Quantcast
Converting a 32-20 to a 218Bee? - THR
THR  

Go Back   THR > Ammunition, Gear, and Firearm Help > Gunsmithing and Repairs

Welcome to THR
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions, articles and access our other FREE features. By joining our free community you will have, access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!


If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please visit the help section.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old August 17, 2014, 04:32 AM   #1
andym79
Member
 
 
Join Date: August 20, 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 333
Converting a 32-20 to a 218Bee?

Hi guys, I have a hankering for a 218Bee, they are however expensive and even then might have worn barrels, especially as they were more commonly shooting jackets than larger bore model 92 (or 92 based rifles) like 44-40.

I thought it might be wise to get a 32-20 with a worn out barrel and a good action and have it re barrelled for 218BEE.

A lever set up for 32-20 would need anything other than a re-barrel?

How much would this cost roughly including the price of a new barrel?

Also, I think I would be better of going for a 1:14" twist instead of the 1:16", it lets me stabilise bullets at a slower speed. I would like to shot cast and a 1:16 twist means a minimum speed of 1900fps for a 55 grainer whereas with a 1:14" I could go from 1000fps to the limit of the bullet or the projectile. Likewise for a 44 grainer the 1:16" needs 1600fps whereas the 1:14" needs a mere 700fps (too slow).
andym79 is offline  
Old August 17, 2014, 08:50 AM   #2
Ohen Cepel
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 4, 2003
Location: Where they tell me to go
Posts: 2,072
Have you looked about re-lining the barrel down to a .218Bee? May be cheaper and not change the looks/handling of the rifle. That would be my way to go if it were an option. If you do opt to line something I would research it more, since you don't seem to have the rifle yet you may want to see which are easier/cheaper to do the lining to.

These guys have the liners in .218 and the twist you want; http://www.trackofthewolf.com/pdfs/catalog/page_208.pdf

$5 per inch from them. Sorry, not sure about the gunsmith cost to get it put in and the breech figured out.
__________________
"He who dares wins."
NRA Life Benefactor Member
BCCI Life Member
SAF Life Member
GOA Member
JFPO Member
MSI Executive Member
Ohen Cepel is offline  
Old August 17, 2014, 09:43 AM   #3
BBBBill
Member
 
 
Join Date: March 7, 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,345
I second the recommendation. I would consider and investigate relining first before replacing the barrel.
BBBBill is offline  
Old August 17, 2014, 09:44 AM   #4
natman
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 11, 2007
Posts: 2,868
The 218 Bee and 32-20 are formed from the same case, so no breech or feeding modifications should be needed.

Redman makes liners for 25-20 and 32-20, so pressure should be OK, but I don't think they make a liner for 218 Bee.
natman is offline  
Old August 17, 2014, 11:49 AM   #5
rcmodel
Contributing Member
 
 
Join Date: September 17, 2007
Location: Eastern KS
Posts: 49,102
The 25-20 and 32-20 are much lower pressure then the .218 Bee.

25-20 = 28,000 CUP
32-20 = 16,000 CUP
.218 Bee = 40,000 CUP.

I'd have to ponder quite a while before relining one.

I might suggest saving up for a Browning Model 65.
They are finer then frog hair!

http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...=435200794#PIC

http://www.armslist.com/posts/236915...del-65-218-bee

rc
__________________
Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
Or all your primers in a glass jar!
rcmodel is offline  
Old August 17, 2014, 11:59 AM   #6
Jim Watson
Member
 
 
Join Date: December 24, 2002
Posts: 18,184
Note that the OP is Down Under.
It might be simpler for him to have a New Daisy (Importer F. Lasseter's mark on Winchester 1892 rifles.) rebarrelled.
It's a slow boat to Washington for him.

It won't be cheap.
__________________
I have a few facts and a lot of opinions.
Jim Watson is online now  
Old August 17, 2014, 09:05 PM   #7
natman
Member
 
 
Join Date: February 11, 2007
Posts: 2,868
Quote:
Originally Posted by rcmodel View Post
The 25-20 and 32-20 are much lower pressure then the .218 Bee.

25-20 = 28,000 CUP
32-20 = 16,000 CUP
.218 Bee = 40,000 CUP.
Good catch. Perhaps that's why Redman doesn't make a liner for them.
natman is offline  
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation by vB Optimise.
This site, its contents, Shooting Reviews, and its contents are Copyright (c) 2010-2013 Firearms Forum, Inc.
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
Although The High Road has attempted to provide accurate information on the forum, The High Road assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the information. All information is provided "as is" with all faults without warranty of any kind, either express or implied. Neither The High Road nor any of its directors, members, managers, employees, agents, vendors, or suppliers will be liable for any direct, indirect, general, bodily injury, compensatory, special, punitive, consequential, or incidental damages including, without limitation, lost profits or revenues, costs of replacement goods, loss or damage to data arising out of the use or inability to use this forum or any services associated with this forum, or damages from the use of or reliance on the information present on this forum, even if you have been advised of the possibility of such damages.