Quantcast
Has the Arm Brace changed your mind about SBR-ing? - Page 2 - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > NFA Firearms and Accessories

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 12, 2014, 10:28 AM   #26
basicblur
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 2, 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 2,053
Well I sure wouldn't call it elegant...

I think iff'n I was to go that route, I'd possibly give it a go in 300 Blackout due to the short barrel ballistics of that particular round.
__________________
It only becomes class warfare when the working class decides to fight back.
When they don't, it simply becomes a case of economic genocide.
NRA Life Member
VCDL Member
basicblur is offline  
Old July 12, 2014, 10:41 AM   #27
Arizona_Mike
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 15, 2013
Posts: 1,862
Here are my thoughts:
1. The brace works suprisingly well as a shoulder stock regardless of how it looks. In fact it makes a much better stock and arm brace. Would I choose it above conventional options even after I get my stamp? No, unless there was a legal issue like hunting with NFA weapons.

2. I think I got mine for about $89 and am glad to have used it during the long wait which I went through at the worst time (it has gotten much better).

3. People really underestimate how easy it is to own NFA weapons and make a much bigger deal over complience than it is. It's not rocket science, you don't surrender your 4th Amendment rights or anything like the rummor mongers claim.

4. I've waited almost as long as current NFA wait times for parts and magazines (and much longer for match grade or custom-made barrels). Instant gratification seems to be a youthfully follw but logically if you want to do something that takes a long time (like going to school, building a carreer, or loosing weight) the same time is going to pass whether you do it or not.

4a. The OP seems to imply that the brace makes one less likely to get a stamp. Because it allows you to try things and provides some gratification during the wait, I can see it encouraging people to get a stamp.

Mike
__________________
Handgun stance by Col. Cooper. Rifle stance by Col. Sanders.
Type 03 FFL, Stamp collector: 11 approved, 1 pending
MG: 1, SBR: 4, SBS: 3, Supp: 3/4
If it involves guns or paracord it does not count as macramé.
Arizona_Mike is offline  
Old July 12, 2014, 02:22 PM   #28
aubie515
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 22, 2006
Location: SE PA
Posts: 779
This is like Ford vs Chevy...some on both sides of the fence.

The brace flat out works.

After my last NFA item taking 3 months to get to SOT and the 11 months to process the paperwork. I'm done with NFA.

If you don't know about NFA, it's not our job to try to explain the benefits.

In the end it's a personal choice just like many things in life. For me, the brace is a great device and I'll be buying more.
aubie515 is offline  
Old July 12, 2014, 02:39 PM   #29
herkyguy
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 31, 2009
Posts: 1,067
I'm not really a fan of it. I dig my 16" barrel and my particular preference is a bit of a longer barrel. But then again, the whole NFA thing is moronic at best. Suppressors and short barrels should be over the counter transactions. Period.
__________________
Non Sibi Sed Patriae
herkyguy is online now  
Old July 12, 2014, 04:05 PM   #30
TrailWolf
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 30, 2009
Location: AZ
Posts: 190
Quote:
Originally Posted by dogtown tom View Post
My thoughts are just the opposite. I can't see paying $150 for an "arm brace" when an SBR stamp is $200.

The arm brace is a poor substitute for a real shoulder stock.
Have you ever tried it? It is pretty damn good.

People always say - oh its just $200 for the stamp - don't forget the cost to set up the trust , lawyers feed, engraving the receiver etc. It adds up.

It is also very VERY nice to have an AR that keeps the "pistol" status - especially when you travel across states and do not have to worry about the legality.
TrailWolf is offline  
Old July 12, 2014, 05:23 PM   #31
Elkins45
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 25, 2009
Location: Northern KY
Posts: 1,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by Theohazard View Post
It could. All you need is a 10/22 stock with an AR-style collapsable stock and a "buffer tube" where you can cut off the notches. Once the notches are gone, the arm brace should fit just fine. And since you can no longer attach a stock to it, you don't have to worry about getting busted for constructive possession of an SBR.
My 10/22 began life as a rifle--you can't just lop off the barrel, add an ugly stock with a fake buffer tube and declare it a pistol. It's an illegal SBR in that instance no matter what you call it.

You would have to start with a 10/22 that began life as a dedicated pistol receiver, like the Challenger. I already have a 10/22, so the stamp and barrel work would cost less than a new gun, and then I could use any stock I wanted.
__________________
NRA Endowment Member

I don't own an assault weapon. I own a counter-assault weapon.
Elkins45 is offline  
Old July 12, 2014, 05:27 PM   #32
Theohazard
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 24, 2014
Location: Western WA
Posts: 465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elkins45
My 10/22 began life as a rifle--you can't just lop off the barrel, add an ugly stock with a fake buffer tube and declare it a pistol. It's an illegal SBR in that instance no matter what you call it.
That's no longer true. Now you can make a rifle into a pistol and vice versa.
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume."
Theohazard is offline  
Old July 12, 2014, 05:42 PM   #33
dogtown tom
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 15, 2006
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 3,556
Quote:
TrailWolf
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by dogtown tom View Post
My thoughts are just the opposite. I can't see paying $150 for an "arm brace" when an SBR stamp is $200.

The arm brace is a poor substitute for a real shoulder stock.
Have you ever tried it? It is pretty damn good.
Yes, I have..........IMHO it's poor substitute for a real stock. YMMV
__________________
Need a FFL in north Dallas/Plano/Allen/Frisco/McKinney ? Just EMAIL me!

$20 transfers ($10 for CHL, active military, police, firefighters or schoolteachers)
dogtown tom is offline  
Old July 12, 2014, 07:38 PM   #34
Elkins45
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 25, 2009
Location: Northern KY
Posts: 1,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by Theohazard View Post
That's no longer true. Now you can make a rifle into a pistol and vice versa.
From the July 25, 2011 communication from ATF regarding the Thompson Center case:

Held further, a firearm, as defined by 26 U.S.C. 5845(a)(4), is made when a handgun or other weapon with an overall length of less than 26 inches, or a barrel or barrels of less than 16 inches in length, is assembled or produced from a weapon originally assembled or produced only as a rifle. Such weapons must be registered and are subject to all requirements of the NFA.

Full text here: https://www.atf.gov/files/regulation...ing-2011-4.pdf

If there's a more recent ruling superseding this, please direct me to it. Otherwise I believe the text quoted above is contrary to your understanding. In a nutshell, you are correct ONLY in the case of a firearm (such as the T/C Contender) originally produced to be configured as both.
__________________
NRA Endowment Member

I don't own an assault weapon. I own a counter-assault weapon.
Elkins45 is offline  
Old July 12, 2014, 10:05 PM   #35
bikemutt
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2010
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 2,769
I use a Thordsen buffer tube cover with cheek rest on my pistol lower when shooting the 300 BLK 9" barrel. With a low recoil round like 300 BLK all shooting positions seem comfortable.

I handled a very nice looking Sig pistol yesterday, .308, with the arm brace included. I'm not sure I want to deal with a .308 pistol and an arm brace regardless of how I can operate it.
__________________
You cannot change criminal behavior by criminalizing lawful behavior
bikemutt is offline  
Old July 13, 2014, 03:21 AM   #36
JT-AR-MG42
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 26, 2010
Posts: 229
So help out a newcomer to this conversation here.

I've wanted an 'arm brace' on a Desert Eagle for a number of years.

If I can figure a way to hang that Sig brace on the wooden support attachment from the pistol's grip that I would need to add, then it is legal to be fired from the shoulder?
Or does this brace require being fitted to a tube or directly to the frame?

Even without my arm being through the brace?

One last, where might I read up on rulings concerning this brace.
Maybe a brace owner could post a copy of the accompanying letter here?

Looking to learn, Thanks for any possible info,
JT
JT-AR-MG42 is offline  
Old July 13, 2014, 10:24 AM   #37
bikemutt
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2010
Location: Renton, WA
Posts: 2,769
Quote:
Originally Posted by JT-AR-MG42 View Post
So help out a newcomer to this conversation here.

I've wanted an 'arm brace' on a Desert Eagle for a number of years.

If I can figure a way to hang that Sig brace on the wooden support attachment from the pistol's grip that I would need to add, then it is legal to be fired from the shoulder?
Or does this brace require being fitted to a tube or directly to the frame?

Even without my arm being through the brace?

One last, where might I read up on rulings concerning this brace.
Maybe a brace owner could post a copy of the accompanying letter here?

Looking to learn, Thanks for any possible info,
JT
Here you go JT: http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2...ired-shoudler/
__________________
You cannot change criminal behavior by criminalizing lawful behavior
bikemutt is offline  
Old July 13, 2014, 04:49 PM   #38
Arizona_Mike
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 15, 2013
Posts: 1,862
I think Theohazard is confused. You can go back and forth if you start with a pistol not with a rifle.

Mike
__________________
Handgun stance by Col. Cooper. Rifle stance by Col. Sanders.
Type 03 FFL, Stamp collector: 11 approved, 1 pending
MG: 1, SBR: 4, SBS: 3, Supp: 3/4
If it involves guns or paracord it does not count as macramé.

Last edited by Arizona_Mike; July 13, 2014 at 04:56 PM.
Arizona_Mike is offline  
Old July 13, 2014, 07:52 PM   #39
Theohazard
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 24, 2014
Location: Western WA
Posts: 465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elkins45
I believe the text quoted above is contrary to your understanding.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arizona_Mike
I think Theohazard is confused. You can go back and forth if you start with a pistol not with a rifle.
You guys are completely right. I should know better considering I used to work at an LGS. Honestly, ATF and NFA stuff is complicated enough that it's way too easy to confuse yourself if you don't keep up on it.
__________________
0331: "Accuracy by volume."
Theohazard is offline  
Old July 13, 2014, 11:33 PM   #40
Elkins45
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 25, 2009
Location: Northern KY
Posts: 1,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by Theohazard View Post
You guys are completely right. I should know better considering I used to work at an LGS. Honestly, ATF and NFA stuff is complicated enough that it's way too easy to confuse yourself if you don't keep up on it.
You want to know how I immediately suspected you were mistaken?

I read your response and thought, "That seems like a very reasonable and customer friendly position for a federal regulatory agency to take." That's when I knew it couldn't be true.

Actually I shouldn't say stuff like that. My limited dealings with ATF (submitted two Form 1 and a Form 4 on a trust) have been entirely uneventful. Slow, but that's not their fault.
__________________
NRA Endowment Member

I don't own an assault weapon. I own a counter-assault weapon.
Elkins45 is offline  
Old July 16, 2014, 09:02 PM   #41
justice06rr
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 7, 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,325
Quote:
Yes, I have..........IMHO it's poor substitute for a real stock. YMMV
It is not designed as a real stock (or SBR lower), nor was it meant to be a substitute for a real stock. It just happens to work well if properly configured. A few vendors now sell pistol tubes i.e. KAK tube which adds length to the SB15.

If you like your SBR lower with a standard stock, great.

But not everyone wants to go through the hassle with the ATF/NFA route, nor do we all want the government to have knowledge (and registration) of the firearms we own. And many law-abiding gun owners feel that the NFA laws are bogus. Somehow a 14.5"-barreled AR15 is much more dangerous than a standard 16" M4????



Anyway, here is my 10.5" pistol build with the same LOP compared to my current AR build (which will be a 16" Midlength). Both shoulder just the same.

justice06rr is offline  
Old July 17, 2014, 12:24 AM   #42
Cooldill
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 19, 2011
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,355
It has for ARs.

I think it's very neat, I've always wanted a short AR with about a 10 inch bbl but never wanted to deal with all the NFA stuff.
Cooldill is offline  
Old July 17, 2014, 09:52 AM   #43
rodinal220
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 9, 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,079
SB-15 works great and I put one each on a BCM 11.5" upper and a parts build up with a DD 10.5" barrel,both run great.I used the KAK Industry Super SIG SB-15 dedicated pistol buffer tube.The whole NFA thing is really a joke for SBR/SBS/AOW,Suppressors,etc.
rodinal220 is offline  
Old July 17, 2014, 12:35 PM   #44
Elkins45
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 25, 2009
Location: Northern KY
Posts: 1,788
If you don't aready have some NFA stuff then maybe, but for $70 more than the cost of the brace you will have the stamp and won't have to worry about the legal status of the brace.

OTOH there is the advantage of not having to ask for permission to cross state lines with an NFA item.

How does the brace impact those states with "assault weapon" bans? Since its a pistol can you own one in a restrictive state like CA? Does it circumvent the rules because it isn't a rifle?
__________________
NRA Endowment Member

I don't own an assault weapon. I own a counter-assault weapon.
Elkins45 is offline  
Old July 17, 2014, 12:42 PM   #45
wally
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 2, 2004
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 10,610
Quote:
If you don't aready have some NFA stuff then maybe, but for $70 more than the cost of the brace you will have the stamp and won't have to worry about the legal status of the brace.
Actually its ~$70 + ~$60 for the stock more to go the NFA route.
__________________
Your commitment to Freedom and Liberty is measured by your tolerance for others doing things you disapprove. NRA Endowment Member, 2007.
NRA Patron Member, 2009. NRA Benefactor Member 2012. There is no "race" or "ethnicity" section on the NRA membership application, unlike the Federal 4473 form to purchase a firearm!
wally is offline  
Old July 17, 2014, 02:57 PM   #46
Elkins45
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 25, 2009
Location: Northern KY
Posts: 1,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by wally View Post
Actually its ~$70 + ~$60 for the stock more to go the NFA route.
I don't follow. The brace sells for around $130 and the stamp is $200. Are you adding the cost of a regular stock?
__________________
NRA Endowment Member

I don't own an assault weapon. I own a counter-assault weapon.
Elkins45 is offline  
Old July 17, 2014, 06:56 PM   #47
Vodoun da Vinci
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2013
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,318
To the original question, YES, I had no interest in the whole SBR deal because of the state I live in (Illinois) and the extra "hoops" involved in getting a tax stamp, getting permission to transport across state lines, etc. In Illinois, I'd have to get a C&R FFL, and a tax stamp and then I'd have to get permission every year as my training range is in Iowa. Way too much hoop jumping for me. I'm primarily interested in 9mm MP5 format guns...I'll have an AR-15 eventually but I'm fine with a 16" barrel.

So, I really had no intention of having an SBR and then the BATF rules that the brace is OK to be fired from the shoulder - It's not a stock and I was skeptical. Then I shot an MP5 pistol with a brace and in 9mm it's *WAY* better than shooting it in pistol form. I agree it's not quite what I want as if I had my druthers I'd druther have a folding stock but that's not gonna happen.

So, yeah, I'm in the "SBR" want but it'll be a pistol with Sig brace and that'll work out fine for me. It's not much cheaper but it is competitive price wise albeit a bit more expensive. I went from "I don't want an SBR'd MP5" to "I *got* to get me one of these!" on an MP5K pistol with Sig brace.

No tax stamp, no permission to transport, no C&R FFL hoops.

VooDoo
__________________
Beretta Px4 9mm subcompact, Glock 26 Gen4, Dan Wesson 15-2VH .357 Magnum, Ruger LCR .38 Special +P, Colt 1903 Model M .32ACP, Ruger 3 screw Blackhawk .357 Magnum, Ruger Bearcat .22, S&W Model 19 .357 Magnum, Colt Officers ACP .45, Glock 42
Vodoun da Vinci is offline  
Old July 18, 2014, 08:10 PM   #48
wally
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 2, 2004
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 10,610
Quote:
I don't follow. The brace sells for around $130 and the stamp is $200. Are you adding the cost of a regular stock?
Bingo!
__________________
Your commitment to Freedom and Liberty is measured by your tolerance for others doing things you disapprove. NRA Endowment Member, 2007.
NRA Patron Member, 2009. NRA Benefactor Member 2012. There is no "race" or "ethnicity" section on the NRA membership application, unlike the Federal 4473 form to purchase a firearm!
wally is offline  
Old July 19, 2014, 12:23 AM   #49
kimberkid
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 5, 2010
Posts: 684
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vodoun da Vinci View Post
I agree it's not quite what I want as if I had my druthers I'd druther have a folding stock but that's not gonna happen.

No tax stamp, no permission to transport, no C&R FFL hoops.

VooDoo
VooDoo ... You can make it fold if you want, Atlantic is selling them with a folded/hinge ... I did this on my PAP M85 with a hinge & adapter for the tube to screw into I got from ACE Rifle Stocks ...

__________________
If you really want something you'll find a way ...
... if you don't you'll find an excuse.
kimberkid is offline  
Old July 20, 2014, 04:22 PM   #50
Vodoun da Vinci
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2013
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,318
I should have emphasized stock....I'm aware that we can have folding braces and that they are available (but I seriously thank you for the heads up - it's the thought that counts! ) in various folding configs now. My personal choice is a full on stock and the brace, while I think it's an awesome idea and works pretty dang well as a pseudo stock, is not quite "perfect" in that role.

It's a compromise for me but it's better than no "device" at all on the butt end of an MP5 and for that purpose fills the need 90%. I personally feel that the ATF ruling that braces are OK for the shoulder is one step away from removing the SBR from the NFA list but I think that is years away.

Until that time the brace will do in place of a stock on those firearms I prefer in an SBR configuration.

VooDoo
__________________
Beretta Px4 9mm subcompact, Glock 26 Gen4, Dan Wesson 15-2VH .357 Magnum, Ruger LCR .38 Special +P, Colt 1903 Model M .32ACP, Ruger 3 screw Blackhawk .357 Magnum, Ruger Bearcat .22, S&W Model 19 .357 Magnum, Colt Officers ACP .45, Glock 42
Vodoun da Vinci is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.