Quantcast
For range shooting 4" or 6" - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Handguns: Revolvers

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 10, 2014, 10:26 PM   #1
Center fire
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 9, 2014
Location: SA Jose, CA
Posts: 17
For range shooting 4" or 6"

I was looking at the Ruger GP100 today while at the indoor range. They have both the 4" and 6" models. I am thinking about adding a 357 to my collection. Since this will be for recreational purpose only which of the two barrel lengths would you recommend? My target distances are as follows:

5 to 15 yds 15%
25 yds 50%
30 to 50 yds 25%
Beyond 50 yds 10%
Center fire is offline  
Old July 10, 2014, 10:40 PM   #2
lionken07
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 31, 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 198
If it's a range only gun I'd say go with the 6". I shoot a bit better with the 6 incher and you get just a bit more power
__________________
No missions too difficult, No sacrifice too great. Duties first.
lionken07 is offline  
Old July 10, 2014, 10:46 PM   #3
content
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 27, 2009
Location: South Carolina, born in Valley Forge Pa.
Posts: 2,014
I prefer my S&W 586 6" to all others in .357.
I would recommend the S&W 617 6" .22 as well....similar feel and balance, also great to start out with at the range.
Gets me warmed up and saves money because I use less .357 to get on target at longer ranges.
__________________
Strengthen the Arm of Liberty

" Would someone PLEASE start producing .32RF"
content is offline  
Old July 10, 2014, 10:49 PM   #4
Paul7
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 3, 2008
Posts: 373
6" isn't as loud either.
Paul7 is offline  
Old July 10, 2014, 11:05 PM   #5
murf
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 16, 2010
Location: arizona
Posts: 1,569
whichever one feels better and balances in your hand better. to me, sight radius doesn't matter much.

murf
__________________
accuracy is a whole bunch of holes real close together. you get to decide how many holes and how close.

it takes an enormous amount of time and practice to become fully-automatic - mindless repetition.

festina lente
murf is offline  
Old July 10, 2014, 11:09 PM   #6
BCRider
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 15, 2008
Location: Pacific North"Wet" Coast of Canada
Posts: 6,214
It sure sounds like you're doing primarily traditional bullseye style shooting. So a 6" would be hands down the way to go. And a longer barrel would not be amiss at all.

If at some point you move towards action style shooting and competition then a 3 to 4 inch would be the way to go.
__________________
Sent from my boat anchor desktop via my pizza greased fingers....
BCRider is offline  
Old July 10, 2014, 11:16 PM   #7
rswartsell
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 4, 2008
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,821
I was thinking in line with the previous posts. THEN I thought, what age is the shooter? If we are talking about a range gun we don't need to be thinking about developing maximum velocity. If we are talking about aging eyes ( a "law of physics" development, not an eye disease ), then it may actually be more difficult to focus on the longer sight radius.

I am a "senior" shooter who finds that about 5" is the optimum for my current eyesight.

All shooters are at the mercy of father time. Just how old a man are you?
__________________
"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety-"

Benjamin Franklin
rswartsell is offline  
Old July 10, 2014, 11:30 PM   #8
ExMachina
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 14, 2003
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 331
Quote:
Originally Posted by murf View Post
whichever one feels better and balances in your hand better. to me, sight radius doesn't matter much.

murf
My experience would agree that balance is the most important quality in a range/target gun.

Sight radius only comes into play mostly at longer ranges (100 yards+)
ExMachina is offline  
Old July 11, 2014, 12:04 AM   #9
Center fire
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 9, 2014
Location: SA Jose, CA
Posts: 17
I'm in my mid 50s. Most of my guns are autos with 5" barrels. I do have one revolver a Dan Wesson 44 with an 8" barrel. It's a beast and fun to shoot, but 100 rounds is where I stop as fatigue takes over and my shot groupings begin to suffer.
Center fire is offline  
Old July 11, 2014, 03:56 AM   #10
ColtPythonElite
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 8, 2011
Posts: 5,543
I have several 4" and 6" sets.....Past 25 yards or shooting very small targets, I pick the sixers every time.
ColtPythonElite is offline  
Old July 11, 2014, 07:27 AM   #11
bannockburn
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 24, 2007
Posts: 7,075
I had a Colt Trooper Mk.V with a 6" barrel that felt perfectly balanced to me, compared to 4" barreled Model 686 or GP100. For me not it's not so much the sight radius but more like the overall balance and handling between different guns with various barrel lengths.
__________________
"An elegant weapon for a more civilized age."-Obi Wan Kenobi
bannockburn is offline  
Old July 11, 2014, 09:45 AM   #12
chicharrones
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: January 19, 2010
Location: Galveston Bay is an Hour Away
Posts: 2,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Center fire View Post
5 to 15 yds 15%
25 yds 50%
30 to 50 yds 25%
Beyond 50 yds 10%
With 85% of your planned shooting being 25 yards or greater, I'd usually pick the 6" GP100.

It is not a light gun and the full underlug on 6" of barrel adds to the feeling of weight due to being muzzle heavy. So, definitely hold both of them side by side to see what you prefer.

Also be sure to see if one offers a clearer view of the front sight compared to the other. Unfortunately, my eyes have gotten to the point where handgun sights aren't in focus for any barrel length so there is no advantage to a longer sight radius. I'm slowly but surely going the red dot route which means at this point in my life I'd probably pick the 4" GP100 and mount a red dot on it.
__________________
596f206573746f792043686963686172726f6e6573
chicharrones is offline  
Old July 11, 2014, 10:56 AM   #13
buck460XVR
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 6, 2007
Posts: 4,129
Not only will a 6'' gun give you a longer sight radius, it will also recoil less than a comparable 4'' gun. I have 4'', 5'' and 6'' .357s and find there is little difference in balance once one develops the muscles in the arms/wrist to shoot them.
__________________
Guns are like Harleys and women.....you can never have too many.


Theiyr're...........take that Grammar Nazis!
buck460XVR is offline  
Old July 11, 2014, 02:34 PM   #14
Legionnaire
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Location: Western PA
Posts: 3,579
Range only? 6-inch. Range and field carry? 4-inch.

YMMV.
__________________
Cogito, ergo armatus sum.
Legionnaire is offline  
Old July 11, 2014, 02:40 PM   #15
BCRider
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 15, 2008
Location: Pacific North"Wet" Coast of Canada
Posts: 6,214
You've got a DW .44 already?

Assuming you reload for it what about making up some reduced power loads? That should remove much of the fatigue and hand shakiness that comes from beating yourself up over a longer session. Work on getting your bullseye loads down closer to .44Spl like speeds or even milder if the gun will shoot them accurately enough.

Or if you find the gun is a little muzzle heavy with the long barrel switch to a shorter one. Or do you not have the barrel "kit"?

On the other hand if you simply NEED to buy another revolver I sure won't hold you back....
__________________
Sent from my boat anchor desktop via my pizza greased fingers....
BCRider is offline  
Old July 11, 2014, 03:08 PM   #16
Vodoun da Vinci
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2013
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,023
When I shoot my Dan Wesson .357 for punching paper at the range it always sports it's 6" barrel. When practicing "Move and Shoot" outside it's always the 2 1/2" barrel.

I do like my 6" barrels for target range shooting but I do little of it.

VooDoo
__________________
Beretta Px4 9mm subcompact, Glock 26 Gen4, Dan Wesson 15-2VH .357 Magnum, Ruger LCR .38 Special +P, Colt 1903 Model M .32ACP, Ruger 3 screw Blackhawk .357 Magnum, Ruger Bearcat .22, S&W Model 19 .357 Magnum, Colt Officers ACP .45, Glock 42
Vodoun da Vinci is offline  
Old July 11, 2014, 03:26 PM   #17
Arkansas Paul
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 18, 2009
Location: Central Arkansas
Posts: 5,978
If you're 100% sure it will be for range use only I agree with getting the 6".

If you were going to add HD or SD to the mix I would go 4".
__________________
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences of attending too much liberty than those attending too small a degree of it - Thomas Jefferson
Arkansas Paul is offline  
Old July 11, 2014, 03:33 PM   #18
diyj98
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 2, 2003
Posts: 160
6" longer sight radius and as others have said, less muzzle blast.
diyj98 is offline  
Old July 11, 2014, 05:51 PM   #19
Center fire
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 9, 2014
Location: SA Jose, CA
Posts: 17
@BCRider I've had the DW since around 1992. It's my only revolver. I like my autos, but I love the revolver. I want another and I like the versatility of the 357.
Center fire is offline  
Old July 11, 2014, 05:54 PM   #20
Center fire
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 9, 2014
Location: SA Jose, CA
Posts: 17
I like to thank everyone for the replies. I'm leaning towards the 6" configuration as this will be a target gun. I have autos for HD purposes if the need ever arises.
Center fire is offline  
Old July 11, 2014, 05:57 PM   #21
MrBorland
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 13, 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 2,615
I recommend a 4".

Not only is a 4" .357mag about the most versatile gun there is, a gun with a 6" full-underlug barrel feels too muzzle heavy to me. And if your technique and fundamentals are good, the shorter sight radius doesn't make that much difference at common handgun distances (<50 yards) IME.
MrBorland is offline  
Old July 11, 2014, 09:27 PM   #22
Schwing
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 3, 2013
Location: Layton Utah
Posts: 978
I met in the middle and bought the 5". They can be hard to come by but they are not all that rare.

The balance is perfect IMO and it is a good compromise between size and sight radius.
__________________
God created man; Samuel Colt made them equal
Schwing is offline  
Old July 12, 2014, 12:31 AM   #23
Manny
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 23, 2003
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 577
The 5" as mentioned above is available, but maybe a bit harder to find. One of my LGS's stocks all the barrel lengths of the GP100, 3", 4.2" 5" & 6" and the 5" is about $20 more. They also have the 3" Wiley Clap model that's pretty neat.

I have a 6" I bought for range use and possibly deer hunting, but have been heavily tempted by the 5". For 4" I went with a 4.2" SP101 and like it very much as it's substantially lighter to carry if that's your intent.
Manny is offline  
Old July 12, 2014, 12:41 AM   #24
ArchAngelCD
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 25, 2006
Location: Northeast PA, USA
Posts: 17,065
For target shooting and plinking I would take the 6" revolver over the 4" revolver almost every time. I like 38/357 Magnum revolvers a lot, they are a lot of fun, powerful with .357 Magnum ammo and a good for a lot of different uses.
__________________
Remember boys and girls, gun control only prevents law abiding Americans from owning guns because the Bad Guys donít obey the laws, no matter how restrictive or lenient the laws are!
ArchAngelCD is offline  
Old July 12, 2014, 01:11 AM   #25
Steve CT
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 19, 2011
Location: Central CT
Posts: 434
I shoot Dan Wesson revolvers, so barrel length is more easily managed. I only shoot .357 out to 50 feet, and I have settled on 4" as the best choice for my kind of shooting. If I shot at longer distance regularly, 6" would be a better choice.
__________________
http://www.danwessonforum.com/
Steve CT is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.