Cerakote experiences and opinions?

I have one Cerakoted firearm currently: an RIA 1911 Lipsey's special order in FDE done by the factory. I briefly had a Mossberg 935 that had been Cerakoted, well I believe, by previous owner in a tan and olive drab pattern.

Neither has seen any corrosion in my ownership and the Mossberg had significant salt-water exposure.

Neither held up brilliantly cosmetically. Lots of little dings, chips and scratches. Both lightish colors tend to show the dings and scratches.

Bluing is cosmetically better but does not protect as well from corrosion, in my opinion. Annodizing works well on aluminum but scratches in about the same level as Cerakote.

All that said, for a firearms that will see hard outdoor use, Cerakoting is a good option. Hydrographics is another consideration.

I do not have any firearms coated with Cerakote. I will say though that I have only heard good things about it, to the extent that I would have no hesitation in using it. On bare aluminum it is probably all you would ever need. Uncoated aluminum oxidizes and the oxidized layer tends to protect the metal beneath sufficiently for a long life, so any nicks or wear on a Cerakoted aluminum part should not be a worry.

I don't own any Cerakoted guns either but my buddy recently had his 300 Weatherby done and it certainly looks good. I'm sure he can't answer for sure how well it holds up to regular use / field abuse because so far its only been out to the range a couple times. As far as compared to other methods of finishing firearms I know he did his homework on Cerakote before he decided to have that rifle done. I'm sure corrosion protection was one of the reasons he chose it because he has plans for some hunts in areas that are notorious for moisture and he plans on using this rifle. So far all I know of it is that it has a good reputation as a quality finish so I'll let my buddies Weatherby be the test rifle to see how well I like it before I consider it. I shot it for the first time recently when we were chronographing some handloads and it was the first time I saw it outdoors in natural light since he had it done. IMHO it looks great and if it still holds up after some field use and his planned hunt I might just become a Cerakote fan.

My buddy had his Weatherby done professionally because he said something about how that surface prep stuff is critical, along with the application process and he didn't feel that it would be a D.I.Y. project for someone like him. I forgot what he said it cost him but I'll have to ask. I've heard of guys doing it themselves but my only exposure to the whole Cerakote process has only been that one rifle of his.

I dont like it, multiple experiences with it from a "factory Certified" applicator who's work wore right to bare metal within 10x in/out of a Kydex holster, that's not an exaggeration either. Next, A Garage Ninja did a great job redoing this 1911 but I say unequivocally that I've not seen it hold up or live up to it claims. This is my carry gun and it see's a lot of holster in/out. Plenty of shiny bare metal to seen, just doesn't live up to what it claims as far as I'm concerned. The ONLY good thing I'll say about it is I got it locally for $125. I have no illusion about holster wear, I'm quite realistic about that my only gripe is the false advertising.

Cerokote: a way to spend $100 and turn a $500 gun into a $300 gun.

I paid to have a gun Ceracoated once. An Israeli BHP. Looked good but as others posters said the finish developed chips and dings.

I learned to Duracoat. I think it runs me around $5 to do a pistol. Never done a rifle.

I got a $10 airbrush at Harbor Freight. Got a can of propellant at hobby store. Just needed to take the gun apart, ( I have only done CZ75's ) Clean it, rough up the surface. Clean it again, then spray.

Seems to hold up as well as Ceracoat.

If it chips or scratches I touch it up myself.

Almost all of my firearms are cerakoted and honestly I can't say enough good things about it. It looks very good, is super good at keeping any corrosion at bay, cleans up real nice, I can go on. I can tell you that it all has to do with proper application tho. If you get someone that doesn't know what they are doing then yes it's possible it might not hold up well. One way to tell a good application vs a bad one is to look at how smooth the finish is. A properly applied cerakote will be really really hard and have a smooth appearance, not like car clearcoat paint smooth but like a smooth satin finish. If it has a lot of texture to it then it's probably not a good cerakote job. And heating the application is paramount for it to cure correctly. Otherwise, you might as well have spray paint.

In the end, do you homework and decide what's best for you. If you decide to go with it then make sure to get a good person to do it for you. Do your homework.

On yeah, forgot to add depending on what type of firearm it is, do not let them cerakote the inside of the action. I mean you can and it will wear in but on some bolt actions for example it can cause some issues.'

coloradokevin said:

Hey guys!

I'm starting to look at some different options for finishing bare aluminum receivers, and/or steel barrels. What is your experience with Cerakote as a finish?

The internet is full of mixed opinions on this finish, and I've heard everything from "it's just a crappy paint that will chip off" to "it's the most durable and indestructible finish ever created by man". Obviously the extremes rarely tell the truth! The manufacturer claims it is great, but manufacturers of other finishes try to tell you that their finishes are superior... marketing is what it is!

I've seen and shot a number of Cerakoted guns, but I've yet to have one for myself. For those of you who have had guns finished in this manner:

1) How do you feel the finish holds up to regular use / field abuse?

2) How do you feel the finish compares to other popular methods of finishing firearms (ex: parkerizing, anodizing, bluing, etc)?

3) How well do you feel the finish has protected the firearm from corrosion?

Click to expand...

Warning: This paint/coating is extremely TOXIC. Please do not DIY. Pay someone knowledgeable to do this for you.

Reason why I prefer to get stainless guns with no finish.

Applied appropriately, it's very difficult to chip cerakote, and impacts which do chip it would have gouged basically any finish or treatment. I have yet to see a well prepped piece take holster wear, it usually takes on a black smear where it chews on the plastic, in my experience.

Applied poorly, it's about as effective as enamel spray paint on a balloon.

I like it for a lot of applications, don't like it for many others. Different horses for different courses.

I have a decent HVLP and am pretty proficient spraying various stains, varnishes and paints. That being said I would not consider Cerakote DIY. There is much more to it than just the application.

I picked up the card of a local "professional" at my range and am probably going to give them a try. Considering the cost of the materials and the rest of the process $80 for a pistol slide seems like a bargain.

Going to give them an old beater slide and see what they do with it. If it turns out positive I've got several more I'll be sending their way.

I have a Smith and Wesson Air weight that is Ceracoated from the factory. The threads of the leather holster I wear it with chewed right through it. I belive it caught some dirt particles and ground them into the surface. But nylon is very tough also. Pressure and friction play a huge role. I wore this one inside my belt. Since it is silver it does not look too terrible. I feel other colors may not be as forgiving.

An anodized Sig-Sauer nine thirty eight has held up much better. Though where the holster holds this one is where it is stainless steel. The grip and frame remain unscratched even when in the glove box, sans holster.

Chips off aluminum way to easy, stays on steel kinda better.