 2012
Location: West Texas
Posts: 656
A TIG torch is a heat source just like a jewelers oxy-aceteline torch is a heat source. That heat source is used to fuse a filler metal onto the existing metal surface. TIG produces higher temperatures but the small oxy-acet torch will work for most applications.
Kp321 is offline  
Old July 28, 2013, 10:11 PM   #11
rcmodel
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2007
Location: Eastern KS
Posts: 50,383
The main difference is.

TIG = Tungsten Inert Gas = Tungsten electrode produces the ark welding heat to melt the base metal and rod or wire added to the weld to build up the part.
A flow of inert gas (argon or helium) around the electrode prevents oxygen getting to the puddle of molten metal.

That stops all burning out of carbon from the original steel or rod.
And it also prevents slag pockets and slag from forming on top of the weld.

MIG = Metal Inert Gas welding = Similar to TIG, except an inert gas is injected around the electrode / wire welding rod to shield it from atmospheric oxygen, which also burns out base metal and forms slag on top of the weld.

Acetylene torch welding = Uses Acetylene gas and pure oxygen to produce a high temp flame that melts the base metal and welding rod being added to the weld.

Unfortunately, the oxygen rich flame also is capable of burning carbon out of the base metal, and slag is an unavoidable byproduct that can contaminate the weld.
Regardless of how good you can gas weld, slag on top of the weld will mask defects until the weld is cooled and the slag removed.

Then you may have to go back and weld the weld again to fill in the slag pockets you could not see while the weld metal was a molten pool of steel with slag on top of it.

Still, oxy-acetylene welding is still the simplest and most economical welding method available to me in my home shop.

I guess I have been relying on a acetylene torch for too many years to change now.
Besides, a torch is more often used for hi-temp silver-soldering gun parts.

And gun parts are more often hi-temp silver-soldered then steel welded, by about 99 to 1.

rc
__________________
Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
Or all your primers in a glass jar!

Last edited by rcmodel; July 28, 2013 at 10:18 PM.
rcmodel is offline  
Old July 28, 2013, 11:20 PM   #12
GlockFu
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 6, 2009
Posts: 44
Thanks for the replies!

So when TIG welding and Acetylene torch welding, are you using a filler material to join the worn out part to another piece of metal or is the filler material the steel that is actually building up the part?

From the above post it sounds like the filler material is the steel that is actually building up the part. If this is true, would you have to harden the steel that's been added?

Also, what happens if the carbon is burned out of the base metal? What does that do to the base metal?

Last edited by GlockFu; July 28, 2013 at 11:30 PM.
GlockFu is offline  
Old July 28, 2013, 11:34 PM   #13
rcmodel
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2007
Location: Eastern KS
Posts: 50,383
Yes, you are adding molten steel to molten steel to build up the part.

If you were only adding another piece of metal without melting the orginial part?
You would probably use Hi-Temp Silver Solder.

If you weld on a tempered streel part?
It will be annealed when you get done welding, and need to be re-heat treated or case hardened.


But all this welding theory & practice is well beyond simple posts on a gun board.

Any type of welding, silver soldering, heat treating, or tempering is not something you can learn in 15 minutes on the internet.

Before you will be able to 'build up' gun parts to repair them??

You will have to at least take enough welding and machinists classes to know the different welding methods, different types of steels, and how & when they are used together.

Then a few years of welding practice before you get good enough to say, build up the hammer notches on an old Colt hammer and re-cut them, and re-harden them so they work like new again, for instance.

So I won't even try to explain it any further.
Because I can't.

rc
__________________
Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
Or all your primers in a glass jar!
rcmodel is offline  
Old July 29, 2013, 12:21 AM   #14
beag_nut
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 21, 2011
Location: Seymour, CT
Posts: 426
With many years experience making surgical instruments may I offer?:
TIG welding is the most versatile, but the machines cost a lot of money, and training. The range of possible size of the objects to be welded are truly astounding, and the control of the welding process is almost unequaled. It is the most suited to gunsmithing.

“Silver-soldering”, as usually cited, can be either “silver brazing”, when the temps are above 800 degrees, and (properly) “silver-soldering” when the temps are less than 800 degrees. “Silver-brazing” is much stronger, but more likely to affect the strength of the parent metals, because the temps are higher. “Silver-brazing” is weaker than any type of welding, but easier to perform, and will less-likely affect the parent metals, especially if a “low-temp” silver solder is chosen. Either torches or induction-heating can be used. “Silver-soldering” is stronger than lead-tin soldering, and used to be how double-barrel shotguns (etc.) were made. Some “silver-solders” will melt around 450 degrees.

Shielded-Metal-Arc-Welding (SMAW) is the full technical term of “stick-welding”, when one uses an inexpensive “arc-welder” to do general-purose welding. This is the least-appropriate form of welding for firearms, unless one is simply making tools for gunsmithing.

MIG welding is Metal Inert Gas Welding, where one uses a special coated wire (from a coil) in a special MIG machine. It is somewhat like SMAW, except that the wires can be very much smaller, easier to control (even with foot-pedal-controlled wire feeding), and one can weld quite small objects. Costs for the machines is in between the TIG and SMAW types. Some gunsmithing applications exist.

Torch-welding requires a lot of practice and experience to do correctly, and can never equal the quality of either TIG or MIG, because of the temperatures used with an unshielded workpiece. The parent metals are unavoidably degraded by atmospheric oxygen. The only gunsmithing applications should be for making tools, or non-highly-stressed parts, like locks for black powder firearms.

Last edited by beag_nut; July 29, 2013 at 12:23 AM. Reason: wording
beag_nut is offline  
Old July 29, 2013, 12:36 AM   #15
BBBBill
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 7, 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,413
Quote:
Originally Posted by beag nut
...TIG welding is the most versatile, but the machines cost a lot of money, and training.
There are some TIG machines on the market now in the $1500-$1800 range that several of my friends have bought. They have been pleased with them for gunsmithing use (low duty cycle).

Last edited by BBBBill; July 29, 2013 at 01:03 PM.
BBBBill is online now  
Old July 29, 2013, 12:59 AM   #16
rcmodel
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2007
Location: Eastern KS
Posts: 50,383
I'm sure they are.

But my point is.

How many old gun parts can you destroy, learning how to use a TIG welder to build them up with??

Welding is not rocket science.

But repairing old gun parts so they are usable again almost is.

If you don't have a clue what welding is, or how to use any kind of welder.

rc
__________________
Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
Or all your primers in a glass jar!
rcmodel is offline  
Old July 29, 2013, 12:24 PM   #17
MI2600
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 7, 2012
Location: Western Michigan
Posts: 293
A timely topic. I just had a friend of a friend TIG weld extra material on the hand of a 1901 Colt to correct "The Colt Wobble". Worked like a charm with a little filing/sanding.
MI2600 is offline  
Old July 29, 2013, 01:02 PM   #18
BBBBill
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 7, 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,413
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcmodel
I'm sure they are.
But my point is.
How many old gun parts can you destroy, learning how to use a TIG welder to build them up with??
I was referring to the previous post by beag nut about the cost of the equipment. Lots of guys who can TIG are unaware of the newer machines. Post will be edited to clarify.

Not suggesting that you buy the skill along with the machine. That would be like the problem with doctors buying Beech Bonanzas. They have the money and a pilot's license, so that must mean that they are qualified to fly a high performance single.... NOT! That's why they are known as doctor killers.
BBBBill is online now  
Old July 30, 2013, 01:28 AM   #19
GlockFu
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 6, 2009
Posts: 44
Thanks for all the replies. I'm not trying to learn how to weld from an internet post, I'm just trying to figure out in what direction to go in. I've now looked up welding classes in my area and thanks to your comments, kind of know what to look for. My problem is that there are no Gunsmithing schools in my area so I have to look for the next best thing.
GlockFu is offline  
Old July 30, 2013, 01:36 AM   #20
BBBBill
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 7, 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,413
Go to your local trade school and take machinist courses. It's been said the you can make a gunsmith out of a machinist fairly easily, but it's really hard to make a gunsmith into a machinist.
BBBBill is online now  
Old July 30, 2013, 08:22 AM   #21
Longhorn 76
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 17, 2012
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 113
I think everyone agrees that TIG is superior at the welding aspect, but the torch also allows you to heat a part for hardening, soldering, or brazing, as well.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
Longhorn 76 is offline  
Old October 17, 2014, 02:41 AM   #22
rallycamaro
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 16, 2014
Posts: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcmodel View Post
I guess I have been relying on a acetylene torch for too many years to change now.
Besides, a torch is more often used for hi-temp silver-soldering gun parts.

And gun parts are more often hi-temp silver-soldered then steel welded, by about 99 to 1.

rc

rcmodel, I know this is an old post but this is the first time I've seen it. When you refer to "hi-temp silver soldered", I'm assuming you are referring to a brazing operation? If this is what you do, do you use brass or one of the steel brazing materials for the build-up?

Thanks,

Rally
rallycamaro is offline  
Old October 17, 2014, 03:17 AM   #23
rcmodel
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2007
Location: Eastern KS
Posts: 50,383
No, you use hi-temp or low-temp silver-solder & flux, depending on the application you need to use it for.

It is used for joining parts, not building them up.

http://www.brownells.com/items/silver-solder.aspx

http://www.brownells.com/gunsmith-to...r-prod584.aspx

rc
__________________
Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
Or all your primers in a glass jar!
rcmodel is offline  
Old October 18, 2014, 12:20 AM   #24
Jim K
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 31, 2002
Posts: 15,462
There are parts and then there are parts. Welding up the full cock notch in an SAA hammer and then cutting it down is fairly easy. But trying to do the same with the hammer from an 1877 is not just hard it is (at least as far as I am concerned) impossible, and I would not touch it. That part was designed by a fiend!

If anyone here has done one successfully, my hat is off to you!

Jim
Jim K is offline  
Old October 18, 2014, 12:48 AM   #25
rcmodel
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2007
Location: Eastern KS
Posts: 50,383
Say what now?
1877 Lightening?
Weld the hammer notches?
Surely you jest!!

I couldn't even put new replacement springs in one and get it to work without breaking another spring or two before I got the first one to work right!!

Never again will I even touch one!
The old masters that fitted them at the factory, and repaired them on out west?

WAY out of my pay grade of gunsmithing!!!

Or, they had a lot more extra springs, skill, & patience then I ever had.

PS: I think that's the only gun repair in my life that ever whipped my you know what!
And it did it with great vigor & glee, time after time!
(Or, spring after spring?)

rc
__________________
Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
Or all your primers in a glass jar!

Last edited by rcmodel; October 18, 2014 at 10:43 PM.
rcmodel is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.