grampajack
AR Junkie
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2016
- Messages
- 1,714
Does anyone else ever feel like there's a portion of the human population who form die hard, nearly religious opinions about guns, yet they cannot even begin to articulate why they hold to those opinions?
The below quotes are examples of various opinions I routinely see and hear expressed in magazines, on forums, at the LGS, at gunshows, etc. And they wouldn't bother me, except they're most often expressed by people who are longtime gun aficionados, who have been shooting for long enough to know better. People who are considered to be "experts" by their peers. Yet they constantly say things like:
"9mm is too underpowered."
".45 is the best cartridge ever devised by man."
"AR15s are unreliable."
"If 7 rounds of .45 ACP doesn't get the job done then you're screwed anyways."
"I hate plastic guns."
"You don't need sights on a carry pistol."
"The AK47 (or M14) is the most reliable battle rifle ever made."
And the list goes on...
What ALL of these people have in common, though, is that they spout these various nuggets of wisdom not only with supreme, God-like confidence in their own knowledge, but without any additional information, no qualifiers, no explanations-simply put, with no rationale whatsoever. And if asked why they hold these opinions, they simply look at you as if you had just asked them why the sky is blue.
I've come to realize over the years that these people have zero objective reasoning behind the opinions they form. They like 1911s just because; therefore Glocks are crap. They know nothing about ballistics and don't care to ever learn anything about it; therefore bigger is always better. They believe every myth they hear and don't care to ever do any historical research of their own; therefore AR15s are the most unreliable rifle ever made. So on and so forth, you get the idea.
So how do such people get to be firearms "experts?" And let's be honest, a good portion of people writing for the old gun mags fall into this category.
Is it simply that ignorant people are the most confident, and therefore everyone listens to them in blind faith? Is it that when they were younger there wasn't easy access to information, so they just formed their opinions without any real data? Do they possess such compelling personalities that people simply put up with their nonsense?
The below quotes are examples of various opinions I routinely see and hear expressed in magazines, on forums, at the LGS, at gunshows, etc. And they wouldn't bother me, except they're most often expressed by people who are longtime gun aficionados, who have been shooting for long enough to know better. People who are considered to be "experts" by their peers. Yet they constantly say things like:
"9mm is too underpowered."
".45 is the best cartridge ever devised by man."
"AR15s are unreliable."
"If 7 rounds of .45 ACP doesn't get the job done then you're screwed anyways."
"I hate plastic guns."
"You don't need sights on a carry pistol."
"The AK47 (or M14) is the most reliable battle rifle ever made."
And the list goes on...
What ALL of these people have in common, though, is that they spout these various nuggets of wisdom not only with supreme, God-like confidence in their own knowledge, but without any additional information, no qualifiers, no explanations-simply put, with no rationale whatsoever. And if asked why they hold these opinions, they simply look at you as if you had just asked them why the sky is blue.
I've come to realize over the years that these people have zero objective reasoning behind the opinions they form. They like 1911s just because; therefore Glocks are crap. They know nothing about ballistics and don't care to ever learn anything about it; therefore bigger is always better. They believe every myth they hear and don't care to ever do any historical research of their own; therefore AR15s are the most unreliable rifle ever made. So on and so forth, you get the idea.
So how do such people get to be firearms "experts?" And let's be honest, a good portion of people writing for the old gun mags fall into this category.
Is it simply that ignorant people are the most confident, and therefore everyone listens to them in blind faith? Is it that when they were younger there wasn't easy access to information, so they just formed their opinions without any real data? Do they possess such compelling personalities that people simply put up with their nonsense?