AlexanderA
Member
And this is exactly why, for the most part, malls are dying. They have been taken over by teenage "mall rats," many of whom are up to no good. The best strategy is to avoid malls altogether.
And this is exactly why, for the most part, malls are dying. They have been taken over by teenage "mall rats," many of whom are up to no good. The best strategy is to avoid malls altogether.
Oh gosh, sorry ... but your "message" was a bit obscured within all the comments about how "people suck" and the negative profiling of the young people you encountered ... I shall strive to be more attentive to the great wisdom you dispense in your posts, especially this spectacular new discovery that most Americans congregating in shopping malls collectively possess no situational awareness ...But it was written in plain English, so I can see where you'd have trouble with that.
It's not a matter of "comfort", society has been CONDITIONED to be unaware of their surroundings. Technology, specifically the smartphone is the main avenue used for this "conditioning". I don't mean to sound proud, I dabble with my smartphone from time to time when out in public, but not to a conditioned point.
I think you've just explained, "ignorance is bliss."
Once upon a time in most parts of America you were safe in most public places. If you are over 40 you lived it. Back then you could be oblivious to those around you and not have anything bad happen to you. That world died in the 1970's.
One might conclude that that may be largely a result of fewer violent attacks, but when one factors in the fact that modern trauma care enables the vast majority of victims to survive (albeit often with serious permanent injury), that assumption comes int question.This decade's overall homicide rate is 50% (~4/100k) what it was in the 1970s (~8/100k).
Yup. This is also partly responsible for the fact that firearm-related homicide figures are as low as they are. Increased survival rates can mean fewer deaths even if the actual injury rate may not be dropping.One might conclude that that may be largely a result of fewer violent attacks, but when one factors in the fact that modern trauma care enables the vast majority of victims to survive (albeit often with serious permanent injury), that assumption comes into question.
I think people take comfort in statistics. They knows that millions of people visit malls and very few ever die.
Aside from the strong undercurrent of misanthropy running through the OP's post, I think it has little to do with people taking comfort in being oblivious. As another poster noted, most people understand that statistics are in their favor and that in most communities, shopping malls are actually pretty safe places to spend time, compared to other venues.
I do not think most folks are oblivious, but rather, as member ironcaintit notes, most folks simply have never been victims of crimes committed against their own person, and therefore, have never been inspired to develop any sort of self-defense posture ...
It's great that we all have a place to come to pat ourselves on the back for being the only alert, observant and prepared men in our respective communities, but there always seems to be this air of superiority on the part of many posters in threads such as this ... Nothing's really changed, folks, since the first humanoids trod the face of the planet. One either develops the inherent defensive instincts of one's species, or one stands more likely not die in one's sleep.
Ultimately, all we can do is prepare ourselves and our loved ones, pointing out that walking around in public in large crowds with one's I-Phone planted in front of one's face is not the best way to successfully navigate through one's life.