Quantcast
Bullet tests at 500m - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Shooting Activities and Venues > Competition Shooting

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 3, 2014, 03:18 PM   #1
Poper
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 12, 2006
Location: Approximately N3318' / W11148'
Posts: 703
Bullet tests at 500m

So today I go out to the Metallic Silhouette range for a little practice and some bullet accuracy testing. Conditions were wonderful! For a change!
Temperature was about 82 degrees, humidity 72%, breeze was very light from the east (right) with gusts to maybe 5mph. Best of all, I had the range all to myself the whole time I was out there!

My practice went so-so. I am a middle of the road class 'B' shooter. Generally scoring 8 or 9 for a 40 round match, so expecting great results in practice is a little unrealistic. But practice is important!

My other mission today was to test three different bullets at Ram range with a solid rest. My Hunter Class rifle is a bone stock Tikka T3 Lite in .270 Win. with a Vortex Viper 6.5-20x44 in Warne rings.
The base line load for this bullet test was my competition load of 52 grains of IMR4831 powder, CCI200 primer, Remington case and Berger 140 grain VLD Hunting bullet loaded to 3.210" COAL. (Berger does not make a .270 cal. match bullet. If they did, I would use it!) The other bullets in my comparison test were Sierra's 14 grain Spitzer soft point and Hornady's 140 grain SST. None of the bullets were weight matched or sorted for diameter. All were just taken straight from the box without special inspections. The Bergers out shined the Sierras and Hornadys by quite a bit. The best group of each of the bullets is attached to this post.

Keep in mind these groups were fired from the bench to the 500m Rams. My target can be seen (sort of) at the tip of the red arrow in the photo of the silhouette range taken while standing at the firing line.

I think I am going to stick with the Bergers as long as I have them!

Poper
Attached Files
File Type: pdf BERGER 140 VLD.pdf (84.0 KB, 50 views)
File Type: pdf HORNADY 140 SST.pdf (100.8 KB, 21 views)
File Type: pdf SIERRA 140 SPITZER SP.pdf (111.3 KB, 21 views)
File Type: pdf RIFLE SIL RANGE 2.pdf (339.2 KB, 25 views)
__________________
Quote:
The NRA is a service organization for all firearms owners and users, and for anyone more concerned with Second Amendment rights than in spouting nonsense about them. It's available to everyone and can't possibly be considered an elitist or exclusive group except by the malicious, the ignorant, or the dimwitted. - Robert Hairless

"The only good bureaucrat is one with a pistol at his head. Put it in his hand and it's good-bye to the Bill of Rights."
-- H.L. Mencken

...mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent...
--Adam Smith

Last edited by Poper; August 3, 2014 at 07:08 PM. Reason: typo
Poper is offline  
Old August 3, 2014, 07:45 PM   #2
murf
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 16, 2010
Location: arizona
Posts: 1,675
poper,

have you tried the berger 150s? curious if they are too long for the 270. my best round is the 130 grain vld. would like to step up to the 150 for elk.

thx,

murf
__________________
accuracy: a whole bunch of holes real close together exactly where you want them to go.

festina lente
murf is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 12:36 AM   #3
twofifty
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 21, 2007
Posts: 1,479
A bit off topic but I have to say it: silhouette shooters are the elite.
twofifty is offline  
Old August 9, 2014, 03:50 PM   #4
Poper
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 12, 2006
Location: Approximately N3318' / W11148'
Posts: 703
Quote:
have you tried the berger 150s?
No, I have not.
I have tried the Berger 130's and they shoot very well, too. However, for the combination of accuracy, power, BC and recoil, the 140's fit the bill very nicely. After 10-20 practice rounds and a 40 round match, the cumulative recoil definitely becomes a factor.
__________________
Quote:
The NRA is a service organization for all firearms owners and users, and for anyone more concerned with Second Amendment rights than in spouting nonsense about them. It's available to everyone and can't possibly be considered an elitist or exclusive group except by the malicious, the ignorant, or the dimwitted. - Robert Hairless

"The only good bureaucrat is one with a pistol at his head. Put it in his hand and it's good-bye to the Bill of Rights."
-- H.L. Mencken

...mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent...
--Adam Smith
Poper is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.