Kel-Tec SU16C suppressed - range report - THR

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > NFA Firearms and Accessories

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Thread Tools
Old August 2, 2014, 05:04 PM   #1
Join Date: March 15, 2011
Posts: 7
Kel-Tec SU16C suppressed - range report

Here is my range report testing a nearly new Kel-Tec SU16C, with the "modified piston" Kel-Tec sent me (for free) for use with suppressors.

Previously I had shot about 100 rounds of Independence 556 FMJBT unsuppressed, with no jams or fte's, with the factory piston, and zeroed my Eotech sight. I then installed the modified piston, and gave the gun a good cleaning.

Link for discussion of the modified piston:

My suppressor is the YHM Phantom QD 3100 -Ti. Ten factory loads were tried. Each load was shot unsuppressed for at least two rounds, then suppressed for at least two rounds.

It was interesting to see that each factory round had variations between them of POI, and also of consistency of extraction. Grouping was similar, some suppressed groups lower or higher than unsuppressed. The Remington Hog Hammer seemed to be the most accurate, with the smallest grouping.

I'm not able to tell you if the variations were all due to the ammo, or to the firearm. All I can tell you is that the gun functioned normally with low-end factory ammo prior to the experiment.

Please note that when shooting unsuppressed (modified piston in place), NONE of these rounds cycled the gun successfully! I don't plan on shooting this gun unsuppressed going forward, so that is not a deal breaker for me.

I will indicate which rounds had fte's, otherwise all shots had good extraction.

My conclusions are that, in my gun, adding the modified piston commits me to firing suppressed; that lower-end factory rounds will work fine; and that it likes the Remington Hog Hammer TSX 62 gr. 223 the best of the 10 loads I tested.

Winchester Varmint X 223, 40 gr., 3600 fps
cycled normally suppressed, POI lower

American Eagle Tipped Varmint 223, 50 gr., AE223GTV, 3350 fps
cycled normally suppressed, POI same

American Eagle 223, 55 gr. FMJBT, AE223AF, 3240 fps
cycled normally suppressed, POI lower

Independence 5.56 FMJBT, 55 gr. FMJBT, XM1931, 3165 fps
cycled normally suppressed, POI same

DRT frangible, 55 gr. 223, 2950 fps
Unsuppressed had fte
Suppressed had initial failure to cycle, then cycled normally on subsequent shots

Hornady 223 55 gr. SP, 80255, 3240 fps
Unsuppressed had fte
Suppressed had initial failure to cycle, then cycled normally on subsequent shots, with POI higher

Hornady American Whitetail SP Interlock, 223, 60 gr. #8027, 3090 fps
Unsuppressed the POI was rightward
Cycled normally suppressed, POI lower

Remington Hog Hammer TSX 223, 62 gr., PHH223R4, 3100 fps
Cycled normally suppressed, POI lower
This was the most accurate!

Winchester Power Point Hog Special, 223, 64 gr., 3020 fps
Cycled normally suppressed, POI lower

Winchester MatchKing HPBT 223, 69 gr., 3060 fps
Suppressed the first shot did not cycle, but extracted OK, subsequent shots cycled normally

Last edited by hitpure; August 3, 2014 at 05:47 AM.
hitpure is offline  

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.