Quantcast
Will this work? - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Ammunition, Gear, and Firearm Help > Gunsmithing and Repairs

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 31, 2014, 07:30 PM   #1
Oldschool shooter
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 8, 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 24
Will this work?

I picked up an old Stevens Favorite at a flea market earlier this summer. The firing pin was broken and the rifling looked pretty rough. I put a new firing pin in it and the little gun functions fine but accuracy is non-existent. If I rebarrel it, could the action handle .22WMR or .17HMR?
Oldschool shooter is offline  
Old August 31, 2014, 08:03 PM   #2
rcmodel
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2007
Location: Eastern KS
Posts: 49,842
No, I would not recommend it.

You could maybe go .17 HM2, but it's pretty much a dead or dying caliber now.

The problem is:
.22 WMR generates about 3 times the energy of the .22 LR.
The .17 HMR about 2 1/2 times more.
Even the HM2 is 50% more powerful.

That translates to more locking block force x 2.5 or 3 times, pushing on a larger case head.
(Bigger piston!)

Old gun, old steel, and not designed for those kinds of forces.

If I were you, I would re-line the present barrel in .22 LR.

In the long run, it will be cheaper, and safer.
And retain the appearance of the original barrel.

http://www.redmansrifling.com/relining_prices.htm


rc
__________________
Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
Or all your primers in a glass jar!
rcmodel is online now  
Old August 31, 2014, 08:08 PM   #3
Edarnold
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 8, 2012
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 501
The Favorite, if it's the very small action, is not considered adequate for high-speed .22 LR ammunition. So either of the RF-magnum cartridges would be a poor choice. Savage-Stevens also made a new Favorite several years ago with improved metallurgy that was strong enough for the magnum rim fires. You wouldn't 'blow up' your rifle with the hotter rounds, but the headspace would likely stretch until the gun was unusable.
Edarnold is offline  
Old September 1, 2014, 08:33 AM   #4
Oldschool shooter
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 8, 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 24
Thanks for the info, I didn't realize the magnum rounds developed that much pressure. Looks like a re-line for this old gun.
Oldschool shooter is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.