Quantcast
Educate me - SIG 55x Series - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Rifle Country

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 18, 2015, 10:15 AM   #1
OldBrownDog
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 26, 2013
Posts: 293
Educate me - SIG 55x Series

Hey guys, looking for some info on the SIG 55x series of rifles. Specifically the 551A1 and older 556 Classic. I don't own a black rifle right now, never have. But I'm planning on one soon and I'm just trying to do some research. I really like the looks of the 55x series, the long stroke piston design and the ability to have a true folding stock, but I'd love some actual user feedback.

How's accuracy, reliability, would you choose it over a quality (Colt 6920, BCM Midlength) AR?

Specifically mentioned Colt and BCM because those are the only two ARs I'm considering in addition to the SIG 551A1 or 556 Classic. Please don't recommend a different rifle.
__________________
Vincere vel mori
OldBrownDog is offline  
Old June 18, 2015, 11:40 AM   #2
Tommygunn
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 14, 2006
Location: Morgan County, Alabama
Posts: 4,092
Well, I have the 556 Patrol with the shortened gas system.
The weapon derives from the Swiss versions and, ultimatly, the AK-47.
I like the pistol grip on it better than the AR series standard grip.
Some like this system because "it doesn't excrete where it eats" (to use a polite word which hopefully won't get censored or me suspended). This is of course due to its gas piston system. This makes it heavier than the AR series.
The folding stock system is sorta cool, and more recent versions have a attachment point mounted there for a sling. However, in reality, the actual stocks (atleast on early guns) were a bit chintzsy. The sights are nice but IMHO not as rugged/reliable as those found on many ARs, but they are replaceable.
I didn't find mine to be very accurate. Mounting an optic on it, I found it didn't like to keep the zero as well as my M4orgeries --- the rail on the receiver on the Sigs are mounted onto the receiver, screwed down or riveted, I can't remember, but this is not as reliable as making the rail an integral part of the receiver like on the AR guns.
If Sig had done a super job of it, I'd say the 556 was a better, though heavier weapon system. But the bottom line is, despite the fact I like the design better in theory, My Colt M-4 is manufactured with better quality standards -- heck, even my Bushmaster is too.
Not to say the Sig 556 won't work .... but unfortunatly I cannot claim the company put forth their best efforst in the execution of the gun, even though the design is nice.
__________________
"History is littered with wars which everybody knew would never happen." ~~ British Parliamentarian Enoch Powell.
Tommygunn is offline  
Old June 18, 2015, 11:48 AM   #3
zoom6zoom
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 24, 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,877
I'm probably a bit biased.... but I love mine. It gets grabbed quicker than any of my ARs. No accuracy issues for me. Some don't like the Swiss mags on the A1 but I prefer them.
__________________
www.vcdl.org Certified AR15/M16 and SIG pistol armorer.
zoom6zoom is offline  
Old June 18, 2015, 01:02 PM   #4
OldBrownDog
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 26, 2013
Posts: 293
Thanks guys, some things to think on for sure. What's typical accuracy? I'd be ok with 1.5ish MOA, I think. If I need more precision, I have bolt guns.

Zoom, have you shot any of the newer ones with a shorter piston system? What do you think of the 551A1 vs the newer 556's? I like the look of the 551A1 better and I could deal with the Swiss mags, but AR mags are everywhere for cheap...
__________________
Vincere vel mori
OldBrownDog is offline  
Old June 18, 2015, 02:42 PM   #5
briansmithwins
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 1, 2005
Posts: 3,773
They (Sig 55x) are ok, but not great.

Most of the differences between the Swiss rifles and the American ones are pretty clearly cost based so Sig could sell a rifle at the $1000 price point. Mine was a 2MOA rifle.

Another problem is that the warranty does not transfer to a 2nd owner.

Between the 556 and an AR, I'd have to recommend the AR, even though I don't really like ARs that much.

I know you said not to mention other rifles, but the Beretta ARX is a great contender for about $1200. You get a adjustable gas system, reciprocating CH, and adjustable folding stock for that price.

BSW
briansmithwins is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.