Quantcast
AR Builds -- What Parts Did You Choose and Why?? - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Rifle Country

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 2, 2013, 10:18 AM   #1
Mike1234567
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: July 6, 2010
Location: Alamo City
Posts: 4,085
AR Builds -- What Parts Did You Choose and Why??

Per the title... I need ideas. Please post your parts lists and explain why you chose them. Also list the approximate prices if you can remember.

This thread has nothing to do with what I want or need. Again, I just want ideas.
Mike1234567 is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 02:51 PM   #2
Quentin
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 30, 2005
Location: NorthWest USA
Posts: 1,506
First I pick a stripped lower with a rollmark I really like, even if it costs $50 more than something else that honestly would work well but isn't what I want. I figure the extra cost is a drop in the bucket when considering the total cost of the build so why not put YOUR mark on YOUR build. Lowers I got are S&W, ArmaLite, Valkyrie, Charles Daly and a Quentin Defense US Army Edition billet (that really put my mark on it!) The CD and Valkyrie didn't cost more actually, I liked them for various reasons.

I like the BCM M4 receiver extension/stock kit with an H buffer, all truly milspec of course. And Magpul CTR stock and MOE+ pistol grip. LPKs by Daniel Defense, Stag and PSA have worked well for me. I've also tried PSA's M4 receiver extension/stock kit which is a bargain but the RE isn't always 7075-T6.

I like 16" lightweight midlength uppers with fixed A2 FSBs and Magpul MOEs. I have bought Daniel Defense, BCM and PSA with the quality roughtly being in that order though I have no real complaints with the PSA upper. BCM's standard phosphate M16 BCG is my favorite but my DD BCG was fine too. My PSA Premium BCG seems ok but it's now a spare and my former spare (BCM) is in the PSA upper. I go with the Magpul MBUS2 rear sight and an RDS. A good two point sling (VTAC or VCAS) pretty much finishes it off.
Quentin is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 04:04 PM   #3
Fishbed77
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 23, 2010
Posts: 2,088
Mike1234567, it would be helpful if you could tell us what configuration of AR you are looking for parts ideas for. Defensive carbine? Plinker? Varminter? Precision rifle, 3-Gun rifle, SPR/DMR?
Fishbed77 is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 04:34 PM   #4
Dr.Rob
Moderator
 
 
Join Date: December 23, 2002
Location: Centennial, CO
Posts: 12,651
I didn't 'build' my upper but I had it built the way I wanted from Model 1 Sales.

16" Heavy ER Shaw 1:9 fluted threaded bbl, free float aluminum handguard w/swivel stud, steel railed fsb, a3 flat top upper. I went with a full length a2 stock in OD green, a houge monogrip in matching colors. This ran $650 or so.

I used the Model 1 LPK, on a Noveske "Chainsaw" lower. Ran about $225 but the flared mag well and beefy trigger guard were worth it.

The Burris optic wasn't cheap. But I really like it.

http://www.thehighroad.org/attachmen...0&d=1375141809
__________________
Former TFL Moderator. "Guess you broke into the WRONG rec room!" ;)
Dr.Rob is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 08:28 PM   #5
Mike1234567
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: July 6, 2010
Location: Alamo City
Posts: 4,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fishbed77 View Post
Mike1234567, it would be helpful if you could tell us what configuration of AR you are looking for parts ideas for. Defensive carbine? Plinker? Varminter? Precision rifle, 3-Gun rifle, SPR/DMR?
Fishbed77... Thank you. I understand but I intentionally left it completely open to interpretation. What I want to know is what YOU built, why you built it, with what parts... and include prices if possible.

I'm completely open to ideas because I only HALF know what I want. Okay, maybe I know three-quarters what I want.

I just want to know the HOW and WHY of what YOU did.
Mike1234567 is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 08:31 PM   #6
Mike1234567
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: July 6, 2010
Location: Alamo City
Posts: 4,085
Dr. Rob... That "looks" pretty close to what I want except I prefer a SS barrel and all black.

AGAIN THOUGH... I'm not expressing what I want. I need your ideas and input... I'm being completely open-minded at this point.
Mike1234567 is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 08:46 PM   #7
atomd
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 7, 2006
Posts: 1,245
Here's the one I'm currently putting together. Well, it's actually together but I'm waiting for the scope mount to come in the mail still.

Noveske SPR complete upper (18" stainless barrel) with the 14" noveske/sws quad rail. I picked this because I wanted something accurate, durable, and can be configured in different ways. I guess I wanted an SPR style gun and this just comes right out of the box how I wanted it. Easy.
Vltor Emod stock with Vltor A5 kit.
Geissele SSA trigger
Currently it's using a Stag lower that I had from something else. I might keep it or I might change that to something different (the lowers don't matter that much to me as long as they are made correctly).
LPK is CMT I think (that was left over too)
Magpul Moe+ grip. I kind of like that grippy feel they have.
I put Larue camo index clips and used them as a hand guard and also installed their handstop kit for the heck of it. I may or may not change that also.
I have a bobro extended scope mount on order
Scope I have for it is a vortex viper pst 1-4.

This is kind of the first piecing together of it and I'm not 100% sold on this configuration. I'll have to take it out and shoot it to really see I guess.

I'm also doing another one but it's going to be quite different and a fair amount less money. I am kind of debating a .300 blackout with this one but not sure.

Last edited by atomd; December 2, 2013 at 09:04 PM.
atomd is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 09:17 PM   #8
NWcityguy2
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2010
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 344
I did a budget build myself.

Del-ton Dissipator barrel for $154 for the Barrel, FSB and handguard cap.
Magpul MOE handguards, $38
PSA blem upper, $50
PSA blem FA BCG $100
PSA for all the needed small parts, approx $80
Benny Hill Rolling Thunder comp $100 (my one splurge)

Used my dept issue lower. Great 3-gun rifle.
NWcityguy2 is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 09:26 PM   #9
jakk280rem
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 12, 2007
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 1,086
I built an AR that I was hoping would be as close as possible to a do-it-all rifle. I wanted as much accuracy as possible in as light a weight as possible. I chose a BCM 18" 410SS barrel in 1:8. I chose the 410 because it is a tiny bit harder and more durable than the 416 used in most other barrels. The 1:8 allows the use of the widest range of bullet weights that I would fire. It has a medium contour so is a bit lighter than a full bull. Also, the 18" barrel has a rifle length gas system so as to keep port pressure and recoil to a minimum.

I chose the Troy Claymore linear compensator to put as much noise down range, rather than laterally as possible. And to reduce the dust signature from muzzle blast.

For an upper I chose the VLTOR MUR-1. It's a bit heavier than a standard forged upper but has the highest build quality and tolerances of any forged upper.

I chose the Midwest Industries SS GenII forearm because it's lightweight, slim, high quality, customizable and very reasonably priced.

The Giessle trigger should be self explanatory. It's the best at what it does.

For a buttstock I went with the VLTOR A5 system. It has a great reputation for smoothing out the recoil and operation of unusual barrel combos. I didn't want to run into issues with the short dwell on my barrel and didn't want to be continuously futzing around trying to find the perfect buffer weight.

For a scope I wanted as much utility as the rifle it was to be mounted on. I chose the Leupold VX-R Patrol 3-9X40. It offered a clean and clear reticle with minimal holdover points and a single illuminated dot. It has capped turrets to insure no change in settings in field conditions and is only 12" long and weighs only a pound.

I went with the American Defense Recon mount because it has an excellent reputation for quality. And was a bit cheaper than the Larue. If I were on my way to Afghanistan, I would have chosen the Larue. For Central Oregon coyotes, the Adco is super okay.

That's about it. There were some other incidental parts, but that's the meat of the matter. Very accurate so far and light enough to shoulder. About 8lbs or so. Heavy for an AR but not unreasonable, especially considering its capabilities.


DSCN1071 by barlow.bum, on Flickr



DSCN1068 by barlow.bum, on Flickr
__________________
"We are all of us carried along by a fiery zeal to recover our liberty; our arms cannot be wrested from our hands." - Cicero

Last edited by jakk280rem; December 2, 2013 at 09:51 PM.
jakk280rem is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 09:37 PM   #10
atomd
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 7, 2006
Posts: 1,245
Nice jack, ours are similar in a lot of ways. I think mine is going to weigh more though which kind of stinks but hey....it's not supposed to be lightweight.
atomd is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 09:46 PM   #11
Dr.Rob
Moderator
 
 
Join Date: December 23, 2002
Location: Centennial, CO
Posts: 12,651
OK let me illuminate the 'why'.

I have a Colt 6920, 'the yardstick' by which most AR's are measured. I use it in a run and gun style competition shooting at ranges out to 400+ yards. I wanted a more accurate rifle I could run as hard as I run my Colt. That means shooting 150-200 rounds of rapid fire shooting and moving in and over and around a variety of terrain and obstacles and 30 rounds of slow fire once a month March-October.

I wanted a stiffer, free floated barrel for better long range accuracy. I went with 16 inches so it would still be handy moving around barricades, shooting though loopholes etc. I want with a threaded barrel because the later style flash hider is closed on the bottom and kicks up less dust AND I've been toying with the idea of getting a suppressor at some point. Fluted to save some weight, cool it faster. (Model one lists this as a 'varmint' barrel)

I have TRIED quad rails and round them overly bulky/chunky in my grip and not to my liking, hence the bare free floated tube.

I wanted a flat top upper for a mounting a wide variety of optics. I LIKE the a2 carry handle sights on my Colt, but I wasn't planning on iron sights for this rifle. (I since added a low profile front sight I can line up with the aperture under the prism sight.)

IF I want to mount a light I still have a rail block to mount on. (Though it now has a front sight)

I wanted a sling swivel that did NOT contact the barrel. I wanted a sling that was not as heavy as the 1903 style but could be adjusted quickly.

I went with a fixed A2 stock because I wanted a more stable (no slop) cheek weld. Adjustable stocks can end up in the wrong position. Color choice was strictly because I thought it would look cool.

I chose a Houge monogrip for the palm swells and tacky pebbled grip surface with interior reinforcement. All 3 of my AR's have them.

I did NOT upgrade the trigger because I can do that later, and I wanted to run the rifle a bit before upgrading that part.

I wasn't going to get a high end billet lower like Noveske but a local supplier got a bunch of them in and the flared magwell and the heavy trigger guard were bonus points over a standard lower and Noveske has a good rep.

I went with a fixed optic because 4x is usually enough for the ranges I shoot at and I have been through a number of inexpensive fixed scopes. The Burris prism is something I've been wanting to try for a while. It has a built in BDC and works even if the battery is dead.
__________________
Former TFL Moderator. "Guess you broke into the WRONG rec room!" ;)

Last edited by Dr.Rob; December 2, 2013 at 10:10 PM.
Dr.Rob is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 09:51 PM   #12
btg3
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 30, 2007
Posts: 1,809
My budget mid-length:

PSA complete upper / rifle kit....$500
PSA stripped blemished lower.....$60
Magpul rear pop-up sight...........$40 used
Hogue grip..................................$25

Assembled the lower and done.

Why? The objectives:
Mid-length
Budget
PSA (home state)
Stock grips are trash
2-gun/3-gun
btg3 is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 09:57 PM   #13
Ro1911
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 19, 2011
Location: Springfield, Missouri
Posts: 384
You could write a whole book on this, but to keep it simple, I only build defensive/offensive guns, hunters varmiters and target shooter will give you different answers. First I only use spikes tactical lowers, very high quality and dirt cheap around $100. Parts for the lower I usually buy a DPMS parts kit, $60-$70 and a DSA stock kit $30-$40, I add a MOE+ grip and a MOE stock or a CTR stock $50-$70. Also I add a BAD lever $25 and a $10 MOE trigger guard.
Upper wise I only used pre assembled uppers from BCM or spikes midlength gas lightweight or gov profile cold hammer forged CMV barrels these barrels are all chrome lined I believe as well. Then I personally don't like rails so I use the MOE hand guard $30 and vert grip $17 and I add a 2" pic rail $5 for a light. You can also add brakes if you like, but I like to run a can that needs a USGI type flash hider so I stick with it. Sights I use the knights armament micro that the usmc gets now, go on ebay you can get a stolen one for $50-$60 and optis I only run an aimpoint and I usually buy the PRO $400 because it is cheap and good to go with a mount.
__________________
Quote:
On another subject why do I hear people say to ditch the .22, thats kind of like saying don't ever have a cheeseburger again. The .22 is one of the quintessential american cartridges, I think I'll get rid of apple pie while I'm at it.
Ro1911 is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 10:22 PM   #14
Dr.Rob
Moderator
 
 
Join Date: December 23, 2002
Location: Centennial, CO
Posts: 12,651
A 5 round magazine and a bipod that attaches to the swing swivel stud makes mine a 'varminter' in a about a minute.
__________________
Former TFL Moderator. "Guess you broke into the WRONG rec room!" ;)
Dr.Rob is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 10:24 PM   #15
Ro1911
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 19, 2011
Location: Springfield, Missouri
Posts: 384
yes, me too lol, but I'm trying not to confuse the OP lol
__________________
Quote:
On another subject why do I hear people say to ditch the .22, thats kind of like saying don't ever have a cheeseburger again. The .22 is one of the quintessential american cartridges, I think I'll get rid of apple pie while I'm at it.
Ro1911 is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 10:28 PM   #16
Ro1911
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 19, 2011
Location: Springfield, Missouri
Posts: 384
jakk280rem, whats up with the hand stop on the top rail of that AR?

btw I like your taste in optics, I have that same scope on my mid range AR.
__________________
Quote:
On another subject why do I hear people say to ditch the .22, thats kind of like saying don't ever have a cheeseburger again. The .22 is one of the quintessential american cartridges, I think I'll get rid of apple pie while I'm at it.

Last edited by Ro1911; December 2, 2013 at 10:46 PM.
Ro1911 is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 10:39 PM   #17
atomd
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 7, 2006
Posts: 1,245
Quote:
DR. rob, whats up with the hand stop on the top rail of that AR?
If you're referring to the pic above, that's not his. The pic that jakk280rem posted has a Larue handstop on the top. The kit comes with 2 hand stops and index clips to hold them in place. You can position one stop on one rail and another stop on a different one if you want so when your hand wraps around it, it makes contact on 2 points instead of one. They seem to work pretty well. I have one on the bottom rail and one on the left...when my hand wraps around it is sort of snugged up between the 2 in a way. I assume the top stop is to have the right side of his left thumb up against it?
atomd is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 10:44 PM   #18
Ro1911
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 19, 2011
Location: Springfield, Missouri
Posts: 384
oops, I thought that had his name on it, well whose ever it is lmao
__________________
Quote:
On another subject why do I hear people say to ditch the .22, thats kind of like saying don't ever have a cheeseburger again. The .22 is one of the quintessential american cartridges, I think I'll get rid of apple pie while I'm at it.
Ro1911 is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 11:02 PM   #19
jakk280rem
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 12, 2007
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 1,086
I actually wrap my thumb up and over the top rail and hook my thumb onto the stop. Makes the muzzle very controllable and puts my wrist in the same position as when I shoot a pistol.
__________________
"We are all of us carried along by a fiery zeal to recover our liberty; our arms cannot be wrested from our hands." - Cicero
jakk280rem is offline  
Old December 2, 2013, 11:12 PM   #20
MistWolf
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 17, 2005
Posts: 1,289
I got a PSA 16" middy because I wanted an AR carbine.

The barrel is a 1:8 twist, government profile barrel with the 223 Wilde chamber. It's stainless because that's what they had at the time and I wanted to see how it would hold up. So far, it has and it shoots good. I would not have seen any difference in performance if I'd gotten a 4150 chrome lined barrel instead. It has a Battlecomp on it. I hate muzzle brakes, but what I'd been hearing about the BC intrigued me. It's expensive but it works without being obnoxious. I started with a standard AR trigger which was surprisingly good for it's type but it got replaced when I was making good money on a contract last year and somebody had a sale on SSA triggers. I used a PSA lower because the work good and during one of the early sales, cost $50. Magpul furniture was chosen because I like it. Before optics and BC I think the rifle cost about $600 with Magpul BUIS. PSA had a sale on H2 micros for about $400. I should have grabbed two


Before I built the 16" carbine, I built a 20" precision.

Barrel used is a Lothar-Walther HBar profile with 1:8 rifling and 223 Wylde chamber and it's very accurate. It's mated to a VLTOR MUR and is surrounded by a PRI carbon fiber Delta free float tube with no rails. Carbon fiber is friendlier than aluminum when it's hot or cold and the shape fits my hand well. Lower is from LRB which sells for a good price. Trigger is a clean breaking SSA-E. Stock is a Magpul UBR which I chose because it's rugged and has the best cheekweld of any of the adjustable stocks. Optic is a Leupold MkIV 10x I robbed of another rifle and a KAC mount was used because it's light, durable and I got one for a killer deal. I think this rifle cost just over $2k before optics & mount (KAC mount was installed after these photos were taken)
__________________
"The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words" -Phillip K. Dick
MistWolf is online now  
Old December 3, 2013, 12:00 AM   #21
Ro1911
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 19, 2011
Location: Springfield, Missouri
Posts: 384
I like that hand guard on the 20", never seen that one, the triangle look of it reminds me of the nam guns.
__________________
Quote:
On another subject why do I hear people say to ditch the .22, thats kind of like saying don't ever have a cheeseburger again. The .22 is one of the quintessential american cartridges, I think I'll get rid of apple pie while I'm at it.
Ro1911 is offline  
Old December 3, 2013, 12:06 AM   #22
mljdeckard
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 5, 2006
Location: In a part of Utah that resembles Tattooine.
Posts: 12,456
The main things I did differently on my AR-10 lower was to put in a oversize safety, because this one will be out in a lot of weather, and a Giessele trigger.
__________________
"I'm not saying we should kill all the stupid people. I'm just saying that we should remove all the warning labels and let the problem work itself out."
mljdeckard is offline  
Old December 3, 2013, 12:37 AM   #23
tactikel
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 28, 2009
Location: Northeastern Illinois
Posts: 745
I wanted a light carbine. Got an AeroPrecision lower ($75), DPMS flattop slick side upper ($65), SMI 16" barrel ($135). DSA lpk, and M4 stock, DPMS free float forend ($45). Great for plinking, and schlepping from from coyote stand to stand.
tactikel is offline  
Old December 3, 2013, 01:18 AM   #24
Dr.Rob
Moderator
 
 
Join Date: December 23, 2002
Location: Centennial, CO
Posts: 12,651
Something I did on my dedicated 22 upper was a set of carbine length triangle hand guards, they are really easy to grip and with a slip-over flash hider make my CMMG upper look a bit like an XM177. Model One and a couple others sell the triangle CAR sized hand guards.

This wasn't strictly aesthetic I have the same flash hider on my 6920, wanted the 'same' gun in form and function, optics, everything just different in caliber.

http://www.thehighroad.org/attachmen...9&d=1328826197
__________________
Former TFL Moderator. "Guess you broke into the WRONG rec room!" ;)

Last edited by Dr.Rob; December 3, 2013 at 01:26 AM.
Dr.Rob is offline  
Old December 3, 2013, 01:47 PM   #25
Mike1234567
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: July 6, 2010
Location: Alamo City
Posts: 4,085
Great stuff, folks. I'm watching... listening. Please keep it coming.
Mike1234567 is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.