Quantcast
Metallic rimfire Sharps Rifle - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Tools and Technologies > Blackpowder Shooting

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 6, 2014, 04:45 AM   #1
4v50 Gary
Moderator
  
 
Join Date: December 19, 2002
Posts: 16,411
Metallic rimfire Sharps Rifle

I was looking at a Sharps 1859/64 style receiver with the Lawrence Pellet Primer. Did Sharps take surplus 59/64 receivers and rebuild them as metallic cartridge firearms?
__________________
TFL Aluminium. Molon Labe!
4v50 Gary is offline  
Old August 6, 2014, 08:04 AM   #2
Curator
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 20, 2007
Location: Bonita Springs, Florida
Posts: 852
Many 1859 and 1863 Sharps carbines were "converted" to .50-70 Government center fire cartridges for the US military. This entailed modifications to the hammer and a new breech block and extractor. 5-groove Barrels with a tight bore were simply chambered while those over a certain size were relined with a 3-groove liner, brazed in place.
Curator is offline  
Old August 6, 2014, 09:30 AM   #3
Jim Watson
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Posts: 18,173
A friend has a cartridge conversion 1863 Sharps. It is about minute of Commanche accurate.
They stayed with the percussion barrel if it was not larger than .5225", which is darned generous for a .515" bullet even soft lead with black powder to bump it up. Larger barrels were lined to Trapdoor specs.

As to the heading, yes, some were converted to .52 rimfire before the .50 central fire was standard.

But it wasn't surplus receivers, they converted whole guns. Mostly carbines but a few rifles.
__________________
I have a few facts and a lot of opinions.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old August 6, 2014, 11:19 AM   #4
4v50 Gary
Moderator
  
 
Join Date: December 19, 2002
Posts: 16,411
Thanks everyone. I was looking for a source and checked through Sellers' The Sharps Rifle and didn't see anything about conversions. The rifle itself has a buttplate cut out for a patchbox, but there is no patchbox. That also suggested that it was assembled from Civil War parts.
__________________
TFL Aluminium. Molon Labe!
4v50 Gary is offline  
Old August 6, 2014, 06:08 PM   #5
Don McDowell
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 23, 2013
Location: east central Wy.
Posts: 700
Quote:
Originally Posted by 4v50 Gary View Post
Thanks everyone. I was looking for a source and checked through Sellers' The Sharps Rifle and didn't see anything about conversions. The rifle itself has a buttplate cut out for a patchbox, but there is no patchbox. That also suggested that it was assembled from Civil War parts.
You might want to go back a check Seller's book, Chapter 11 is titled Conversions. It goes into quite a bit of detail on the converstion guns, and on to explain how the early 74's were nothing but converted from percussion carbines to cartridge rifles.
I have an original 74 that is a convertion that was shipped from the factory in October of 72.
Don McDowell is offline  
Old August 6, 2014, 06:13 PM   #6
Jim Watson
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Posts: 18,173
Flayderman says: "When condition of the original stock required that it be replaced, a buttstock with no patchbox was used in all cases, regardless of the original model designation."
Obviously that did not mean a serviceable buttplate would be discarded.
__________________
I have a few facts and a lot of opinions.
Jim Watson is offline  
Old August 6, 2014, 07:48 PM   #7
Don McDowell
Member
 
 
Join Date: April 23, 2013
Location: east central Wy.
Posts: 700
The biggest thing to do when looking at these old sharps , is to keep in mind they did what they had to do. The Sharps co, in it's many forms never really was on solid footing, so they used what ever parts they could get ahold of to turn out rifles. There really is no one standard version of any of the sporting models. The target guns were fairly standard to the designated use.
Don McDowell is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.