Quantcast
Why have revolvers become passť ? - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Handguns: General Discussion

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old August 4, 2014, 07:09 PM   #1
Center fire
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 9, 2014
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 49
Why have revolvers become passť ?

Over the past 10 years I have seen a dramatic decline in the use of revolvers as well as there availability at gun shops. Why have revolvers become passť? I myself like revolvers over semi-auto pistols. I find my shooting to be more purposeful when shooting a revolver over a semi-auto. I find with a revolver I want to make ever shot count. I tend to get sloppy with semi-autos and just fire away.
Center fire is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 07:13 PM   #2
Vodoun da Vinci
Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2013
Location: Illinois
Posts: 1,167
I bought a Ruger LCR last year and I really like it....got a 2 1/2" tube for my Dan Wesson and I shoot and carry that as well as my polymer framed 9mm's. I think the trend for concealed carry has been compact and subcompact semi autos since all 50 states now have concealed carry.

But don't kid yerself. There are a lot of revolver shooters out there and will be for some time.

VooDoo
__________________
Beretta Px4 9mm subcompact, Glock 26 Gen4, Dan Wesson 15-2VH .357 Magnum, Ruger LCR .38 Special +P, Colt 1903 Model M .32ACP, Ruger 3 screw Blackhawk .357 Magnum, Ruger Bearcat .22, S&W Model 19 .357 Magnum, Colt Officers ACP .45, Glock 42
Vodoun da Vinci is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 07:53 PM   #3
ljnowell
Member
 
 
Join Date: June 21, 2008
Location: The Peoples Republic of IL
Posts: 4,290
In my opinion they haven't. Sure among many keyboard commandos that claim to carry two fullsize autos and two compacts along with a tactical vest and body armor they have.

In the real world, amongst many average conceal carriers they are very popular. Just look at the sales numbers of j-frames, LCRs, etc. they are very popular.
__________________
If the mentally deficient are not allowed to own guns then why should they be allowed to make gun laws?
ljnowell is online now  
Old August 4, 2014, 08:01 PM   #4
Cooldill
Member
 
 
Join Date: November 19, 2011
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,165
When did they?

Sure semi-automatic handguns have ebbed into great popularity but I think the revolver is here to stay for some time. The subcompact revolvers like the J-frames are all over. I carry one myself as EDC. I enjoy shooting revolvers slightly more than semis at the range, I try to hit the target as best I can no matter if I'm using a Brown Bess or a .22 target pistol! !
Cooldill is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 08:05 PM   #5
skoro
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 2, 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,858
Why have revolvers become passť ?

They're just not as fashionable as high capacity tacticool tupperware, which is what's in fashion currently. And those pistols that are in fashion tend to be pretty darn good, to be honest. Still, I like my wheelguns and usually carry a 38 snub.
__________________
Watch where you're pointin' that thing...
skoro is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 08:06 PM   #6
Ed Ames
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 21, 2006
Location: Tejas Norte
Posts: 2,943
They haven't, in the corners of the market where they offer a technical advantage.

Semi-auto pistols have a good but not overwhelming presence at the very low power (.22LR) end of the market. They dominate the low power (.25 to .45 ACP) market. They very quickly drop off at intermediate power (.357 and .41 magnum) and they have almost no presence in the high power domain (.44 magnum range). Apart from rifle-receiver (AR and AK "pistols") they have zero presence in the very high power (.454 casull on up) zone.

Revolvers are commercially available across the entire range (.22LR up to .45/70, .50S&W, 7.62x39, etc). They are downright popular in the areas where semi-autos don't play.

Maybe you are really seeing the preferences of your peers and not the market as a whole?
__________________
Don't hide arms, get sidearms!
Ed Ames is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 08:10 PM   #7
BSA1
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 20, 2011
Posts: 2,752
Passť?

While revolvers have fallen out of favor with LEO's they are very popular in the civilian markets. Revolvers are the most common choice for women buying a self-defense gun and the big three gunmakers are constantly adding new models.

With California's new gun laws revolvers will become very more common.
BSA1 is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 08:11 PM   #8
wojownik
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 15, 2009
Posts: 1,164
Revolvers have never been passe, IMHO, but they have been overshadowed by semiautos in the mass market, entertainment media, etc...

I think this one goes back decades ... higher capacity, ease/speed of reload, perhaps even the attitude that that revolvers were too "old school" in favor of higher tech. Perhaps this was all nudged along in the 1980s by police acceptance of semi automatics in the 80s, and the increasing use of semis over autos in TV/movies (though the trend started years early, think of the movie "Die Hard" - Bruce Willis and his Beretta, Alan Rickman and his oh-so-cool nickel HK P7, and then the overweight uniformed LAPD cop and his revolver...).

I know I certainly had my own biases in favor of semi autos, for all the above reasons. When looking at my first handgun, I didn't even consider a revolver ...

It wasn't for some years before I was drawn to revolvers as well, first hands on with a Colt SAA, then some other truly old school Colts (Official Police, M1917).
wojownik is online now  
Old August 4, 2014, 08:26 PM   #9
ivankerley
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 18, 2012
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 333
man if they're passť I wish the prices would come down, least the places I've been locally they're kinda high.
gene
ivankerley is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 08:30 PM   #10
Carl N. Brown
Member
 
 
Join Date: May 10, 2005
Location: Kingsport Tennessee
Posts: 6,766
I must have missed the memo that revolvers are passe, since my prefered SD handgun is a .38 revolver.
__________________
Cogito me cogitare; ergo, cogito me esse.
Carl N. Brown is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 08:40 PM   #11
frankiestoys
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 16, 2009
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 772
I like both but , but don't own anything in plastic anymore ,revolvers included ...WTS if its a SHTF situation I want a mag that holds as many rounds possible but as a edc its a J Frame for me.
__________________
GO NAVY !
frankiestoys is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 08:47 PM   #12
plexreticle
Member
 
 
Join Date: October 8, 2006
Posts: 1,204
If anything there is a resurgence in the revolver market.
plexreticle is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 09:04 PM   #13
MAKster
Member
 
 
Join Date: July 8, 2006
Posts: 1,725
Clearly a 4" service revolver in 38 spl or 357 is not very popular today. But I think snubby revolvers are still top sellers.
MAKster is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 09:17 PM   #14
zerobarrier
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: November 17, 2013
Location: Northwest PA
Posts: 478
I started out with only semi's but now have found myself liking revolvers a bit more. I mainly carry a 45acp revolver 4" barrel. I have picked up a 44mag, 38spl, and would love to get a 357mag, and that new S&W model 69 in 44mag. My LGS keeps a pretty good stock of revolvers, 2 cases full and 4 cases of semi's
zerobarrier is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 09:28 PM   #15
*Kemosabe*
Member
 
 
Join Date: January 1, 2014
Location: UCLA - Upper Corner of Lower Alabama
Posts: 171
It costs more to make a revolver than a semi-auto, so the semis generally sell for less.

The lure of lower pricing is also at play in the semis popularity.
__________________
*
In self defense, runner-up is first place loser.
*Kemosabe* is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 09:35 PM   #16
twofifty
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 21, 2007
Posts: 1,479
Through shear ignorance, I once thought revolvers were passť.

That was until I saw them used in IPSC competition. The revolver guys
were shooting very well and were having lots of fun. So I gave it a try.
When I scrape up the money I will get a nice revolver for competition...another
fun toy to play fast games with.
twofifty is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 09:43 PM   #17
Bobson
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 9, 2011
Location: Snohomish County, Washington
Posts: 2,967
For the same reason muskets are passe, just to a much lesser degree.

For the untrained/unpracticed everyman, a pistol is much faster than a revolver. For instance, the amount of time I've spent with revolvers could be measured in minutes, on one hand. It probably takes me around 12-15 seconds to empty and reload a Ruger LCR. I've spent considerably more time with a pistol, but even when I was new to them, I could empty and reload an M9 in close to 1/3 that time (or about 4-5 seconds, if my estimate is on). I would expect, too, that given equal amounts of practice, most people can more effectively/quickly manipulate a pistol.
__________________
More Christians have been executed by persecutors in the 20th century than the sum total of all those who were similarly persecuted in every past century, combined.

"As for me and my house, we will serve the LORD." - Joshua 24:15
Bobson is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 09:44 PM   #18
Comrade Mike
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 16, 2013
Posts: 673
I own two semi autos and four revolvers with no plans to buy any more autos. I must have missed the memo.
Comrade Mike is online now  
Old August 4, 2014, 09:58 PM   #19
SDGlock23
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 1, 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 466
I guess revolvers don't really fit the bill as being tactical and modular and all that. But fairly recently I bought a BFR in 454 and just bought (another) Blackhawk .45 Colt convertible, love me some single actions.
__________________
Glocks and Single Actions!
Repent America!!

http://www.be4thefire.com
www.tribulation-now.org
SDGlock23 is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 10:05 PM   #20
BullfrogKen
Moderator Pluribus
 
 
Join Date: July 28, 2005
Location: Lewisberry, PA
Posts: 14,886
I own many handguns.

Half of them are revolvers.

Guess I missed the memo, too.
__________________
Ken O'Donnell

NRA Expert - Highpower Rifle, Across-the-Course
NRA Expert - Highpower Rifle, Mid-Range Prone


Love THR? Help support it (and never see advertisements again) by becoming a Contributing Member.
http://www.thehighroad.org/payments.php
BullfrogKen is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 10:06 PM   #21
Jorg Nysgerrig
Member
  
 
Join Date: April 13, 2006
Posts: 7,736
30 years ago, the number of revolvers produced was awfully close to pistols. Now pistols outnumber revolvers 5 to 1. While some may prefer a revolver, the numbers certainly are skewed in favor of pistols.

Last edited by Jorg Nysgerrig; August 4, 2014 at 10:12 PM.
Jorg Nysgerrig is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 10:10 PM   #22
Elkins45
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 25, 2009
Location: Northern KY
Posts: 1,701
As a reloader I am increasingly appreciative of the ability to recover 100% of my brass without having to hunt for it in the gravel. The ability to retain 100% function at any power level and bullet shape is also a plus.

Revolvers aren't passť among most shooting enthuseasts that I know.
__________________
NRA Endowment Member

I don't own an assault weapon. I own a counter-assault weapon.
Elkins45 is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 11:03 PM   #23
mikemyers
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 12, 2011
Posts: 359
Very simple answer.

pas∑sť
adjective
1. no longer fashionable, in wide use, etc.; out-of-date; outmoded


Why did this happen? When I grew up, myself and all my friends wanted guns like the TV cowboys had, six-shooters, especially the ones that took "caps" so they went BANG! Anyone raised like that, and who went through the stage of pretending to go around shooting the bad guys, might really be thrilled when they could get the real thing.

Fast forward to today. If you watch on TV, or the movies, or most of the magazines, the guns that most of the heroes have are something that looks much more sinister, and that's what people nowadays are likely to want.


If guns can have "charm", I think that feeling fits revolvers best. Maybe it's just my upbringing. Semi-autos make me think of the military, current entertainment stars, and maybe even with attached accessories such as lasers, flashlights, night vision - all the new stuff, that gets kids and younger people excited - much more so than the old fashioned stuff that was used to protect the good guys from the rustlers and Indians.



Of course, you can apply this to the likely future, when both revolvers and the current semi-automatics will become passe, replaced by computerized guns with electronic ammo that will hit the bullseye every time, won't work for anyone who steals it, and will probably be constantly "on-line". Laugh now, but 50 years from now, that's what I expect will be quite common.....
__________________
:::M:i:k:e:::M:y:e:r:s:::
Web site: www.sgrid.com
mikemyers is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 11:09 PM   #24
460Kodiak
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 12, 2011
Location: In a place.....by cool stuff.
Posts: 2,706
Passť? I don't think that's true.

They offer clear and measurable benefits over semiautos that we revolver shooters acknowledge and value.

Semiautos have benefits over revolvers too, but passť? Not so much.

Of course, the simpler answer is polymer and Hollywood.
__________________
Me........ "I need a screen name."
Friend.... "What's your favorite cartridge?"
Me........ "460 magnum."
Friend.... "You should be 460Kodiak....... yeah"
Me........ "Great...... now I have to grow a mullet."
460Kodiak is offline  
Old August 4, 2014, 11:24 PM   #25
rcmodel
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2007
Location: Eastern KS
Posts: 49,123
I don't think so either, judging by the number of revolvers vs semi-auto's around my house.

Or judging by the prices fine old S&W's and Colts are bringing lately!

Maybe the video games & action movies are influencing the younger generation in choosing less accurate guns with no soul? And half a box of ammo in every mag.

(Spray & Pray beats Accuracy every time, right?)

But I don't do video games & the latest movies much, so I remain pretty much unenlightened.

(Except for 1911's, old Colt Woodmen, and a few certain S&W & SIG autos built the old school way before plastic.)

rc
__________________
Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
Or all your primers in a glass jar!
rcmodel is online now  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.