Winchester SXP defender opinions. - THR

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Shotguns

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Thread Tools
Old August 5, 2014, 02:34 PM   #1
Join Date: March 22, 2012
Posts: 127
Winchester SXP defender opinions.

I'm in the market for a home defense shotgun. I recently looked at Sxp, 870, mossy 500, Stevens 320,pardner pump and mossy 590. To me the 590 is the ultimate, but more than I want to spend. I haven't been able to handle an Armscor yet, but they look nice. The Winchester has the best finish and prolly the smoothest action of them all. If it was still made in New Haven we wouldn't be having this conversation. What do you guys think of them? Any owners here?
bscott29 is offline  
Old August 5, 2014, 04:51 PM   #2
Join Date: January 19, 2006
Location: Happy Valley, UT
Posts: 10,246
IMO buy a used 1200 or 1300 if you want to go that route. For some reason the tarted-up new "SXP" line has proprietary accessories, stocks, barrels, etc. that none of the other 1200/1300 parts fit. Kinda sad, really. Good shotguns.
Pet peeve: "You better send that defective __________ to me for proper disposal." Not original. Not funny. Not helpful. Please make it stop.
1KPerDay is offline  
Old August 5, 2014, 05:12 PM   #3
Join Date: February 13, 2007
Location: Buckeye Country
Posts: 262
I have personally seen a multitude of Mossberg 500's take a lot of abuse and neglect from some of the Bubba's around here and they do an outright impressive job of keeping on.

The Maverick 88's are also worth mentioning.

I appreciate the lighter aluminum receivers in the 500's over the Remington's, but you must realize you're hampered with the factory magazine unless you find a factory extended version due to how the barrel attaches. Personally, I prefer how a 5+1 18.5" shotgun handles over the 8+1 20" barrel models so for me it's a non-start.
gotboostvr is offline  
Old August 5, 2014, 07:43 PM   #4
Join Date: November 18, 2013
Location: Québec
Posts: 160
I have one and I enjoy it very much. I just went to the range today and shot another 15 slugs to first sight in and then use the new scope I just put on it this morning. It is strange to put a scope on a shotgun, but it shoots fine. Skinner sights might have done just as well...
Yes, it is the smoothest pump action I tried before buying, smoother than my friend's Benelli Nova. It handles well, is very easy to take apart for cleaning and to reassemble afterwards. It is light, but recoil is normally quite tolerable. I do not feel it when I shoot target loads, a little with standard 2 3/4" 00 buckshot and a little too much with the slugs. I guess I am more sensitive to recoil than I thought... Good thing a recoil pad is included with it.
And I like its looks. But that does not really matter. It shoots. Would I buy the same one today? Difficult question. I patterned some buckshot with it today: five inches spread at 25 FEET, eleven inches spread at 40'. I will have to try the FliteControl loads previously discussed on this forum. Although this spread would be close to perfection for HD in my place (small home) I do not intend to use the said shotgun for HD, but rather for hunting deer as a backup/runs weapon in combination with an adequate rifle for the task. So, the hideous stainless version of it might have been a better choice, because it is threaded for chokes. But still, the 28" barrel I should have at some point in an indefinite future (ordered December 20th, 2013) will be threaded for interchangeable chokes, so I do not loose everything for birds and clays.
I have cycled approximately two hundred rounds through it for now, maybe a little more, without a glitch. A mix of target, 00, 000 and slugs. All loads functioned fine. I personally think it is an excellent shotgun, but what do I know, I have been around rifles all my life and only recently developed interest for shotguns. Try one, see for yourself if you like it!
Le guerrier qui cultive sont esprit polit ses armes.

-Stanislas de Boufflers
Frostbite is offline  
Old August 5, 2014, 09:18 PM   #5
Join Date: July 8, 2006
Posts: 1,725
I think the SXP is a good shotgun. It shows that if the company keeps quality control tight the fact it's made in Turkey isn't an issue. But Remington and Mossberg account for 90 percent of sales and a comparable percentage of accessories. If you are looking for a lighter shotgun I would get the 500 because things like extra barrels are cheap and easy to find. A second barrel for a Benelli Nova costs as much as a new gun.
MAKster is offline  
Old August 5, 2014, 09:52 PM   #6
Join Date: April 7, 2003
Location: Evangeline, Louisiana
Posts: 3,380
The Winchester 1200 was one of the first lower cost guns they introduced after ceasing production of the venerable Model 12, and it and the 1400 like to took them under. If you have one and like it, more power to you, but those two models had a world of issues. It evolved into the 1300, then the Speed Pump, and now the SXP. Each one has gotten a little better it seems, at least so far. Notably Remington and Mossberg got it right to start with and have changed the basic design hardly at all in over 60 years.
What could have happened... did.

I would not trust Remington's dating service accuracy as far as I could throw my truck.
Virginian is offline  
Old August 5, 2014, 10:07 PM   #7
Join Date: March 22, 2012
Posts: 127
I actually have 2 1300's. A walnut deluxe 12ga that I've had for 20 years and a black shadow 20ga that I've had for about 15. They are great guns. My only complaint is the ugly choke tubes. I think they are under rated. When they came out everyone said they were junk because they were light with stamped parts. I think if the Model 12 came out today everyone would complain that its heavy and overbuilt.
bscott29 is offline  
Old August 6, 2014, 05:14 AM   #8
Join Date: December 25, 2007
Location: Estado de Lone Star
Posts: 487
While I was in college back in '83 I purchased a new Winchester Defender with the full length mag tube. I still have the shotgun and the hangtag...$199.00. It doesn't have a model number stamped anywhere on it, just "Winchester Defender 12 GA 2 3/4" & 3"". I shot the devil out of the thing the first few years I had it. Lived way out in the boonies, so I rigged up a scabbard on my dirt bike and carried it everywhere I went. Never had an ounce of trouble with the thing. That's been over 30 years ago and it still looks pretty darn good and runs like a top. That speed-pump feature sure helps you throw a lot of lead out there in a hurry, too. It has never let me down, and I would not hesitate to trust my life to it as a home defense gun.

Last edited by az_imuth; August 8, 2014 at 07:44 AM. Reason: photo
az_imuth is offline  

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.